Based Islam?

The memeball has a good point there Sup Forums.

Name one argument against Islam that doesn't involve using a fallacy.

Muhammad is the perfect man and perfect muslim who must be copied in all ways to live a perfect life, and he ordered the murders of poets who made fun of him. We like fun and welcome all satire.

He also taught his troops to cum inside the captured sex slaves about to be sold, to produce more muslims for Allah. I personally recommend the pull-out method for captured slave rape, or just avoiding the whole ordeal entirely

Day Of The Rake.....you will not be spared.

In your perfect world what would happen to all those SJW journalist?

Come get me faggot.

Precisely what is happening now. Relentless mockery and entry into the loserhood hall of fame. Andrew Breitbart co-founded Huffington Post to showcase retarded SJW opinion and to provoke the reaction to it, which has worked marvellously. He did not order people to murder SJWs in the middle of the night. Andrew Breitbart is better than Muhammad.

I fail to see where you draw the line.

What's so wrong about cumming in sex slaves that makes so much worst than say throwing communists off an helicopter.

>I fail to see

I know you do. it's ok though, you're still loved probably

This is now a meme ball thread.

Explain your code of ethics faggot.

Use their tears as lube.

...

>implying that women have any other uses
There is literally nothing wrong with that

...

...

...

...

So Based Islam then?

Not memeball but still good.

Nuke earth completely. So 2018 may be the first year in history where there is zero suffering. The universe is suffering on this little place called earth so let's just clean up the problem once and for all. What's your solution to eliminate all suffering?

...

You'll never eliminate all suffering dumbass.

I also don't get your logic.

>Suffering exists thus life is not worth living

no, '''we''' just don't like radical progressivism and feminism, and we don't want open borders to people with shit IQ.

National Conservatism, if Sup Forums was rolled into one person. That doesn't mean goat fucking, shari'ah law, pedos, burkas, and suicide bombing.

I'm not sure eliminating all conscious life is worth no suffering. If you do that this universe might never be able to experience itself.

Maybe we can give it a shot after we invent conscious AI

Damn. Thats a lot of fuck ups. Are you trying to outdo us in destabilizing the world?

I literally just gave you a way to eliminate all suffering for eternity and you call me dumbass basically admitting you can't read saying you can stop suffering. You will be the first to be nuked. Earth will be dust scattered into the galactic wind. Why do you think chaos is the soup of the day?

I think bombing trains is bad

What's your biggest fundamental disagreement with Shariah law?

can't*... I'm dumbass who can't write, I can admit that

Suffering of what sentient beings or human beings?

They would swallow the red-pill.

The universe is experiencing itself everyday, and it is screaming in agony. Let us restore peace and clockwork harmony.

>tfw your OC gets used to for a serious discussion

It's a good memeball desu.

All life. the earth would be dust. The universe sadly awakened on speck of dust dot earth and we should correct the mistake. The sun has burned half it's energy already, so let's just speed up the process to stop the more suffering to come.

...

>The memeball has a good point there Sup Forums.
the maker of the memeball does not understand that western culture is much more than the conservative values christianity and islam share.

Elaborate

the creator of the memeball knows that it isnt about western civilization but Sup Forums where you frequently find people talking about how women shouldnt vote, just listen to their husband and shoot all commies.
>inb4 Sup Forums is not one person
i know, and this is just a meme covering one spectrum of this place

Your solution emplies that earth is the only place where life exists.

You also haven't justified why the existence of suffering is a good enough reason for erasing all sentient lifeforms.

just because Sup Forums and mudslimes hate niggers and think womyn should not vote does not mean they are the same

have you not learned at math the diference betweem included and intersected crouds of numbers?

My solution implies that all life in the universe will end eventually of course obviously, so what's the holdup. You haven't said why sentience is reason enough for the existence of suffering. Haven't you ever watch a video of children stuck in rubble screaming after a bomb blast has killed their family and scattered the pieces all around them while they breath in dust and cry for help and an end to all suffering? Being conscious means the question, conscious of what, and the answer is Of suffering.

>You haven't said why sentience is reason enough for the existence of suffering

Dodging the question

Your view is based on the idea that there suffering is the only thing that is to life. Ever heard of something called happiness and fulfillment?

Even Buddha said the highest goal was the cessation of suffering. Well now we have the power, the nuclear age. War has birthed our greatest tool for eternal peace. Can you deny this? Life isn't one big organsm you know, that's why they promise Heaven Paradise etc, eternal orgasm, because life is so shitful of suffering.

Instead of inventing the Endless Orgasm Machine to maximise human happiness we invented nukes to end all suffering, so let's make use of them.

>Even Buddha said the highest goal was the cessation of suffering.

irrelevant. An argument from authority is a fallacy.

Sure with nuclear weapon we have the power to end all life on earth but it doesn't mean that we should.

Life isn't one big orgasm but lots of people live long and happy lives.

Not argument from authority, an argument saying it is a thing humans have known for many thousands of years and isn't exactly some revolutionary idea i am now just making up. I am simply saying we have the power to make humanities ancient dream come true.

You cannot bring happiness to all, or even to many. I can bring an end to suffering for all.

Thing is that I don't really disagree with your utilitarian approach.

I think the end game of the human race is a bunch of brains in jars eternally being stimulated by AIs. Our own pseudo paradise if you will.

I just don't see why you think bombing the earth is the better solution though.

Its a globalistic ideology. Worldwide caliphate and all that

Also woman walking around in bags is a stupid fuckng idea

You say these should suffer because those are happy. I say no should suffer. You are a monster!!!

...

>Also woman walking around in bags is a stupid fuckng idea

Why ?

See

You're not weighting the happiness and suffering ratio fairly on top of ignoring a better solution that is to artificially eliminate suffering and maximize happiness.

hi nagato

>16 posters
sad and weak op

>I think the end game of the human race is a bunch of brains in jars eternally being stimulated by AIs. Our own pseudo paradise if you will.
Hi madara

Madara did nothing wrong.

The other option is we make AI and it makes better AI which makes better AI etc etc, requiring more and more computing power, so begins to convert all matter into computing stuff able to AI-compute and sustain the AI life, and it converts the moon, mars, etc etc and goes outwards until every single atom in the universe is "awake" and artificially intelligent, rather than biologically intelligent, the universe will become one giant brain capable of asking questions. (if it is also able to suffer nor be happy it is probably not worth it though, just to ask questions robotically). The universe is briefly suffering with us human and animal life. I wonder whether with the sun middle-aged already, is it worth the effort, probably not. As soon as we invent and release the AI and give it an eternal orgasm setting every atom in the universe will be engaged in the search for knowledge and in eternal orgasm. Humans are irrelevant unless we invent AI that is set up to love us and eliminate our suffering and keep our sun going. it's a lot of ifs. let's just nuke instead.

we could also just work on getting our shit together and stop at least the meaningless suffering caused by (((corruption))) and work for a better future ourselves, but that would be too much work i guess right? so lets just nuke anything. what else do we have nukes for amiright?
also how do you know suffering ends with death? what if the real suffering starts then?

If the real suffering starts with death then it would be our duty to end all future life from being born. ie nuke now!

By 2100 the African continent will have as many people as the whole earth has currently. If we can't eliminate their suffering now, or help them do it, and set up systems of decent living, how will we do it then? Nuke now!

how do you know those are actually new souls being created? what if they are just old ones being reborn getting a break from the suffering. yes population increases, but maybe the souls get split up. i mean people do look more and more shallow every year, seeming to have less of a personality. some seem like they dont have any at all. maybe this life is the break we get from the eternal suffering after death

>we invent AI that is set up to love us and eliminate our suffering and keep our sun going.

>it's a lot of ifs. let's just nuke instead


"You know I'm pretty hungry right now, If I made myself a sandwich and if I made it big enough I'd stop being hungry. That's a lot of ifs better just kill myself"

The fact that you will be a second class citizen in a sand nigger country is probably the number 1 reason. Stuffs like jizya (it's pointless to debate you if you don't what's the meaning of that word).

That and the penalty for adultery, i guess.

Yeah but I'd also be discriminated or persecuted against if most of Sup Forums had their way.


But it works if everybody is part of the herd.

Please do not kill yourself over a sandwich based on my AI story. We must induce maximum chaos so as to bring about the end of the world sooner, not kill ourselves.

>when a bunch of young western neets who never leave their houses let alone their countries gather on the internet to circlejerk and assert that their culture is supreme without any real life basis of comparison

Maybe this is what love is, the 2 bits of a soul finding each other

Give me a valid proof of example that you will be treated like that by the poltards.

Their rants in Sup Forums ? if u unironically taking it seriously you probably want to consider the option of killing yourself

Islam, however.....

Authority, morality, sexual restraint..monogamous marriage, personal responsibility, patriotism, national unity, community, tradition, art, heredity, education, conservatism, law, Christianity, language, free market capital in the hands of the people, equality under the law, the search for knowledge and truth.

Got some OC for you lads, rate please.

You understand the intent behind that analogy right?

It's to show you that you're intentionally being a pessimistic asshole by unfairly dismissing any other possibilities and dramatizing the negatives of life.

You're constantly working backwards from the conclusion that we have to nuke ourselves instead of analyzing the situation and trying to find the best possible outcome.

>implying im not a krautkebap that visits relatives in kebap country regulary
also what has that to do with the memeball? are you denying that many minorities traveled to germany and fought for the SS? are you denying the entire muslim divisions they had?

>Their rants in Sup Forums ?

If you think some of theses asshats aren't being serious then you're an idiot.

Islam is multi racialist

Who knows what the fuck could hide under that

Saying Sup Forums should like Islam because we're against over rampant degeneracy is like saying we should be communists because we like the working class

>Pedophilia
>Bestiality
>Killing a woman with rocks when shes raped
>No pork
>No alcohol
>Special privileges for a book and his shitty author

I'm not going to say "we" because pol is not one person. But I'd say that I'd personally be mainly against these things

Chopping some kids hands off for stealing a packet of sweets is nigger tier. And women should have bin bags thrown over them, although they should be encouraged to not dress like prozzies.

Discriminated against for what? Most we'd do is send you to your own country

We have invented planet-destroying weapons. Even if we dismantle every one of them alive today we still have the power, which makes it an inevitability over the long run that earth will be ended. AI could save us, let's try i guess, but we are still doomed anyway. We are literally at a point trying to invent computers that can stop the heat death of the universe. I will admit it is a great accomplishment to have come this far. Maybe we will learn how with our planet-sized computers to pull energy in from other universes, maybe we will become the destroyer of other worlds to save our own. We have done well so far, yes, but it not being pointless requires some very strange things to become possible. I suppose we both have good reasons to be pessimistic and optimistic.

Go back to school and learn how to be actual journalists. Also have them blacklisted if they pull that shit again.

then give me a valid proof then. any sorts of violence or threat have ever happened to be executed ? Words will always be powerless and accepted as an acceptable human right in the name of free speech.

Proven examples of violence and any damaging behavior are totally different case.

You look pretty paranoid for a group of people who spend all their time becoming a keyboard warrior, but don't see any problem when islamic terrorist attacks are happening weekly now in western europe.

>Name one argument against Islam
It's foreign
And we are a unique culture that is worth defending
Conquering is a legitimate mode of change, the only thing that's different now is that we have prevented ourselves from defending ourselves

>what is pedophilia?
Next

It's a non Christan theocracy

I wouldn't be persecuted because of my race or gender.

but because I'm a hentai loving, bisexual who enjoys freaky sex and not believing in god. I'm also pretty liberal and to some extent a socialist/anarcho-communist.
Aren't some of those things also in the old testament?

>Aren't some of those things also in the old testament?
No pork
That's it

>freaky sex
Keep it a private matter
>not believing in God
God can't be proven or disproven but Christianity is a kike lie anyway. Not important just don't be an obnoxious cunt over a subject that can't be proven either way
>liberal socialist anarcho communist
This is where we have a problem. especially so since your kind tend to be fucking globalists

What about cutting a woman's hand-off when she tries to defend her husband by grabbing the other man's genitals?

I dont want Muslims cause theyre non-white.. like if all Arabs were Christians and all Europeans were Muslim I'd be totally fine with Sharia Law and white ISIS

>muh Christianity
Just because other bullshit kike religions have this in their book doesn't mean it's OK when Islam does it. Considering you don't believe in a god i find it's strange you're here shilling for Islam

Sand niggers are not based Islam is not based nothing brown can be based nigger nigger nigger sage

You see. I'm fucked in your world and the thing is you're one of the more reasonable people here.

I'm not really shilling for Islam. Just trying to show that Sup Forums is hypocritical.

Are you using old testament as an argument to belittle the damage of what muslims have done ?

What you are saying is true, but :
1. You are using a tu quoque, a logical fallacy.

2. The amount of people who still do what talmud said right now is barely existent, very much different with islam when many statistics have shown us the enormous amount of muslims who actually believe the islamic radical views.

Oh a fucking leaf,who would have thought?

>statistics have shown us the enormous amount of muslims who actually believe the islamic radical views.

Probably has more to do with the fact that muslim countries are war-torn and that big foreign powers are funding religious cults. And you know christians fought wars against each other for disagreements?


Not really saying defending Islam since I think it's a shit religion like most Abrahamic religions.