Give me one argument against Globalism without referring to nationalism or culture.
Give me one argument against Globalism without referring to nationalism or culture
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
archive.4plebs.org
twitter.com
Muh culture muhfugga
Too small minded - we're intergalacticists now
If eugenics are going to be a thing then nothing, otherwise it means being flooded with subhumans
Religion
People aren't equal.
Driving down wages because of 3rd world shitskins who will work like slaves
That's good.
...
you cant make BLACKED porn if all the women are already half african.
God doesn't exist. Grow up.
NEXT!
who wants to get his ass handed to him?
Where you going to threaten to run away to when your candidate loses?
According to Varg she is an African nigger because she has Brown hair...
Centralized government is always less effective than local. That is, until it inevitably seeks as much power as it can get its hands on. And remember, the more power the government has, the less power you have.
Competition is the driver of human innovation
Yep.
This just proves the argument against globalism is whole pinged on nationalism and culture - two irrelevant and archaic concepts from the stone age.
it profits the richest and the poorest in the world, at the detriment of everyone else in the middle
finite resources doesnt mean we should share everything, life sucks and to the victor goes the spoils.
An unelected bureaucrat in anywhere else in the world doesnt know how to fish here and as such has no qualification to pass or have any effect on fishing legislation where I am from.
niggers
Prove he doesnt exist.
Just because we have a federal government doesn't mean we also don't have state governments. Similarly, why would having a global government stop local governments from enacting their own localized laws?
We need a global government to deal with global threats just as we need a federal government to deal with federal threats.
You'll never see your tax dollars work for you, because they are being spent on the other side of the world.
No, it just proves the only argument you have is muh current year nonsense.
This.
Thats okay because the tax dollars from the other side of the world are being spent here.
2287 hey it really sucks that we live in this dictatorship well lets just move to another country ........... o yeah idiots like op 300 years ago thought they were evil and racist
How is that a good thing?
Cheaper stuff.
Tell me about how much of humanitarian help did Canada get from Nigeria in 2016.
self-determination, democratic power/voice, and rights of the individual are far superior to the needs and wants of the herd
Like I said, centralized government always seeks more power, as it has done in both the states and in the EU.
Most people don't know this, but, like the three branches have checks and balances to keep the other branches from becoming too powerful, the levels of government (local, state, federal) also had checks and balanaces until the Supreme Court basically overrided the constitution and made itself more powerful in multiple ways. Before that point states had much more independancy and leverage.
I guess if you look at it from the perspective of we're all the same one world government then maybe.
Though you could argue that it's better to have everyone employed than everyone having the ability to buy cheap goods
They gave us diversity which is priceless.
The truth about immigration, by the numbers:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxist Jews Admit Organizing White Genocide
The plan to eliminate the white race:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxism in action… Political Correctness, the tip of the blade:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxism & Social Justice Explained:
>youtube.com
Why are we in Decline - Cultural Marxism:
>youtube.com
also see
The facts about slavery in North America:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxist Jews fund media propaganda against whites on an enormous scale:
>youtube.com
Does this sound familiar at all? (starting at 6:52)
>youtu.be
The Holocaust:
>youtube.com
Globalism devalues both workers and products by allowing vastly different locales to compete with one another. While this seems like a good thing at face value, there are two major side effects:
(A) It incentivizes areas with lower standards of living to remain underdeveloped in order maintain and edge on product cost by maintaining poor working conditions, and (B) it reduces regional independence; Regions that come to rely on outside products gradually lose the ability to produce those products, themselves. This decreases regional ability to make up for shortfalls in necessary goods caused by natural disasters, military action, or other unexpected outcome.
For instance, European dependency on Russian fuel places European nations as a whole at risk should Russia suffer a disaster.
So why won't we have checks and balances in a global government?
You guys act as if a global government is a totalitarian state. It's literally not. It'd be like parliament with seats from each country.
Why is culture not an acceptable answer to you?
Let's get back to your previous post
>Thats okay because the tax dollars from the other side of the world are being spent here.
Where are those Nigerian taxes again?
Biology
I think you missed the point. He was saying that different religious groups will clash and create turmoil and unrest.
>Argue against X without bringing up the superiour alternative to X.
You already know you're wrong. Jew logic won't help you.
Yes but Europe is only singularly dependent on Russian fuel. If we lived in a global world Europe would have access to fuel in anywhere in the world and would ease up reliance of any one region on another region's resources.
we should try to preserve and maximize the dignity of each human life, global capitalism is predicated upon perpetual growth in the economy and ultimately in the population of useless eaters and wage slaves
/thread
>So why won't we have checks and balances in a global government?
Because global government, spanning over thousands of ethnic groups can play divide and conquer until it gets rid of those checks and balances. The options for doing it are virtually limitless in that setup.
I used to be varg internet defense force but fuck him
It's exploitative of lesser nations in multiple ways, Brain Drain, Slave-tier Labor, ect.
>It's superior because I'm retarded
next
it vastly lowers the value of labor and concentrates wealth in the hands of a tiny elite. it turns the whole world into a shitty managed economy populated by a hodgepodge of cultureless consuming units
You can say the same of the US. It's not true though.
whats 2+2 and you cant say 4
the self proclaimed rulers of earth are self interested
culture and ethnic purity have more tangible value than your cheap produce and leaded childrens' toys
Gayest shit I've ever read you kike faggot
Let people who suffer consequences of a decision take the decision.
>culture
errr
wrong
also "muh i cant compete with others so everyone must suffer"
literally toddler's mindset. why don't you innovate?
>i-i can't.
lol. pathetic. NEXT
Easy- sustainability. Globalism is about money, and economic growth requires population growth. The planet can't sustain that many people and quality of life will continue to degrade for all but the ultra rich. And yet the same people pushing for this are publicly condemning the ultra rich and ironically pushing for solar panels.
Tighter connections mean that one node can bring down the entire system down.
See: greece & the eu.
>It'd be like parliament with seats from each country
And why the fuck would anyone want that besides lefty ideologues like yourself?
niggers are disgusting
You ignored me you kike trudaeu leaf motherfucker. Humans are like the Chimpanzee and not the Bonobo
What do you not get about centralized governments being power-hungry? Even with the checks and balances in place, our fed still managed to fuck the system, and that's given them the freedom to guve itself more power than it had originally ever since.
Even so, what part about politicians in Brussels deciding how many muzzies get to live in some poor schmucks house in Liverpool sounds appealing to you?
you should run off to bed wagie, mr. goldberg will be most upset if you clock in late again
There are many countries on the planet that don't even have parliaments. What makes you think that they'd sit down with countries that they want to see destroyed?
It distorts the market. With globalism huge corporations can leverage the poor and desperate against the workers to keep wages low or essentially create a new slave cast.
The workers can't do anything about that because while a corporation can easily afford international lawyers and bi-linguals to operate globally, a workers union can not. A workers union also needs strong cohesion, which does not exist between say American workers and workers from India.
evil jews have been secretly working toward globalism for more than a century.
they've killed countless numbers of innocent people and deceived the world to get us to where we are today.
"Give me one argument against globalism without referring to the two things globalism is attempting to destroy."
Go get HIV you fucking faggot.
Society progresses because communities with vaguely similar morals and viewpoints can work towards common goals.
What makes society cease functioning is throwing in a new population with drastically distant viewpoints, which in turn always leads to "these X people should be persecuted and killed because of my Y beliefs."
Also, leaf
it's impossible to unite all peoples without an alien invasion forcing us to unite
same reason communism is garbage
Im a NEET atm but YOU are the goldberg porky faggot. Capitalism a shit.
Because it's the main requirement to make communism work
Globalists are filthy commies
It affects negatively on anyone else but rich. All worker movements should be nationalistic, but for some odd reason the jew has convinced them, that bringing foreign workers to lower wages is good for you.
Centralized power.
How can Canada even compete? That's right, it can't.
is anyone but the right expression?
The issue of still being unable to make up for shortfalls remains. The ability to get help from somewhere else does not alter the fact that regions are not encouraged under a global system to be capable of self-suffiency.
Blood. Soil. There's two.
That's not true. The federal government likes nothing more than to get bigger
you're fuuucking stupid holy shit
you have no reading comprehension do you? i just criticized capitalism in that first post i made you dumbfuck
It becomes easier for big corporations to collude with politicians.
It becomes easier for politicians to have less accountability.
It dilutes the power of the vote and concentrates even more power in the hands of a small international elite.
The distance between citizens and the government becomes even wider. It's already hard for a common citizen to deal with big governments, it will only get worse. Sometimes the Mayor of a city is detached from the reality of some of its constituents, imagine a "president" of a supranational block that you didn't even elect, doesn't even live in your country or know your culture, that appoints bureaucrats that will create regulations that will affect you. How the fuck do you deal with that?
Fuck yourself dickbag im tired
Give me one argument against leaf genocide without referring to maple syrup or hockey.
Where they convinced or did they just not have a voice in the matter? It's kinda hard to fight the global power that rules you.
no nation is self sufficient. without china the us wouldn't be able to make electronics because its REM plants are shit and cannot meet the demand for it.
Literally no cons
And it is balanced by the local governments trying to get more power.
If it works in the US, it'll work for the world.
We dont need electronics cosmopolitan dicksleeve KEK
>Give me one argument against Globalism
>multiculturalism
>does not work
nice try tho.
You'd have to get out of your chair fatty.
you're a faggit, you're looking for excuses to get mad and instigate shit with people and it's made you DUMB
Economics. Example: Nazi Germany; no central bank, reichsmark system restored them to one of the strongest economies in the world post WWI. Literally valued their currency on human labor, directly responsible for their success in building an army, science, and all other developments until WWII.
A country that is independent is stronger. This is for the good of that country, not others.
i.e. the United States would benefit from taking care of itself, the rest of the world would suffer not leeching off our foreign aid/heavy deficits in trade.
Depends what side of the border you're on.
>lol we dont need REM. bye bye military. bye bye everything that was built 50 years ago.
pic very related
I'm a lazy millenial who is too ADHD from watching porn all day to learn so I just work at Arby's part time, live with my parents and spend my cash on anime fleshlights. Globalism means Somalians will take muh Arby's job then how will I buy fleshlights and pocky? What am I supposed to do go back to community college? Again?
Fundamentally globalism is a good concept.
If we ever want to make sci-fi real we need one world government.
The problem is that the current (((people))) pushing for globalism would use such a system to create a authoritarian oligarchal dystopia
99% of the population would go to either America or wealthy EU countries to take advantage of better paying jobs and better infrastructure. Thus making infrastructure in piggyback countries like Mexico and Canada obsolete and useless since manning the stations for empty cities is pointless and stragglers would be forced to move as well so the power isn't on for a couple thousand people in the middle of iceniggerville, canadia.
It happens though. In the US you can clearly see politicians playing divide and conquer, meanwhile stripping their citizens from their rights. Sometimes on act local think global basis(especially gun rights), sometimes just straightforward the fed said you can't kind of things(Patriot act).
Democrats evidently have lax immigrant policy because they know Hispanics vote 7:3 in favour of them. As the US grants citizenship by birth, it means that in course of 25 years, a couple of Mexicans will have, let's say - 4 kids that are grown up and can already vote.
Republicans tried the same thing too - why do you think Reagan gave illegals in Cali amnesty? They should've known better but they still tried it - I mean what's the reason behind Rubio and Jeb "I talk Spanish at home" Bush and his guac bowls?
If its not Somalians then it'll be machines.
you can't keep your shit job forever you know. this isn't the 50s anymore.
Leaves the whole world at stake if a single governing body makes a bad financial decision.
>Give subprime loans in the US
>Fuck the whole world
>Give subsidies for construction in China
>Fuck the whole world
>Give endless "loans" to countries that will not pay
>Fuck the whole world
>Base the world monetary policy in a petroleum backed currency
>Fuck the whole world
Everyone that has tried escaping those problems gets killed