If Democrats and liberals are so ignorant of economics, then why are economists in America 2:1 Democrat:Republican?

If Democrats and liberals are so ignorant of economics, then why are economists in America 2:1 Democrat:Republican?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE
youtube.com/watch?v=bOgkGzMdieI
youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM
youtube.com/watch?v=xnqIj8C2Aek
youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs
youtube.com/watch?v=b5tci36bNjg
youtube.com/watch?v=-4Ojbi6lXQI
youtu.be/kPdxhLUKZYM?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe&t=412
youtube.com/watch?v=tPc899uUb-A
youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk
youtube.com/watch?v=TxpIsep4160
youtube.com/watch?v=IKy3fCvMz-8
youtube.com/watch?v=PE56dcgGVMs
youtube.com/watch?v=pDsJtB2F9i8
youtube.com/watch?v=7dxsVSzL4HE
youtube.com/watch?v=3HlPcaP9x5o
youtube.com/watch?v=80GgRWuXcO8
forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/08/02/surprise-70-of-economists-support-hillary-not-trump-but-70-of-economists-are-democrats-anyway/#c4b91f73fba2
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Academia is a liberal bubble.

The truth about immigration by the numbers:

>youtube.com/watch?v=LPjzfGChGlE

Cultural Marxist Jews Admit Organizing White Genocide

The plan to eliminate the white race:

>youtube.com/watch?v=bOgkGzMdieI

Cultural Marxism in action… Political Correctness, the tip of the blade:

>youtube.com/watch?v=q6c_dinY3fM

Cultural Marxism & Social Justice Explained:

>youtube.com/watch?v=xnqIj8C2Aek

Why are we in Decline - Cultural Marxism:

>youtube.com/watch?v=VggFao85vTs

also see

The facts about slavery in North America:

>youtube.com/watch?v=b5tci36bNjg

Cultural Marxist Jews fund media propaganda against whites on an enormous scale:

>youtube.com/watch?v=-4Ojbi6lXQI

Does this sound familiar at all? (starting at 6:52)

>youtu.be/kPdxhLUKZYM?list=PLo0ThsDnveH5nv5TNviBrGTX9P6IrYfIe&t=412

The Holocaust:

>youtube.com/watch?v=tPc899uUb-A

>youtube.com/watch?v=jgGP_evkvOk

>youtube.com/watch?v=TxpIsep4160

more like free fugs lol

because they fuck with it constantly. Ever hear of Clinton's cattle futures scandal? of course not! you're fucking retarded and have no opinions of your own.

Democrat economist =/= Democrat voter

> Because they fuck with it constantly
How, by doing better with it and having it perform better under them?

Those who can, do.. those who can't ,teach. .. There are no billionaire professors teaching business classes...

Economists are poor as fuck. therefore democrat

one for me pls

Sauce?

At Majdanek, (((Soviets))) claimed that 2 million Jews were killed in gas chambers. Thanks to revisionists, today it's believed less than 60,000 died (primarily of disease). The Red Cross estimated only 8,000 had died there. That is a drop of almost 2 million. Most normies don't know that, and continue quoting the 6 gorillion.

At Auschwitz, (((Soviets))) claimed 4 million people died in gas chambers. Today, the TOTAL death toll sits at 1.1 million (from ALL causes, eg disease). That is a drop of almost 3 million, though still grossly inflated going by Red Cross reports.

Normies blindly believe the 6 gorillion because they don't bother examining such a grisly topic from a critical pov. They take it on faith that (((Hollywood))) and what they learnt in school is 100% factual.

Watch these, if you STILL believe the Holohoax myth, you may be a Jew!
>The JQ:
youtube.com/watch?v=IKy3fCvMz-8
>Auschwitz - Why The Gas Chambers Are A Myth:
youtube.com/watch?v=PE56dcgGVMs
>The Majdanek Gas Chamber Myth:
youtube.com/watch?v=pDsJtB2F9i8
>1/3rd of the Holocaust (debunked):
youtube.com/watch?v=7dxsVSzL4HE
>Buchenwald: A Dumb Dumb Portrayal of Evil:
youtube.com/watch?v=3HlPcaP9x5o

>The Last Days of the Big Lie
Spielberg's Oscar-winning documentary about the Shoah uses discredited eyewitness Paul Parks, who lies about being in a unit that liberated Dachau.
Parks, a known fraud, was in an earlier documentary about black soldiers liberating concentration camps, criticized by the press after being disproven by historians and military records.
NO BLACKS were involved in liberating ANY camps. But Spielberg uses Paul Parks as 1 of his 5 key witnesses in The Last Days, because the ONE American soldier in it couldn't be a WHITE guy, no he wanted it to be a NIGGER for his anti-white agenda.
Other obvious lies are also exposed:
youtube.com/watch?v=80GgRWuXcO8

Leigh Schuyler

>be democrat
>get cheap labor lel
>people are pissed
>make up some propaganda shit to make them love the foreigners stealing their jobs
>massive amounts of profit
>mfw the liberal college student blame the republicans they have no job

There's almost certainly a very strong link between the two.
Professors make a lot of money though at a safe job, it's the smart choice to do in all honesty, jobs like that (billionaire-tier) require shit tons of sacrifice, risk, etc. compared to a low-stress job with guaranteed $80k+ a year.
No they aren't and you don't know what you're talking about.
Just some random chick from a while back.

The American economy is carried by Boston and San Francisco who create all the technology and science, and then NYC administers the economy by marketing that technology to the rest of the world.

The rest of America just hopped along for the ride and for some reason think that their opinion matters.

Most Dems and liberals are Communists, plain and simple.

By having leftist ghouls in powerful positions regarding the US economy...they can wreak more havoc, to bankrupt America and then force government to take all control, of every aspect of everyone's lives.

Economics is more an art than a science. Also being in academia makes you out of touch with reality because you create a view that everything is sterile and perfectly monitorable like an experiment

Same reason Richard Dawkins is a biologist: easier to put out fake info and nonsense when people think you've got credentials.

The same reason climate scientists are overwhelmingly believe in global warming. It makes them relevant.

An economist that truly believes in the free market doesn't have the justification for controlling people.

You know its possible to be ignorant and an economist right?

Controlled for inflation republican numbers are better.

If you think $80K is not dirt poor in their circle of friends.

Proof that their policy ideas are disasters for the country.

>Dem
>burger
>black chicks
>stupid arguments
Nigger detected

Because, most academia is taken by a economic current that appeals to government intervention and welfare (keynesianism), and marxists in general, and this happens with any other area in college.

And because those economists are demanded, the ((media)) is looking for them, they often write stuff that is about what people want to hear (muh inequality government, muh gibs, muh welfare) (e.g Piketty's Capital book). You see them in news and tv shows.

> Stupid arguments
There literally are nearly or just over 2 times as many Democratic as Republican economists in the US whether you like it or not. Republicans like to think they know economics and that all there is to it is small government but they're completely wrong.

Wrong. The study measures real GDP

Youre an idiot

I really enjoy watching someone who doesn't have a real understanding of economicd, act like they do. "Free market" is such a vague and useless term. But, yeah keep reading wikipedia and listening to "self-educated" libertarians.

Because free market economists seek jobs that carry different titles, pay more, and actually contribute to the economy. "Progressives" seek carry-me employment via the State, not the market economy. Their job titles are Economist. It's pretty straight forward.

economics is a social science and incapable of actually predicting anything

So because there are more that means they have to be right, correct?

most economists are ego maniac keynesians that think that they can outsmart the free market through centralized planning(they can not).

11/10 would definitely take her up on that offer
Enjoy, friends:
leddit/u/i_hug_strangers

If Democrats are so well educated why have they never heard the phrase "correlation is not causation"?

You don't know what Keynesianism is, and the fact that it completely dominates economic pedagogy and interpretation says something about it being at least partially correct.
There's something to be said about an educated field which holds an overwhelming ideological predisposition, and it's closer to being correct more likely than not.
Wrong, it's predicted things all the time before.
Free market economists like nearly all of them? Free market economists get jobs in the economy, like Milton Friedman, who was a university professor?

This. Colleges are rigged. Also those are corporate sell you down the river Dems. Plus Coastal Jew culture where they fuck the world over economically but want to pretend to be an oppressed minority and pretending they are doing some civil rights bullshit gets them off.

Youre an idiot, having a billion democrat economists doesnt transfer that knowledge to you.

Your best economist (nobel prize and everything) Thought the solution to the dot com bubble was a real estate bubble. And that the solution to our economic recession is a fake alien war.
Tell me you believe this crap.

correct in the method of studying the economic indicators, not on performing magic with the economy, never has worked, will never work.

republicans make more money tard

They use top down Keynes theory because it gives them a job and makes the economy something to be controlled.

The "economists" on TV are not impartial experts.

They are literally paid shills whose job is to advocate a certain economic position

>muh conspiracy

No, you fucking idiot. They make good money giving speeches and peddling books that attempt to articulate their paymasters' economic agenda. If they suddenly start saying "you know what, here are some great ways to aggressively end tax evasion by the uber rich" then they can do that, but they're going to find it a lot harder to publish their books and the speaking fees will dry up.

tl;dr TV economists are 95-99% literal paid shills.

A meaningless statistic even if you had a citation (which you don't) because the vast majority of all professors, period, are Democrats.

A more relevant statistic would be to compare the ratio of Democrat economists to Republican economists with the total ratio of all Democrat professors to all Republican professors. When doing so we discover that economists have a greater likelihood of being Republican than any other type of professor.

ever notice how in the last few decades the democrats are mostly a corporatist whig party while their individual members might have really left wing politics
guess which side of that divide a democratic economist at a university sits on

>there's more bad economists in the US than there are good ones
ok thanks dude

patiently waiting for someone to post the infographic that shits on the supposed proofs of dem economy growth by showing that when the economy grew, republicans had majorities in the house/senate and vice versa, and detailed to the point which shows concretely that liberal economics have fucked this country for decades.

why is that
is it because smart people are all liberal?

Because the days of even the once prestigious Chicago university cranking out economic geniuses like Dr. Thomas Sowell and Milton Friedman are long over. Your average economics course teaches retardation like the following:
>minimum wage is good, more money being spent, there's no relation to unemployment
>Inflation needs to be curbed by government, and the best way to do that is controlling the money supply with a federal reserve banking system as opposed to a gold standard
>Universal basic income is totally a good idea my dudes
Seriously a lot of people going to university these days are not being taught economics, they're being taught leftist bullshit. I got in an argument where I was trying to explain to a bro (he's in university) that minimum wage is a fraud that raises the cost of living and increases unemployment and the idiot started spouting the meme concepts above and when I pointed out it was bullshit he said "oh well I guess my economics course means nothing compared to watching videos on youtube like you." To which I replied, "Well if I'm getting more accurate information who's wasting their money?' He was pretty choked by that.
Still the thing is this: Economics classes in universities are becoming garbage, and the only economists worth listening to are conservative ones, and most of them are old.

In case you haven't noticed, economists are worthless.

Could just be a regular shitposter and he has the black chick folder just to fuck with Sup Forums. Our trolls are merciless he could be white as fuck and just a shitposter.

My economics professor said that the minimum wages was "not a very good leverage point" and that increasing it would accomplish nothing.

Why are bankers in the USA 100:1 kikes/goyim?

Why are entertainers in the USA 1000:1 liberal retards/everyone else?

Why is OP such a faggot?

This is pretty funny and I see it posted a lot.

Democrats have a tendency to hurl debt and money or shit policies as short-term fixes at the economy to artificially inflate growth. These usually end in a fucking disaster. Just a case example from that pic is the fucking catastrophe Clinton cause with his policies for allowing subprime mortgages that Bush got blamed for. I don't even like Bush he was a neocon shitshow, but he didn't do that. I guess cause and effect are hard to follow for some people, especially when the effects are delayed. Obama's bailouts should have nationalized industries as an example. Now in about a decade they will cause chaos and get blamed on whoever happens to be in office at the time since again, patterns are cause and effect are bretty hard stuff mang.

Bandaids on bulletholes are good shows for the plebs.

Most of the problems we have today can be traced back to fuckin FDR and his retarded new deal package.

That "infograph" is good bait though. About the same meaning as the infographs trying to legitimize the wage gap or the glass ceiling.

Teachers are liberal because Democrats support teachers unions. It's like asking why the oil industry is conservative.

Explains why our economy is fucked.

>is it because smart people are all liberal?
>is it because smart people are all black?
>is it because smart people are all women?
>is it because smart people are all transpenderqueer otherkin?
they aren't

forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2016/08/02/surprise-70-of-economists-support-hillary-not-trump-but-70-of-economists-are-democrats-anyway/#c4b91f73fba2
I'm not talking about TV economists but economists in general.

Same reason scientists will now tell you there are 50+ genders, nobody want's to ruin their career by calling out the left on it's bullshit

Union tenure. It's impossible to fire a full on communist professor who uses his post to spread his dogma as long as he pays lip service to his job description.

WEW LAD, liberal democrat economists supported Hillcunt, who would have guessed?

You know a good deal WHY many economists supported her? Predictability. Trump is a wildcard, Hillary would have carried the same standard policies on everything that her predecessors did, making it easier for rich Jew bankers to get richer and richer.

Trump unfortunately made these faggots have to do some actual WORK again planning how to deal with a curveball that could make them have to take their usual plans off auto-pilot to where they might have to think critically about industries changing in many ways.

Liberals AND kikes hate work, so needless to say, they wanted the easy, predictable course for the next 4+ years, and they didn't get it. Which is a net gain for most of the rest of us.

This isn't rocket science, so stop trying to make correlations where there are none and accept that most economists are just greedy kikes who wanted to keep things the status quo, and now they're salty as fuck for having to take off their fucking yarmulkes and scratch their heads once in a while trying to figure out how the economy will be changing as we stop sucking globalist dick.

because although economists tend to support more market oriented policies than the general public they despise the bible thumping anti-immigrant rhetoric of republicans

> t. I have no idea about economics

Apparently, neither do you, because you're not discussing economics, you're trying to make false equivalency of liberals being smarter, hence more involved in economics, which has no foundation in fact for anything you've said here.

So, perhaps you need to take into consideration you started with a weak, flawed opinion and don't have a leg to stand on, so this whole thread is garbage.

People with low self esteem believe this, have to make yourself feel special somehow.

Buddha is real just as Christ is real in giving comfort to people who need an idol that represents aspirations higher than those of their own limited earthbound beings. If someone chooses to believe that his/her god was born in a lotus blossom or born by a virgin, it's a pleasant myth that, in itself, does no harm.

Yes you can't possibly figure things out, listen to "experts"

Economists in general, too; professors and writers.

It's a self-selecting group. And if you want to get in to the group you basically have to be good with international merchants plundering what's left of the wealth of the First World's middle class. Have different ideas? You get laughed out the room and nobody will publish you. There are a handful of exceptions, sure, but they are dwarfed by the cucks and shills.

And once you get past this, it doesn't matter what color tie these fucks like to wear.

>spend billions of dollars
>GDP goes up 2% more than other guys

Billions?

The last faggot in office spent 12 TRILLION over 8 years and we're no better off for it.

So much for "liberal economics".

Honestly what is the point of this and your overall post

I've never once seen Sup Forumsacks defending neocon economic policies. If we liked corporate Congressional (((Republicans))) so much, why would we be supporting a president like Trump who was condemned, criticized, and opposed by the majority of the establishment Republicans multiple times throughout his campaign you dumb nigger?

This would make some sense if Sup Forums liked Reagan and his trickle-down politics but we fucking hate that Jew lover. You probably don't know that cause you're a filthy shill. Gtfo faggot. Saged.

Not this BS again! A high-schooler can see the gaps in that silly "jars of candy" presentation! And the rest, similarly.
Even for Sup Forums this is pretty low-grade.
You really must do netter!

A fucking leaf, everyone.

Great story, with no proof.
Did you see who won the election?

That's why the economy is fucked you god damn whore

Economists are wrong 99.99999% of the time anyway.

citation on that? leaf

outside of not being able to predict the future

All the top economists can't fix the economy. Either thry have no idea how to do thier jobs or they are just fucking useless.

Nigga, you've gotta stop proving the white supremacists right!
You do not gain a magical understanding of economics by being in the same political party as some economists.

well, I think you are giving the economists too much credit. Very often there is no easy solution to fixing growth or recessions without inducing high risk policies, so the alternatives are never black and white

Only another WW will fix the economy.

Reset the economic clock for another few generations.

t. supreme Keynesian or lolbertarian nutjob
cant tell who at this point

> Confusing intelligence with wisdom

You are like a little baby.

tht or just angsty bc no gf

What makes you sure economists know what they're talking about?

I'm not saying I'm the best economist in the world, but I can tell you that it doesn't take alot of intellect to get through econ grad school. Most of it is derivative dribble and the theories from which they derive are in no way indicative of the real world.

Sounds alot like how liberals think, doesn't it?

most professors aren't making 80k a year.

many are, but most aren't.

And our economy is doing GREAT!

Would 100% suck on those titties

Globalists are economist.

>I can tell you that it doesn't take alot of intellect to get through econ grad school
econ grads have like the 3rd highest IQ among all majors

I thought Business/Econ leaned slightly conservative (Especially for professors).

Super high IQs lead to people intellectually jack themselves off over adopting new and novel ideas that often don't work. Look at all the high IQ AnCaps and commies. Moderately high IQ people understand that the average person is too dumb to live in a perfect utopia created by unsensible high IQ autists so they stick with what's tried and true. A Japanese researcher once did studies on this - can't recall the name but "novel" is a key word if you wanna look for it.

Literally every single Democrat """economist""" is wrong. Keynesianism is fake.

agreed, loads of macro is mental masturbation and micro is fine tuning masturbation while ignoring rare events and hoping to be right

>more economists = quality economists

stop thinking like a retard

Universities tend to attract people with no practical usefulness. Majority of economists are employed by academia and most of those that aren't are called "financial analytics" or "market analytics" instead which are something completely different!