Just finished reading this. Debate me christcucks

Just finished reading this. Debate me christcucks.

Other urls found in this thread:

reasonablefaith.org/dawkins-delusion
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

God isn't something you can debate, retard.

Have you gained any humility by it? Or, in a single book, you've decided you understand everything about the universe, the human condition, unconscious, conscious, symbolic, logical, rational, emotional, psychological all in one swing?

Did you love sucking dick before or after you read this book?

Because you sound like an enormous faggot

lets not forget the big one, human spirituality

No
Read Vox Day
Bye

Like most British atheists he literally cannot form a single argument that is just a bitchy rant about things he doesn't like about Christianity. The book has little to no substance. Truly, brainlet reading. I mean there are better atheist authors out there. The "arguments" he does deploy have been refuted a million times over and aren't taken seriously by atheist intellectuals.

It's was written for edgy atheist rebels.

reasonablefaith.org/dawkins-delusion

inb4 some retard gives me an incoherent response just for the sake of responding and making his atheism look reasonable

Ive read it, i am agnostic. But religions still trumps atheism and is superior.

Yes you can brainlet. Read up on Christian philosophy.

fpbp imo desu

...

I definitely, positively, unironically wrote ''fpbp imo t.b.h''

and somehow ''t.b.h'' got translated to desu...??

t. newfag

Nah...I just never used ''t.b.h'' before.

...

Muh dawkins
Muh atheism

Read Vox Day.
Then Watch everything by Jordan Peterson and get sorted.
Then ignore them both, stop watching porn, and worship Odin.

1. Dawkins doesn't like God.
2. I'm a cuck who wasted time reading his shitty book.
3. Therefore, God doesn't exist.

Checkmate theists!

baka senpai desu
Yeah, you can even skip the VD/Peterson part and proceed with worshipping Odin directly.
Odin>Dawkins

>debate me
kys

kinda newfaggish, people used to spam (imo) (desu) and (senpai) alot and it gets chat filtered into imo desu senpai

fuck it im tired i cant remember the other cos i dont spam it

How many underaged penises have you sucked?

>Debate me
>Provides no points to begin debate
>1 post from this ID.

>>Provides no points to begin debate

Here you go.

“What has theology ever said that is of the smallest use to anybody? When has theology ever said anything that is demonstrably true and is not obvious? I have listened to theologians, read them, debated against them. I have never heard any of them ever say anything of the smallest use, anything that was not either platitudinously obvious or downright false.

If all the achievements of scientists were wiped out tomorrow, there would be no doctors but witch doctors, no transport faster than horses, no computers, no printed books, no agriculture beyond subsistence peasant farming. If all the achievements of theologians were wiped out tomorrow, would anyone notice the smallest difference?"

Richard Dawkins, The Emptiness of Theology.

thanks for the clarification.
I've actually been lurking for years, but I never used ''T_B_H'' myself before. I'm a Sup Forumstard slowly converting//radicalising.

If Christianity got us this far what better world would you propose? Don't resort to pure rationalism it always falls short.

Read it again. The right way up this time.

wait, is pol seriously religious?
after a year of lurking i I'm not sure you boys are larping or really are Christ cucks.
There is no God and even if there was one, its life would be just as meaningless as yours except magical powers.

>Christ cucks
It's freedom lad. I'm an educated scientist and I can't answer everything in my life with science. So far science has not proven to me that it is able to be the foundation of society. Like anything else science is competitive. We need Christianity in many places of our lives.

Atheist here. Secularism and Atheism were two horrendous things to happen to Western society.

After the Church began to wane, we got things like second wave Feminism, postmodernism, the sexual revolution, etc.

All of these things (Especially the sexual revolution) were objectively horrible for society. Christianity, for all of its faults, is a bulwark against such degeneracy.

yeah shocking but christianity is still relevant. no matter how hard pol hates jews they still keep being ruled by them.

You cannot deny the benefits that organised religion has brought to the European continent. If we did't have to go on a few crusades in the past all would be good baka desu senpai

Christ was a Jew but he would not have tolerated today's Jewry one bit.

You may as well just say that there is no reality. That you don't exist. That nothing has ever happened or existed, ever. As of this point you fail to recognize what the concept of "God" actually is.
Religion is highly corrupted and has been for a very long time relative to recorded human history, this is a rational conclusion. Look past that and get to the source. On your own. Don't listen to anyone that pretends to have the answers for you because you have to find them yourself. Because the answers are unique for each one of us.

That is some fucking kike bullshit, there's nothing more redpilled than right wing agnosticism/atheism. All the morality and trad is still there but it doesn't come from a god it comes from scientific thought.

>"yes, stop questioning the church goyim"
>mfw Christianity is considered "redpilled"

Does the church wave God at us as a threat or does God show us the church as a warning?

The decline of the church results in the rise of degeneracy. Debate that faggot

You can be culturally Christian or catholic and adhere to certain values without believing in something which may sound like complete fiction to you.
You can also do that.

Dawkins lives in a Judeo-Christian civilisation. If he really thinks the Bible is worthless then he should move to Sudan and see how he likes it there. He's also totes a paedophile.

Hitler is the one true lord. Heil Hitler.

The first one probably

Why not both?

Sure lets debate.

who would have won the war?
the united atheist alliance?
the allied atheist alliance?
the unified atheist league?
and why?

What a fag xD

>Dawkins lives in a Judeo-Christian civilisation

Right now Britain is turning into muslim Britainistan. The only Brits I see fighting back are Dawkins, Farage and Tommy Robinson.

>being such a shallow materialist that you can't fathom someone believing is something for non rational and non scientific reasons
>being such an unimaginative philistine that you are only capable of interpreting religious texts literally and not symbolically.

Paddy, please drown yourself.

Is there a clickbait equivalent term that's used for books and other printed literature?

Jew civ??
How is western civ based in jews??

Its a good book. Best if you read 'The Selfish Gene' and 'The Greatest Show on Earth'.

People here get pissed off that the one book that focus on bashing religion just focuses on bashing religion.

The other stuff does it much more elegantly because it makes the case that evolution happens on its own without a prime mover.

Sup Forumstards chimp out when their Christ is insulted by someone who is smarter than them.

I'm pretty sure everyone chimps out when something they like/follow is criticized. It's just how humans are.

So...anons logic comes down to
>I need jesus in my life
>I don't understand
>muh society
You boys forget that this party ends and everyone lives are equally as irrelevant
>The only reason I don't kms is well...might as well play the game until I die...shit, no respawn.

Notice the degeneracy of today, with Antifags and faggots running around the streets and dindus and mudslimes raping and killing left, right and center, all the while the kikes are profiting all of it with their globalist agenda.

Get the fuck off pol normies

Atheists are the normies now.

>I have never heard any of them ever say anything of the smallest use
>except those things which are platitudinously obvious
What a deluded faggot.

The difference between us and Reddit is I don't have to act like you know better for being an atheist. Get fucked.

You have made the assertion that god does not exist.

The onus is therefore on you to prove this.

Attempting to shift burden of proof elsewhere is therefore not an argument.

Go.

...

You have to be over the age of 18 to be here

>reasonablefaith.org/dawkins-delusion
your link is bad and you should feel bad.

Hitler was our White Jesus. His speeches inspire greatness and he tried to save us from this horrible fate.

Fair. I also find it funny that Milo and Shapiro admire and respect Hitchens, but always make sure to point out that 'God is Not Great' is his worst book.

That might be true though, mainly because by the time I read it I already agreed with it and I don't need to constantly reassure myself. The other books gave me information I didn't already know.

Funny how none of the criticisms in this thread are any different than the ones spouted out when the book was released.

Could it be that doing research would require user to come up with better arguments?

Fuck, I'll even give you the agnostic atheist "We can't fully know, so we can't fully say there is no God" argument.

I just know that belief would require me to actually believe, which I don't. If God was going to speak to me, he had the 18 years I was raised a Christian in Dallas to do it and he didn't. The other Christians pushed me out for not being Christian enough. Questioned and went, "yeah, those guys were right. I'm not christian enough to be a real christian." Sorry.

>triggered
tell me, what is the purpose of God?
If you have super powers and are immortal, what are your goals after 1000 years?

After a billion years?

You fucking normie faggots can't handle the fact that this existence is completely arbitrary.

>tfw legitimately wanted to debate OP about the historicity of the Bible and resurrection but it's just a shill like always

People don't even want to have real discussions on the Bible, I got sources for days but it would take some reading

Belief in God is a decision based on what you want, not a debate. Even the Bible says that. The better question, the one most (You) won't answer, is why you want there to be no God.

...

By the way
>1 Post from this ID
OP baited everyone once again into a fruitless argument. Way to go /nupol/

Hundreds of pages of repeatedly pointing out the blindingly obvious.
God was created by man, not visa versa.

Ehm... so, you expect your opponents in debate to be so impressed by Dawkins, as an authoritative figure, that your merely having read one of his books makes you some kind of a transmitter of shining truth?

Dawkins himself is not up to standard for any meaningful religious debate: a self-confessed atheist. Analogy: to point out a blind-from-birth man of the visual appeal (beauty) of something. He hasn't got that part of his brain developed, so it's not the case of you disagreeing on something, it's the fact that he is unable to be familiar with the concepts involved.

Now read Moldbug's "How Dawkins Got Pwned" series.

God bless the four horsmen..
I mean hail Dawkins
...
Go atheists!?