Redpill me on Global Warming

is it real?

propose it is real, what are the legitimate environmental effects we would experience?

Other urls found in this thread:

riggedit.com/2017/05/01/the-great-global-warming-swindle-full-movie/
riggedit.com/2017/05/01/global-warming-or-global-governance-full-length/
riggedit.com/2017/05/01/john-coleman-founder-of-the-weather-channel-global-warming-scam/
nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/use/?cid=nrcs142p2_054028
youtube.com/watch?v=x1SgmFa0r04
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

climate change is real. the question is how big the human impact is.

...

Nah the real question should be how can we adapt to it so the least amount of people die.

Global warming is real, climates change, but humans probably have nothing to do with it. Just another excuse to tax and divide us rather than solving the to problem

>Nah, you are totally wrong. I personally believe that we should focus on some irrelevant part of the discussion.

Keep it up!

Well you know what, I'm gonna say it... no u

climate change is real, human impact on climate change is real.

Things like us coating cities in black tar roofing and roads increases the temperature of the surrounding area by a massive sum.

But the greenhouse gases thing is just a theory. Technically the methane released from the millions upon millions of farting livestock such as cows that we breed to feed our populations is a heavier molectule and has something like a 100x higher potential to be a greenhouse gas.

Global warming could literally be cow farts.

Climate change is real. The human impact no matter how small or large is real. All the more reason to find alternative fuel sources and stop having to exploit foreign resources causing damage to the planet while inciting war.

see >pic related

Let’s be clear about what Stephens actually said. Here’s his summary of the current state of climate science:

>>While the modest (0.85 degrees Celsius, or about 1.5 degrees Fahrenheit) warming of the Northern Hemisphere since 1880 is indisputable, as is the human influence on that warming, much else that passes as accepted fact is really a matter of probabilities. That’s especially true of the sophisticated but fallible models and simulations by which scientists attempt to peer into the climate future.

Here’s the translation: Science teaches us that humans have helped cause global warming, but when we try to forecast the extent of the warming and its effects on our lives, the certainty starts to recede. In addition, the activism has gotten ahead of the science. Indeed, Stephens even quotes the New York Times’ own environmental reporter, Andrew Revkin, who has observed that he “saw a widening gap between what scientists had been learning about global warming and what advocates were claiming as they pushed ever harder to pass climate legislation.”

The ice on earth will melt and it will drown us all

>tax

nailed it. and a tool the jews use to weaken the west. carbon taxes for example. weedman/his handlers are hellbent on them here. making the government billions of dollars while simultaneously weakening our last ounce of competitiveness is a win-win for (((them.)))

global climate change is real.

the climate has not stopped changing for the last million years, why would it stop changing now?

Do humans affect the climate? Yes. 7 billion people and the resources to keep them fed is going to make an impact.

Unless you are willing to get rid of 5Billion plus people we will continue making an impact, deal with it.

So what is going to happen? absolutely nothing, we humans are resilient fucks.

Dude, i was just joking. What the fuck is wrong with you? You actually hurt me, do you know that, big boy?!

Urgh, this is why I hate Sup Forums ... I came here to laugh and have fun... not to cry... again.

no it's even worse than that.

dinosaurs will come back alive and EAT EVERYONE WHO'S NOT WHITE

see >global warming could literally be cow farts

this is another part of the human equation, more so than CO2 (which is pushed the most, but never the food part)

Cows, of course, were bred into existence by us similar to domesticated dogs. This would mean it is "man-made".
However, what solution is there?
>Vegan!
right, people will totally go for that one.

And with cows farting we have to take into account humans farting, there are 7 billion of us and we all fart an awful lot.

But still a huge question of mine has gone unanswered, what would the actual effects be?

>methane and carbon dioxide go into the atmosphere and just stay there forever, nothing eats it

k

This may be all real but there is physical evidence of pic related, whatever facts you want to put out there, pic related is something to avoid, and a good way of avoiding this is to move towards renewables.
plus, its real, we are killing the earth

Got my B.S. in environmental science. Yes it's real, yes you should conserve and recycle and all that bullshit but don't listen to the doomsayers saying everything is going to end. Can it happen? Yes, but we have laws and regulations for a reason. If global warming is as bad as these liberals say it is, then sea levels will rise, temperatures will change and lots of carbon dioxide will go into the atmosphere if the permafrost in the Arctic melts. Will we get there? No, the cleaner car engines, phasing out of small motor combustion engines and alternate fuel sources are helping, it's just going to take time. In the meantime, jus recycle and conserve but don't go out of your way for it.

riggedit.com/2017/05/01/the-great-global-warming-swindle-full-movie/

riggedit.com/2017/05/01/global-warming-or-global-governance-full-length/

riggedit.com/2017/05/01/john-coleman-founder-of-the-weather-channel-global-warming-scam/

>billions more in population growth in the coming decades
>massive and growing chinese consumer class

no human impact at all guys, the past 3 years ocean animals just decided to kill themselves en masse for no reason it's all part of god's plan

Yeah, cow farts are destroying the atmosphere.

Climate change is quite real. The problem is that pollution from industrialized civilization throws a curveball into the typical cycles that this planet deals with on a small geological timescale (in the thousands of years).

The increased CO2 output is going to cause a positive feedback affect that is going to result in more erratic weather patterns and a massive shift in biomes.

Human civilization depends on stable, predictable weather patterns with its current population level and distributions.

Why do you think that people are immigrating from regions from the planet that experiencing the most severe symptoms of climate change? A.k.a Africa is flooding into Europe and Eastern Asia.

The problem with cows is the management, not their existence. We feed them stuff that leads to excessive methane production. If we had them grazing the same way that their wild ancestors did, it wouldn't be an issue.

In fact, in grasslands, grazing animals are essential to soil health, but only if they graze in similar patterns to what they would in the wild with predators around. Vegans simply do not understand this, nor do they understand that the environmental impacts of meat production have more to do with management than they do with the animals themselves.

>Global warming could literally be cow farts
It's more like the closest we've officially been told it's bullshit being used to control and extort us that we otherwise have no worries about.

The entire reason the livestock thing was brought up under a global warming context was to push the allotment credits for livestock farmers so the big corporations could then buy out the smaller farmers/ranchers allotments(why work when someone is going to buy all the work you could legally do and make almost as much money) and further consolidate their market share.
>the planet while inciting war.
The current driving factor for the wars we are seeing has dick all to do with oil. It has to do with the grip Israel has on our foreign policy. The war for oil meme has been pushed by leftist for it's anti corporation conclusions. Noam Chomsky has been a big player in pushing that and Cohencidentally he is also a Zionistgatekeeper.

Btw "alternative fuels" only become alternative fuels when they become economically viable just like how oil was an "alternative fuel" to whale blubber. We didn't need anyone to force us to switch because it was a true genuine alternative solar/wind simply aren't economically viable right now(nor will ever be if government would get out of the way of nuclear which already would be the most economically viable energy source of ironicallynot for the green movement)
Otherwise it is an empty political talking point to justify funneling tax dollars to government's cronies in the "alternative energy" sector.

Is it real?
Yes
Is it mostly man made?
Yes
Is it used by the left for their own political agenda?
Yes
Are inbreed rural Americans stupid?
Yes

We've broken the carbon cycle with agriculture, and this started before industrialization. If we focused on the health of soil biology instead of yield, we'd still get the yields that we need, and it would restart the carbon cycle. The planet could probably handle our CO2 emissions if we managed our soil fertility properly.

90% of the world's problems can be solved by severely reducing the human population. Wtf would you want to save people?

yes. the globe is warm.

That pic has dick all to do with climate change or c02 """""""""pollution""""""""""""

That is what happens when a developing nation has yet to develop to where they can actually afford all the things we take for granted now that we've already become wealthy enough to have. Such as paying for our energy production waste to be scrubbed before being released into the atmosphere.

Which we already began doing in America before the federal government even got involved with the creation of the EPA. Of course the government takes full credit despite the trend in decreasing pollution starting years before there was even any federal government action
Shove Malthusianism up your ass alongsidethe rest of the antihumanist fuckwits pushing this doomsaying crap

fascinating.
do you have any sources on your claims? I'm interested.

i have wondered about this....if you add more co2, wouldn't that would trigger more photosynthesis therefore creating more o2 as a byproduct?

Problem is that a lot of the CO2 goes into the oceans to form carbonic acid, therefore increasing ocean acidity and causing its own problems.

Just look at the pic that I posted. Degraded soil is low in organic matter. Rich soil is high in organic matter. Organic matter has a lot of carbon in it. If we build healthy soil, we're using photosynthesis to pump carbon out of the atmosphere and into the ground, and we can build it much faster than most natural processes.

nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/detail/soils/use/?cid=nrcs142p2_054028


youtube.com/watch?v=x1SgmFa0r04

Most farmers leave fields fallow in the winter. That is a mistake. So is using crop residues as silage.

Man man global warming is not real. Its all greeny propaganda. It was global cooling, then global warming, then climate change, later climate disruption. Why this name, because anything that happens on earth can be blamed by humans.

IPCC garbage has been debunked, and the people associated with it shows the dishonesty and corruption of that garbage gathering.

The 97% talking point has been debunked. Its all a propaganda ploy for control of power. Go watch some Tony Heller videos on youtube for a brief intro on some of the basic propaganda the media pushes on you.

We all agree here that we want clean air and clean water. We all want a clean environment, no one refutes that. But if you look at the center of this movement you can see the corruption and money that is being scammed. New technology is good but to say humans have the power to control climate is pretty stupid. What should be the medium temperature be for the earth. No one knows, and the climate cycle is impossible to predict. Every stupid climate model has been wrong. Now the scammers are pushing to model to a 100 years from now because they know we cant refute that model till then.

The climate is changing...
But that doesn't mean there's anything unnatural or devastating going on.
Pic related

>more photosynthesis therefore creating more o2 as a byproduct?
That's why the Earth is currently getting greener both in agriculture and in natural foliage.
It's also why the people saying global warming will lead to droughts and more starving people should be laughed at for not understanding basic plant biology.
More Co2 means plants need significantly less water to grow. And warming temperatures are most concentrated near the poles not the equator which means that huge swaths of Canada and Russia that are currently not viable for people to live and farm on will become as such while the equatorial regions won't be even remotely near as negatively affected as alarmist claim.

I live in Indiana, I'm gonna have beach front property by the time I retire.

If only we had some way to put salts into the ocean to head off the acidity.

Also I see you don't believe in evolution; that a slightly different environment will promote adaption.

How are we going to fight off an alien invasion if there's less than a billion of us and 90% get wiped out on first contact.

plants do not create o2 from CO2, they create oxygen from H2O. CO2 is turned into complex carbohydrates, but the oxygen molecule comes from water.

>and now you know!

thanks for the info lad.

I see you don't understand evolution. It doesn't happen overnight.