Women in the military

>mfw this meme will NOT die
Goddamn, nothing makes me angrier than the encouragement of women in military service. They have been proven less effective then men in combat roles, what makes it even worse is that the govt wants integrated units, which have been proven to be half as effective as all men/all women units.
thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/03/01/the-truth-about-women-in-combat.html
>be me
My sister and my cousin's gf we're talking about rape in the military, I said I don't think women should serve in the military, let alone serve in the same unit as men. I cited Pentagon studies which showed that all men combat units were the most effective, closely followed by all women units, and co ed units being half as effective as both.
They replied by saying it's just a "bump in the road", just a phase that we must push past to reach equality.

HOW?! How can you possibly justify intentionally putting men and women into a situation where they are at their least effective? WHY would you want to send women off to war? War is an awful thing in itself, I simply don't feel women should be subjected to that, WHY do these people REVEL in the idea of sending men and WOMEN off to war?!

I'm really fuckng pissed, can we please kill this shitty meme?

Other urls found in this thread:

dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a262626.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Maybe they are half as effective because they receive half the praise
Ever think of that? Huh?

kikes, feminists and leftists, user

They're the recipe for destruction

Maybe your right based nord
Agreed

How do we kill this women in military roles meme though?

Start a real war.

women don't care about effectiveness, they just want to feel good

If God existed and could create and do anything he wanted, do you think he'd want to just feel good or look for meaning in his activities?

This guy gets it.

I'm in the same boat user, I've found using information from the source below is a good way of disarming the arguments that are usually made:

dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a262626.pdf

Mandatory reading if you oppose women in front-line units as well.

>If God Exsisted
Wew
To answer your question, God would look for meaning
Thanks

You all ever hear of the "another pregnant service woman" thing? They have this cool superpower when they join the military to opt out of being deployed or working if they become pregnant.

I know a girl in the Army in Texas.
She just became pregnant. Couldn't help but think this was planned to avoid being stationed overseas. But no, a woman is infallible and would never take the easy way out. They are capable of honor too.

Women's suffrage is the downfall is civilization.

Logic, reason, statistics, evidence, and experience mean nothing in comparison to arbitrary equality for emotional satisfaction of perceived righteousness.

Women can never truly understand what war is like. They believe the tales are simply exaggerated. Even when confronted with the horror their minds will shut down and not allow them to perceive the reality.

Honor is a male abstraction. Gruesome death, gore, wails of agony, the smell of blood and shit and smoke; these cannot be processed in their raw form by the female mind.

What meaning can there be except to feel good? If you pursue meaning, isn't the end goal the good feeling of discovering that meaning?

>listening to thot's opinions

this is where you fucked up

>I simply don't feel women should be subjected to that,
it continues to amaze me that even men think their lives are less valuable than women's

Fuck women - I agree with you about mixed units, but all female units should be used as cannon fodder to soften up the enemy, so the /actual/ soldiers will take fewer casualties.

Well no, just because something is pleasurable doesn't make it meaningful, take jacking off for instance, it induces pleasure, but there's no meaning to it.

What I mean by meaining is a purpose

Burn in hell, hedonistic fuck

The thought of women being harmed just doesn't sit well with me, I even cringe at those female UFC Fights. I just don't like to see women harmed.
Say what you will about that, but I stand by it

This 100%
That just makes me angry, fuck "Stronk,Empowered, female Soldiers"

It's simple population dynamics. Three tribes of 2000 people war. Tribe A sends only its men. Tribe B sends only its women. Tribe C sends an even mixture of men and women. We'll assume falsely that men and women have equal fighting capacity, to make the calculation easier. All parties lose 90% of their army, and Tribe C suffers a 50/50 rate between male and female. The armies return home. Tribe A has 1000 women and 100 men. Each man beds ten women. In two years, they have 2000 children for the next generation's war. Tribe B has 100 women and 1000 men. It doesn't really matter how many men the women bed. In two years they have 200 children for the next generation's war. They lose immediately. Tribe C has 500 men and 500 women. In two years, they have 1000 children for the next generation's war. Tribe A outnumbers them 2:1, and the odds get worse every generation. They will eventually lose. Neither mathematics nor evolution cares about your morals. Protect the women, expend the men. This is the drive written into our brains through instinct, as we are the children of Tribe A which survived.?

You'd be doing something other than just feeling good for the sake of feeling good

...

I don't mean feeling good in the sense of sensory stimulus, which God is obviously above. It's more "the peace of God which passeth all understanding"
What meaning, what purpose can an eternal, all-powerful entity have except to rejoice in the fact of its own existence? To him, who encompasses all, there is no external world from which to derive any meaning or purpose. So then what is there, except to feel good?

>what is there to feel good?
To make others feel good.
Sacrifice

>We should all pretend like we are still spear-chuckers just because user can't figure out which of his instincts are still valid and which are outdated.
Modern day women have betrayed Western civilization to the point where only sending them off to war will fix them.

Which others?

Right, like making yourself forget what it's like to feel good so that you can rediscover it

this.

I'd love to see women get slaughtered, captured, raped to hell and then STILL deny they are not suited for it.

>sending women off to war will fix them
No, the other half of humanity which is found within women will be lost forever
>others
Your family, your friends, your nation

Right, but God is everything, so anything anyone does to make others feel good is ultimately God making himself feel good. Once again feeling good becomes the ultimate purpose, whether it's for God as a whole outside of our dimension, or as seemingly differentiated forms in this material universe

They are only like this because they are too comfortable. They have been told that being women is terrible, and being a man is the best thing ever. Which is why they have demanded "equality." Obviously, what they have isn't actually equality. They just have all of the rights, with none of the responsibilities. The only way to get them back to normal is to actually give them some responsibilities. Once they realize, "oh, shit, I might actually get shot," the tears will come on and they'll turn back into little girls again.

What I don't understand is how people think that we haven't tried women in combat roles before. You're telling me that the thousands of years we've been around that we haven't tried female soldiers only to realize its a terrible idea? If they made good soldiers as much as men do, we would've already had them implemented years ago. It wouldn't even be questioned if it worked.

Oh right, liberals think we're better and smarter than our ancestors because we have smart phones now.

>push past to reach equality.
women have always been relativity equal to men in European culture. it's just jewish projection trying to divide us all up into groups so that we forget that we have more power united than divided.

Have you read GK Chesterton's "What's wrong with the world?" It's a very good book, and it has a very good section about woman's true role and the follies of feminism, its spot even today, 100 years later.
That's what makes feminism and this false notion of equality so evil. It encourages women to disregard feminity, it even demonizes it as "oppressive"
the powers that be wish to make men weak, make them more womanly, into something not quite woman, yet not quite man.
They also wish to make woman more manly, yet they can never be true men, so hey become something which makes s neither man nor woman.
Both creations are inhuman, and disturbed.
>everyone is God
Ok, I see what you're getting at. I don't see every living being as an extension of God, but Rather a subject of Gods will

My point was simply this: are you able to conceive of any purpose, the goal of which is anything except feeling good in one way or another? Isn't feeling good always the end game, whether or not you need certain conditions to be fulfilled before that can happen?

I suppose so

"But that wasn't a fair battle! They had more people than us! And they don't value equality so it was all men!"