Jewish anons...

Jewish anons, why do you reject Christ when he fulfilled 353 prophecies in the Old Testament which to be random chance would be mathematically impossible?

accordingtothescriptures.org/prophecy/353prophecies

Other urls found in this thread:

jewfaq.org/mashiach.htm
m.youtube.com/watch?v=Te9hqkylR84
chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/246646/jewish/Isaac-Ishmael.htm
comparet.christogenea.org/sermons/who-are-gentiles
christogenea.org/podcasts/paul’s-epistle-hebrews-part-13-substance-faith
christogenea.org/essays/race-genesis-10
christogenea.org/essays/heirs-covenant
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Perennial malcontents
Born to whine

Because he does not fit the criteria for the messiah. Plain and simple.

It's written down so it must be true

Fake news

If something is true just because it's ancient and written down then what about the epic of Gilgamesh?

I encourage all to read the epic of Gilgamesh, from ancient Mesopotamia, if nothing else it is entertaining

>he does not fit the criteria for the messiah
-Gentiles worship the true God
-The dominion of sin is destroyed
-Is the dominant world religion
user what in God's name do you think the criteria are?

>jews
>browsing Sup Forums
I mean, there's probably nowhere else to ask this without getting digitally airstriked, but expecting kikes to frequent the designated holocaust denial board sounds a little silly, christfriend.

Dropping breadpill

For starters, Israel would be the a government that is the center of all world government of both jews and gentiles. The temple will be rebuilt, and the religious court system based on Jewish law will be restored.

Additionally
>All of the Jewish people will return from their exile among the nations to their home in Israel (Isaiah 11:11-12; Jeremiah 23:8; 30:3; Hosea 3:4-5). The law of the Jubilee will be reinstated.

>In the Olam Ha-Ba, the whole world will recognize the Jewish G-d as the only true G-d, and the Jewish religion as the only true religion (Isaiah 2:3; 11:10; Micah 4:2-3; Zechariah 14:9). There will be no murder, robbery, competition or jealousy. There will be no sin (Zephaniah 3:13). Sacrifices will continue to be brought in the Temple, but these will be limited to thanksgiving offerings, because there will be no further need for expiatory offerings.

jewfaq.org/mashiach.htm

The argument for Christ as the messiah doesn't hold any kind of legitimacy.

You see Israel flags quite often. And non-whites go on this board to

You're obviously new here, this board is at least 10% Jews.

The Epic of Gilgamesh didn't predict the future

> on the internet nobody knows your nose

I'd bet a good half of those are proxies tbqh family

This. See link, not your usual "Revelations-- source: my ass" mumbo

m.youtube.com/watch?v=Te9hqkylR84

Why is Abraham's seed called through Isaac, and not Ishmael?

>chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/246646/jewish/Isaac-Ishmael.htm

tl:dr ishmael was a little shit and became the descendant of sandniggers

So basically, it is because one is not a child of Abraham by blood, but by faith? So the prophecies for Israel's restoration is not to the Jews but the Israel of God, for they are not all Israel who are of Israel.
The people of God are those faithful to Him and in Him. These people were scattered, but then were regathered; Though once they lived in idolatry, they were called out of it by the good news of the Messiah's Kingdom. So to be an Israelite one must have faith in the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and the One who raised Him from the dead.

No, it's the opposite. It's by blood, not faith alone. The reason Israel wasn't called through Ishmael is because his line became mixed with non-israelite Arab peoples that were broken cisterns or vessels of destruction, unable to contain the covenant of God

Not Jewish, but because several of the prophecies he fulfilled required jumping through hoops and post-hoc fictionalization to be true.
The historical Jesus was from Nazareth. The Bible claims that Augustus ordered a census and that's why Joseph and Mary went to Bethlehem so he could be born there. But there was no such census in that time frame and if there had been, there wouldn't have been a requirement to go to their hometown. Such a command would have would have severely disrupted the Roman Economy.
Also signs in the sky did not happen in reasonable enough proximity to his birth to be confirmed, but instead are likely to have been borrowed from memories that people had of astronomical events having happened in the past, but with no idea what they were or clear memory of when they happened (because when it happened it would have been a curiousity but not necessarily a great memorable event).
Basically the authors capitalized on unremarkable things that people vaguely remembered happening, but not the details or dates of, then squeezed them together in order to push the fulfilling prophecy narrative. It's really easy to say they fulfilled x prophecy when you don't even write it down for decades after the fact.
That's not even getting into the whole "I am the god who brought you out of Egypt where you were slaves" thing, and why you would want to worship a desert war god (or the son of said god) who let his followers be conquered and crushed by any and every powerful nation or empire that the Hebrews didn't ambush first through deception and infiltration.
Especially when their creation myth, supposedly passed down from their god gets everything out of order and wrong while contemporary Greco-Roman creation myths described the sun forming first and the earth being a ball.

Your previous posts suggest you aren't a Jew.

Jews aren't Israelites. See-->

You literally glossed over 353 definitions that he fulfilled.

Because you are confused about the Kingdom Age prophecies, which will occur when ripe.

They're not ripe yet.

Because you people murdered the Messiah and rejected the Kingdom.

So you're some Christian Identity heretic?

It does, however, fit nicely in with Noah's ark. It even includes Noah, naming him Utnapishtim.

How is it heresy?

There's this weird little antisemitic teacher in Europe who screams about Jews then and Jews now being totally different people. He has some idiotic followers.

If you're counting on being white to save you, how is that not heresy?

Do you believe gentiles can be saved, or "Israelites" only?

Rejected the temple's bank.

Why even build a temple again? You can do all your trading online now

fuck gilgamesh tho, that nigga was an asshole

It's not heresy if it's biblically supported. Try reading some of the essays

Wrong on all counts, actually.

First off, there were two censuses in that time, 14 year apart. Both under Quirinius.

And substantial evidence to demonstrate that people did have to go to their hometown to be counted.

Gaius Vibius Maximus, the Prefect of Egypt, declares:
The census by household having begun, it is essential that all those who are away from their nomes be summoned to return to their own hearths so that they may perform the customary business of registration and apply themselves to the cultivation which concerns them. Knowing, however, that some of the people from the countryside are required by our city, I desire all those who think they have a satisfactory reason for remaining here to register themselves before . . . Festus, the Cavalry Commander, whom I have appointed for this purpose, from whom those who have shown their presence to be necessary shall receive signed permits in accordance with this edict up to the 30th of the present month E . .

They're going to build a temple so that they can set the stage to accept the antichrist as their messiah, and watch him desecrate their temple and pronounce himself God.

Their sacrifices are in vain.

Galatians 3:28

Oh, I would absolutely love to see in the bible where heaven is for white people only.

Because then it would contradict this, which IS in the actual bible:

Revelation 7
After these things I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no one could number, of all nations, tribes, peoples, and tongues, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, with palm branches in their hands, and crying out with a loud voice, saying, “Salvation belongs to our God who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb!”

>all nations, tribes, peoples, and tongues,

That is "just white people" to you?

kek

First of all, the word "jew" in the Greek is Ioudaos (Judean). It's a national appellation, like "Californian". Judea at the time was a multi-ethnic "kingdom" (thanks to Jews) with real Israelites mixed in. This is why Jesus preached in parables to the crowds but later told the disciples the true meaning, and that the message was only for true Israelites and not the whole multitude.

Anyway, the reason Paul was writing to the Galatians in the first place is because he knew they were lost white Israelite brethren who had been separated from their identity before the Israelites had received the mosaic law. They were the wild uncultivated olive tree that would be grafted back in to Israel and reconciled through Christ. The reason he is saying that there is no Judean or Gentile (of the nations of the known mediterranean/Asia minor world, i.e. white civilizations) is because they are all Israelites by blood and able to receive Christ's gift. This is also why he tells the judeans not to be jealous just because they had the law of Moses.

From Christogenea: "the Galatians to whom this is addressed were primarily Hellenized Gauls, who were Kelts, with some Greeks and Romans among them. Since Paul wrote to these people specifically, no one else can possibly pick up this letter, who has no relation to its intended recipients, and imagine that Paul could be addressing them also. Paul knew that these Galatians: Kelts, Greeks and Romans, were the “lost” Israelites, as he demonstrates so often in his epistles, and here he tells them as much in this very chapter, and in chapter 4, verse 28 where he says “And we, brethren, down through Isaac, are children of promise”. As I’ve said before, Paul certainly cannot be held responsible for the blatantly errant, judaized mistranslations of his letters found in all modern Bible versions today"

>Quirinius
Quirinius didn't take over Syria or do his census until 12 years after Herod died.
As I said, the authors took events of minor notice from the general period and squeezed them all together so that they all happened at once.

10 years after. (4bc to 6ad)

comparet.christogenea.org/sermons/who-are-gentiles

And from christogenea.org/podcasts/paul’s-epistle-hebrews-part-13-substance-faith
>As for the promise concerning “all the families of the earth”, many commentators insist that may included families of other races, who did not descend from Noah. However in Genesis chapter 10, only two chapters prior to the call of Abraham, we read of the descendants of Japheth in verse 5: “By these were the isles of the nations divided in their lands; every one after his tongue, after their families, in their nations.” Then we read of Ham in verse 20: “These are the sons of Ham, after their families, after their tongues, in their countries, and in their nations.” Then we read of the sons of Shem in verse 31: “These are the sons of Shem, after their families, after their tongues, in their lands, after their nations.” And finally of all the sons of Noah in verse 32: “These are the families of the sons of Noah, after their generations, in their nations: and by these were the nations divided in the earth after the flood.”

These are “all the families of the earth”, which is not the planet but the land upon which the race inhabited, as they are the only families within the Biblical context, and they were the families which were within the scope of Abraham’s consciousness. The families of other races which are never a concern of the Scripture cannot be justly forced into this Genesis chapter 12 context. This is why we have a genealogy in Genesis chapter 10, so that we may recognize these nations. If all of the world’s races were descended from Adam, the identity of the families of Noah would not even matter and therefore there would be no need for such a genealogy. Yet history proves that all of the descendants of Noah were originally White, and we can identify them with this same list

List of Adamic nations: christogenea.org/essays/race-genesis-10

>Jewish anons, why do you reject Christ when he fulfilled 353 prophecies in the Old Testament which to be random chance would be mathematically impossible?
>accordingtothescriptures.org/prophecy/353prophecies
poor jesus
will nobody be his friend?

christogenea.org/essays/heirs-covenant
"It can be fully demonstrated from classical history that many of the tribes of the Mediterranean basin indeed descended from Old Testament Israelites. These Israelites colonized many areas long before the Assyrian and Babylonian deportations of Israel, which began around 741 BC and ended with the destruction of the temple in 585 BC. Of the Israelites who were taken away by the Assyrians, Micah the prophet says (4:7-8) “7 And I will make her that halted a remnant, and her that was cast far off a strong nation: and the LORD shall reign over them in mount Zion from henceforth, even for ever. 8 And thou, O tower of the flock, the strong hold of the daughter of Zion, unto thee shall it come, even the first dominion; the kingdom shall come to the daughter of Jerusalem.” It is this passage to which Matthew 21:43 should be cross-referenced.

Going back to examine the “promises made unto the fathers” which Paul mentions in Romans 15:8, we see that Abraham’s seed (offspring) – according to a promise made to him by Yahweh - were to become an innumerable multitude, and grow into many nations with their kings (Genesis 12:2-3, 13:14-16, 15:1-6, 17:1-10). Yet these promises were not to all of Abraham’s seed (offspring). We see that Ishmael was sent away, because even though he was circumcised and “believed” (Genesis 17:25-26), he was not to become an heir (Genesis 17:20-21, 21:9-13). Additionally, the children which Abraham had later with Keturah were also sent off, since neither were they to become heirs (Genesis 25:1-6). The promises of Yahweh would fall to Isaac exclusively (Genesis 18:9-15, 21:12, 26:3)."

(2/2)
Of Isaac’s descendants, Jacob and Esau, Esau sold his birthright, and by it his share of the promises. Yet Esau’s selling of his birthright may be viewed as a mere formality. He actually lost it by going against the desires of both Abraham his grandfather and Rebecca his mother, by marrying accursed Canaanite women (Genesis 24:3, 27:46, 36:1 ff.). Therefore the promises given to Abraham were passed down exclusively to Jacob-Israel. By these promises and other Biblical prophecies, we see that Jacob’s offspring were to become innumerable, and were to become nations and companies of nations (Genesis 28:10-16, 35:9-15).

While this is a mystery to most people, even in the churches and the halls of academia, this is not the fault of Yahweh God or of the apostles. All of these promises were surely fulfilled in history, and this fulfillment is revealed upon a study of both the classics and archaeology. Many of the Greek tribes, namely the Dorians and Danaans, along with the Trojans and those who sprung from them, such as the Romans and the Illyrians, had descended from Israelites dispersed long before the Assyrian invasions. Yet from the Assyrian and Babylonian invasions and deportations of Israel are descended the Kimmerians, Scythians and Parthians, from whom came all of the Germanic tribes of later history.