My father viewed thousands of child abuse images over many years, but rather than accept his guilt, he blames my wife and me for ‘refusing to move on’ because we no longer let him see our young daughters
>I learned of the arrest one summer morning a few years ago, when my father rang with the news: “This is very difficult for me to say. I’ve been using the internet to look at pictures of children, and I’ve been arrested. Now, because of your girls, social services are going to need to talk to you …”
>hey daughter >yeah dad >check out this sweet boipucci >*turns laptop around to reveal aforementioned boi pucci* >wtf dad!? Ewww >YOU HAVE TO ACCEPT ME YOU BIGOT
Nolan Jackson
>This is why the recent recommendation of chief constable Simon Bailey, the lead on child protection for the National Police Chiefs’ Council, makes me so angry.
>Bailey has proposed not prosecuting viewers of child abuse images categorised as the least serious, referring to a lack of resources to deal with the large number of people committing these crimes. My understanding is that even if Bailey’s recommendations were put into practice, my father’s crimes would still have been serious enough to warrant prosecution. Nevertheless, the message Bailey is sending out plays into the hands of the perpetrators, and all those who seek to minimise the seriousness of viewing these images.
>Perpetrators only get to hear the frank, unflinching words of a judge when a case is prosecuted, and in my opinion it was crucial that my father heard these words. For people like my father, the last thing we should be doing is strengthening the arsenal of arguments they can use to say that what they were doing was not that bad after all. Shining a light on these dark crimes is, in my opinion, the best way to counter them, and prosecution plays an important part in doing this. Sunlight, as they say, is the best disinfectant.
Brayden Mitchell
slippery slope isn't real, goy.
Christopher Thompson
I wonder when SJWs will accept pedophilia just like the fucking Muslims?
The Austrian president will then just say "all kids should be raped by pedophiles for solidarity purposes".
Joseph Gutierrez
>entire article is about how fucked up pedophilia is >SLIPPERY SLOPE SLIPPERY SLOPE How does it feel to have very low IQ?
John Adams
see
Cooper Smith
Don't yuck my yum! *liberals actually say this
Nathan Roberts
...
Lincoln Hall
Remember when we were afraid to respect faggots? Remember when people said it would lead to things like pedophilia and bestiality? Remember when people laughed and said slippery slope is not an argument? Remember when Canada made it ok to suck dog dick?
Evan Anderson
>even these fruitcakes reproduce >but not the autist
Oliver Lee
>implying all consumers of child pornography started with child pornography rather than escalated to it in search of novelty after consumption of normal pornography was no longer exciting enough
William Ross
>Bailey has proposed not prosecuting viewers of child abuse images categorised as the least serious This is how images of child abuse are categorized according to seriousness: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/COPINE_scale
In this context, presumably we're talking about the "Sexual Offences Definitive Guideline" section where >Category A: Images involving penetrative sexual activity and/or images involving sexual activity with an animal or sadism >Category B: Images involving non-penetrative sexual activity >Category C: Other indecent images not falling within categories A or B So Category C I suppose is the one that would not fall under prosecution. I guess this means nudist type images since I doubt they prosecute people viewing images of clothed children because of how vague and in-the-eye-of-the-beholder any definition of "suggestive posing" can be. However, production of images involving clothed child models can be criminal. See: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_erotica#A_Little_Agency >the judge assigned to the case, Chief Judge Campbell, denied the motion to dismiss, noting that the U.S. Supreme Court has determined fully clothed pictures can be considered pornographic I wonder if that means people viewing images produced by the mentioned company are prosecuted in the US for child porn.
Nicholas Walker
Bump for anti-porn message.
Dylan Ross
When we live in a time when drawings in retarded countries like the UK, Australia, the UK, the UK, the UK, oh, and did I mention the UK? classify as "child abuse images," I take stuff like this with a grain of salt...
Hudson Rivera
Kek
Levi James
>viewing drawn porn is a crime Since fucking when?
Anthony Wilson
...
Chase Martin
I think they should move on. In this case the man is just guilty of looking at pixels. Thats not a real crime. And why cant he father his children? It's not a valid excuse to deprove a man of his children, that he looked at a pictures. People need to move on.
Robert Turner
It's written by his son who doesn't want his father to be around his daughters (i.e. granddaughters). Can't blame him. Would you want your pedo father around your daughters?
Your reasoning is basically exactly the reasoning the son is arguing against. "It's nothing, just pixels". Dude, if you spend your time masturbating to images of children, something is wrong. The dad's stash included a video of a toddler being raped.
