/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL
This thread is for Discussion of Libertarianism, Capitalism, AnarchoCapitalism, and the physical removal of communist fags from our board of peace.
>Post sneks
>Bump for Life, Liberty, and Private Death Squads
>Vanilla /lrg/ pastebin- CREATE IF YOU DONT SEE ONE IN THE CATALOG
pastebin.com
/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL - gimme your memes edition
Christopher Ross
Other urls found in this thread:
pdfs.semanticscholar.org
liberalstudies.ca
il-rs.org.br
socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca
iea.org.uk
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
riosmauricio.com
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
telegraph.co.uk
zerohedge.com
youtube.com
en.wikiquote.org
counter-currents.com
twitter.com
Cameron Wood
GENERAL READING LIST (feel free to make suggestions to expand this list)
>Basic Economics - Thomas Sowell
pdfs.semanticscholar.org
>The Law - Frédéric Bastiat
liberalstudies.ca
>Free To Choose - Milton and Rose Friedman
il-rs.org.br
>Nicomachean Ethics - Aristotle
socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca
>Hayek’s The Constitution of Liberty - Eugene F. Miller
iea.org.uk
>Liberalism: In the Classical Tradition - Ludwig von Mises
mises.org
Brandon Lewis
...
Jordan Bell
HOPPE READING LIST
>The Economics and Ethics of Private Property (1993; 2006 2nd edition)
mises.org
>A Short History of Man: Progress and Decline (2015)
mises.org
>Democracy—The God That Failed (2001)
riosmauricio.com
>A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism (1988; 2010 edition)
mises.org
>From Aristocracy, to Monarchy, to Democracy (2014)
mises.org
>The Myth of National Defense: Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production (2003)
mises.org
>The Private Production of Defense (1998; 2006 edition)
mises.org
>Economic Science and the Austrian Method (1995)
mises.org
>What Must Be Done (2009)
mises.org
Dylan Price
...
Jack Parker
MISES READING LIST:
>The Mises Reader Unabridged
mises.org
>The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality
mises.org
>Marxism Unmasked
mises.org
>Profit and Loss
mises.org
>Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis
mises.org
>Human Action
mises.org
>Omnipotent Government: The Rise of the Total State and Total War
mises.org
>Bureaucracy
mises.org
>Liberalism: In the Classical Tradition
mises.org
Nicholas Edwards
Daily reminder that commies aren't people
Aiden James
...
Christopher Evans
Is this corporate bootlicking autist general? I'm assuming I'm in the right thread.
Brody Adams
Fuck yourself you niggerloving commie dipshit.
Charles Powell
kek
Leo Powell
We support small companies over major corporations who are for the most part in cahoots (or however you spell it) with the states and pay for less taxes than smaller companies per x amount of revenue and employee. Obviously the issue is that small companies have to pay high taxes, not that the big ones pay less (fuck them though for being part of the system).
Michael Green
I'm still not a libertarian but at least you articulate it in a way that sounds reasonable.
Eli Cook
Spotted the gommie.
Libertarians using my daughterfu as a poster girl? You guys are alright
Colton Clark
What do my /lrg/ friends think of Jack Donovan and his Barbarian culture? It's look a lot interesting and might be the answer to (((their))) attempts to hinder men's progress in today's society. He's a bit on the fashy goy side but his other views sound quite appealing.
Levi Phillips
Over the last 20 years, since the end of apartheid really, South Africa has really gone to shit. The current socialist president has recently called for the confiscation of all white land & hints at the full removal of whites from the country.
>telegraph.co.uk
At least there is the based Suidlanders civil defense group.
Ryan Diaz
>gommie
but lolbergs are leftists too
Carter Reyes
I'm not familiar, anything specific I should look into?
Yeah I know south African whites are on the brink of being overtly genocide. I hope for the best for them.
Charles Martinez
No. Libertarians are the true Right, natural law and all.
Kinda like NatSoc calls themselves the true left from time to time.
Jose Cooper
...
Jacob Hill
answer the following question: which one is the smallest unit of society?
a) individual
b) family
Isaac Reyes
Good
Connor Gonzalez
youtube.com
He sounds meta as fuck. Advocates male tribalism, paganism, traditionalism, hates PC culture, snowflakes, etc.
>en.wikiquote.org
>counter-currents.com
Isaac Jenkins
Of course Hans is pro genocide.
Angel Wood
Society is built on the actions of the individual; thus the individual is the smallest unit of society. Society could exist without families, however it would be difficult for that to be the case. The family unit is indeed far more efficient than the individual, since the family unit is comprised of individuals whose goals include uplifting one another from a state of futility to a state of usefulness; a state in which the individual would prosper
Oliver Morris
I'd say the individual, you need a mother and a father don't you?
Cooper Clark
see, you guys are leftists. the right wing sees the family as the basic unit of society, not the individual.
David Garcia
Maybe he meant good that the white militia is standing its ground?
Eli Rivera
Also may I add if you have shit individuals, you have shit families.
Family is important, but you need to care for the individuals to have a healthy family.
Isaiah Hall
Just a reminder that socialism fails everywhere it is applied.
Aaron Morales
Lol, get out of here faggotwe don't deny the importance of the family unit.
Cooper Perry
...
Tyler Campbell
no, the choice is mutually exclusive, you can't shill for individualism while claiming you support family values.
Aaron Myers
I bet you think individualism means having orange hair.
You have no clue what individualism is.
Easton Peterson
I'm not denying the importance of the family unit. In a way the family is the basic unit of society, a functional society, but its not absolutely essential
Parker Howard
>you can't shill for individualism while claiming you support family values.
That's retarded. Explain why we can't support both
Cooper Mitchell
The family; the rise of private property is inextricably linked to the rise of the nuclear family and the parental household. When humans evolved from hunter-gatherer societies where no real private property existed other than one's clothes into fixed societies, the concept of a man personally owning the scarce resources which he obtained from Nature also came to be. Instead of collecting berries and small animals to add to the "publicly-owned"/"common" property of the tribe, humans started to develop bonds of love and sympathy for the opposite sex and a desire to nurture their children and love them (r/K selection theory).
This is why the Left (and modern states in general) is hellbent on destroying the nuclear family; Marx and Engels both correctly asserted that destroying the "bourgeois" lifestyle of capitalist countries rested in annihilating the concept of monogamy, kinship and in-group preference. The state stretches its tentacles and attempts to engulf all private institutions, clubs and organizations which may (and do) stand between it and its goal: to become the ultimate master of all humans serving it. The state seeks the absolute loyalty of its followers, who in turn are prohibited to form their own associations and in-group clubs that escape its power.
What better way to tax and expropriate someone than to render him completely defenseless against state power by way of subverting and ultimately destroying all organic social structures that stand in its path?
Zachary Rodriguez
Τι έχεις σβήσει εkεί πέρα;
Nathan Richardson
>see, you guys are totally on the other side of a false dichotomy that definitely exists
Levi Collins
I think pol fucked my ideology up. I'm Libertarian, but I advocate for the preservation of the white race and be willing to work with Nazi's. How did this happen to me?
Ethan Edwards
...
Jaxon Fisher
I'm in the same boat, gotta preserve your people to preserve your liberty
Jordan Lopez
His wife ain't brown.
Hudson Watson
Now I feel regret for having written that long ass post. You're a sad faggot.
Also, that "shitskin woman" isn't brown nor is she stupid, they met when she was taking a post-grad or whatever.
Hunter Gray
His wife is Turkish. She doesn't look bad at all
Gabriel Allen
It's really fucking weird. When Nazis and Libertarians are fighting, I honesty don't know who to side with, I like both.
Kevin Peterson
Just be a reactionary racist libertarian.
Matthew Cooper
Sounds good to me!
Jaxson Fisher
...
John Ramirez
Sup Forums had the opposite effect on me. It drove me to the left after realizing how hollow, parochial, and ultimately indefensible the right's arguments are. When you stop paying attention to the low-hanging fruit of the left and start seriously contemplating what scholars have written, it becomes apparent that most of the people on here simply don't have any idea what they're talking about, and are only voicing the prejudices they acquired long ago, using scanty (and usually dubious) evidence to rationalize them.
Isaiah Fisher
Then why the fuck are you here?
Hudson Cruz
Lefty pol or antifa?
Daniel Rodriguez
To understand the opposition.
Anthony Stewart
Austrian or Chicago school?
Tyler Hernandez
Something is either reasonable or it is not.
Choose one.
William Ross
Why not both?
Easton Price
Saved.
Blake Mitchell
because individualism leads to women's suffrage and their participation in the workforce.
Angel Martin
No that's egalitarianism.
Charles Torres
Neither. I say I was driven to the left, but I meant to the left of Sup Forums. I'm not a communist or anything. I relate most to the post-left anarchists.
Asher Brown
OC
Andrew Perry
so you're an individualist but agree that half the population shouldn't enjoy the same individual freedoms as the other half?
Eli Stewart
>this whole post
you said absolutely nothing of substance. please be specific about what you find indefensible.
Josiah Taylor
JANET YELLEN'S HEAD ON A PIKE
Eli Nguyen
Thoughts on funding college tuition with lotteries?
Even if it's not 100%, anything would be better than 0%. At least then it would be voluntary instead of theft.
Made me think why you aren't allowed to start your own lottery, it removes government power a lot. Makes them small, any way thanks again Libertarians to opening my eyes.
Every time I see a problem in the world, 90% can be traced back to the government fucking shit up somewhere. Makes you wonder who is really there for you. I think we could do a much better job as a community.
Another question: do you think it would be possible to have an AI make our government decisions? As it is not corrupted, it makes sense to me. That leaves us with an corrupt economic system, and there we could use the blockchain. What do you think? Is this what we need?
Jose Stewart
Austrian
Jeremiah Butler
voting is not a freedom or a right. It's only framed as one.
Easton Evans
It only leads to their participation in the workforce if employers choose to employ them. Surely he would not hire women if he has worked with them in the past because men are better at jobs
Ryder Wilson
Because they are opposites in terms of methodology. Austrian school is aprioristic while the Chicago school is positivist.
Cameron James
I believe every individual has a place in the hierarchy, I do not believe all roles are equal. The father guides the family, the mother is the caretaker.
And democracy is egalitarianism also.
Mason Green
this
Daniel Baker
>Thoughts on funding college tuition with lotteries?
lmao in a free market college as we know it wouldn't exist
"tuition would cost maybe a few hundred dollars and would be mostly VR based"
no need for these gigantic schools and sports teams
Joseph Brown
What would you consider left? I support freedom as in you can do whatever you want as long as it doesn't harm anyone. The only thing I would consider myself conservative is family and multiculturalism. I don't really care if we legalise gay marriage but it should not be promoted as normal, being gay is a failure to the gene pool because a humans purpose is to reproduce. There is no evidence that multiculturalism works, it divides a nation more than unites it, as my parents lived in Yugoslavia and people kept to their own community and not trusting any outsiders, resulting in the collapse of the nation.
Bentley Hall
>Austrian school is aprioristic while the Chicago school is positivist.
this is why I like the Austrian school the most. A priori truth > empirically derived laws
Parker Cox
Eh, both capitalist.
Henry Bennett
why wouldn't a woman choose to be a housewife?
opportunities =/= outcomes
Grayson Taylor
Pretty much this. Was also hoping to see others' more developed and educated opinions on them because I'm pretty split between supporting both of them and haven't taken formal high-level courses that focused on them.
Owen Murphy
so let me get this straight
poor and hopelessly unskilled people (low IQ's like me) should support ancap because while they lose out on immediate welfare gains, they gain more in the long-term by decreased prices on everything and a higher standard of living if the rich are absolutely and completely free of regulations?
so in this ancapistan, I would still have to work, but if my needs are low and prices are low, I shouldn't have to work very long or very hard to still live comfortably?
I kind of see how it might work, but this is hard sell desu. The problem is that poor people in general can't really think in the long-term because otherwise they wouldn't be poor anymore. how do you address this problem and convince poor/low IQ fags similar to myself?
preferably not by gassing.
t. NEET
Joshua Jackson
I'm going to post this in every fucking thread until you guys wake up.
Why do you guys suck so much at propaganda?
Where are my infographics I can post when someone brings up the "muh monopolies" argument?
Where are infographics explaining rothbard's explanation for the great depression?
You people are fucking lazy.
Stop working for a living and be meme creating neets for once.
Aiden Lopez
I'm sorry to tell you this but NEETS might starve if they don't live under their daddies money.
Dylan Sanders
>sounds reasonable
>actually being reasonable
There's a difference.
Noah Walker
I pulled it out of my ass
Carson Cox
well if prices are low because the free market makes things cheaper (this is true, right?), then I shouldn't have to worry about that too much if daddy can just spare a few dollarydoos every now and then instead of giving me a check in person with a death-stare about how i need to get a job and gf for grandchildren
Zachary Ross
>"WAAAAAAA PAY FOR MY COMFORTABLE LIFE" the post
Pathetic. You're deluded if you think you have the right to steal our money so that you could support your parasitic and comfy lifestyle
Michael Butler
how so?
doesn't matter how many women they choose to employ, the fact that they're part of the workforce already drives down the wages.
but your place in the hierarchy should be based on individual merit, no? how do you reconcile taking away women's suffrage and working rights with fair individual competition?
>why wouldn't a woman choose to be a housewife?
because if women are part of the workforce, the oversupply of workers drives down wages, making the single income family an unattainable goal for most women.
>opportunities =/= outcomes
how is this egalitarianism though?
Kayden Walker
my mistake. I read your post too fast. I thought you were complaining about not getting gibs
Xavier Wright
>I would still have to work, but if my needs are low and prices are low, I shouldn't have to work very long or very hard to still live comfortably?
Honestly, if there were no central banks. You would only have to work 2 days a WEEK at most.
and this would decrease as living standards do
also you'd be able to retire much earlier.
Nathaniel Morris
this is why you ancap babbies are delusional. you assume the losers in your system would just roll over and accept their fate.
Dominic Wright
Daily reminder the first country to eliminate their central bank and allow free market banking will have the highest living standards on earth within 5 years.
Massive high paying service sector jobs with dominate this country's economy to consume the goods the rest of the world has to produce for it.
The workweek would shrink to 2-3 days a week and people would retire much earlier. This will also lead to more jobs becoming available.
Everyone would have high saving rates. Houses would be inexpensive. Debt would be strongly discouraged economically.
Massive automation would take place as the cost of capital goods would be extremely cheap. This will lead to massive levels of technological innovation.
It would be extremely easy for the average person to start a business due to the cheap cost of capital goods.
Daily reminder that real free markets have prices falling all the time instead is going up. We don't live in anything close to a free market.
Daily reminder America never had a system of free market banking. There were only patches of American history with free market banking. The panics that happened during the 1800s were due to government intervention in the banking sector. Sweden had the longest most successful period of free banking and that's what made them really rich.
Daily reminder the longest period of (relatively)free banking in America coincided with the INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION where wages rose and prices fell.
Daily reminder central banks are the very reason the economy is a pile of shit and our generation is so fucked!
Joseph Perry
>Honestly, if there were no central banks. You would only have to work 2 days a WEEK at most.
Holy shit. Redpill me on this?
Brayden Johnson
>you assume the losers in your system would just roll over and accept their fate.
they are losers for a reason
Joshua King
Ancapistan is about devolving power back to families; power the state has usurped. NEETs would either be subsidized by their families or be forced to adapt and become productive members of society, lest they wanted to fall behind.
David Howard
ok cool that doesn't sound too bad. i am trying to understand ok, you must see that for the lowest of society's low this is difficult to fully grasp because we are just not very bright
but I also want to ask: does this also mean there would be more jobs available and less competition for them? is there any guarantee that low skilled jobs will even still be there or would everything become automated and jobs for the lowest of society's low goes away?
Lincoln Wilson
I'm gonna call you a faggot trap-lover everyday until you change your nihilo-Libertarian ways.
Faggot.
Caleb Green
I did those blue and black & white Hoppe quotes and pic related. Might do one on immigration entirely soon.
Cooper Harris
Maybe slavery could be brought back
Henry Moore
>be loser NEET with no future
>local warlord recruits you
>your job is now to take other people's private property by force
in case you were wondering what happens to young men who got nothing going for them in a decentralized society
Elijah Scott
>Redpill me on this?
see:
dude trust me
its the ultimate redpill
even Sup Forums itself is too cucked to accept the centralbankpill
IMAGINE A WORLD where your wages rise all the time, while prices fall all the time, while your savings rate increases all of the time, where you could put money into a savings account and the interest rate would be like 8-14%
Over time you would bargain for jobs that had lower hours, you would find jobs that allowed this.
Christian Cruz
>but I also want to ask: does this also mean there would be more jobs available and less competition for them? is there any guarantee that low skilled jobs will even still be there or would everything become automated and jobs for the lowest of society's low goes away?
There would be more jobs, but competition would be higher. Think with me: if we remove state regulations (minimum wage laws, price fixings, red tape, corporate taxes, copyright/IP laws, etc.) and essentially make everyone free to sell and buy to whomever they want, competition would be much bigger than we have today. We would have a much more diverse and varied selection of products to meet even greater and more varied consumer demands. NEETs like yourself who aren't very bright and/or skilled would probably have to shape up or resign to lower paying jobs that are heavy on human capital or lack workers. You wouldn't have state welfare too, so you'd better become a responsible and peaceful member of the community in order for other people to want to help you get back on your feet. Private charities and clubs, and what-not.
Carter Davis
>does this also mean there would be more jobs available
yes
as the price of capital comes down it becomes easier and easier for anyone to start a business
there would be a massive service sector economy, massive chucks of land would be just for amusement parks and restaurants and shit
>is there any guarantee that low skilled jobs
It's funny. What this process also does, is lowers the skill level for all jobs while increasing the wage. There will be high paying jobs that don't require much skill.
>lowest of society's low goes away
You mean homeless. They'll never work anyway. Society would have so much disposable income that they would be able to take care of them easily.