ITALY YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ITALY YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Other urls found in this thread:

camera.it/_dati/leg17/lavori/schedela/apriTelecomando_wai.asp?codice=17PDL0044140
breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/13/transgender-toni-the-tampon-teaches-children-men-can-menstruate/
sandrarose.com/2015/08/company-designs-tampons-that-bleed-for-transgenders/
business-standard.com/article/news-ians/landmark-judgement-establishes-tougher-italian-alimony-rules-117051101501_1.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>pay women to not show up to work on their periods

this is, on the whole, a good thing. It's worth paying money to not have to deal with hormonal cunts.

Transphobic legislation since trans people can't have periods

might as well just pay women not to work at all then

>allow
every private employer could have done this if they wanted to. what is this garbage

How do they prove they are on their period?

Someone women have heavier bleeding than others, and it lasts for a few days longer. Is Italy going to examine the medical history of each woman to determine how long their average period lasts?

Some forms of birth control reduce or eliminate periods altogether. Do those women still get paid time off? How do they prove they are not on the rag?

Might as well pay me every time I take a shit.

Don't you faggots already do that with welfare?

>3 days of paid leave every month
So that equates to a 10% reduction in productivity compared to a male employee, but for the same price.
Why exactly would you want to hire women under those conditions?

WTF Man.


Women already take more time off than men as is.

Now we are giving them even more?

this

yes but this has nothing to do with the fact that women earn less haha

this same german keeps going around with this exquisite bait

well then give trans people paid leave whenever they want

This. This law wont change anything. If so, it will make difference in genders @ workplace even bigger

haaaa makes sense

More like 15% because most people only work 20 or so days a month.

Assuming a company has 50% of their workforce that is female, this equates to a 7.5% decrease in productivity overnight.

That means these companies are going to have to spend another 7.5% on labor just to be able to get the same amount of work done as they get done today . This is going to make hiring women even more undesirable in the future.

>Two equally qualified individuals competing to get hired, one male one female.
>Already know that I will have to spend money on payed leave if the woman gets preignant down the road.
>New legislation introduced.
>Now I also have to pay her 3 days per month but she won't come to work.

Why the fuck would I ever hire the woman, the only way I would hire women in this conditions is if they are overqualified.

Which is extremely rare case considering bigger half of women have brains and choose family instead of career

I can't wait for a few more years when trannys have ketchup bottles surgically implanted in their groin (covered under insurance) so they can squeeze it whenever they want a period.

they should pay males more with percentage of female/male ratio for 3 days

They dont realize difference between govmnt welfare and free market where companies are paying thousands for 5% increase in productivity. And if you have 7.5% decrease and ur rival does not, ur business is fcked

>this law was presented 27/04/2016
I think this is more about us italian not wanting to go to work then feminist rights

What the fuck, to think I just praised Italy for getting rid of alimony.

exactly this

This is good news, more stay at home moms for italy, since it makes no sense to hire them.

Womenquotas when?

I don't think that's bait, it's more like post-ironic shitposting

If it will catch on, the pay gap should fucking exist

There wont be pay gap, just gap in % occupying workplaces

Big problem here. Soviet law makes employer pay pregnant woman her leave for 3 years and then take her back for the same job. Makes sense when state is in charge. My mother did it, got a job, 3 days later i'm pregnant ok thx bye! Don't forget to send me my full monthly payments for 3 years.
But we don;'t have USSR, why the fuck would i risk to employ a female now?

>tampon
Someone tell Italy the good news.

It will develop a wage gap.
>be boss
>a woman wants you to hire her
>pay her less, because she legaly can get 3 free days a month

Why are Italians so fucking lazy - so averse to hard work?

Jesus fuck, that's insane.
I wouldn't hire women under those conditions, ever.

Guess the solution is to import millions of military aged Muslim men from the undeveloped world :^)

To be fair, some women have periods that are pretty debilitating. Not all, but some.

lad is real
camera.it/_dati/leg17/lavori/schedela/apriTelecomando_wai.asp?codice=17PDL0044140
this is our official site for the PDL(Proposal of Law)
For now this law is under examination

Periods aren't genetic! They are a bi-product of sexuality with is mental!

>Two people come in for the same job interview they are a man and a woman
>Both seem relatively equal in education and experience
>The woman will cost you a lot extra so you hire the man
>This will result in women being back in the house taking care of the children and the men being at work

Italy is just playing 20D chess.

But they get periods every month, this isn't paid leave is it? If it's unpaid, and women are forced to take the period leave, that will be called sexism, and women will get paid only 3/4 what they get paid now.

If they are not forced to take leave, it is retarded and unnecessary, and they may as well make it equal by giving men 1 week per month they can just take off.

If it is paid leave, this is retarded and absolutely unfair to men.

Wow, I just totally ignored OPs pic, disregard my stupidity.

Making the employer pay for her bleeding out once a month makes her a financial and production liability and undermines any chances a woman could have in the workforce since its assured a man will work a full month

>to allow

Was there really a law against it before?

They got rid of alimony????

Let them have their days then.

No, it's to make them don't work for 3 days every month in case of Dismenorrea. (around 60% and 90% of women suffer of Dismenorrea)

Right, but if she's proven to be a good worker the rest of the time I don't see a problem. If one of the women at my job left a few days or one week out of the month, I would prefer them to come back instead of hiring a new, potential retard.
Only one of them is a piece or shit worker that I'd suggest replacing

Why not just stay home and be a housewife at this point?
As soon as they elbowed their way into the labor market it seems all they've been trying to do since is come up with excuses to work less.
They clearly don't 'want' to work.

hwave thought of a way to prevent this from being abused. It makes some sense not complete sense so im gonna call this bullshit. but if they figure a way to get around that along with how they handle the how long they can have a period for.

>The country is in deep shit, full of debt
>Ironically can afford to pay women to leave one week a month...GG

Well done, Italy, nobody's gonna hire women from now on. No work means no emancipation.
It's a genius move actually. Time to send women back to the kitchen where they belong.

> am boss
> see no reason hiring woman on this conditions

unironically these

woah

Will fast food joints be providing the ketchup?
McPeriods or if you're feeling really spicy you use Taco Bell.

That's where you're fucking wrong, kiddo:

breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/13/transgender-toni-the-tampon-teaches-children-men-can-menstruate/

sandrarose.com/2015/08/company-designs-tampons-that-bleed-for-transgenders/

It becomes a problem once you're the one who has to pay for her absence.
If you have 2 competing video on demand services that offer the exact same content for the exact same monthly subscription price, but one of them doesn't work one week out of every month, why would you ever pick that one over the other one?

Period is a social construct.

>when your economy doesn't do well so you decide to make absolutely sure it gets run to the ground
but >muh fair equal wage amIright?

Depends on what the video service offered the rest of the time.
Also, most people at my job take at least one day off a month already unless they have 2+ kids.

Wat
For what purpose...

>1 woman out of 75 is a good worker
>you're still paying leave for the other 74 at a complete net loss.

Okay champ.

Oh whoops didn't read the middle part.
Awful comparison. Different workers offer different skills.

>why would you ever pick that one over the other one?

Because your socialist government will literally imprison you if you don't. How about that?

I don't know. It turns out the trans tampon fem Flo thing was false, probably a pol memer gone rogue, but a lot of people were posting on forums about it being a good idea.
Vocal minority, I'm sure, but the insanity exists.

DUH, everybody can go day off every month Im doin it even tho I dont have kids.

nice ass, definetly made for bbc

>Italians looking for any excuse to not work

Gee what a surprise

lmao, I wonder if he ever tried to compete in free market

Right I'm strictly talking my job. Also, not all women need time off for periods. My ex didn't get phased by her bloody puss at all. No cramps or anything.
All I'm saying is if it is a severe thing for the woman I don't see an issue with it as long as she's a good worker the rest of the month.
I've seen way too many fucking idiots come through my job to throw away a few good ones because they want time off for their personal shit.

leaf calling out burger for welfare

a great incentive NOT TO EMPLOY WOMEN, which is a great victory

> implying you cant find replacement w/ same skills and 7.5% more productive hrs

I don't disagree with you about the good worker, but at that point it shouldn't be mandated by law. The exception does not prove the rule, and the one good woman out of 50 or so would just get it straight from her boss that "yeah, stay home a few days".

Otherwise when it becomes law, you're now forced to pay for the other 49 shitty enployees to benefit the one good one.

It makes no business sense.

Italy has massively onerous diversity requirements once your business employs more than a handful of people.

>same price
you mean for 75% of the price. this is how they're battling the wage gap you idiots

This is true, but I feel like this would be much easier remedied with some sort of "allowance" rule that is less hard on those types of breaks when the periods are that bad and for the women who specifically experience that. No idea the rates of that though.

My husband's employers don't seem to mind, I think these people are looking at things from more then one angle. You couldn't understand a company choosing to hire/retain a male employee even if he revealed that he had some sort of chronic reoccurring illness that would end up keeping him home a couple of days here and there once a month, because he does a great job other than that?

AS CAPABLE AS MEN

how do i get an italian gf?

There are workplaces reserved for:
- strangers
- handicapped
- women

> plus for obvious reasons everyone prefers women over men to work

then and only then, for males

Enjoy your discrimination lawsuits.

>breitbart

fuck off shill

>implying we are black

this

and Jesus wept

(((wage gap))) please...

you don't know what you're talking about burger, please

italian girls are the most pretentious on the continent

INB4 average sallary in Italy decreased.

>women are more profitable when they're on their periods

business-standard.com/article/news-ians/landmark-judgement-establishes-tougher-italian-alimony-rules-117051101501_1.html

>Alimony payments should be based purely on guaranteeing "the economic independence or self-sufficiency of the spouse who requests it," the judges said.

>"If it is determined that (a former spouse) is economically independent or effectively is capable of being so, the right (to maintenance) must not be recognised," said the ruling.

Basically, if the one trying to claim alimony is deemed to be capable of living on their own then they're not entitled to anything.

that is the problem too, Fritz

women are fucking advantaged in everything

Women shouldn't be working if they can't perform to the same level as a man.

Well what are you going to do about all of the women (there are bound to be a decent handful) whose bosses refuse to make those exceptions? I know you don't agree with their lifestyle choices but these people still have mouths to feed, they can't just roll over and stop living because they don't fit in to your ideal version of society.

> implying you cant prove why she wont be able to get this job by artificially amping skill requirements

>not an argument
Why don't you just Google "trans women menstruation" and see for yourself how broken this world is

m8 big companies would probably pay millions for an 1% increase
They pair the stupid menstruation laws with forced gender diversity quotas and completely ruin productivity everywhere.
Women are less productive as it is, the 7.5% is a number that considers men and women to be equally productive and I know from experience that's not the case.

>random cunt in parliament proposes law 1 year ago that nobody will ever even bother to read let alone vote
>ITALY TO BECOME FIRST COUNTRY TO ALLOW PAID PERIOD LEAVE!!!
Wow talk about clickbait

Lol.

C U C K S.

Employers should not hire women its more hassle then its worth.

Well they are and a lot of them don't have a choice right now. If they stopped working, they'd have their utilities shut off, become homeless, and have no way to feed themselves or possibly their families. What do you want to do about that issue?

Stop trying to appeal to emotion, it's not gonna work. Ain't my problem they bleed out their vaginas once a month and some can't work, a company shouldn't be forced by law to pay them for it.

If the 1 in 50 good female employee can't get her boss to give her a few days, she should find a new job.

I wish men had a 3 day thing for just R&R
Once a month you cash it in mon-wed for a 5 day weekend sounds nice..

Well I tend to disagree about men and women productivity, it varies from individual to individual imo but other than that, agree