The motion has begun to end net neutrality. What should we do about it?

The motion has begun to end net neutrality. What should we do about it?

Get rid of the liberals.

Kind of obvious.

We are well beyond the time to look for the answer to the liberal question.

>we

fuck off back to Bongistan, John Oliver

...

Sauce?

"Access to social media such as Four Chan is only available through an extra 19.99 Social Media Gold package."

This is your future.

John Oliver is world's biggest cunt for mentioning Sup Forums and Reddit together in the last ep

I'm surprised Sup Forums didn't rage a lot harder

1. Kill all the Sup Forums posters who put up sexual imagery.

2.

Lmao ur about to be more fucker than us.

Start by posting a source.

Nothing

Anyhting liberals support is now LITERAL CANCER

America has rejected liberalism now and forever

The Internet should never stop being a wild west zone.

If you don't have anything to hide, you've got nothing to fear. It's for the greater good!!

>Get rid of the people in government protecting net neutrality.
>Get rid of the only people in government protecting internet privacy laws.
I hope you can't wait to pay an extra 15$ per month to access Sup Forums.

It stopped being that a while back

Augh I want a waifu

Stop

based deregulation and capitalism

>I want to pay an extra $19.99 for Sup Forums

>But thats okay, because it would make Liberals made xd

Nothing is going to happen Sup Forums has been invaded by bootlicking queers

Yeah, the first time Net Neutrality was being debated around 2011-12, the whole of Sup Forums (along with most of the internet) was against removing it.

Now this place is infested with newfags who suck the American governments cock.

guys dont worry, islam will fix sweden

On the flip side why should ISPs pay for the brunt and demand of services like Netflix? This whole net neutrality exists because kikes at Netflix don't want to pay extra for the strain they put on ISPs.

Gutting net neutrality will return the Internet to the American people. Based Ajit Pai. I'm so glad Obama appointed him to the FCC in 2012.

What are they planning on changing?

The internet will be free from oppressive and limiting govt regulation. It will be the greatest accomplishment of the Obama administration.

How hard is it to pass it onto the consumer by raising the fee a bit more? 4k is overrated, 720p is adequate for most needs anyway and there are always advances in codecs.

oh no..... people might actually stand up and walk away from this make believe world and rejoin the real community.

Why does the Democrat party care so much about net neutrality?

Fuck google.

nothing

the internet wasn't horrible before net neutrality
what changed?

what if we just make a new interweb?

What's all this "we" talk about?

If my internet gets faster and cheaper anyway im gonna kick your ass

I've always wanted this, a new internet, and another system besides the FED.

Pretty much split the world and go our own way, in your own circle.

Do you understand the billions of dollars it takes to build an interconnected web of cables on a functional network?

If you want to leave all these billion dollar coorperations behind you can't continue to use their multi billion dollar infrastructure.

At this point most of old Sup Forums has left and nu/pol/ is just those brought here from reddit/zuckbook by trump/pepes and the ones sprouting kekistan bullshit.

You fucking retards have no idea how the free market works.

If Comcast or AT&T (whoever has a monopoly over your town) starts pushing shit like "Pay only 29.99 a month for Sup Forums and PornHub!" then a very large portion of people would start demanding to get rid of this nonsense.

If that happens, either AT&T/Comcast will cave in to the pressure and stop advertising such "packages", or competing industries will see a business opportunity and start funding technologies that would allow them to bring wireless high speed reliable internet into households WITHOUT relying on those cables. Their monopolies would be ended.

Because they refuse to allow any sort of competition, government funded or otherwise. If they won't let me pick my provider, then I'm sure as hell gonna run up the bandwidth usage to get what I paid for.

Not if they all do it.

Or are you going to create a startup ISP and compete with them? And how will you keep customers when none of the major websites work on your network because they all block you abd your entire customer base?

Sauce this shit nigger

>Thinks the Free Market will magically provide a solution to every problem on earth.
>Calls others retarded.
If you have yet to notice you need infrastructure to provide Internet service, that infrastructure is incredibly expensive and also require the approval of local municipalities to be created. It also just happens that the ISP's have bought out the politicians in these local municipalities and those politicians will block any newcomer from laying down the cable infrastructure needed.
The wireless solution is also fucking retarded, which company is going to spend billions of dollars on creating a brand new wireless network and not charge as much as possible in order to achieve maximum profitability for their shareholders? Not to mention that wireless connection is inferior in nearly every way.

YUH!

You seriously think that there is or was a net neutrality before?

Naive.

2012 here, Sup Forums has always been shit. For it's credit though, it at least used to be anti-government consistently, from outright conspiritard shit to supporting Raw Paw. Now it's full of Trump dicksuckers, so it may be a bit worse, but it was never good.

If they kill net neutrality, I'm not saying you should destroy the infrastructure but....

it's just a series of tubes.

this

all the retards saying "muh monopolies and lack of choice" well get what assholes, the government is what made that happen. The same fucking gov that wants net neutrality.

net neutrality and a government-sponsored isp monopoly, both have to fuck off, and fuck off fast. Caving in to the gov with NN and the status quo of ISP monopolies is pathetic

everytime i see her i fall more in love

So lets say net neutrality goes away.

A competing ISP emerges. Why wouldn't the monopolies ban them from the network and cut them off?

Who is going to pay for a service that can access 10% of the available internet and doesn't have any of the mainstream sites like youtube and facebook? I might pay for it, but I think 99% of people won't.

You're telling me we could have Sup Forums on a whole separate internet from the normies? sign me the fuck up

but senpai isn't that what the gestapo said

what do you mean by "banning them from the network", they can still access the internet, remember?

ISP's can't fucking stop people, the customers, from visiting web pages, altogether. That's not what net neutrality is at all. It's just redirecting throttling speed, not connection itself. We had internet just fine prior to 2015, it's just that the ISP's keep the market to themselves and use government to push out competition. No net neutrality but more competition is just literally more options, better deals, better packages, and cheaper prices

and yeah that sounds pretty good too. A privacy-focused private ISP sounds nice, rather than the usual isp and the gov with all eyes on us

cause cable companies didn't see the potential in it back then, now that they do they're gonna strap us up like a gimp and make us beg for whippings

technically that already exists but just between universities

>ISP's can't fucking stop people, the customers, from visiting web pages, altogether.
Yes they can, if net neutrality is gone. And who gets to define throttling? What if they just slow youtube access to 10kbps? It's not blocked. It will just take you 200 hours to load a 5 minute 1080p video. It's not "blocked"...

Get rid of net neutrality.
It's insane how people on Sup Forums are so blue pilled on net neutrality. You've completely fallen for the MSM propaganda.

Congressmen benefit from the communication lobby -> communication enterprises must perpetually increase their income -> people are cancelling their cable subscriptions in favor of IPTV -> communication enterprises must recoup their losses somehow -> congressmen help said companies by way of regulatory capture -> goto start

>A privacy-focused private ISP
That doesn't even make sense unless it uses the established monopoly infrastructure.

Your idea is like building your own driveway, and then your friend in another state building his own driveway. Then you drive from your house to his house using the federal interstate and claim you used your own private road system to do it.

>if we don't allow the government to control the internet, companies will just cut internet access to random sites for no reason and put themselves out of business

This is what blue pilled retards actually believe

if it's 10kbps, then people go somewhere else that's the point. Anybody putting youtube to 10kbps is business suicide anyways, everybody goes on there. If anything, they'd ramp up and throttle YouTube so that I'd get even faster connection for less of my money, because it's concentrated

Anyone think ending net neutrality will result in internet providers being forced to finally supply better internet to rural areas? You're all saying it will hurt their monopolies and allow competition.

Good riddance. I don't want poor people on my internet.

if the infrastructure was rented to be under different ownership under a different set of rules, the terms of use aren't exactly the same anymore. It's still different, and hopefully that difference means better quality service and cheaper prices or people go somewhere else to who does

Nobody gonna call this faggot out for being a cuckshill for raping the internet?

for that to happen they would need to cut down on the isp monopoly regulation laws directly so more interest in local expansion is made by smaller ISPs. Net neutrality on its own won't do much, but it's a step in the right direction for government to fuck off

Then you should be supporting NN, you stupid fuck.

Why do you assholes keep getting it completely backwards?
>hurr durr ending NN means more expensive internet
>hurr durr ending NN means more censorship
>hurr durr ending NN means slower internet
>hurr durr ending NN means less internet access
It's the exact fucking opposite, are you idiots paying any attention?
You don't even know what you are supporting and what you are opposing.
Useful idiots.

Go to this site
>gofccyourself.com
>click express
>spend a fuckin minute and tell the FCC to preserve net neutrality
>troll while your at it!! Fuck!! Trump!!

Example: "PRESERVE THE GOD DAMN NET NEUTRALITY!!!!! Don't listen to butt fuck trump's half witted pocketed retard, use your brain stems and realize that Act II is fine as it is. Fuck Pai in his squirrelly ass."
Don't be retard.

imagine 10 inch black dick between those tits

Judging by pic related I'd say fap
Furiously and then experience the usual
Horrible guilt

cable bill is $200 a month and I cant even stream 4K when I want

with all that money you would think they would upgrade their 40 year old copper lines

celebrate

>The Internet should never stop being a wild west zone.
this

>No net neutrality but more competition is just literally more options, better deals, better packages, and cheaper prices
>10 comcasts ripping me off is better than one

wew

They don't put any "extra strain" on ISPs. Internet speeds in the US are laughably shit compared to the rest of the world. An ISP in the US complaining about having strain put on them is like a fatty crying about how hard it is to diet.
They haven't even BEGUN to feel any kind of strain.

>not choosing which ISP offers the best deals for you, meaning that the other ISPs must now try and do better by sweetening their own packages

choose the least shitty comcast clone, and watch the other comcast clones offer more quality services in order to stay in business. You can only win while things get cheaper with more benefits if you have the power of choice. no ripping off needed

She's ready to get blacked by multiple BBCs.

Are you some sort of idiot ?

Do you not understand than in many places in the USA there is only one ISP ? How does competition work then fucktard.

The fuck is based about this?

>in many places in the USA there is only one ISP

that's the problem caused by government, fixed by less government, not more, not government-based net neutrality. Less regulations means an easier time for business to start, and more choices so what happens as I described can happen

this. just imagine black dicks slapping those tits and face

In a perfect world you might be onto something, but ending net neutrality in the current environment is going to encourage the psuedo-monopoly and region trading, where certain regions only have one option to choose from across almost the entire country, and they're all garbage, because there's not actually any competition. Crony capitalism in motion.

>muh less regulations

don't you have a snake flag to wave around you retard

>regulations that make it harder for smaller businesses to develop
>complains of only one ISP and ISP monopoly

really maeks you think

why would that happen?

Men, there is an escape, cast off your degenerate mind prisons!

All you must do is quit the porn jew, and the rubbing your own cock with your own hand like a monkey jew!

>since it stopped being that a while back, we should make it less that

not just that, it's going to royally FUCK the small business that I have been building a marketing campaign for.

massivemassivemassive

this

I feel like this topic should be a call to arms. I'm disappointed that it sounds more like fucking whining