Checkmate

checkmate

Other urls found in this thread:

lichess.org/yVpmZcdn
lichess.org/c7mf7MP6
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>all chess is 4d
only 2 spatial dimensions are relevant to chess though

>1: length
>2: width
>3: height (nope)

>4: time

therefore, you're wrong nigguh

>he doesn't know what 3d chess it
user..

then how does the knight jump OVER the other pieces, dipshit?

Knight can move over pieces adding a 3rd dimension. Time is the 4th

Checkmate reddit

was about to post this

lichess.org/yVpmZcdn

the part i'm saying is wrong was "all chess is 4d"
it doesn't need to actually jump, you can just slide it to the square it's going to "land" at
>wouldn't the pieces be height?
not necessarily, you can draw the board layout after each move without having any actual pieces seperate from the board

For the purposes of chess, knights simple move between the pieces resting on the squares, or around them, until getting to an acceptable legal movepoint. Next time you play checkers or chess try moving a piece in an L shape, you don't actually need to lift it off the board.

You are now aware that Knights actually charge and flank like a basic cavalry strike does.

It doesn't literally jump over them. It can merely pass through them.

>knights jump
>what is cavalry

then how come you can move the knight before you move any of the pawns?

the knight is just like triple H, he always goes over

This kinda depends on the size of the peices relative to the board

...

>implying knights jump
they teleport dipshit

horses can jump...

knights are literally
*teleports behind you* the chess piece

the chessboard is an array of QPU

Yes, medieval cavalry was known to leap over everything like a sugared up autist on a pogo stick. The "L" move isn't to represent a jump but, the main use of cavalry, the flank.

Sup Forums needs at least a chess thread per week.
lichess.org/c7mf7MP6

But how could chess be even 3d if we dont put those glasses on?

time is not a geometrical dimension, pleb

>4D is time!!
The 4D is literally incomprehensible to us UNLESS we use time.

4D is like the difference between 3D and 2D.

duh, that's why i separated it from the spatial ones
OP does have a point that time is involved in chess

we don't use it freely, but we do use it with limits-exactly one piece moves at a time, forcing all other pieces to halt, and furthermore-all same colored pieces to wait for a different color piece to move.
What you are suggesting is like saying the width and length aren't dimensions because we are limited to 8 points on each axis, and can't move freely.

>arrow pointing diagonally upward in 2 dimensions

lmao, the 4D arrow would be pointing inward or outward, which is impossible to depict to us.

>OP shows a 2 dimensional image of a chessboard thus directly refuting his own argument without even realizing it.

>BertrandRussell.jpg

Should've shopped a fedora right on his head, mate.

Watch the first harry potter movie

Or better yet, anybody in this thread play a game of chess on the fucking computer. Your screens pixels are arranged in two dimensions

>shows a 2 dimensional image of Bertrand Russel thus directly refuting his own argument without even realizing it.

Checked, and true

But the image is not 2 dimensional because you are making reference to OPs point of perspective, therefore when you includeboth OPs perspective and the time factor, the game is in fact not only 4 dimensional, but at least 6 dimensional as each player exists in their own state of linear observance interacting with both each other in a shared 3rd dimension and the 2 physical dimensions of the virtual chess pixels. How could you deny the 8 dimensions? Don't you know my grandmother died in those 10 dimensions? Denying the 13 dimensions of computer chess should be illegal :>