Google changed the definition of fascism

Full on deception, anons. This is as dirty as it gets.
Fascism is not right or left.

amp.dailycaller.com/2017/02/04/google-redefines-the-word-fascism-to-smear-conservatives-protect-liberal-rioters/

I still don't know what fascism is.

It's not left or right, it's basically the opposite of freedom of speech, thought.

There used to be a thing around the 2008 where you would type fascism and hit I'm Feeling Lucky and get directed to Sarah Palin's Wikipedia page.

a fascist government has to have the following characteristics

1.) Ruled by a dictator: Single person has complete control over every aspect of the country i.e can change laws, execute citizens if they wish

2.) One party state: No democratic way to change ruling party

3.) Enforces authority through violence: murders political dissidents, imprisons protesters, culls the educated etc.

4?) Strong Nationalist values: not sure if this is part of the definition but whether it be Stalin Mugabe or Hitler i have never seen a globalist fascist state

>i have never seen a globalist fascist state
Modern Germoney

Kek, 4/4 here.
How can the west even compete?

nice meme but there technically not fascists at least while there still not majority Muslim then i guess they would be with the imam being dictator

My problem with fascism is that the variables which lead to our eventual prosperity are so hard complex, that no one mind could possible act in a way though would consistently lead to good outcomes. The increasing complexity of economies and all that shit just makes it even worse.

You need a system that can aggregate vast amounts of dispersed information which no planner can ever do.

They're using Oxford's API. Oxford dictionaries changed the definition, not google.

We live in a society where those in charge can change the definitions of words to fit their political agenda... and they have the audacity to call us authoritarian

fascism is actually right wing though since it's all about nationalism

people (dumb americans mainly) conflate it with any sort of authoritarianism

No

It's about power and control. Nationalism is power and control?

Fascism is different from right wing ideals

it's more or less centrist authoritarianism.

Nationalism is not inherently right wing, only cucked liberals are trying to push that meme.

Fascism is not planned, it relies on state capitalism. Historically it has been more economically successful than liberal democratic states.

What the FUCK. I cannot express how fucking angry I get when people claim fascism is the end of the right wing economic scale. Both soviet russia and nazi germany were left wing, it's even in the name, socialism for fuck's sake. And I get pissed because I'm libertarian/anarchist, I'm actually MORE right-wing than most people while I actually DESPISE fascism. I just get fucking sick of criminals and terrorists being labeled as "far-right" when they don't give a single fuck about open markets and tax.

And why do anons what this?
Its like wanting to be ruled by Kim
Fucking Nazi larping wannabes

"Right" means "tradition".
"Left" means "revolution".

I like googles definition better to be honest

>has to have
Oh fuck off, no it doesn't

Isn't Sweden's democrat left wing party the nationalist side?

The right wing is not just about economics, libertarianism and anarchism are not far right and are idiotic jokes of ideologies.

Fascism is not left wing, the 3rd Reich was state capitalist. Horthy was Hungary's greatest leaders.

>I'm libertarian/anarchist, I'm actually MORE right-wing than most people
>muh money
Kill yourself globalist fag, also stop using the basic right vs left dichotomy. It hasnt been like that in years.

>ifunny

What they don't want you to know: >Mussolini was a radical Marxist.
>The "left right spectrum" meme is useless for historical analysis.
>Fascism in Italy, if implemented today, would look a lot like an Obama presidency. Look at the policies that Mussolini actually made, look at his actions, not just the ideology.

>Libertarianism not far right
Then what do you propose it is?

>Fascism is not left-wing
Literally the same argument I'm making

>Libertarian
>Globalist
Pick one

You can't build a good house on a faulty foudation.

You can't have a good historical analysis of anything using the foundation of the left/right political spectrum nonsense.

Anyone who opposes communists is the defacto definition

Even in the first half of the 20th century, patriotism and nationalism were universal. It was not a spectrum issue. Nationalism is not an indication of right over left.

Even Soviet Russia used nationalism to recruit for the war effort. WW2 = "The great patriotic war".

You're retarded

>Arresting people over facebook posts that go against their global political narrative
>not fascist
what?

its not a planner but an administrator, its as you playing an rts... with better ai at least, you tell improve food production, your delegates make sure it happens lest they get executed

>Ruled by a dictator
Wrong
>One party state
Yes
>Violence
Generally yes
>Nationalist
Typically yes but not necessarily required. All that is required is a guiding myth of society. It can be class or nationalism or religion or anything.

You get angry because you're not very good at understanding politics? Do you cream and bash your head on things, too, like a proper retard?

What do I not understand?