How biased this pic is this?
How biased this pic is this?
Jesus is blonde with blue eyes.
The romans didnt look like that, they didnt have spartan helmets.
black egyptian
really disinterested looking native american in the corner like
>who the hell is this guy this he is
>nigger cant even see all the colors of the wind
Wrong
>Jesus isnt portrayed as a 150cm brown big nosed kik
AmericanChristianity/10
>@Kangswood
It's another Sup Forums falls for its own trolls episode
For it is written, As I live, saith the Lord, every knee shall bow to me, and every tongue shall confess to God.
Christianity is white man religion.
Cool pic
Also
>KANGZ
love that pic who made it are there any more like it?
Very. Jesus was a lot darker than that.
Also, he is a con artist, not a saint, and was never resurrected.
nah
Is that Aragorn?
this
Not even religious, pic is based AS FUCK man.
It's also missing a Soldier from WW1, I'll let it off this time though just don't fuck up next time whoever made this.
proofs?
>that black Pharoah
WE WUZ KANGZ MY NIGGA
proofs that would refute his proof
youtube.com
Buncha fags going crazy for a man yup pretty accurate.
is that Aragorn son of Arathorn ?
He's not black just in the shadow, look at some other people that are clearly supposed to be white, their skin is sand nigger colour, so sand nigger skin of the pharoah would become nigger colour.
>that disgusting nose
>those awful autism lips
Ew
the affirmative claim carries the burden of proof
this isn't proof. this is pseudo intellectual con man babble. this is the type of speech that entraps the gullible
Look at the nose nigga. He's a Kang my nigga
>lol didnt read
ok
not baised at all, that will happen irl 100%
>whatsapp
using US gov botnet
Hello Schlomo, had your daily ration of foreskins today?
I see a bunch of gullible goyim sacrificing their lives for nothing more than Zionism, praising a non-existent, non-white, Jewish messiah who the Jews themselves proclaim is a false idol. So yes I'd say that pic is biased, but everything is.
jesus had short hair
You must mean based. And very based.
OP asked if it was biased, not based. GG
>the affirmative claim carries the burden of proof
this was the affirmative claim that i said "nah" to
> Jesus was a lot darker than that.
> Also, he is a con artist, not a saint, and was never resurrected.
>atheist intellectuals
Why is the samurai bowing?
Is the black guy a ethiopian or some shit?
He doesn't look like a pharaoh, he looks like he's wearing jaguar skin and a spear
did read. it makes the same faults right from the start. if a one page essay can prove all this then the vatican library is a massive waste
grow up, user
Are you fucking blind?
and it's also blatant marketing literature for "the jesus-seminar"
>women don't matter
lul
This would make a good "I came" picture.
you're somewhere between the yellow and the orange
>blatant marketing literature for "the jesus-seminar"
go read about what that is
en.wikipedia.org
it's bad:
en.wikipedia.org
having a conclusion you will not waver from and then seeking out only the material to prove your indelible conclusion is ignorance
There is no pharaoh in the picture.
Then who is this kang?
>en.wikipedia.org
hmm, so you agree with a Christian that the methodology of the Jesus seminar was faulty because of naturalistic presuppositions.
Jesus in my church looks like Thor. I'm Ok with this.
It always pisses me off that the Roman's scutum (shield) is for some reason next to the Spartan. What the fuck.
>spartan with roman shield
Kys.
Damn. I never even saw that sneaky bastard. Kind of makes me wonder if I've been missing things like this my whole life.
My whole reality has changed now.
Fuck you.
Make it go back to the way it was before.
who is he?
just stop. you are looking more mentally unstable. go to school and get a job
Why is there two roman soldiers and a greek with a roman shield?
Also: WE WUZ KANGZ!
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA the painter had to add at least one woman to not be treated as misogynist and he put her in the corner xD
Correction, three roman soldiers and a greek with a roman shield
let me make it clearer so you'll know how embarrassed you should be.
the criticism being levied at the jesus seminar's methodology that you've pointed out is that the Christian thinks the scholars that make up the comittee are coming from a worldview where miracles do not exist.
they have predetermined conclusions. that's all you need to worry about and it comes from another christian.
be embarrassed.
DELETE THIS
BOG?
Why is there a nigger pharaohs?? This paint is profane.
>predetermined conclusions
what he is complaining about is that they are being too scientific in their examination of the evidence when examining the history of Christ.
that should make them even more credible as an authority to cite for atheists, not less.
This is closer to what jesus looked like. he got the red hair from the King Davids line and God Himself.
update: these mods are fucking retarded. I got warned for posting a thread about the CURRENT FUCKING NEWS REGARDING HAND SIGNS and they say it must be related to current fucking political news. these antifa faggotmods are ruining Sup Forums REEEEE!!!!
hnnnnnnnnnnnnngg
>How biased this pic is this?
Buddha and the Bodhi Tree of Life?
>Also, he is a con artist, not a saint, and was never resurrected.
He never died. If I was up for capital execution I would stage my death by drinking a mild poison, buy off the gambling guards, have a new trap-door sepulcher built for me and escape into the night.
I'd also tell the women to pretend they had seen me rise from the grave after I had a few days lead time. Can't trust a woman, amiright?
>If I was up for capital execution I would stage my death by drinking a mild poison
how would you make it so that you didn't die from the scourging? or asphyxiation from being nailed to a cross for 3 days? or the deathblow?
how would you walk?
>god
>redhead
god created the first man in his own image, and the first man was in africa, ergo god is a black man
Vikings didn't wear horned helms.
...
>israel in Africa
What the fuck is autism lips!?
This is a photograph. No bias included
>how would you make it so that you didn't die from the scourging?
Poison slows blood flow so you don't exsanguinate. Why did Jesus refuse the wine and myrhh? Because it would have thinned his blood.
>or asphyxiation from being nailed to a cross for 3 days?
Poison reduces the need for oxygen. The shallow breaths minimize the lung compression
>or the deathblow?
Jesus was apparently crucified WEARING fine garments - remember the Roman soldiers were casting lots to see who would get them. Gambling soldiers can be bought. So all he had to have was a wineskin of pig blood under his robe to fool the people.
The way he was nailed to the cross could have been through the skin with nail underneath the bone to support the skeleton
>how would you walk?
You're making the assumption that his crucifixion was routine. Remember he did not have his legs broken as was customary and he was not left on the cross like all the other condemned.
...
I like how the Indian is just enjoying himself.
God is a Melinated Woman. Research real Black History.
>tiny assault rifle
>gothic plate is wrong
>roman legionaire's shield is tossed over to the other side
>spartan from "300"
>non-classical age sword with said spartan
>viking with horned helmet
>female soldier
>WE WUZ KANGS Egyptian
>stoned look on Jesus's face
>made up helmet design on the far left
>half these cultures never did or ever would believe in Christ
>He Curly haird
>He blek
>Bethlehem
>He lookin laik dis
What the fuck, check ém
makes much more sense when someone edits their waifu in
>Spartans
>Roman
get good at brains.