Are chads literally closer to monkeys?

Ever noticed how the lower races have a lot more chads? They're basically all chads. Also, ever noticed how the white race seems to have an absolute epidemic of autistic, skinny, fat, ugly, losers etc. All of the 25+ year old virgins, shut-ins etc, never hear about a ton of such people from the lower races do you? Conclusion, evolution of humanity goes from being of this world to being out of this world. From fitting in like a fish in water in earthly life to being an actual alien, constantly clashing with the physical world. Fact.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/channel/UCxcVvBUylGdjCS4jz5PVSag
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertility_and_intelligence
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Life is a struggle. Those who follow the flow of life without adversity are lacking in will and power, hence they are lesser
Be you a balding man saying "oh fuck it, I don't like bald looks, but I'll shave my head" or someone thinking "I don't like my country, but I am to afraid to move", you are throwing away your human nature.

We have overcome nature time and again, those who gave in to it perished. Same with society, degenerate norms must be fought.

>causing your county's ethnic decline by leaving
lolcuck

>basing your values on those around you

Generic bullshit response. Take your attempt at poetry somewhere else.

You are not tied to a people because of birth, but by feeling. We are not animals, we are an intellectual, emotional, spiritual race. You belong to the people you feel you belong to.

I am not causing my kinsmen's decline, but they themselves.
But I care not, I will be a bergjude and die a bergjude

wrong
youtube.com/channel/UCxcVvBUylGdjCS4jz5PVSag

"Lower race" depends really on how you look at it.
From a biology perspective all the fat ugly 25+ virgins are a lower race than any animal, and surely than any human.
What you see today between humans is barely any evolution at all, its simply effects of the society upon us, the only thing that evolves when it comes to humans, is societies.
Being socially retarded or unable to care about your own physique to a bare minimum is not evolution. They are "out of this world" in a way i suppose, but in a negative way.
A dumb human that manages to spread his seed is biologically a higher form of a being than an intelligent one that doesnt.
Of course humans have more ways to value another, but we dont have information to discuss those ways, and we never will. Noone will ever conduct a study of how many "chads" are in a field of science or how many autistic retards are in the field of science.

don't fall for the high IQ equals shit physique meme. Work out and be fit, combine that with high IQ and you are an alpha human.

I'm so glad I'm not an ugly loser who thinks up shit like this.

Please tell me when the name Chadwick became cool too.

thats some depressing shit

Just because you might come across one or two extreme outliers doesn't mean there can't be a clear correlation.

By your logic bacteria are the most evolved species, since they procreate a lot.

>intelligence is negatively correlated with fertility rate

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertility_and_intelligence

parrot

Another generic bullshit response. There are things you can change, and things you can't.

Instead you are one of those drones who never question shit, couldn't think one millimeter outside of the box if your life depended on it, an extreme group thinker, thus proving my point.

>Ever noticed how the lower races have a lot more chads?
>sweden
checks out

No, evolved is not the same as biologically successful.
To be a successful creature in biology you have to survive and procreate. A successful species is a big species or a species thats higher up on the food chain.
But you do raise an interesting point, id say that bacteria are probably the most perfect organisms on earth. The second they appeared they were already in their perfect state.
Also i am not saying intelligent people dont have children. Im saying that a dumb one that does is biologically more successful than an intelligent one that doesnt. And since your post was a dichotomy of either dumb chad or smart social retard. I think it should be very clear why i said that these " smart " people, that are really not so smart at all, are lesser on the scale of biological success than a beetle.

I do suppose that the length of a species is an important thing to note, as evolving does prolong it. But as mentioned, some creatures didnt evolve at all and theyre still here.

It's called having a life bro.
Get one and stop being angry at the world because you're ugly and lack the motivation to change it.

Look up the pretty rat experiment and the population demographics over the last 50 years or so in the west.

I didn't say evolved is the same as biologically successful. YOU said those who spread their genes are "a higher form of being".

>A successful species is a big species or a species thats higher up on the food chain.
Usually the lower on the food chain the higher the reproduction rate. And life evolved from simple organisms to complex organisms, never the other way around. The higher up the food chain the more complex the organism.

>The relationship between fertility and intelligence has been investigated in many demographic studies, with contradicting evidence that on a population level, intelligence is negatively correlated with fertility rate, and positively correlated with survival rate of offspring.

Your posts are so fucking stupid you clearly are a chad.

And your point is? You haven't said a fucking thing that's relevant to the topic. All you've done is prove my point.

>Enlightened = Japanese imperial war flag
Sounds about right.

I guess i misinterpreted what you meant by "higher form or lower form." What i am saying, is that ones that reproduce are more successful than ones that dont, simple as that.
Yes, thats why i said there are more ways to be successful than just one. Though i wouldnt see anything wrong if some would claim that only biomass matters. Sure the higher up the food chain the more complex is the organism, but as ive said, that doesnt necessarily mean its a superior organism in every way. In some surely, but not in all of them. To some not even in the most important way.
If you are a person that considers the IQ to be a number and thats it i suppose i cannot talk to you about intelligence. Recently IQ has been split into a spectrum of different intellectual properties a man can have, you can agree or disagree either is fine and i dont think either is wrong, but one form of intelligence is social intelligence. IF you fail to make friends and if you fail to connect you are not socially intelligent, you are not intelligent on one field of a spectrum. Doesnt mean you cannot be intelligent in other fields, but in this one you are not.

If you want to talk about stupidity you really shouldnt start threads with false dichotomies

niggers have more chads its true. asians have the highest iq and the least number of chads

I dont think its purely based on IQ however, rather on how the people were raised.

>ever noticed how the white race seems to have an absolute epidemic of autistic, skinny, fat, ugly, losers etc.

These people die or are killing countries such as Saudi Arabia, in lower IQ countries they barely make it past birth.

If you're so smart why don't you imitate chad thundercock for own profits and fresh young pussies?
Surely, man of your intelect can do it easily.

Because hes socially retarded and inferior on 1 spectrum of intelligence.
If not OP in specific, most people that argue his points the way he does, certainly do fit the category.

>Swedecuck is so brainwashed by kikes he thinks autistic, skinny, fat, ugly, losers are a product of his race's superiority, and not of fluoride in the water, estrogen/xenoestrogen in food/drinks, excessive sugar, sedentarism, porn addiction, degeneracy, moral relativism, lack of strong family values, spiritual weakness, lack of vitamin D, shitty nutrition in general, and last but not least the utter disgust towards the outside world caused by the same brainwashing that brought himself and his very society to a rut
>doesn't realize even third-world mongrel shitholes such as my country are sick with the same epidemic of autistic, skinny/fat, ugly, loser virgins coming from all strata of society except the very lowest.
What a good goy you've become. Weak, self-hating, and ignorant. Ready to be an eternal slave.

Yes. And civilization is the mechanism which allows life despite various weaknesses. In populations where this civilization process is more advanced you have a higher prevalence of all kinds of defects that civilization allowed to be propagated through the generations. Another thing I've been thinking about is the fact that you tend to be more likely to invest time, money and effort into helping people that have a closer relationship to you, people you are more likely to breed with or be genetically related to as well. A population in which many people have bad eye sight but only very few have lactose intolerance for example is probably more likely to invest resources into eye research than lactose intolerance research. So it becomes self-perpetuating.

>fluoride in the water, estrogen/xenoestrogen in food/drinks, excessive sugar, sedentarism, porn addiction, degeneracy, moral relativism, lack of strong family values, spiritual weakness, lack of vitamin D, shitty nutrition in general, and last but not least the utter disgust towards the outside world
All of those things might play a part, but they might go hand in hand with being more civilized. Porn for example became a bigger problem with the arrival of the internet, and similar relationships exist with all of the above and a lot more.

>third-world mongrel shitholes such as my country are sick with the same epidemic of autistic, skinny/fat, ugly, loser virgins coming from all strata of society
I doubt it. There's a reason all white women spread their legs for third world trash.