/lrg/ - Libertarian-Right General

This thread is for Discussion of Capitalism, Libertarianism, Paleoconservativism, Minarchism, and the PHYSICAL REMOVAL of COMMUNIST FAGS from our board of peace. Reminder that this is the Libertarian RIGHT General. Aleppo Johnson-fags, Left-Libertarians, and other Shit-Libs need to fuck off. Voice your complaints to r/libertarian.

>Recommended Reading list
libertarianright.org/reading/

>Vanilla /lrg/ pastebin- CREATE IF YOU DONT SEE ONE IN THE CATALOG
pastebin.com/7K1EJYb8

>Bump for Life, Liberty, and Private Death Squads

Previous Thread:

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=nrT0kBeld3Q
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-23/subchapter-IV
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

...

Consequentialist ancap reporting for duty!

Checking in

fpbp

>Claims to be libertarian
>Isn't an NRA member

Explain yourselves.

>Paleoconservativism

...paleoconservatism ? ? ?

How do I try to tell normies that a socialized healthcare system is fucking trash?
Please don't include shit like "taxation is theft" i don't want to sound autistic.

also minarchist reporting in

paleoconservatives are anti large govt.
You're thinking of neocons

(checked)
The paleoconservative platform, in a nutshell:
>Restricted immigration
>Anti-multiculturalism
>Decentralization
>Cultural conservatism
>Control on free trade
>Economic nationalism/isolationism

Outside of those last two points, it lines up pretty well with the libertarian right's platform.

Threadly reminder not to engage shills from /nsg/ and /leftypol/

Rarely if ever have I had a fruitful debate with a NatSoc, let alone a commie

NRA are shills for gun manufacturers.

>According to international relations scholar Michael Foley, paleoconservatives press for restrictions on immigration, a rollback of multicultural programmes, the decentralization of the federal policy, the restoration of controls upon free trade, a greater emphasis upon economic nationalism and isolationism in the conduct of American foreign policy, and a generally revanchist outlook upon a social order in need of recovering old lines of distinction and in particular the assignment of roles in accordance with traditional categories of gender, ethnicity, and race.

You say that like it is a bad thing.

What about your half NatSoc half Ancap Brotherts?

They are actually fighting for gun rights. Those benefit everyone even if they take a lot of funding from gun manufacturers.

I want to spread the love among our anti degeneracy brothers at /nsg/. they're pretty right about race realism and anti-faggotry

You guys are cool, you accept that fascism is only workable in a voluntary society.

even if they're retarded on the issue of gibsmedats for white people I still respect a Nationalist over a fucking commie!

Swiss shill incoming

Aw, but I like those guys...

Damn I love Capitlaism, can we just removed Bernie Sanders from the United States?

And gun manufacturers want strong 2nd amendment rights.

I see nothing wrong in shilling for them

You can always tell where somebody really sits on the gun issue by looking at how they talk about the NRA. There are plenty of liberals, and liberal politicians, who will pretend to be pro-gun, and they'll say things like "I support the 2nd Amendment, but....."

of course man, facsism only works when you embrace it, and love your people on your own understanding. Fuck Communists physically remove nabolz

how do you do

...

Good, KEEP MANUFACTURING GUNS.

Como vai, nosso amigo?

How strong is the libertarian right movement in Portugal? You guys tend to be the top contributors here, in addition to based Maltabro.

test

You should be able to defend your positions fucktwat niggerbitch

1/2
It depends on why they support socialized medicine.

Most "normies" will say that healthcare is a right. This is more or less the appropriate response to that.

youtube.com/watch?v=nrT0kBeld3Q

The other common argument is that healthcare cannot be handled by free markets: it is too complex and requires a relatively large degree of central planning. There are a few questions you could ask a person who believes this, but I would just give them an intuitively correct argument, and then show how that argument is analogous to one that indicates healthcare should be left to a free-market. This type of persuasion requires little knowledge of our healthcare system of problems with socialized medicine. It would look something like this:

>(you) Are monopolies a good thing to have or a bad thing to have?
>(normie) Bad.
>(you) Why?
>(normie)...
>(you) Because monopolies take advantage of their monopoly hold by providing to buyers a relatively low quality good or service at a relatively high cost to the seller. The quality of the good or service would be higher and the cost to consumer would be lower if there were a bunch of groups competing for the consumers.
>(normie) Right!
>(you) So why do you want a monopoly on healthcare?

Something like that. If you'd like reasons as to why we should not have socialized medicine for strictly economic reasons then I can give you those. It's just that most people who support socialized medicine don't do so for strictly economic reasons; in other words, they wouldn't give you well-reasoned economic arguments to support their position because they don't have any. These two simple counter-arguments cover the two most common reasons.

Sorry my response took so long, I was eating dinner.

>How strong is the libertarian right movement in Portugal?
Non existent. There are some think tanks and stuff like that.
But our most to the right party, promoting "free" markets are to the left of Hillary.So there's that. They are also socialists and very pro EU. Our govt is Socialist Party, with Left Bloc and Communist Party. So yeah, I'm getting the fuck outta here asap.

One based portubro who help shill /lrg/ with me creates the h o p p e w a v e. The rest are cool dudes I assume.

I don't register my guns.

The enemy of your enemy is not your friend. Natsocs will drown you out the first opportunity they get.

So we'll just gas'm if they get too antsy about invading ancapistan. They can keep their white welfare state and heavily centralized government for all I care, as long as they recognize our private borders.

They don't know shit about capitalism i'll admit, they dont know anything about economics at all. but they have great cultural preservation that libertarians really need. Libertarians need to stress SELF DEFENSE as much as NON-AGGRESSION.

bump for constitutionalism

bump for "nah"

you dont know shit dude they would execute you by firing squad if you criticized their governance

stormnigger newfags already ran libertarians off this board once before, I wont let it happen again.

THEY ARE NOT ALLIES, THEY ARE NOT LOYAL

The constitution was ruined by the 17th amendment (which opened the door for federal overreach) and 19th amendment (which opened the door for modern feminism).

...

kill yourself larper

So let's just get rid of them, then.

Don't know if anyone itt knows this, but it is against federal law to be a communist. It is in violation of U.S. Code Title 50 Chapter 23 Subchapter IV

law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-23/subchapter-IV

>kill yourself larper

What did he mean by this?

americanism > muh anarchy

join or die

...

...

What are you going on about? Are you trying to say something substantive or just shitposting?

That's a great argument against universal healthcare

used to listen to the fifth column, but their the amount of times Michael Moynihan freaked out about Richard Spencer left a bad taste in my mouth. You don't have to talk about him. I t also annoys me how many libertarians are open borders

You LOLbiterians are all civicuck Nu/Male Nu/Pol - tier faggots.
NatSoc is the true ideology.
Your whole useless ideology was made by fucking kikes, that alone should send a red alert to everyone about you faggots.
You all have to go back to Le_Dahanald
Daily Reminder that /pol is a NatSoc, Fascist, WN board

Natsoc was funded by jews

The only thing remotely right-wing about you is your race realism. Even neocons and other parts of the religious right have you beat. Get off my board.

...

>ยง 842
Mm, so technically this applies to ancom protesters and antifa. I wonder if we could work this in with the running-over-protesters legislation to get some actual removal going.

tbf, Goebbels, had some pretty off-color humor. I have no doubt that pic related is accurate for a lot of people on the board though

As individualists, how do libertarians seek out like minds IRL?

I don't.

I'm a university student on the northeast coast. Even in STEM, where the average IQ is supposedly higher and more male-dominated, the overwhelming majority of my peers are normies who are either apolitical or unrepentantly left-wing. Seeking out a like mind would not only be incredibly difficult but it would also be social suicide.

It actually isn't, but it SOUNDS like one, which is what makes it effective.

There are plenty of theoretical scenarios we could concoct in which we would prefer to have a monopoly over a bunch of firms competing with one another (theory of second best). But I agree with something Milton Friedman said, which is that you never persuade a man with an argument, you just give him ideas with which he may later persuade himself. Something like that.

I have to go to bed now. I'll be in the libertarian general thread tomorrow and we can continue this discussion. Bye.

That's what I meant. It's useful against most people. Good night.

I guess you could establish a libertarian gathering and post signs advertising it throughout your university's campus.

>If you were paying for someone's healthcare and could make laws to govern them, would you want them to be able to drink, smoke, or drive a car?

BUMP