Alot of Social justice warriors, shitskins, and leftists are mad about it.
twitter.com
twitter.com
Alot of Social justice warriors, shitskins, and leftists are mad about it.
twitter.com
twitter.com
Other urls found in this thread:
en.m.wikipedia.org
geneticliteracyproject.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
sciencemag.org
twitter.com
Why are they mad at it?
It means the white man was here first
Because neanderthal man was the proto white man.
Muh humans came from Africa
Wouldn't it more likely be homo-erectus,since it could be walked to from Siberia?
"Hol dup so you be saying we werent the first humans and sheeit? "
patagonians were neanthertals? ive always wondered
That settles it, fuck off Tonto
Aren't jews and caucasians (georgians, chechens, armenians) and certain breeds of Arabs the ones with the largest amount of Neanderthaler DNA?
I mean just look at the nose
Indians have to vacation at our casinos now.
Also, Washington Redskins can be changed back to Shitskins as originally intended.
I thought race was a social construct
WE WUZ AMERICANS N SHIEET TILL DA SAPIENS CAME AND STOLES OUR LANDS!
Neanderthals were in North Africa also.
WE WUZ NEANDERTHALS N SHEEIIIITTTTTTTT
not really seeing any lulz here, sorry.
The point is that it defeats the lefts narrative of American land.
Nope, at most you have four percent of their DNA.
You are 96 nigger as opposed to me which is 200 percent nigger.
Top 3 percent, bitches.
what do the spiral bones mean?
Top kek
They shoah'd your people and now they're set on finishing the job.
What? How the fuck does that follow?
looks like someone I know
>neanderthal exclusively means proto-white people
You do realize East, Western and Central Asians, Amerindians, Sandniggers, and Poo in Loos have neanderthal DNA too, right?
Pure blooded Africans are the only group of people on the planet that don't have neanderthal DNA, which is why they're so fucking stupid.
East Asians unironically have as much neanderthal DNA as Europeans do.
Either way that would imply proto humans existed in North America casting doubt on out of Africa and any claim to first "migration"
Not "as much." 20% MORE. If anybody can claim WE WUZ NEANDERTHALS it's the East Asians.
>Canadian education
no they don't have as much not all archaic humans were the same jump from your glasstower you hong couver ching chong fuckhead
Basques Finns and Scandinavians have the most, neanderthals were not swarthy yellowish niggers you dumb fuck
Exactly. People who say humanity started in Africa are retarded or brainwashed. Prehistoric great apes/various proto-humans were spread all over the world, not just contained in Africa. It's just that the Africans were the ones to spread out and breed with the various other types of humans in Europe, the middle east, east asia, and so on.
You do realize that neanderthals weren't exclusively found in Europe, right? They were found all over the Old World excluding subsaharan Africa.
The majority of the difference is denisovan, not neanderthal.
East asians don't have much denisovan DNA, you're thinking of South Asians, Australian Abbos and Indian/Pacific islanders
this leaf is a real buzzkill...
WE... WE!! we wuz.. I mean.. neanderthals n shit.. right??
Anybody that isn't a subsaharan african wuz neanderthals n shiet.
so uh... are inuits more Neandertal than us?
those various proto-humans originated in africa as well, starting with homo erectus. homo sapiens just spread out and interbred again later on, with neanderthals.
Wait. So let me get this straight. I thought it was debatable whether or not Neanderthals were interbred or if they just went extinct since it wasn't possible to crossbreed?
That would put Neanderthals in a much different category than even modern human beings.
Probably not, but their skulls are shaped slightly differently from the rest of the American natives or the Asians they came from.
KEK
BTFO, AMERICA IS LITERALLY WHITE MANS LAND
There is certainly denisovan in Han, but not as much as the other groups that you listed. The extent is not concrete and continues to change. That 20% difference figure is likely inaccurate.
These guys really tickle my noodle.
didn't they used to have really north far settlements in Canada? I remember reading about permanent Inuit settlements in Alert.
They obviously have denisovan DNA, but not nearly as much as the other groups I listed. I'm pretty sure they don't have more neanderthal DNA than Europeans do though, the sources I read say they have just as much.
so they never spread to the south of where they originated huh instead they exclusive tract across more dangerous territory as to fit your little btfo narrative
>WE WUZ NATIVE AMERICANS AND SHEIIIT
We can finally use they're logic against them
They still do. Inuits were and still are the furthest north living people
>These guys really tickle my noodle
Their history's fucking strange desu. From our perspective they were primitive savages, but their oral history depicts them as genociding every other native in the arctic for being primitive and """uncivilized""" compared to them.
Also they claim that they discovered a rich land full of wealthy people across the Atlantic ocean sometime between the years 1200-1400, which fits in just well with written accounts from Trondheim, Norway in the 1400s where locals claim they saw strange brown people coming across the ocean in seal skin canoes.
Also I don't know how the fuck they drove the Danes out of Greenland when the Danes fucking outnumbered them 3:1 and had metalworking.
are you talking about neanderthals? they were isolated from the rest of the world by glaciers during their species's formation, not to mention they were adapted mostly for colder environments
so again proto humans left Africa to make humans so humans did not originate from Africa any more as they did the places Neanderthals were found which now we know was also existed in north America.
also existed*
you mean south africa?
They were blocked by the worlds largest desert
The narrative is that all of mankind was born from the black race hundreds of thousands of years ago. This finding contradicts that.
They were also blocked by a fucking tundra but made it to the most northern parts of Russia and Europe
MANIFEST DESTINY
humans as we (mostly) know them today are a mix of neantherthals and north africans, with the exception of sub saharans which never mixed with neatherthals
although in recent centuries that may have been diminished
tundra has animals you can eat, water you can drink, you can build shelters that wont be buried by sand the next day
considering europeans and asians only have 1-4% of neanderthal DNA, you can figure out exactly how much of us is ""african."" again, neanderthal ancestors were also migrants from africa.
does it even matter to begin with?
It probably wasn't a tundra then. Siberia was capable of supporting thousands of mammoth. It would've had significantly more vegetation
Funny because the sub Saharans manages to walk this desert with little more technology than early humans in more modern times such as Egypt.
regardless the point is then that either you accept people with Neanderthal admixture are a different species/sub species or humans as we see them didn't completely originate in Africa anymore than the places Neanderthals did and those places we mixed.
BS. We'd have found caves full of animal bones by now.
again, neanderthals were built to withstand cold, there's a reason africans are on average far more lanky than european counterparts, even in modern times.
so how did any proto human reach the sub Sahara since they exists supposedly blocked off by a giant desert not matting with Neanderthals.
>The narrative is that all of mankind was born from the black race
No it fucking doesn't. Jesus you people are retarded. The narrative says we have a common ancestor. Holy fuck.
see>humans as we (mostly) know them today are a mix of neantherthals and north Africans
so humans as we know them don't originate in Africa any more than the places Neanderthals existed...this is the point.
>I don't understand out of Africa theory
meant to reply to as well
yeah but we are not neanderthals, we are niggers mixed with Neandertals
Out of Africa doesn't say we stem from """the black race""" you literal fucking subhuman.
the Sahara is only about 10,000 years old IIRC
Neanderthals and denisovans were humans because we could reproduce and have fertile offspring.
HOLY SHIT kek this is too good. how will niggers ever recover?
>WE WUZ KANGZ
but you can trace the origin of the neanderthals back to africa
and the ones that bred with and didnt breed with neananderthals also came from africa
the foundation and the materials of what will be humanity came from africa
This is not a bad thing, this is not a good thing it is simply the way it is
The Danes probably saw that the land was nor worth it or they simply could not survive there as well eating nothing but seal every day.
>Also I don't know how the fuck they drove the Danes out of Greenland when the Danes fucking outnumbered them 3:1 and had metalworking.
I imagine they also had a reliance on foods that cannot be foraged in the arctic snows unlike the Inuit, and probably got fucked up by the Inuits' homeland advantage.
so then the proto humans were or were not separated by crossing the Sahara desert?
not really. Africa was mostly dominated by erectus. Heidelbergensis reigned over europe which then evolved into Neanderthals and us partially
it would mean that muh indigenous peoples were nothing of the kind, and that they actually genocided all the first inhabitants. tender
>The first representatives of the genus Homo with proto-Neanderthal[64] traits are believed to have existed in Eurasia as early as 350,000 to 600,000 years ago[65] with the first early Neanderthals appearing between 200,000 and 250,000 years ago,[66] and the first classic Neanderthals 130,000 years ago. The date of their extinction had been disputed because they seem to have disappeared close to the limit of what can be dated with radiocarbon and many dated samples had been contaminated with modern radiocarbon. In 2014, a team led by Thomas Higham of the University of Oxford used a new radiocarbon decontamination technique on material from 40 archaeological sites to show that Neanderthals died out in Europe between 41,000 and 39,000 years ago. This is 2500 to 5000 years after Homo sapiens reached the continent and coincides with the beginning of a very cold period in Europe.[67]
Comparison of the DNA of Neanderthals and Homo sapiens suggests that they diverged from a common ancestor at least 400,000 years ago. This ancestor was probably Homo erectus, who evolved to Homo heidelbergensis, the probable immediate ancestor of Neanderthals. Heidelbergensis originated between 800,000 and 1,300,000 years ago, and lived on until about 200,000 years ago.[citation needed] They ranged over Eastern and South Africa, Europe and Western Asia. Between 350,000 and 400,000 years ago the African branch is thought to have started evolving towards modern humans and the Eurasian branch towards Neanderthals
en.wikipedia.org
>They ranged over Eastern and South Africa, Europe and Western Asia. Between 350,000 and 400,000 years ago the African branch is thought to have started evolving towards modern humans and the Eurasian branch towards Neanderthals
Neanderthals originated in Eurasian branch of another proto humans species
THIS
aswell
>tender
what did he mean by this?
No whites are cro magnon mixed with neanderthals
Niggers aren't cro magnon or neanderthal they are more like Homo Heidelbergensis
en.wikipedia.org
mongoloids, objectively, always genocide/rape everything they come in contact with
that's why you could say they are the most successful human race.
tl;dr Human females could never be NEANDERTHALED.
>Out of Africa doesn't say we stem from """the black race"""
Out of Africa is a hypothesis that states that all existing humans are descended from a group that was living in the horn of Africa 60-70,000 (some go as far as 100,000) years ago who wiped out all other species of proto humans.
It has been discredited by recent findings of admixture with Neanderthals who were long considered to be a separate species from Sapiens.
So, either Neanderthals aren't a separate species and human ancestors left Africa long before what's considered politically correct, or Neanderthals are a separate species and the definition of species is wrong--opening the door for consideration that niggers are a separate species.
>shh shh
>no tears
>just sleep
it was done gently.
a eurasian branch that had its roots in africa
or the ""indigenous peoples"" went extinct before modern humans ever arrived. 100,000 years is a long time. nice assumption.
when there was an ice age they could have walked from the northern atlantic
>logarithmic scale
>implying
Into the garbage it goes
Then how can we reproduce? Damn you're fucking stupid
there are many definitions of species, kiddo, neanderthals are in the gray area between many.
and no, given our immense interbreeding, niggers are enough like you not to matter. jesus christ, why am i even here
whites can reproduce with blacks without fail. we are same species
...
You mongs need to learn how to read.
But that's impossible since (((people))) keep telling me that if two groups can breed they are the same species.
it's hard to compare Africa to Madagascar when Madagascar was settled in a few decades while humans have been in African for hundreds of thousands of years.
They are not a separate species, but they are at the very least a different sub-species.
needs a source and date, but those don't matter anymore, do they
Nothing unusual there except retarded creationists. Try again.
What about the Banana DNA?
It is, and simultaneously blacks are better than whites in every imaginable category.
Also we wuz kangz
The proto Neanderthals had its roots their m8
>Africans spread out and breed with the other types of humans in the world
and its happening again
>There was a jew proto-ape promoting inmigration and race mixing
there*