Serious question

Who can be considered honorary whites Sup Forums, besides finns?

bump

Russians, (northern) Pakistanis, Afghanis, Armenians, Leventine Arabs, Caucus peoples, some Turkic peoples.

There are pockets within each of the groups I've listed above that are Aryan.

slavs

you, my brother.
you are to us what usa is to israel

You are what you are.

>Pakis
>Afghans
>Arabs
>Turks

Keep dreaming Omar

...

...

Niggers

.

-

You and also Mongolians.

muslims when they throw homos off buildings

Iberians. The only """"lesser"""" whites who ever managed to build civilization on their own and form an empire.

Gross

>Pakistanis
>Afghanis
>Leventine Arabs
>Caucus peoples
>Turkic peoples
Are you actually retarded?

Holy fuck. By your standard this would make America nearly 95% white.

>Japanese
>(some) South Koreans
>Armenians
>Georgians
>Romanians
>Arab Christians

It would make Sweden 95% white too. He's completely retarded.

Do you have more of these?

worth the read

>Japanese
Hell no. They're so beta that the government literally has to step in to help them find dates so Japan doesn't go extinct because no one has kids.
>Armenians
They don't need to be honorary white, they're already actually white.
>Arab Christians
What the fuck? No. Arabs are one of the most degenerate races in the world and it's not just because they're Muslim. Before Islam, Arabia was still just a wasteland full of barbarians and savages. They only started cooperating after they all became Muslim, and became savage against everyone else instead.

>Hell no. They're so beta that the government literally has to step in to help them find dates so Japan doesn't go extinct because no one has kids.
Yet there's still not importing immigrants which makes them honorary whites.
>They don't need to be honorary white, they're already actually white.
Have you ever seen an Armenian besides the one that works for The Young Roaches? All the ones I've seen in person have skin as dark as Indians.
>What the fuck? No. Arabs are one of the most degenerate races in the world and it's not just because they're Muslim. Before Islam, Arabia was still just a wasteland full of barbarians and savages. They only started cooperating after they all became Muslim, and became savage against everyone else instead.
Not true. Arab Christians (particularly the Lebanese) are one of the most successful immigrant groups in the USA.

>Negroes evolve into Gibbons
I lose it every time

1. Anyone that serves in the special forces of any 1st world country.

2. Anyone that serves as a Law Enforcement Officer in a jurisdiction that is mostly black and/or hispanic in the U.S.

Categories '1' and '2' Thank you for your service!

I'd rather Indians be Aryans than the pakis, do you think it can be arranged? I don't like pakis

>Yet there's still not importing immigrants which makes them honorary whites.
By that logic, Africa, the Middle East (except Israel), South America, China, North Korea, India, Bangladesh, Laos, Myanmar and Central Asia are all honorary white.
>Have you ever seen an Armenian besides the one that works for The Young Roaches? All the ones I've seen in person have skin as dark as Indians.
Race =/= skin color. Armenians are objectively white people.
>Not true. Arab Christians (particularly the Lebanese) are one of the most successful immigrant groups in the USA.
Jews are THE most successful group in the US, but you wouldn't say they're honorary white, wouldn't you? Same thing applies here. Plus, if you're supposed to be honorary white then you generally aren't supposed to be a significant immigrant group. Immigration is degenerate.

chinese because they niggers and sand niggers

hate*

They also behave like jews and eat dogs and cheat all the time.

Does it need to be special forces, isn't it enough to be in the military? Then I could count as honorary white too.

So do Jews, but they sure as hell aren't white.

Vau!
Olet likainen paskiainen!

Mostly the rich ones do act like jews, eating dog isn't what it used to be, there aren't many chinese eating dog nowaday, there won't be any at one point in the future. Cheating, is usually because they don't know your rules or culture, but most behave correctly once they are told. For the asian american millenials, that's another part and I wasn't referring to those greedy fucks.

>By that logic, Africa, the Middle East (except Israel), South America, China, North Korea, India, Bangladesh, Laos, Myanmar and Central Asia are all honorary white.
None of the countries you listed are first world.
>Race =/= skin color. Armenians are objectively white people.
Skin color is a very large part of race. Would you consider Turks white as well because they share the same skin-color?
>Jews are THE most successful group in the US, but you wouldn't say they're honorary white, wouldn't you? Same thing applies here. Plus, if you're supposed to be honorary white then you generally aren't supposed to be a significant immigrant group. Immigration is degenerate.
False equivalency because Jews have never fully integrated while Arab-Christians have. As for the "significant immigrant group" theory, are Germans not white as well because they encompass the largest white immigrant group in America?

I hate to break it to you, but all those ethnic groups combined aside from the Russians only make up at most 2% of our population

I want to start the "are (insert obscure african tribe) black?" meme

jews hate everyone that isn't a jew in Israel/M E and love everyone that isn't white every where else. Chinese just hate niggers and sand niggers anywhere, they just use their natural ressource in Africa but they don't even give a shit about them unlike white use to. A chingchong once told me he bougth a costco membership because there were no niggers at costco.

They know the rules. They cheat anyways, even in their own culture. Overrall, even the poor chinks engage in overwhelmingly jewish behavior.

Stop trying to paint yourself as an exception Jackie Chan. You're not.

>None of the countries you listed are first world.

Not original replier but
That's too subjective tho, for example China is like the US. People who live in Shanghai or Beijing live like first world jews, many of which blow money to crash cars and do pointless shit (like NYC). But you go to rural Guangdong and you'll have a farm in Tennessee filled with chimping niggers that could be considered 3rd world tier. First world/Third World claims is not a logical argument.

Well, I'd still prefer to be invaded by chinks than sand niggers, shitskins and somalis

But it is a logical argument since America is objectively a better place to live than China.

Better place to live for who? White Americans? Also subjective. A nigger who isn't an ape and has a full time job would probably live better in a rich liberal town in South Africa as opposed to an American rural town full of white people that hate niggers (doesn't matter if its justified or not) and want to shoot the first one they see

Albinos

>Well, I'd still prefer to be invaded by chinks than sand niggers, shitskins and somalis

>being invaded by sand niggers, shitskins, somalis, and chinks

HDI in China: 0.738
HDI in USA: 0.920

btw, you can stop posting Jackie Chan, we know it's you.

You never once denied it so it must be true

Go back to shooting another one of your shitty movies where you lose yet another fight to Bruce Lee.

Red pilled, light skinned, blue or green eyed coloured women like pic related.

Americans.

lmao this chart is fucking hilarious reminds me of something you might see on Strangers with Candy.

Saudi Arabia also has a higher HDI than most of Eastern Europe and South East Asia. Are you going to than tell me that it's an objectively better place for women and a "1st world country"? Race, gender and environmental accuracy is important when rating countries. Japan can be honorary aryan for many reasons, but being a "1st world country" that doesn't import immigrants isn't (and they do, they take plenty east asian and chinese labour workers)

>Romanians
Say hello to the Captain you uneducated twat.

wew vlad

>Are you going to than tell me that it's an objectively better place for women and a "1st world country"?
How did intersectionality come about? Objective measures like HDI's, while not perfect, are still a better measure for quality of overall life than your Marxist-influenced speculations.

>None of the countries you listed are first world
Exactly, because none of them are honorary white. It takes more than just not letting in immigrants. Besides if only first world anti-immigration countries count. What about Qatar, Singapore, the UAE, Bahrain, Brunai, Taiwan and Kuwait? Are they all honorary white then?
>Skin color is a very large part of race. Would you consider Turks white as well because they share the same skin-color?
No, I literally just said that skin-color =/= race. See pic.
>False equivalency because Jews have never fully integrated while Arab-Christians have.
Not false equivalace at all. You argued that Arabs are "one of the most successful immigrant groups in the USA", I said Jews are the most successful group and they're not white, so that debunks your argument. And as for Jews not integrating, that's not true at all. If they didn't integrate, you'd notice them miles away, but you pretty much can't tell if someone in the US is a Jew or not unless they tell you. And Arabs basically never integrate, doesn't matter if they're Christian, that just makes you notice it less since you have the same religion.
>As for the "significant immigrant group" theory, are Germans not white as well because they encompass the largest white immigrant group in America?
You need to look up what the word "generally" means. White people don't generally immigrate because they have no need to, they already live in a first world country

...

It's funny because it's true.

>Exactly, because none of them are honorary white. It takes more than just not letting in immigrants. Besides if only first world anti-immigration countries count. What about Qatar, Singapore, the UAE, Bahrain, Brunai, Taiwan and Kuwait? Are they all honorary white then?
I only used the anti-immigration sentiment as proof of why I consider Japanese to be honorary whites among other things. Culturally, Japan has a lot more in common with the west than any of the nations you just mentioned.
>No, I literally just said that skin-color =/= race. See pic.
How does a genetic mutation disprove what I said? Skin color is still a very large part of race.
>Not false equivalace at all. You argued that Arabs are "one of the most successful immigrant groups in the USA", I said Jews are the most successful group and they're not white, so that debunks your argument. And as for Jews not integrating, that's not true at all. If they didn't integrate, you'd notice them miles away, but you pretty much can't tell if someone in the US is a Jew or not unless they tell you. And Arabs basically never integrate, doesn't matter if they're Christian, that just makes you notice it less since you have the same religion.
And I stand behind my statement that Arab Christians have integrated into mainstream American culture while Jews have not. People on Sup Forums point out Jews all the time from their behaviors and attitudes.
>You need to look up what the word "generally" means. White people don't generally immigrate because they have no need to, they already live in a first world country
Then how do you explain the USA, Australia, Canada, New Zealand?

>I only used the anti-immigration sentiment as proof of why I consider Japanese to be honorary whites among other things. Culturally, Japan has a lot more in common with the west than any of the nations you just mentioned.
So then what about Aboriginals or Native Americans? They're from western first world anti-immigration countries, so they must be honorary white, right?
>How does a genetic mutation disprove what I said? Skin color is still a very large part of race.
You're changing your argument, that's not what you said. You said Armenians aren't actually white because some have dark skin, when skin color doesn't define races (as that image proves), genes do. This is exactly the reason why Turks aren't white either, like you said.
>And I stand behind my statement that Arab Christians have integrated into mainstream American culture while Jews have not.
Fine, be wrong then. All you need to do is look at how Arabs act (especially in Europe) compared to Jews who are virtually indistinguishable from white people.
>People on Sup Forums point out Jews all the time from their behaviors and attitudes.
Sup Forums points out known Jews when they commit acts of Judaism. I doubt they'd be able to tell a random US Jew and a random white apart.
>Then how do you explain the USA, Australia, Canada, New Zealand?
Colonization =/= immigration. When Britain colonizes a place, they're not moving to a new country, they're just expanding their own. Those territories in turn become independent and countries of their own without the people living there having to move at all, so there is never any immigration involved.

>So then what about Aboriginals or Native Americans? They're from western first world anti-immigration countries, so they must be honorary white, right?
They clearly didn't build the societies they live in so you're just grasping at straws.
>You're changing your argument, that's not what you said. You said Armenians aren't actually white because some have dark skin, when skin color doesn't define races (as that image proves), genes do. This is exactly the reason why Turks aren't white either, like you said.
How did I change my argument? Skin-color is an important part of race but I never implied it was the only component.
>Sup Forums points out known Jews when they commit acts of Judaism.
AKA evidence of not fully integrating
>Those territories in turn become independent and countries of their own without the people living there having to move at all, so there is never any immigration involved.
Actually, there was a lot of white immigration to those countries (especially the USA) long after they were established.

Here is the original you ignorant nigger.

>How did I change my argument? Skin-color is an important part of race but I never implied it was the only component.
You kind of did since the reason you said Armenians aren't white is because they have dark skin.
>AKA evidence of not fully integrating
No because no one in the public notices these Judiasms or finds them strange except Sup Forumsacks so they're following all the social rules and the culture of the American society (capitalism and marketing are huge parts of American society, which Jews excel at) unlike when an Arab chimps out akin to a nigger.
>Actually, there was a lot of white immigration to those countries (especially the USA) long after they were established.
Again, the key word is generally. There also needs to be an expiration date. For example, just because a group used to immigrate somewhere a lot in the 1800s or something because their country was in a shit situation at the time but has completely changed since then, then they should no longer be considered a significant immigrant group.

>You kind of did since the reason you said Armenians aren't white is because they have dark skin.
I thought it could be implied that their features make them non-white as well. pic related
>No because no one in the public notices these Judiasms or finds them strange except Sup Forumsacks so they're following all the social rules and the culture of the American society (capitalism and marketing are huge parts of American society, which Jews excel at) unlike when an Arab chimps out akin to a nigger.
Sorry but the fact that they actively work against American interests almost 100% of the time without fail means that they have not fully integrated. If you're only criteria for integration is not being notice in public then would any foreigner who looks like a native be considered integrated?
>For example, just because a group used to immigrate somewhere a lot in the 1800s or something because their country was in a shit situation at the time but has completely changed since then, then they should no longer be considered a significant immigrant group.
Sounds like completely arbitrary criteria to me.

who's that, Viorel?

I've got a good one.

Kys Communist Slavic subhuman
How can anyone not know about Codreanu and call himself redpilled

ah, that guy... yea, I've heard of him a few times...

Made me proud burger.

Lol hungarians dont look asian. Most of us are dark haired, dark eyed, white skin.

Filipinos, the most powerful race.

The whole phrasing is flawed from the ground up. Even Hitler said chinks should be proud of their lengthy culture. A more appropriate term would be "honorary westerner". Honestly the term "white people" is bullshit propaganda originally spread by (((socialists))) to promote nigger rights. When the irish and italians were being discriminated against for being the subhumans they are from their respectively shit nations, there was no wink-wink-nudge-nudge about being a similar color.
>sure i hate your disgusting people and refuse to offer you work or rent you housing...but hey at least you're not a nigger
It never happened. Furthering on this: what does an anglo and a slav have in common other than skin color? Their cultures are different, their customs are different, but somehow it's ok to group them together in the same 'white people' category. How is that NOT the definition of racism?