I'm confused

Okay so:

Right is supposed to represent the upper class, right? The factory owners and all that?
And left is supposed to represent the general working class? Factory workers and such?

If so, why is right anti-immigration left pro-immigration?
Immigration would greatly benefit factory owners and upper class, as it would provide practically free workforce, that otherwise would be hard to come by. So, shouldn't the right support immigration?
And for the left, the immigrants would cause unemployment of the local population, and the left is supposed guard their jobs and rights. So wouldn't it be impractical for the left to support immigration?

I dunno, I'm confused...

Right doesn't represent upper class. Right represents white, christian and conservative.

Left represent non-white and supposed acceptance of all less conservative and non-religious.

The right doesn't have a problem with immigration, they have a problem with non-white Immigration which means a threat to white. It's not rocket science you retard, Trump won because he revived something people have hidden and felt threaten for: white nationalism

Ok.
Then what the fuck happened to the traditional right and left?
Am I too outdated, user?

The left was co opted by cultural marxists to push their agenda - destabilize the nuclear family unit, secularize the people and institute socialist reform in the government.

The right has become greedy, with many sacrificing their values for personal gain.

*My eyes bleed as my world crumbles*

No, you are viewing politics through the lens of identity politics rather than what the core of their arguments are.

The Right: Small government is the way to go with as little interference as possible. If government gets too much power, it can only lead to bad things.
Freedom > Equality

Center: I understand that some government intervention is necessary, but less is more. Freedom and Equality must be balanced.

The Left: Government intervention is necessary and there should be more of it. Nothing bad can come of this.
Freedom < Equality

As to answer your question:
The word ___-immigration is a misnomer. The right and left are not arguing whether or not immigration should be a thing; what they are arguing about is whether the controls on that immigration should be lax or strict. The Right is very much for rule of law and thus wishes to see those laws upheld. The Left is very much for equality, and this is usually extended, although most of the time with feelings and not logic, across borders, thus illegal immigration isn't a big problem.

>The Right: Small government
>The Left: Government intervention

I thought those were supposed to be authoritarianism and libertarianism?

That's certainly one way to look at it.

The attribution of authoritarianism to the Right is common mistake, but it's an understandable one what with Hitler and all that nonsense. Let's say what you say is true: is Stalin the most libertarian leader ever? Of course not.

The nature of authoritarianism seems to manifest itself at the ends of ideologies; their endgames, whether it be right or left.

I consider myself a liberal in all respects. Life, Liberty, Property, Freedom of Expression, Individuality, the works. The careful balance between the two that liberals (and no not the modern conception of liberals, I mean in the classical sense) strive for is for the very purpose of preventing authoritarianism from either the Right or Left.

Okay, thanks for easing my worry a bit.
But still, man, politics is complicated.
I will go to sleep now.

Societies need vs society wants with no regard to degeneracy.

Total focus on issues with no positive and progressive need in society. Absolute self-absorded superficialness. Pretty much everyone has become a jew

Industry right-wingers like the Koch brothers do support immigration. Bush did a pro-immigration reform.

and if i had a choice over which authoritarian government ruled me, I would chose NatSoc over Communism every time.

Read more is what I say. I'm an ardent defender of Liberalism. Read Locke's Second Treatise, Rousseau's Discourse on the Origin of Inequality, and maybe The Social Contract (a bit too collectivist for my taste).

Then it's important to understand the criticisms of Liberalism. Mill, Tocqueville, Marx, Nietzsche.

Also the """right-wing"""" (((neocons))) don't have a problem with mass immigration and declining white population.

Reagan Democrats

Although I'd rather resist and die fighting an authoritarian regime that tried to topple my government, I would legitimately pick NatSoc as well.

The degeneration of the soul is not as progressive as it would be under Communism. Maybe I'd kill myself at the age of 60 rather than 45 under NatSoc.

You are confusing the political spectrum with Neoconservatiam and Neoliberalism. Both ideologies are centrist neither left or right.

no need to be confused. it's just that

>Right is supposed to represent the upper class, right?
Wrong but I can see why you're confused. It does represent them, it's supposed to represent traditionalist values.
>And left is supposed to represent the general working class?
Correct but they actually represent non-whites and progressivism, that's about it.
>If so, why is right anti-immigration
Also wrong. The only anti-immigration guys on the right are the nationalists, the rest want high immigration for cheap labour.

The left's one over-arching principle is the hatred of America/Western society, and the men who have built it. Once you understand that, everything else falls into place.

>No, you are viewing politics through the lens of identity politics
Does the kosher sandwich taste nice?

There are many types of right wing movements. The more liberal ones (like minarchists, libertarians) and the more traditionalists ones (like conservatives and nationalists).

Different businesses have different needs. For example, tech industries benefit from a more libertarian approach where they can acquire cheap qualified workers from overseas and import/export more easily. The primary sector might benefit more from a more authoritarian approach that protects them from foreign competition. It depends.

The working class is no exception and these actually make the bulk of the extremist parties: one part is in direct competition with unqualified foreign workers (the majority of migrants). This is the true bulk of the far right (not the edgy tards that shitpost in this board). The other simply blames the wealthy for their misfortunes and appeal for forced equality (soviets and communists).

Lefties and rights are all garbage. Only a very small portion of politicians are sincere. But all governments are evil.

right & left both support big business, big governemnt, open borders, globalism, etc

the migrants only vote left, so the left pushes it harder

by the time a politician is out of office they're already millionaires and can live in a gated community like they do in south africa if shit really hits the fan

>*traditionalist ones