Science Proves Being Gay is Genetic

archive.is/IF4XB

Regardless of how wide-ranging these studies are, they tend to have one thing in common: they treat gay men as a monolithic group. But now a research team out of the University of Toronto Mississauga (Ashlyn Swift-Gallant, Lindsay A. Coome, D. Ashley Monks, and Doug P. VanderLaan) has investigated variation within the population of gay men based on their anal-sex roles (that is bottom, or receptive, top, or penetrative, and versatile, or both receptive and penetrative depending on circumstance). The results of two of their studies suggest there very well could be biological subgroups of gay men, which is to say that one’s biological makeup could possibly (and most likely, indirectly) influence whether or not he likes to fuck or get fucked (or both).

When it has been studied, anal-sex role has been viewed as a result of social factors (more on that in a minute). Despite every study I’ve read that asks about the anal-sex role of its respondents has found that the majority men who have sex with men identify as versatile (including the two studies at hand from the University of Toronto team) as well as my own anecdotal experience suggesting as much, the top/bottom binary persists in gay culture. It comes with predictable cultural baggage for those who firmly fit on either pole (pun intended—but only for the bottoms). Tops are stereotyped as masculine, taking up the male tradition of putting their dicks in things, while bottoms are regarded as more feminine (despite the overwhelming evidence to the contrary in porn, and the preponderance of self-identified “masc bottoms” in sex-app profiles). And with the assumptions of femininity in men come insults (“bottom” as a pejorative amongst gay men) and with those come a specific kind of shame in addition to the shame many gay men already experience merely living in a heterosexual world.

Other urls found in this thread:

strawpoll.me/12872023
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051088
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296090/
cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/johns-hopkins-psychiatrist-there-no-gay-gene
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

who gives a fuck

No one cares

>Not knowing you can pretty much bribe scientists by "funding" them to produce any result you want.

What are you trying to proof here op?

if my father was gay how was I born?
checkmate

It's been known that it is a genetic defect for a long time now.

Being gay is not a choice or a convertible state. Inb4 trannies, most are gay guys larping as women bcuz autistic, but being gay is legit a biologically based thing rather than psychological.

If Homosexuality is genetic, it can be isolated and eliminated.

Then why is conversion therapy still a thing?

>doesn't understand how genetics works

Get on it Dr.

A lot of gays are gay because of childhood abuse.

>JEZEBEL
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Wtf I love biological defects now!

A majority of gays do not report being abused as kids. What of us?

I dunno, out his ass ?

Even if this was true (which it isn't, wholly) faggotry is still an unnatural deviation, a disease which still needs stomped out. GTFO of here you dicksucker you are degenerate and will always be a beta

Homo sexuality is a genetic flaw you can never wipe it out.

Just because you didn't report it doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Maybe your uncle slapped his cock on your face when you were sleeping.

>its genetic
that makes it a disease
i dont hate gay people.

Nice set of triggered closet homos right here.

I bet you get your girlfriend to stick her finger up your bum hole while she wanks you.

That his behaviour is genetic and therefore not his fault.

I hope you are not being serious.

see

>Scientists have studies and reasearches
>Poltard has greentext and joos
;)
I bet you believe in Hermeticism

Never underestimate Sup Forums.

Just remember that the rabid homophobes are just a loud minority, even on Sup Forums. Every poll I've done on this site virtually always comes back with the people who actually want to walk back homosexual rights being in the vast minority. Most are for the status quo, and an amount slightly larger than the reactionary minority want to continue walking them forward.

Funny how such a small group can control so much discourse though.

Cancer is a genetic abnormality.

Once cancer can be cured, so can homosexuality

>money gets pumped into researches like this
What a joke

Would you please compare your headline to your 1st paragraph and then tell us what made you so fucking retarded? Genetics, alcohol abuse by your mom, what was it?

>""""science""""
This degenerates was BTFO'ed long ago, but they still want to push their failure agenda in order to legitimize homosexual behavior.

maybe ur mum was gay

So there is a gay gene, the very thing liberals were adamantly opposed to for ages? Who could've guessed!

no, the joke is that it's an article on jezebel of all places

Lets get a good ol' poll going:

strawpoll.me/12872023

Homosexuality is natural. It is not a disease. Gay can procreate.

This is actually huge because if they find the gay gene and a way to test for it in utero we'll have our first pro-life gay people protests.

Don't bother. Now that I've laid down a gauntlet some autistic faggot will sit there F5ing to stuff the ballot so that he can win arguments on the internet, because winning is more important than being right.

So what do you propose burger (sterilization the fags dont have kids anyways) genocide? Or genetic engineering?

You moron Homo sexuality is by its very nature sterile no actuall homo would breed thats why the adopt.

Sup Forums's fill of faggotry. We should be experts

It makes no sense as a genetic problem. Genes want to procreate. Unless a virus adjusted specifically the genes of one person to become gay to spread through anal sex, I don't see how these genes can survive. Gays don't have kids in huge numbers.

The way I see it, it's far more likely for being gay to be environmental. As a mental illness, it makes perfect sense, since normal behavior is to replicate genes and gays avoid this.

>Gay marriage + Adoption

1. Marriage isn't about love. That's only a recent thing.

It's a contract for the trading of resources for the purposes of societal cohesion.

2. Gay adoption is child abuse.

Gay parents are incapable of raising a normal child.

Women who have male gay relatives have more kids on average.

journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051088

Oh shit I shouldn't have even bothered to respond good call Putin

So basically you just proved, a genetic mental disorder, thanks OP. Now fuck off.

>Muh russian hackers

Sterility sounds the cheapest.

>Homo sexuality is by its very nature sterile
That is not true. You fagg dad fucked your tranny mom then you popped out.

Gays dont breed thats why the opt for adoption.
Homo sexuality isnt natural because there geneticaly dead.

>strawpoll.me/12872023
>No DIAF option

why even?

>he thinks people on Sup Forums aren't autistic enough to stuff ballots on unsecured polls when one of the first things we did after the presidential debates was stuff ballots on unsecured polls

How the fuck is that possible?
They dont make children, so the gene would die out or be extremly rare.

Well I'm not sure if you call surrogacy breeding but that is becoming increasingly more common and I would say is the most desirable option if it can be afforded by a majority of gay men.

>So what do you propose burger?

Exile.

We can put them all on an island then airdrop jello shots and meth.

They'll love it.

>Great bait mate

Tranny fags cant have kids.
Thr operation sterilizes them.

Gay people were stigmatized through history so they had to hide.

There has been (((scientific))) evidence to proof every possible way someone could be gay ranging from psychological disorder to genes
The one i think is more likely however is the lack of exposure to testosterone in the womb due to anxiety or unhealthy practices done by the mother (like smoking or drinking alcohol)
which fits in nicely with the rise of feminism and women in the workforce which lead to more stressed women which in turn create more fuck up children
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3296090/

What the burger is saying the use surrogate's.

>2010
>I WAS BORN GAY
>2011
>scientist disprove gay gene
>IT'S MY CHOICE TO BE GAY
>2012
>I'M TRANSGENDER SHITLORD
>2013
>scientist disprove children are born transgender
>IT'S MY CHOICE
>2013
>x
>y
>2014
>more x and y
>2017 time skip
>(((SCIENCE))) HAS PROVED GAY GENE IS REAL CIS WHITE MALE

So either you're born gay and you're a defect much like any other retard or you're not born gay and we are in fact products of our world.
Either way homosexuals are bat shit crazy in both scenarios.

>be born gay, due to retard gene
>not be born gay, and just happen to be mentally ill from years of degeneracy.

>Thr operation
>sterilizes them.

Wow, you know nothing about human biology.

Also:
Can a gay man impregnate a woman? Yes
Can a lesbian woamn give birth? Yes
Are gay people sterile? No

In your posts you are making 2 claims
1) You can read minds over the internet
2) Polls are an argument

Did Hillary really have a 98% chance to win? Hmmm.

Sure it does. Sure it does.

>he thinks people on Sup Forums aren't autistic enough to stuff ballots on unsecured polls when one of the first things we did after the presidential debates was stuff ballots on unsecured polls

>Make up shitty greentest to make gayslook bad

>Gay people were stigmatized through history

You're missing

-The entire Greek period
-The Roman hedonism period where the Emperor fucked foreign diplomats
-The Ottoman boytoy period

Let's hope genetic engineering becomes more available, then.

If your gay your not going to have sex with a woman you autist the cant get arousal from females.

43 – Roman conquest of Britain begins, creating Roman Britain. Roman Britain adopted Lex Iulia de Adulteriis Coercendis, which criminalized adultery among "males" (heterosexual and bisexual oriented men) and Lex Scantinia, which penalized a sex crime (stuprum) against a freeborn male minor (ingenuus or praetextatus). The Lex Iulia de Adulteriis Coercendis may well have provided for a widely-attested wave of castrations in the Roman Empire, in order to supply sex partners who were not "male"

>lower testosterone
>naturally more feminine, less muscle, weaker voice
>loses out with females
>lacks confidence because not alpha male
>figures other guys are just as horny as him
>gets some dick

I don't think it's purely "biologically gay," but more a set of circumstances that lead to being gay.
Avoidable? yes. Knowingly avoidable? Probably not.

gay people should be gassed

(citation needed)

Think of a gene that helps women have more kids by making them unusually highly attracted to men, found on the X chromosome, that in males just makes them attracted to males. The best we can do to cope is have surrogate kids. I have a desire to have kids, I just can't imagine living with a woman. I could do it but it wouldn't feel right.

And what does this tell you of the validity of polls as an argument, as you've claimed that a stuffed poll can be used to win an argument?

I'm gay I can get aroused by women, I've had sex with them it just doesn't do anything to me emotionally. I can't feel "in love" with a woman.

>If your gay your not going to have sex with a woman

If you are not vegant, you are not going to eat vegetables ;)
You arguement is invalid. Gays still hide in major countries because of anti-gay laws and stigmas.

Even in Chechnya gay people have families, but still buttfuck each other

Explain Elagabalus.

great, now that we have found the gene. Can we finally treat it through gene therapy and remove the homosexual menace from our society?

>And what does this tell you of the validity of polls as an argument, as you've claimed that a stuffed poll can be used to win an argument?
That you need to be careful when polling so that you can get an accurate result.

Not that polls are always worthless all the time and can be dismissed out of hand whenever you disagree with their results.

How the fuck do you even have sex with women if they don't make your pee pee hard?

What if a straight person developped a liking for things up their ass through sextoys etc, but still isn't attracted to men despite liking that ? Asking for a friend

Then your a "bi sexual"
Or your not a fag.
>comparing food to Homo sexuality
Autism

It makes it hard I just don't really enjoy it as intimately. Mechanically it works fine. It would be really awkward to try sober, and that has never happened, so take that for what it is worth.

Sex is better if I care about the other person and I can only really do that on a friend level for women.

342 – The Roman emperors Constantius II and Constans issued an imperial decree to the Codex Theodosianus, which imposes an "exquisite punishment" for the crime which occurs "when a male gives himself in marriage to an effeminate [femina, literally 'a woman'] and what he wants is for the effeminate to play the male role in sex [literally 'project the male parts']," thus for himself to play the female role.[1]

390 – The Roman emperors Valentinian II, Theodosius I, and Arcadius issued an imperial decree to the Codex Theodosianus, that criminalizes "all persons who have the shameful custom of condemning a man's body, acting the part of a woman's to the sufferance of alien sex (for they appear not to be different from women), shall expiate a crime of this kind in avenging flames in the sight of the people."

I'm gay. I could only settle down with a man to make me happy.

And you'll know the difference between an accurate poll and a stuffed poll how? Because the results agree with you?

Polls are worthless beyond getting a general idea of what a certain group of people is thinking and even that use is questionable. Yes, they can be dismissed out of hand.

Pretty evenly divided so far, same as last time when I did a poll of the same sort.

there are probably a dozen or more examples from lesser known civilizations and empires. there were gays, ladyboys, eunuchs... basically back then there was a range of choices from twink to femboy to post-op, at least for its time. no HRT back then so you know the guys acting feminine must have been really fucked up in the head. as much as i think gay behavior is degenerate, satanic, and jewish... it has been a meme in probably at least a dozen big civilizations that historians know about. greece and rome and ottoman are just three more famous ones.

Wait. So the gay gene was a meme, that was disproven, that has suddenly been re-proven?

Oh vey, goyim.

>openly defending retards
>shill
>bait
No, you're just a fucking Newfag.

Gay gene was disproven long ago.
cnsnews.com/blog/michael-w-chapman/johns-hopkins-psychiatrist-there-no-gay-gene

There is no gay gene.
In Twins with identical DNA, where one was gay and the other wasn't.
They had no correlation with homosexual being a birth right.

If it was caused by a freak mutation or disease (cat parasite conspiracy from /x/) that is entirely different than being homosexual from birth.
The "citations" being provided are all meme tier at best.

The everyone who disagrees with homosexuality is gay meme. Fuck off

Being gay might be genetic but the emergence of trans whateverism is most definitely mental illness exacerbated by the age of social media. I used to play this crappy text based role playing game that was like 80% women - all around the same time that the trans fad swept across tumblr there was a sort of domino effect where every other chick suddenly decided that their depression was caused by being the wrong gender. Some would just do the thing where a girl cuts her hair short, wears men's clothes and changes their profile gender to snowflake but others actually started taking hormones and some went as far as getting their boobs surgically removed. I spent a lot of time in the game because Im a depressed NEET and it was almost frightening how many of them would suddenly one day tell me to consider that my depression was due to me possibly being the wrong gender... it's like a mental illness wrapped in a fad but instead of cutting and putting the pictures on MySpace like emos or wearing dog collars and studded hot topic pants like goths in the past youth today are jumping the hormone-injection/new-pronouns-every-day bandwagon.

>Late Rome

That's right. Ignore the vast majority of its' history.

>And you'll know the difference between an accurate poll and a stuffed poll how?
Because it doesn't have 500 responses all made 2-3 seconds apart consistently for a handful of minutes while someone runs their voting bot you fucking idiot.

I said that somebody /probably would/ stuff the poll, not that the poll /was/ stuffed. Note the tense.

Maybe nobody stuffs the poll and I'm wrong.

I guess we'll see.

>Polls are worthless beyond getting a general idea of what a certain group of people is thinking
AKA THE ENTIRE FUCKING POINT OF TAKING A POLL.

ARE YOU FUCKING STUPID?

Polls are effectively sports matches. Entertaining to watch but their outcomes are meaningless.

Good that mean it's possible to exterminate them.

>retards
>People are naturally different from me
>They dont claim women, so I have more girls to fuck
>They are valueable part of society and produce wealth to us
>We should probably gas them coz Islam is bad thing!
When will poltards pray to Allah?

That user raised a good point. Scientific data can be skewed by bias, prejudices, and conflicts of interests.

>greece and rome and ottoman are just three more famous ones.

They're the most well known because they reached peak wealth.

Says a lot about us

As always, depends on the categories:

Reactionary:Progressive (if we assume the current position is at civil unions)
9:9

Tolerance:Persecution (if we assume tolerance is anything from not-criminalised and up)
11:7.

sometimes they fuck women so they aren't ostracized

hey can you speculate on how the femina plays the male role in sex? were these actual women or faggots? actual women being dominant (all the way up to penetrating my anus, all the way up to elbow deep fisting) is my fetish, sadly. i've never tried it, but i blame pop music and predictive programming subliminal messages.