You trumptards talk shit about the Berkley kids that chimp out about their safe space being invaded by people that just want to make a speech, but then when some comedian starts telling jokes about your replacement father figure then you cry to the FCC.
You are no better, hypocrites.
>what do we do to stop the feminists from getting men to lose their jobs over harmless jokes on twitter?
>HE MADE A GAY JOKE, KILL HIM WITH FIRE
GORF
I agree with you on this one, lefty.
>muh reduction fallacy
it's like they don't realize by doing this, they are only perpetuating the system purport to hate in the first place.
Where were you when bill oreilly got fired, hypocrite?
Bait
CBS is legally required to have some decency, its public programming.
>Getting more people to hate a system is perpetuating the system.
You must be one of them retards.
Who cares? Colbert has the best ratings ever since he went hard on Trump. He surpassed Jimmy Fallon by a ridiculous margin yesterday.
The #FireColbert shit is clearly not working in Sup Forums's favor.
look up poetic justice
it fits colberts homophobic backlash to a t.
:-)
O'reilly had high ratings for over a decade. Doesn't matter.
bbc.com
It's an inflammatory post, but I'm actually ashamed though not surprised. Both sides of the political spectrum basically want others to "do as I say, not as I do".
>accelerationist spotted
>implying we actually give a shit about what that cunt says
we're just having fun encouraging them to eat eachother. Colbert is high enough up the media chain to make it worth it to get rid of him.
Yeah at first I thought it was a funny joke about liberal double standards, but then I began to see that a sizable minority on pol want to see the left silenced. That is fucked up and wrong.
Colbert was better when he acted like an asshole. Now he is an asshole acting like a nice person. That, and he is only funny when acting like a conservative retard.
Stephen Colbert didn't sexually assault anyone, last I heard.
What this guy said.
What does that have to with high ratings?
Jokes? That was Colbert being a passive aggressive little bitch. You cock suckers lost and lost hard. Stop wasting everyones time. Go regroup and figure out where you went wrong. I'd tell you to stick around and learn something but you're clearly too stupid to learn anything here.
Unless Colbert sexually assaults someone, he is not gonna be fired. Not while he surpasses every other late show.
No one is calling for acts of violence or censorship of Cobert, libshit.
It's the double standard of political correctness, in which it's fine to make homophobic jokes, as long as they come from the lips of a leftist who has the stamp of approval from (((the system))).
Dont blame the player, blame the game.
If you dont like the rules, then fucking change them
>You are no better, hypocrites.
Who cares. I don't care.
Faux outrage is fun. It's like a feeding frenzy laser pointer for libshits.
Our outrage is to piss you off, your outrage is to look like a good person online.
>RULE 4:
Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.
>RULE 8:
Keep the pressure on. Never let up.
>RULE 12:
Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
I love how leftists are completely incapable of understanding anything non-literal. You probably think that #endfathersday was about getting back at daddy.
Naw. I don't support one size fits all strategies.
That said, it's obviously true that if you make something unbearable, most people will want it to change.
...
Serious fucking retard spotted. It's so easy to game you libshits it's fucking ridiculous.
Sites you should be reading:
Radix Journal:
radixjournal.com
Counter-Currents:
counter-currents.com
Occidental Observer:
theoccidentalobserver.net
Alt-Right dot com:
altright.com
American Renaissance:
amren.com
VDare:
vdare.com
The Alternative Hypothesis:
thealternativehypothesis.org
HBD Portal:
humanbiologicaldiversity.com
My thoughts exactly
>you change the game by playing by the rules
wew
ehh, there's some merit to this, but i believe it to be ineffective
>everyone who calls me a stupid is a libshit
>ouroboros tactics surely will work in dismantling that which i do not approve
Imagine if a late night tv host said 'the only thing obamas mouth is good for is being the Iranian supreme leaders cock holster.'
Imagine if Hillary had won and a late night tv host said 'the only thing her mouth is good for is being George soros cock holster.
Imagine the fucking bitching and blackballing that would commence
>pol is one ideology
the public has always had movements in which 'art' or 'culture' that was deemed unacceptable had people up in arms about it, until the owner decided to shut it down themselves.
Nobody has to listen to our demands at all.
Nobody is being forced to do anything. If anything, there was nothing we could do about the feminists getting people out of work, because there was no legal reason to.
It's like complaining about getting shot by a gun in the middle of a war, and screaming 'hypocrite' at the enemy as they stand over you. If you want to change these circumstances, then how about instead of whining about them, try and make the situation in which they are deemed necessary no longer existent?
>It's an inflammatory post, but I'm actually ashamed though not surprised. Both sides of the political spectrum basically want others to "do as I say, not as I do".
Liberals constantly pull this to Republicans. Why in Gods name should they hold back and be "above this"? How does this help Republicans at all?
That
THIS IS WAR YOU INSANELY RETARDED FAGGOT
THEY USE DIRTY TACTICS, WHY SHOULD WE PLAY FAIRLY???
No, dipshit. You change the game by changing the rules. Otherwise you must EXPECT people to play this 'game' to their full advantage. You really are the stupid libshit that people claim you to be, since you're locking us up in some arbitrary cage of 'muh morals' just because you don't like how society operates on one level. You are no different from the libshits, SJW's or the christcucks who bitch about everything.
IF YOU WANT TO CHANGE THE GAME, THEN CHANGE THE GAME. Until you do, people will continue to play this game to its fullest.
>OUTRAGE IS ONLY LEGITIMATE WHEN I DO IT
I don't even care about any of this bullshit.
It pleases me just to know that the people that do are suffering. MAGA!
Like you know shit about anything someone in another country does behind closed doors.
Sponsors must be getting ready to bail on Colbert judging from the amount of leftist squealing going on. Keep up the pressure.
honestly feel bad for how you brain must feel having to waste energy firing neurons to produce thoughts like this
Using libtard tactics against libtards is funny as fuck, you moron faggot
saged
is that why we are doing it? because we got triggered? because we need a safe space.. lol ok
>mfw lefty using our tactics trying to keep us from using their tactics
I know, right? thinking must be a very hard task for you, since it's quite apparent that you do not understand why it is important to set the rules so that they don't inadvertently subsidize such behavior, rather than just making stupid arbitrary rules to suit your gay fee fees.
Nice job responding with a non-argument anyway, stupid fuck.
Taste of your own medicine. Please, cry more
sage
>responding to an ad hominem argument that has no premises or a conclusion that follows using sound reasoning and is not circular
>expects me to actual come back at him with an argument
I just enjoy people yelling hypocrisy just because liberal idiots can't even play by their own rules.
I don't even give a shit about colbert, he stopped being funny after CC. Keep dancing, though.
This talking point is insane. Liberals get people fired all the fucking time for shit like this the one time Republicans attempt something like this they call them hypocrites? Are you fucking insane? Liberalism as a philosophy is about the rights of the individual above all else how are Liberals not hypocrites here?
You should look at the politics subreddit when shit like this happens. Absolute salt mine.
>doesn't know what ad hom means
>claims he's being ad hom'd because someone called him stupid
Wew.
plebbit is two doors down to the left
Really make me think
When someone hits you you hit back
>Wahhh I was only trying to berate and demean you how dare you try to berate and demean me... you you hypocrits!
Ideals are things that come in the end until then you must beat anyone that gets in your way.
Learn the Truth
>We dont like being held to the same rules/standards we force on others
think you might need to go reread what an ad hom argument is, kiddie
shouldn't have dropped out of school
They're using your tactics against you. It's not hypocrisy because the principle isn't political correctness, it's political warfare. The left made the rules to this game, and the right thinks they should die by them.
Upset we're using leftist tactics? Too bad.
>pol is one ideology
I never said that. I'm well aware there are many people here that aren't r/the_donald stooges and that this placed used to be more skewed towards lolbertarianism before the 2016 election.
Furthermore people shooting guns is not comparable to people shooting their mouth. You're free to make complaints to "big bad gubmint" about a comedian talking shit on TV, but by doing so you can't complain about leftists whining about safe spaces without being a hypocrite.
So only the lefties are allowed to complain? Why cant we hold them to their same moronic standards? Why shouldnt they suffer from the very issue they created?
>say something offensive get fired
These are the rules SJWs wanted, we're just making sure they're followed by all.
>the best ratings
Which are still shit because TV is a dying medium.
Wow not even 1/2 of 1/2% of the population of the country watch his show on any given night, he's really knocking em dead!
Ad hom:
Your argument is wrong because of x character trait.
Me calling you stupid while arguing alongside another point: Not ad hom.
Wow! dumbfuck btfo how will you ever recover.
>I never said pol was one ideology
>'Both sides of the political spectrum basically want others to "do as I say, not as I do"
Not everyone on pol is saying just that. Not every ideology is decrying trying to get people fired for having dissenting viewpoints. Therefore, your claim that both sides are 'do as I say and not as I do' is incorrect
>but by doing so you can't complain about leftists whining about safe spaces without being a hypocrite.
At what point are you going to concern troll how liberals are hypocrites for starting this since liberalism is the ideology of individual freedoms first and foremost and getting someone yanked off tv because they said something you didn't like is that.
This, fuck leftists
you mad fag?
Honestly dude you sound like a total faggot and a bitch.
>b-b-but muh hypocrisy
Eat shit lol.
>muh hypocrisy
Lel, grow up.
>brainlet detected
you didn't make an argument
probably because you don't know what the structure of an actual argument is, and don't know about validity or soundness
>listening to molyneux makes people this dumb
>Comedian
Colbert has been a propagandist for years.
Yeah, it would be mean and wrong of us to want to silence the people who have unashamedly been silencing us for years, we wouldn't want to sink to their level and win or something. Better defeat with honor than victory at any cost.
>You're free to make complaints to "big bad gubmint" about a comedian talking shit on TV, but by doing so you can't complain about leftists whining about safe spaces without being a hypocrite.
It's about holding the left to their own standards. Remember that woman who got a man fired for making a single joke at a conference? Or all those people baying for blood when that guy who helped land a probe on a comet wore a shirt with sexy women on it? Or how about Sam Hyde getting his show cancelled because it appealed to the alt-right? Pewdiepie making Nazi jokes got the WSJ writing to his sponsors.
These people have no honour, if you don't behave how they want they will try to have you fired. If a right wing comedian had made the same joke he would get shit on by SJWs. So we're holding them to their own standards. If we don't they' just carry on. Why would they ever change if they learn they can get people fired for being offensive but their own people can be equally as offensive but we won't do shit about it?
My argument: Change the rules if you want people to play by the rules in which you envision. That way, you have legal grounds to punish them, as compared to just you screeching at them.
your argument: 'Wow it must take much hurt brain! Brainlet lolol! AD HOM AD HOM AD HOM AD HOM'
>Colbert has been a propagandist for years.
I will never understand how autists here say he was good or based on the Colbert Report but only got bad now. He was worse then. How is not being a living breathing strawman hyperbole of a side you dislike whose existence is to dishonestly portray the mindeset of the opposing side a good thing? Sometimes I question the intelligence of people who post here when they think things like that?
>i swear i really know what an argument is
>doesn't know how to make one
>this placed used to be more skewed towards lolbertarianism before the 2016 election.
If by lolbertarianism you mean national socialism, then yeah.
I'd say third reich nostalgia threads and doom paul threads were comparable in number.
>Change the rules
We'd rather just set the board on fire and play a new game when it's over, a game of our choosing.
Why they would follow your rules? Just because you said so? They need a reason, first you need to demonstrate that the rules they are using now are bad, dumbfuck
I'm glad you posted this, we should really use rule 12 on the anti free speech, racist, and homophobic talk show host Stephen Colbert.
We must use his anti free speech rules against him so that he cannot force his anti free speech rules on us.
if you changed the rules, then you would have the legal grounds to punish them. For example, weed. If you made weed legal, then those who are punished for smoking it will no longer be punished for as such.
If you want to punish people for tax loopholes, then fix the loopholes, and the people trying to use these loopholes will be arrested, if they continue to do so after the law's change.
This. Nothing could more accurately describe my political views than this. Brexit, Trump, Le Pen, I want some wild destabilising changes that will give us something new
Suck a dick, faggot. You little ass pirates go cry about meanie words on the internet and get people fired all the time. Game ain't so fun when the rabbit's got the gun, is it? Just wait until "punch a commie" comes around; you're REALLY going to dig that game.
This. A thousand times.
Who the fuck told you we were looking for a fair fight? I bet you are the same kind of asshole who thinks we shouldn't lock up Hillary either
Are you retarded? It was the marxist morons LARPing as Sup Forums's NatSoc to make him fired. We are pro-free speech. Even if he said horrible things, it is HIS IRIGHT
We aren't talking about law and you still haven't answered me, why would they follow your rules?
>Who the fuck told you we were looking for a fair fight?
I think he's been talking to jeb
We should destroy the Left, because we are the Right. Simples. The Left are the sode of ethnic erasure and replacement. The Right are the side of White identity, survival & prosperity. Alinksy tactics are effective, the Left does not have a monopoly on them.
>HUUUUUUUU HUUUUUUUU HUUUUUUUU HUUUUUUUUUUUUU HUUU HUUU HUUUUUUUUUUUUU W-WHYYYY ARE YOU USING OUR TACTICS AGAINST US HUUUUUUUUUU HUUUUUUUUUUUU HUUUUUUUUUUUUU HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU!
Honestly, BTFOing liberals is like fluffy abuse. There is a perverse joy to destroy them using their own tactics, to humiliate them utterly with their own weapons, and then to simply ignore their complaints of unfairness.
You invented this shit, Lefty, so you get to die on it. We aren't the FCC, we aren't the screeching SJWs asshurt at him, we just started the fire. Your fault for being covered in oil.
>it's a racist homophobic bigot gets to spew his hateful rhetoric on TV because he's a "comedian" and it's "satire" and if you disagree you just "can't take a joke" episode
you're the one who just entered the conversation, not me. I was and always have been talking about law.
Maybe it's an impossible pipe dream, but it's better than just accepting shit as it is and as our kikey overlords have planned out.
>punch a commie
The problem is that /leftypol/ are actually NEETs and would never put themselves in a comprising situation in which they could be put in their place.
Come on, really? Is this what passes for bait these days? Is OP even trying anymore? Oh but what generosity! Everyone is giving OP free (you)'s! I have never seen such kindness towards such a poor soul in my life! It really brings a tear to my eye, seeing all the good souls on this board taking such pity on poor OP! Now OP has enough (you)'s for his daily bread and it's all thanks to YOU!!!
Thank you.
We'll be pro free speech once we have the culture. For the time being the left has the culture and comedians can't make certain offensive jokes because the left will get triggered and do everything they can to get them fired. So if that's the game, everyone will be made to follow those rules. Once the left realises that actually it's pretty shitty to get someone fired over a joke you don't like maybe they'll change their minds. But if they're never put in that situation they'll never think about their actions.
Ss you aren't going to respond? Alright then
>You
I remember when people on this site used to know the difference between classical liberalism and authoritarian neo-liberalism.
Then Trump got elected.