Is the horseshoe theory true?

Is the horseshoe theory true?

Are we just as bad as the commies?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=WH6Ajowgg4U
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No it's not true. It makes sense to idiots that don't the meaning of what they say. People that do one thing and say another.

It's actually a circle:
center - right - radical - left

>It's a centrist circlejerk thread

oh boy can't wait for indecisive fucks who aren't confident in their beliefs to use their mindset as a way to feel superior to both sides

Centrists are fucking cancer.

This is a fallacy.
>All genocide is bad
>All genocide is good
>Some genocide is bad

White genocide is bad, every other genocide is good

Like most things in politics, there are times where it can be applied, but it's ultimately a simplification and at times falls apart

...

no, the Left and Right have fundamentally different motivations. intellectually lazy retards just see that both sides become authoritarian as you approach the extremes so "hur dur dey da saem!". it's just like this idiocy with calling Antifa, fascists. there are some superficial similarities so they must be fundamentally the same.

>if ur against faggots then sry bud u r 1

It's correct if it represents authoritarianism

Stop thinking, imagine a shape, then disregard all statistics, opinions, and experiences you have had. Congratulations, you are now a peasant.

Well, if you're a fascist/natsoccer then yes, you're as bad as the commies.

How did the drunken musings at one stream became a "theory"
No, it's not true

Commies:
>Believes your property is theirs for the taking
>NEETs
>Attacks people for wrong think
>Manages to fail at attacking people
>Filled with cringy edgelords
>AnCom exists
Fascists/Libertarian:
>Believes in impoving society be removing several degrees of degeneracy (Fasc) or letting them not affect you (Lib)
>Most have real jobs
>Only attacks in self-defence
>Always the underdog with the media using language gymnastics to make it look worse
>Objectively best memes
>Only counter arguments to each ideology are unrealistic strawmans
You tell me.

>we

im a centrist. abortions for every nigger.

Tell me right now the world would be worse off if everyone was white, and how. Or fuck off.

genocide is ok in moderation

horse shoe theory is fucking retarded

>Are we just as bad as the commies?

The furthest right on that spectrum is anarchism. I don't think many people on pol are genuine anarchists.

why would it be a horseshoe and not a line. does this imply that the distance between far right and far left is the same as left and right?

When I read the commie section I actually thought you were talking about Sup Forums

Yes

The redpilled man's ideology is Technocracy.

It implies that once you go all the way to the left or right the impact on a citizen is the same. On the far left you have an all-authoritative government that doesn't have to answer to the public.

On the far right you have anarcho-tyranny which is the inevitable result of anarchism. All government structures are dismantled and in their absence, the strongest take control. This in turn leads to an authoritative leadership which does not answer to the people.

For the people living under them, both outcomes are the same.

It's somewhat true for tactics but only a little bit true for real beliefs. Many political tactics work for anyone who uses them, while beliefs are real differentiators.

It's very much true, and it's even evident on Sup Forums.

Far right politics tends to be extremely left-wing economically. All the complaining about unfair competition, hate towards free trade and free markets and so on is straight from a Communist Party manifesto. In France, a significant portion of the far-left electorate is voting for Le Pen because she is so left-wing.

Yes it is. Both sides of the extreme (SJW, alt-right) don't care about facts, it's all about pushing an agenda.

But it's true. Genocide of my people is bad. Genocide of your people is good. Tribalism 101 m8. Centrism is based.

>we
speak for yourself

>Are we just as bad as the commies?

Not yet, we still have a lot of liberal purging to do first.

socialism vs capitalism

socialism is poison
capitalism extreme capitalism good

the reason there is always fag talk of moderation is that if you are altrusit and u give everything u die
so you can never be extremely good in altruist morality
yaron brook youtube
you are good if you do not steal from others or control them NOT if you give free stuff

...

you should be gassed

Can't accomplish this with a shitskin population that we have.

this.

>tfw rightwing social and leftwing economic views
Fuck

Nice to see you believe in the Holocaust!

Communist countries = countries that toppled under their own politics
fascist countries = countries that were invaded and dissolved

Ask yourself this, if Hitler did nothing wrong then does that mean Marx and/or Stalin did nothing wrong?

No...that's stupid...stop being stupid.

Nice meme cunt

Alt right
>Believes in free speech
>Race realists
>Sex realists
SJW/Antifa
>Doesn't believe in free speech
>Race deniers
>Sex deniers

the armenians had it bad its true

capitalism good
communism bad

stalin was wrong to betray hitler, he should have stayed with hitler and GLORY would have been his!

It's only really a warning for 1 party getting too much power in a two party system. Too far left and you get thrown in jail for misgendering someone, too far right and you get thrown off a rooftop for being gay. What's currently going on now is that the left has gone too far and we're returning it to the center, but if the left gets BTFO and doesn't reform, the evangelicals might come back and ruin everything.

I think there's enough popularity for libertarians within the republican party to stop that from happening, but who knows the republican party has a lot of infighting.

>SJW/Antifa
>Race deniers
>Sex deniers

If this was actually true, then their entire FUCKING WHITE MALE narrative would crumble.

No. No one is as bad as communists. Nazis at least think about well-being of some part of population, while communism is purely malevolent, from it's basic premises to it tragic conclusion.

>Antifa
>Race is a social construct so it must be the evil white racists that are keeping minorities down.

>there's nothing in common with horrifically failed authoritarian regimes that got tens of millions of their own people killed in pointless wars, systematic persecution, retarded economic policies and deadly work camps who's only discernible difference is the boogeyman they used to justify all this is called The Jew or The Rich and even there they are often literally the same individuals being pointed to
>if you don't want your country destroyed you are le euphoric militant centrist since I am a dumb as dogshit american who honestly thinks theres only two possible political opinions

I think its more of a circle. Opposite of centrist, at the bottom of the circle would be extremists. People who do violent shit for political reasons and have no interest debating or anything. Like antifa. And BLM. I have yet to see extremist right wingers yet. They like to compare the far right to hitler. But thats just not true. There is one more position and thats the extremist position. The violent positions. The positions reserved for war. But the left doesnt seem to mind dipping its toes in a little early. Fucking pussies. Theyre instigating a second civil war. And nobody fucking calls them out on it. Theyll wait until the right has had enough and then theyll paint the right as extremists. When whites chimp out. Theres no putting pandora back in the box. Were not fucking childish like the left. We dont poke the lions. We slaughter them.

the coherency of SJW ideology is irrelevant since it only exists to undermine their opposition, not to offer a substantive alternative

More or less. We are evil to our enemies and kind to our brethren. But the leftists have it exactly the other way around.

>in moderation
Absolute genocide is the only answer, fampaitachi oniichan, if I can be completely honest with you.

>If something is different it is the same
t. enlightened centrist

In some circumstances, yes.

>These two groups of people fight each other tooth and nail everywhere they go.
>They must be unwitting members of the same group.

No, on the contrary, it is we who are not as bad as you.

youtube.com/watch?v=WH6Ajowgg4U

What you gonna do,
when i genocide you?

I will build a wall,
a nuke you all

Yes

Wrong faggot.

Alt right
>Only believes in free speech when its appropriate for them
>Racists
>Sexist
Lefties
>Only believes in free speech when its appropriate for them
>Racists
>Sexists

>genocide is ok moderation

Considering the term itself is extreme, meaning the complete annihilation of a population, I have trouble seeing how it can be moderate.

Is this the power of leaf education? It was supposed to be good.

The entire movement is steeped in contradictions, fallacies and ignorance. Do not expect any of the narrative to make any sense, which is why the most die-hard ones that haven't dropped out are impossible to be converted and must be gassed.
Cognitive dissonance and lysenkoism is the very basis.

Alt lighters like you will regurgitate leftist bs to claim all races are equal. Equal outcome will never be possible and evil racist white males will always be blamed for it.

>not being a hardcore centrist
lmao
I'm so intelligent I always pic the middle ground. I'm a really decisive man!

Damn...it weird how sometimes you hear something said from a different angle and it suddenly has much greater meaning.

;_;

...

just a retraded

checked

People who call themselves "centrist" or "moderate" now are agreeing to policies that would have been radically leftist 50 or 100 years ago. And the "centrists" or "moderates" of back then thought mildly of policies that would be unthinkably right-wing today.

"Centrists" don't seem to realize the extent to which leftism has co-opted the status quo.

The key is to just think for your goddamn self and make your own ideology. Maybe it's one that others share. Maybe it's bits and pieces of either. The key is to stop believing the hollow myths that extremists on either side so often repeat. It just becomes a shouting match of black lives matter and straw man and Nazi accusations and helicopter memes. No free thought.

Its time to swing this ship HARD right by using fascism as a tool to restore democracy. Centrists are just delaying the inevitable crash and reformation of the government into a national fascist state. Its going to happen as a natural reaction to the degradation of our society. I support Nat Soc because id like to cleanse it now rather than wait for the normies to realize that their all degenerates and need to clean up their acts.

it's bollocks. left, right and centre are the same

Frankly, NatSoc doesn't go far enough to the right. 1930s prole democracy is still pretty degenerated compared to, say, pre-Civil War.

Not saying it can't be done, but I'm curious how fascism could restore democracy. Can you cite a situation where it didn't lead to an authoritarian regime?

>tfw too intelligent for left or right wing
It's a difficult life for us radical centrists. Gotta fight off idiots from all sides.

The point of the horseshoe theory is that extremes have one thing i common. Violence and fantasies about a violent great revolution.

>everybody that is against the status quo is the same
No. Just like everybody that is in favor of the status is not the same.
And the left right dichotomy is shit anyway.

this

ITT indecisive fence sitting = intelligence

It's easy to believe in free speech if you're on the losing side.

>falling for the "anti-status quo people are extremists and extremists are violent people" meme
Good goy.

And BTW, reactionaries never fantasizes about revolution yet they are considered extreme right.

The ideal is a temporary authoritarian regime, see Pinochet for reference.

The entire reasoning behind far left and far right being similar is that there are only so many ways to run a totalitarian state that they'll inadvertedly end up similar, but you could probably get the same result with any ideology when it gets extreme enough.

If you believe that government must intervene in the market for the common good, then you are as abad as a commie.

>Alt lighters
Being associated with the right at all disgusting.

>Left and right wingers are just as bad as each other
>What me, take a stance?

lel

Why are you even on a political board if you're shilling for the status quo?

Your ideology did not weather the test of time. It was given opportunity to flourish and it failed. Our time is coming and we will be proven right.

Not quite. It only appears you're looking at a horseshoe because you're looking at the horseshoe in two dimensions. In fact, if you were to look at the horseshoe from the side, you'd see that when you go far enough to the right, you go up and off a ramp and ascend to a higher plane of existence. When you go too far to the left, you go down a ramp and fall down into the deepest pits of left wing dogshit like feminism, communism, and other brain viruses.

wait, are the guys on the left of ancaps ancoms or some other shit i dont know about?

>implying I don't have stances
>implying you have to agree with one wing on all issues
>implying allowing a group to control your entire worldview is intelligent
>implying you haven't been brainwashed by the overlords
You've been duped lad. Mixed stances, not no stances.

>Implying that politics is 1 dimensional

Participating in caveman tribalism politics

I can post silly pictures too.

ffs
horseshoe theory does not mean that both sides are exactly the same!
it means that the opposing sides end up having some similarities.
fascism and communism are both very collectivistic, albeit one economically and the other socially.

Oh theres that meme again.
"You are not part of my tribe you are the status quo"
Read

I don't give a fuck, I just vote for whoever supports gun ownership.

this is how it truely is

It's a nice way to say you have no stances. You're cowards and pseudo-intellectuals and people like you will be forgotten. The future is ours.

Yeah, facts are facts regardless of who is saying them. Cherry picking a bunch of categorically things does not dispute whether those things are correct. Jesus Christ, seems like Sup Forums is overrun by moronic newfags. Seriously, at least make an arguable point which can be empirically verified you stupid brainlet faggot.

Agreed all races are equal. Living for thousands of years in different environments wouldn't have had an evolutionary impact on the different races at all.