Reddit is defending pedophiles

...

Other urls found in this thread:

faqs.org/childhood/Pa-Re/Pedophilia.html
bjp.rcpsych.org/content/179/6/482
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

This is how it begins. Pretty soon you will be walking down the street and see a 40 year old man with his 11 year old girlfriend.

RWDS needs to happen soon, or I'll be out there solo shooting pedos in the dick and then the face

Whenever you see someone posting pics of underage girls on Sup Forums, you can reply with this picture and accuse them of being a redditor. That'll hurt them more than accusing them of being a pedophile

And logically speaking why is that untrue? They're defending pedophllic thoughts not convicted pedophiles, free thought is the cornerstone of Western civilization. It's like saying someone who fantasizes about being a serial killer but never acts on those urges is somehow guilty. Perhaps the thoughts are heinous and wrong but the point is their just thoughts. Sounds like you're just trying to jump on the 'le reddit' meme with no critical thought on your part. Let's not forget which of the two sites was known for users posting cp ;)

Slippery slope
Get ready for legal kiddy diddling

I don't have a problem as long as they never make it public and suppress it for their whole lives

>however

I don't think we can defend people who feel the urge to stalk, plan, and carry out serial murders.

>however
>however
>but but but

maybe not so bad, eh? eh?


>BORN THIS WAY

Well, it is reddit afterall. If they alienated the paedos, their traffic would be down to a quarter of what it is.

how did that work for gays?

You don't have to pat them on the back for their degeneracy and make them think they're accepted. Let them have their fucked up fetish, sure. But they're not entitled to not being demonized for their utter degeneracy.

Except they aren't trying to argue against thought-crime. Leftists love the concept of thought-crime.
They want to normalize pedophilia.

But won't that be illegal? Depicting the Prophet Muhammad and all?

>Let's not forget which of the two sites was known for users posting cp ;)
/r/jailbait
/r/creepshots
why do these not work anymore

I kind of agree in that that hypothetical person would go through life completely normal. Can't be guilty if you haven't committed a crime

>pedo scum
>good person
Say that to my face cunt. I'll smash your teeth in.

It is still clearly a mental illness and should be shunned. The social implications of "accepting", or even tolerating, them for not acting is disturbing. We should tolerate them on the condition that they are in a therapy program and trying very hard to recondition themselves and the ones who, at give the believable appearance, of reformation away from that should be lauded with praise.

kek

Reddit is defending pedos?

Or is Shariablue pushing an agenda?

>the cornerstone of Western civilization

Not a great argument to bring to the table considering the pitiful state of our civilization

>Let's not forget which of the two sites was known for users posting cp ;)

Let's also not forget which of the two sites actually reported the fuckers and got them arrested and probably killed in prison ;)

>tl;dr pedophilia is a weapon being used to further the zionist agenda

The normalization of pedophilia is another weapon being used to systematically deconstruct the fabric of our society and reduce us to nothing more than a gaggle of easy to manipulate hedonistic egoists wandering through time.

Just as the deconstruction of traditional gender roles and family values (compounded by the normalization of divorce and promiscuity) and the now widespread acceptance of selfish obscenities like obesity, homosexuality and transgenderism, so too will pedophilia be used as a tool to subjugate our society.

This is a two-pronged assault. The first is to drive the mature members of our society deeper into a life of excess, to reduce everyone to nothing more than selfish creatures wandering about hopelessly lusting after their addictions. The disciplined will of course be able to resist themselves which brings us to the second prong which is, as always, the indoctrination of our youth.

Sex is addictive. Children are impressionable and prone to addiction because their brains are still in development -- they don't understand the consequences of excess; they will eat sugar until they vomit, they will play video games for hours and hours, ignoring their health and their homework. There aren't many who grew up without video games who will play them endlessly to a fault... but many people who did grow up with video games DO. They were exposed and addicted to them early on and now they are nothing more than slaves to their addiction. Exposing children to sex early on will have the same effect. People who first had sex at age 18 are much less inclined toward promiscuity than those who first had sex at age 14... and each year it seems people are becoming more and more accepting of children having sex at younger ages.

This will ultimately lead to irreversible and disastrous consequences for our society.

>It is still clearly a mental illness and should be shunned.

Agree.
It's one of those things where if they didn't act upon those certain thoughts, urges, whatever it is and everything just remained inside of their head forever after then they just need to stay silent and there is 0 problems. By no means do I want to see on daytime TV pedos coming out talking about their "Problem" but it's all alright as they haven't committed a crime. Just keep quiet and live to your moral compass.

>if any murderphile is reading this and decides not to shoot up or decapitate everyone he comes into contact with, you're a good person
>if any moneyphile reading this decides not to rob or burglar homes and banks and shops, you're a good person

fucking christ

...

idk i've never met any gays

Age of consent laws are one of those things that has always struck me as arbitrary. Restricting sexual activity before a girl's period makes sense, but what about for boys? afaik, there isn't any comparable physical onset of puberty. and trying to ascertain when someone is capable of meaningfully consenting is fuzzy at best, hence the ancap memes about 'what if the child consents tho'. If a 13 year old boy and a 14 year old girl want to fool around, is that wrong? What about a 13 year old boy and a 15 year old? 13/16? 13/18? 13/20?

Sexual relations before a girl has her period is definitely no-no though.

Beat me to the muslim joke

>i-its not my chose
>muh genetics!
in what stage of grief are degenerates at?

>Sup Forums
>actually reporting cp posters

Minus the guy who posted dead children being fucked as the exception and the mod said he did on the ban screen

>Age of consent laws are one of those things that has always struck me as arbitrary
The age of consent itself is arbitrary if you see the purpose of it to be protecting the children from each other or from sex, but I don't think that's the point of them.
The point of it is to protect, mostly young men, from angry fathers by ensuring that they aren't going around fucking 14 year olds and having dad show up with a shot gun on their door step.
When you look at it from the perspective of protecting dumb horny 20 year old guys from themselves it makes complete sense.

Ment 4u

There are laws in your own fucking country which do exactly this, idiot. They are called "close in age" exemptions.

How can you be so ignorant about your own country?

>going to reddit

Although, he is kinda right. However, pedo is still a mental illness. So, pedo gets three choices: chemical castration, suicide, or get help.

>arguing for punishment of a thought crime
>leftists love the concept of thought-crime

>Sup Forums against pedos

I don't see a problem honestly.

People think about killing others sometimes but it doesn't mean they should be ostracized to the extent actual killers are. As long as people keep their thoughts inside and never act, there's no harm.

Why are Reddit posters such fucking faggots? Actually though, in all my life, I've only encountered a few liberal retards that had a similar personality to Reddit posters.
Is it because Reddit posters are the anti-Nazi retards in Europe?

>>arguing for punishment of a thought crime
Trying to normalize pedophilia is an action. Not a thought.

Yes and no.
Free thought and such is fine, but this post commends and individual for simple not behaving like a niggerchimp or camelfucker and raping shit left right and centre. If the idea of paedophilia in the mind becomes normal then ultimately more laymen will think it is acceptable and enact on it.
Continue it being shameful and wrong and then many otherwise paedos wouldn't even give it a proper second thought.

(((Reddit)))

>normalizing
what does that even mean. It means not punishing people for thoughts?

>user is posting a picture of Reddit defending pedophiles

Whats wrong with that? The Virgin Mary was impregnated by the Lord at age 14.

"HAHAH YOU THINK ACCEPTANCE OF HOMOSEXUALITY WILL LEAD TO ACCEPTANCE OF PAEDOPHILIA?! DUMB RIGHT WINGER! SLIPPERY SLOPE FALLACY MUCH!?"
-Average Reddit user circa 2013

Honestly this raises some good points. WTF I wanna boink kids now?

Oh, you thought only the left relied on buzzwords to make their arguments for them? :^)

Making a concept acceptable and immune to criticism in general consensus among a population.

I think the stance I kind of have to take on this and many others might is
>Closet pedos are fine given that they lock that cupboard up
>Pedo acknowledges if he even hints at it through conversation he will be judged severely
>Still has a right to talk about it though
>0 tolerance for any form of embracing it on mainstream platforms.

basically
>If no crimes committed their not a criminal
>Don't want to hear about it though

What he said makes complete sense. I fantasize about blowing my bosses head apart at point blank with a shotgun but I never act on it.

more like 2008. By 2013 it was already at "I can't even why would you even question that"

>People think about killing others sometimes but it doesn't mean they should be ostracized to the extent actual killers are.
Well obviously they shouldn't be ostracized to the extent of people who kill others, but having repetitive thoughts about murder and wanting to kill others usually indicates a larger problem. The response to someone saying they have thoughts about killing others shouldn't be "Congrats on not killing someone today. That makes you a good person :DDDD" which essentially says that those thoughts are acceptable. The response should be "That's messed up and you need to get some help"
A similar thing should be done for pedos. You should ostracize them, but do so with compassion.

Age of Consent laws are such a stupid modern thing I'm amazed Sup Forums hasn't declared them a part of the SJW/feminist agenda.
Every single civilization in the history has had shit like marrying young at 12-14 and shit, and everything was fine. But its only recently that everyone flips out at the thought because "muh childuns!"

reddit used to be fucking full of pedophiles because of the jailbait subreddit. It's still the only place you'll ever see the word "ephebophile"

I want that picture to be real.

>Every single civilization in the history
Is modern western civilization not a civilization in history faggot?

Did you forget they literally have ISIS subreddits? How does this surprise you.

As long as their pedophilia stays in the fucking mind and doesn't translate into getting pics and videos or worse yet personally exploiting or assaulting a child I don't give a shit. It's actions that condemn a person not their thoughts. Hell if thoughts condemned a person I'd be a fucking serial murderer right now.

...

>Despite the lack of statistics, other sources indicate that sexual relations between adults and children have always existed. Attitudes toward this have changed over the course of history, and these relations have been condemned since late antiquity
faqs.org/childhood/Pa-Re/Pedophilia.html

>It means not punishing people for thoughts?
To portray the thoughts as acceptable or ordinary. There isn't anything wrong with the thoughts if they are sparse or an occasional morbid curiosity that happens once in a blue moon, but by saying that they are a "good person" for not acting on it is reinforcing that having those thoughts is acceptable.
I don't think these thoughts should be punished in a legal manner, but social ostracizing is appropriate. Reinforcing that these thoughts, although just thoughts, are indicative of a larger issue at play is important. There is some correlative data that suggests I'm right as well considering many pedos were abused themselves.

>medieval legislation that established minimum marriage ages

Paedophilia hasn't been as widely accepted throughout history as you may be proposing.

this. very specifically

>Reddit
>One person
kek
>Sup Forums
>One person
kek

Just you fucking wait, pedophiles are going to be included in anti-descrimination legislation.
I'm not joking

...

Pedophilia isnt something you are born with, its part of a mental illness and mentality of loneliness and low levels of self worth or having a lack of sexual market value. People who act out this sick shit are usually twisted into thinking little kids and easier to have sex with because you are the dominant one. Think about this. Submissive pussy men have low sexual market value, they are not seen as dominant so they find someone who is. And that is children


t. Phd

>Hell if thoughts condemned a person I'd be a fucking serial murderer right now.
What sort of thoughts are these? Are they usually about the same or different people? Are they people you know or strangers?

Logically speaking why cant i think hes an utter faggot who should be hung by the testicles until they fall off.
The leddit user is doing exactly what he claims to condemn; judging me for my thoughts toward a pedophile and his thoughts. Thats the arena they like to play in.
Thoughts and microagressions.
Once you let them play in that arena they win. Once im comfortable with the thought of pedophilia ive opened the door to it.
This is how homosexuality hit the mainstream.
Dont fall for it. Give an inch and they take a mile

No really, Slippery Slope is a fallacy, amirite?

>mfw x3 gold for that post

No worries. They will all burn in Hell.

it is immune to criticism. It's not a choice
>wants potential child-rapists to live in the shadows

Don't most pedos have a history of being molested as children as well? Like how most abusers were abused themselves?

Also just to add, these fucks are not curable. That is why sexual predators in communities who already served time in the slammer are more likely to do it again. Its a sexual urge like masturbation is to a teen boy. Addiction to the max

If gays are ok, then pedos will be too

there it is. And You people accepted gay people, You accepted the trannies, now expect pedos to be normalized within at most 40 to 50 years, and that's being generous. I just hope im dead before it happens im 20 btw so rip me. The world is not meant for sane people like me anymore.

So you are a fan of them keeping it hidden and not seeking help from doctors, repressing until they ass rape a kid one day?

Sure you don't want to make it a thing where you are deliberately putting peaceful pedos in charge of daycare centers in order to show solidarity, but there is a point to be a made about treating the issue pragmatically so that kids will be safe in the long run.

That's the thing they'll never understand about this place, no matter how many people say it.

Sup Forums is not a single person. Never has been and never will be, as long as it remains in this state.

Sites like Reddit, Twitter, FB, etc. are subject to censorship and mob rule via voting/reporting. Therefore the thoughts circulated there are homogeneous, controlled, and filtered. But here, we have free reign. We can say anything, so we do.

And so Sup Forums never "thinks" anything in the way those other sites do, or think they do but are actually controlled to discuss. And in that way we circulate more thought than in any other format.

I believe the chance is higher if you are male, but with females they usually become very slutty at a young age and act out in a very degenerate manner while also being heavily suicidal. For men, which I havent studied extensively in these matters, seem to act out what was done to them as a show of dominance to the aggressor by theoretically punching back harder

>you fags post cp on Sup Forums for years
>reddit says something sensible
>HOW DARE THEY DEFEND THOSE AWFUL PEDOS

You people are all retarded

There are already full blown pedophiles living in the shadows. I'm simply addressing it from the legal aspect that you cannot charge a person for a crime they haven't committed and a crime is dictated by a persons actions. If someone has pedo thoughts I think they're ill but if they were to keep silent about it they'd live an entire life of not being a pedo

It isn't immune to criticism because it's a disorder.
This is the kind of shit the left does.
Keep gender dysmorphia a condition so it can be capitalisd on with healthcare.
Make paedophillia no longer a paraphilia, leading to more sex acts with children.
Make racism a mental disorder.

Using ideology to make results that fit a narrative. It will happen if this bullshit cultural marxist culture persists.
They want to change the culture about paedophilia, then it will change the actions.
Just like how the US and the west in general was subverted by marxists in academia

>17 years, 364 days, 23 hours, 59 minutes and 59 seconds old girl
FUCKING PEDO REEEE SCUM GET ARRESTED FOR EVEN THINKING ABOUT HER REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
>18 years, 0 days, 0 hours, 0 minutes and 0 seconds old
Perfectly fine to do anything with.

>it is immune to criticism. It's not a choice
No it isn't. People are malleable and adaptable. In addition for most pedos they were abused themselves and are thus fucked in the head because of that.
bjp.rcpsych.org/content/179/6/482
Yeah. I did some googling and found some corroborating data.
Yes and that is bad.

If you believe being homosexual isn't a choice, you should believe being a pedophile isn't a choice. Pedohilia being the *attraction* to younger things.

The difference being consent, and that gender is inherently different from age. Age increases as you age, gender only changes if you are mentally ill. As your age increases, your maturity increases.

Many differences, most importantly maturity and consent. Who isn't consenting in homosexual sex? The small percentage of rape and stealthing and shit? Happens in heterosexual sex, too.

That said, by the time you develop your sexuality you should have developed enough morals and know the laws well enough to not rape children.

If that hasn't happened and you've acted on those urges, you are severely mentally ill and are a monster.

Child porn hurts children. Molestation hurts children. I hear much loli/shota stuff is related to child porn, dunno how I feel about it regardless.

Feel free to argue with anything.

It is true you can't help what you are attracted to, but everyone has the power not to act on their urges. Being gay isn't wrong for the fact that the sex and relationship is 100% consensual. Sex with kids is not consensual nor is it right

well pandora's box is open

seriously am i being rused
Or is this the other side of the coin when it comes to pure virgin women at prime breeding age?

>well pandora's box is open
Don't be so defeatist about this. "Pandora's box" has been opened before and it was put away by the acts of righteous men through the will God. The same can be done now.

one of the many casualties in the 3rd memewar

eh I'm pretty black-pilled so ur not going to convince me

RRRRRREEEEEEEEEEEEEE LEAVE MY LOLIS ALONE YOU NORMIES. ONLY FAGGOTS LIKE 3D KIDS
T. Sup Forums

This will never happen in any fashion whatsoever. Usually these guys have loli or CP on their computers or film the local neighbor girl

What happened with that twitter account that blew up earlier this evening, it seems to have completely disappeared from the board?

20 > 3.0

I can do it in just 1.

I could really see this pedo argument getting convoluted with the follow
>Homophobia
>Spartans

That isnt how it works retard.
Question: Years ago we did the exact same thing with Homosexuals. Are homos more accepted in society today or less?

Youre ignoring the collective consciousness

It's largely a myth, though it'd be disingenuous to say that a sizable proportion weren't. But by and large, there are no reliable and accurate statistics on this because the study samples are almost always inherently biased (most sample data comes from prison inmates or therapy patients and the like, not relatively normal people in all other life aspects).

The molestation myth is a media myth for the most part in their peddling of inaccurate and disingenuous info to craft a specific image of a "pedophile" into the public consciousness.

>IDIOT

>being a pedo without acting on it is now commendable and praiseworthy
Get the fuck out of here this is pure slippery slope, next it'll be "it's okay if you have a relationship with a child as long as you're not having sex and the parent's consent" it's disgusting either way anyone giving these fucks any leeway are degenerates