Why do right-wing Americans hate taxing the rich? It wouldn't have any effect on you anyway. After all...

Why do right-wing Americans hate taxing the rich? It wouldn't have any effect on you anyway. After all, the richest Americans are Jewish and East Asian. Whatever happened to hating the Jews?

Other urls found in this thread:

businessdictionary.com/definition/cost.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Because allowing the rich to keep most of their profits is what separates us from the animals.

right wing Americans love the jews

But you're not rich and I don't think you will be one of them.

because taxing the rich is a meme.
the rich avoid taxes with long term tax planning and loopholes.

it was the jews man, they did this

Even if we raised their taxes it wouldn't change the loopholes they use to avoid paying.
And our tax code is longer and more onerous than the bible, so changing it is kind of hard.

The rich in America are still overwhelmingly white and trustworthy.

think of it this way
you have millions of dollars and your making more every year
you can live anywhere in the world do to your wealth
the country your currently in decided to raise the taxes on your rich ass
so what do you do? you leave
you take you, your money and your taxes to another country that wont tax you out the ass
so now the country that raised the taxes is in even worse shape cause there now getting 0$ from that rich man what used to live in their country
i guess what im trying to say is that the rich can choose where they live and in turn where there taxes go

The State Jews get the taxes and the Corporate Jews are rich enough to avoid paying the taxes.

that's my meme answer because obviously this is a slide thread

it's not so much hating taxing the rich as much as wanting that money to be used for something worth a shit. looking at how Obama spent our money the last 8 years it's hard to justify raising taxes as opposed to nailing down why the fuck our government is spending our money like 8 year olds at Chuck E Cheese with their mom's credit card. also if you entirely demolish the rich, guess what, they're not gonna be able to employ anyone. meanwhile they still have their yachts and mansions, and the lower class eats rats.

because due to the pareto principle and past experience, the poor people just fucking spend all of their new money and cant create more wealth. the wealth just goes from some wealthy people, to the poor people, then to the fucking top of the top people. you want have wage equality and the 1% gets richer since they avoid the tax and gain the money that the poor people spend. income tax also barely ever goes to people and is usually used in a government project or paying off a company.

I'm certainly not poor. And god willing I plan to work hard enough to become one of them, despite what you may think.

better them than niggers n spics desu. the jew meme is fun but there arent that many of them really, most of the rich are good white people

>trustworthy
You mean like hollywood, the oil companies, and the banks?...
...the housing market....?

Fuck off shill.

Fuck off. The rich are Jews.

I think I've seen you in the zerohedge comment section. Stop posting, you're retarded.

Don't even know what that is

>The rich in America are still overwhelmingly white and trustworthy.

Nobody is taking you seriously in this thread

0/10

...

jews are overrepresented per their percentage of the population, thats a different question from if people are entitled to keep what they earn

They're already taxed you idiot.

No need to tax successful people any more than they currently are.

I work for rich people
I don't want to anger them
I don't want to live in Cuba

Fascists and natsocs do not hate taxing people. Low trust societies are the reason people don't like taxes. Guess what causes that low trust?

he's literally right, though. the reason your parents could afford to raise you is because rich people tried to make profit

>Low trust societies are the reason people don't like taxes.
What?

Why did anti-Chavez Venezuelans hate taxing the rich? It wouldn't have any direct effect on them any...

Would you have a problem with paying 10℅ more in taxes if it was guaranteed to help poor white people improve their children's future? I don't think most of Sup Forums would n that scenario.

The problem is that it goes to lazy niggers, Muslims, and Marxists.

They are already taxed enough and it is theft

And taxing rich people will stop them trying to make profit?

>I want to make more money but some of it gets taken away
>Guess theres no point having more money then

Who actually believes this?

Because you can't tax your way to prosperity.

I don't like taxes because I don't like Politicians who are bought and paid for by (((them))) using my money to buy votes from some nigger family in the ghetto. Atleast send me a picture of the nigger family i'm supporting with my tax dollars, so I can put it on my fridge and look at it with pride.

It would affect me when my boss fired me because he didn't have enough money to pay for all his employees, dipshit.

Tax affects PROFITS not revenue, if he fired you due to tax increases he's firing you because he wants more money which means hes a shitty boss with no business sense

or has no business sense*

Because right wing voters think they are way more richer than the left which is generally true

because the rich can choose to just throw the "debt" forward to you, and increase the price of whatever he owns.
Just imagine, for example, a big farm owner who can just raise the price of corn and there's very few people can do besides paying.

>Whatever happened to hating the Jews?
Who do you think then gets those redistributed taxes? A bunch of bullshit governmental programs, non-profits, charities and social benefits for parasites. Regular people don't see that money - (((politicians/activists/minorities))) do.
What regular people do see is fleeing private capital, less small and medium businesses, less real jobs.

>it's impossible to define "rich" in a way that everyone will agree with
>taxation is theft
>money should be in the hands of the individual, not the government
>individuals are naturally incentivized to be fiscally responsible (since it's their own money); no such incentive exists for the government

They could buy from another business? You know how capitalism is all based around competition?

So, will only a few of the companies get taxed? if they all get taxed more, they will all push the price up. A company can't go on debt for principles like "i'll keep the customer happy!"

If all companies in a sector decide together to push up prices it is known as collusion which is illegal in all developed countries

Because it doesn't work that way dumb ass. The rich didn't get rich by being stupid (mostly) and if you try and take all their money they will find a way to give you none of it. You can't tax a nation into prosperity, but you can definitely fuck it up real bad.

Not really.
It's onluy collusion if they all decide together. It makes no sense otherwise.
If the cost goes up for all of them, it's expected that they all raise the prices. Only in "very developed countries" like Venezuela I guess that's illegal

The COST isn't going up at all tho, corporation tax taxes PROFITS not revenue.

People take sides too hard. Jews have actually tricked cuckservatives into bending over for them. I don't think tax increase will do anything, but it's nonsense for cuckservatives to be completely opposed to upward mobility and the American Dream

He's having to pay more in taxes. That's a higher cost to his business.

I don't. I think it makes clear sense. They have more money available, it makes more sense to tax a rich person more than a poor person. Why should a poorer person be forced to pay a greater percent of their income that could actually affect them than someone who has millions of dollars and would barely feel a dent in their finances and could still live more than comfortably? Nationalist/conservative social policies and socialist economics are the future. This is what the West needs. This combination I call Nationalist Socialism will address every issue affecting the West currently.

This. Doesn't matter which part of the company's Money you want to steal, it will always be counted as cost and added to the price of making the thing. That's how managing finances work

one thing rich people like to do is invest their money and make a profit. This type of activity is good for the economy!
You'd rather have the government take all the money and "invest" it in handouts and other wasteful and non-productive programs, which will only cause inflation and chaos like in Venezuela.

It's time for a revolution! Overthrow the Capitalist American government! Let's burn it to the ground and let China (who is also Capitalist) take the lead!

Who's with me?!? Let's call ourselves "ANTIFA"!

businessdictionary.com/definition/cost.html

As I said before tax affects PROFITS not the procurement of assets, paying of wages / licences. the operating COST of running his business is the same, the only difference is a reduction in profits.

In which case there is little arguement to increase prices as per supply and demand he would be expected to lose money from increasing prices.

think of it like this. you take business and they pass the cost on to you. so in reality you are paying the taxes. so you buy less and they make even less money so the government gets less shekels. if they aren't making those shekels then they don't hire more employees or close down so no employees. no employees means no jobs, so even less shekels.

if you have a business friendly environment the rich invests shekels to make even more shekels. more people making shekels creates a competitive environment and that brings prices down.

the only people who actually want massive regulations and taxes are the huge multinational corporations. they can absorb the hit and spread out the costs but the smaller businesses can't. then you have oligopolies which limits competition(bad for consumers). the market is only controlled by a few who total control prices.

(((Trump))) was supposed to tax the rich according to what (((Alex Jones))) said on the Joe Rogan podcast