Here's a quick rundown on the CIA fairy tale of Russian hacking the election.
Never get caught without the facts again.
1. CIA declassified assessment contains no facts. These are only opinions according to their own definitions. imgur.com/a/awg8v
2. FBI/DHS Report contains a glaring disclaimer about the accuracy of information discussed. imgur.com/a/zvZJE
3. Adam Schiff, of the House Intel Committee, refused to acknowledge whether there is evidence Russians actually hacked the DNC on behalf of Wikileaks. youtu.be/HDtvYHOY_Uc?t=6m18s
8. Julian Assange and WikiLeaks have a perfect track record regarding accuracy in their journalism, and maintain the leaks were provided by a DNC insider. In fact, there is no mention of Julian Assange or Wikileaks in relation to Russia in any report. cnn.com/2017/01/04/politics/assange-wikileaks-hannity-intv/
Kayden Sanders
9. The CIA has a motive to propagate the Russian hacking narrative in order to expand their budget and powers under the supposed threat of Russian interference in the election. It is also an attempt to smear Wikileaks and other whistleblowers to protect their institution. This happens to coincide with the upcoming re-authorization of section 702 of FISA.
10. The DNC has a motive to propagate the Russian hacking narrative in order to cover up and distract the public from their election-rigging crimes and culpability for the Democrats losing 2016.
12. The DNC has refused to turn over their servers to the FBI for investigation. Instead all the information the FBI has received about the breach has come from a 3rd party security firm, called CrowdStrike, which is the same firm to falsely conclude that North Korea hacked Sony. cnn.com/2017/01/05/politics/fbi-russia-hacking-dnc-crowdstrike/
Sebastian Martin
Here's a diagram depicting how the """evidence""" was completely manufactured.
Grayson Long
thank you based FSB, have a pickle with the next shot for me
Connor Evans
didn't Sup Forums hack podesta?
i'm serious
i remember someone hacked his twitter and posted some autistic "Sup Forums is here" message or something and it was the same guy who got into the email
where'd the whole "Russia" thing even come from
Nicholas Sanders
>Adam Schiff
Aaron Green
RRREEEEE SHUT THIS DOWN
SO... this is propaganda correct? They are allowed to manipulate us, divide us, anger us, cause us to riot and protest based on a lie..
John Hughes
KEK E K
Jace James
...
Ayden Rogers
Sup Forums didn't "hack" podesta. His twitter password was in the leaked emails and he was too stupid to change it. His "hack" was due to the fact that his password was literally p@ssword AND he fell for one of those automated phishing schemes.
Sebastian Perry
????
Easton Collins
upmost keks
Oliver Collins
Damn that's not as exciting
Mason Robinson
>not evidence
Hunter Gutierrez
i heard that they are basing the russian hack angle ont he fact that it was a russian account they traced. When even a 6 year old hacker would know to use a proxy so obviously it wasnt russians.
Joshua Myers
wonder if they are discussing his walnut pasta recipe
Henry Thompson
Was it a proxy or was it part of the hacker tools that was leaked from the CIA (they could leave a foreign fingerprint on any computer ...)
Camden Fisher
Yeah, the Podesta version of "muh Russia" is the most ridiculous when you actually go over the details. It could have been a 10 year old with his cell phone..
Colton Wright
Correct
Henry Rogers
and use "shell" companies to anonymously donate to divisive groups in the US. in the US its voluntary to register as a "foreign agent" in >> muuhh russia even a dollar from an outside country you are automatically labeled a 'foreign agent" or traitor
CRINGE
Christopher Sullivan
Another important detail is Craig Murray (former UK ambassador and a Wikileaks associate) claims to have personally met with the DNC leaker in Washington DC and that it was a DNC insider. The media refused to report that.
Justin Rivera
seth rich
Alexander Morris
Too bad the people can't take them to court over emotional distress or some bullshit so all their internal documentation is open to discovery
Jordan Sanders
Did we find out who leaked the Macron info? Didn't a staffer die of heart attack recently on stage
Julian Diaz
>Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, called the CIA claims “bullshit”, adding: “They are absolutely making it up.” “I know who leaked them,” Murray said. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things. craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/12/cias-absence-conviction/
Grayson White
i dont know about computers really but i remember seeign a bread here with a news vid explaining in detail how they found it was the russians and every autist here was like "any retard would use a proxy"
Joshua Torres
guys look at my thread here
Jacob Perry
We need to get this UK hacker/journalist's info into the mainstream. Even Assange retweeted him but nobody has paid any attention.
Guccifer2 was a Democratic op meant to smear leakers with MUH RUSSIA and discredit the Seth Rich leaks.
The Metadata of his leaks, which have some suspicious Russian fingerprints, also show that the documents were created by a man named Warren Flood just minutes before Guccifer2 appeared online.
Warren Flood is the WH staffer who was Joe Biden's tech director.
It's also interesting that WH visitor logs show that a Ukranian delegation along with Victoria Nuland were in the West wing at the time Warren Flood created the documents with Russian fingerprints.
Seriously, we need to get it out there.
Jordan Hall
I always thought Hillary's email situation was a false flag that was supposed to increase national security elite's budget.
Obviously backfired.
People will get pissed but in the end it will all be about greed and lies.
Ryder Myers
>Campaign chair for potential next POTUS and former chief of staff (fairly important person) >Access to classified information >Lots of sensitive email correspondents >Uses p@ssword as password >Fell for the phishing scheme where a bot pretends to be Google and asks for your password If it was a sophisticated attack, sure we can rule out most of the population and look at nation states.. But when you're that retarded when it comes to security, the suspect list is millions of people.
Isaac Williams
>3. Adam Schiff, of the House Intel Committee, refused to acknowledge whether there is evidence Russians actually hacked the DNC on behalf of Wikileaks. video is gone, I wonder why
Eli Scott
>Brits gave McCain & Obungo a fake dossier on Trump. They, in turn, gave it to Comey. The Brits' involvement and contents of Piss Papers were used as foreign sensitivity excuse to justify FISA warrant (after a prior attempt had failed) and subsequent wiretapping of Trump & Co. The taps yielded nothing, which frustrated the Dems and the Kenyan. It's likely they realized that Trump was onto them because, at some point, Trump probably used the wiretaps to mislead the bastards, and pull a bait and switch--ie making them believe he would do one thing when in fact he would do another--and this may have helped him win the election despite all these dirty tricks. Obama and team Killary may have deduced that Flynn had been tipped off by the Russians, hence Obama's shitting on Flynn to Trump, and urging against him for Nat Sec Advisor, despite Obama approving Flynn's Nat Sec. clearance (he wanted to continue monitoring Flynn and use any Russian contacts against Trump). So, Flynn received contact from Russians, who let him know Trump's campaign was wiretapped by the US itself. Flynn kept this between himself and Trump only, not even telling Pence. Together, Flynn and Trump used the knowledge of the tap to mislead Clinton and Obama and to identify leakers. In the ensuing fiasco, and ultimate Clinton loss, the Dems got frustrated, leading Susan Rice to unmask parties in tangential conversations w/ Russians, in attempt to figure out who tipped off Trump. They pushed for sharing IC info between agencies last Dec, in hopes that someone in IC community could figure it out. Comey played all sides, trying to please both Dems, Repubs, and Trump. He continued feeding the Russian narrative as show for Dems and McCain while privately telling Trump the investigation was bullshit. Eventually, Trump realized Comey was stringing him along and working w/ McCain and Graham, who, together w/ top Dems who were trying to coup. Trump axed him.
