@WikiLeaks is still assessing content

>@WikiLeaks is still assessing content.

>still assessing

>still

>WikiLeaks states that it has never released a misattributed document. Documents are assessed before release. In response to concerns about the possibility of misleading or fraudulent leaks, WikiLeaks has stated that misleading leaks "are already well-placed in the mainstream media. [Wikileaks] is of no additional assistance."

web.archive.org/web/20110813024350/http://www.newstime.co.za/WorldNews/Wikileaks_:_Is_Julian_Assange_a_hero_villain_or_simply_dangerously_naïve/16065/

This isn't adding up. Wikileaks have always run on credibility alone and the Macron leaks are looking as if they could destroy that.

Is Assange still in control? I have my doubts.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0T_h7pSVIFo
rt.com/uk/363672-russian-navy-fleet-channel/
file.wikileaks.org/file/podesta-emails/)
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Friendly reminder of bizarre tweets that occurred after the internet blackout.

Remember when they gave the video proving Assange was alive? They never did. Why not? Seems simple enough.

due that data is alredy public you faggot...

Only a fucking idiot would leak there anymore. I mean really...

How about all of the times he's come to the window since then. Oh right he never has. It didn't seem too difficult before.

I'm sure the media won't blame them if this is proven fake.

JUST GO TO THE WINDOW

This sure seems to fit the narrative that Wikileaks is owned by muh Russia. Why make such a dumb statement?

exactly! why the fuck won't he do it?

Because he is no longer behind any windows.

I haven't been on board with the idea that Assange has been killed or compromised until recently. This shit stinks too much. Looking back at everything since they shut his internet off shows how out of character all of this is. There were so many questions they swept under the rug and then put out a fake photo to prove it's all cool still. I'm not buying it anymore.

when was his internet shut off?

youtube.com/watch?v=0T_h7pSVIFo

Assange ran for a Russian submarine.
Rumor is he is somewhere along the euro/ russian border.

Remember that the Russians was "accidentally" running parts of their fleet trough the Canal that day ?

And the weird fucking tweets fom Cryptome at the same time ?

He is not in London, for sure.
But he is alive. They cant reveal that he was saved by Putin.

...

>Remember that the Russians was "accidentally" running parts of their fleet trough the Canal that day ?
No

Wanna add, that boat was the one that spews out a comical amount of smoke. Enough to stop satellite visual.

Was some talk about a mini sub in those cryptome tweets too if I remember right.

this was when they moved the NATO nukes from Turkey to Romania. after the failed CIA coup against Erdogan.

what's the context for these 2 photos?

rt.com/uk/363672-russian-navy-fleet-channel/

Let's not forget these. These happened just as Assange's internet was shut off. I can't recall any explanation ever given for them.

Macronleaks ins't initiated/published/leaked by Wikileaks you moron(s).
Wikileaks also found the links to it like everyone else and just spreads it further, also discussing and analyzing it.

bro, can you even read??
Also that line of code was probably copy pasted from a russian stack exhange

Please explain how this fits the "muh wikileaks is russia" narrative, I don't think you actually can.

You're right. It will be so hard to ruin their credibility when their twitter is pasted in Macron leaks. No one will think they were pushing it.

i think what op is getting at is that it's meant to look fake and therefore ruin wikileak's reputation.

these were an automated response to his internet being shut down. They basically published the md5 hashes of the files they have so when/if they release them, they can be verified as the files previously mentioned.

Generally yes. All of this is out of character with Wikileaks before Oct. 16, 2016.

can you dumb this shit down for me. what does that mean? what are those files?

bump

They haven't published anything.

And they have been critical of the leaks since receiving them. The media already claims they are a russian propaganda piece. This changes nothing for people who already accept wikileaks as a valid source.

those are not files, they are checksums of files.
You can create a 'fingerprint' of a file or an archive of files, so people can check and make sure they were not altered before their receipt.

>False flag, incompetence, intentional Russian signaling, or happenstance.

Pic related.

It's a matter of slowly devaluing their credibility until they aren't taken seriously by the public anymore. What good is the dead man's drop if most people think it's fake?

attribution is a bitch when everyone knows how the game is played

If you want wikileaks to read through decades worth of documents in a day or two, how about donating a few shekels you cheap fuck.

>we know the source is real but are still looking through its contents

are you retarded? why do I have to spell this out for you?

I don't see how it matters when every time they do publish something it turns out to be true. People can deny facts all day. Hell you've seen it happen on Sup Forums too. They are still facts.

close, they aren't MD5, they're SHA2

These emails weren't released by wikileaks.

Of course they're "still assessing" them you retard. It's 9 GIGABYTES of emails, in French, with all kinds of references an outsider wouldn't understand without research and cross-referencing. The Podesta email archives were only 2.8 GB in total (file.wikileaks.org/file/podesta-emails/) and took many months for both WL and the entire internet to analyse.

I would have thought they assess it's validity before releasing, then assess the actual content afterwards.

sorry, im working from memory here but i should have been able to tell from looking at them and from the md5 vulnerabilities

Wikileaks lost control when assange's power went out last year. Most of them are probably dead

This

i think in the past they combed through them and edited out info that might lead to someone being hurt while checking the validity

It was leaked by Sup Forums not by wikileaks. They're assessing the validity of the leaks because they aren't the original distributor.

Assange probably has a deal with the russians of some sort.

they're rehosting publicly available data, not publishing shit

it's sad that you think we're this stupid because it's always projection

Any sightings of Pamela Anderson? Since he's banging her.

I remember one was a proof of life picture when a guy sent a package with a camera in it to the embassy. But it turned out to be a photoshop from three years before.