NO Evidence of Trump-Russia Collusion, and DEMs/media know it!

[Ethan Stewart]

NYT, Nov 2016
>the FBI says there’s no definitive connection between Donald Trump and the Russian government, reaching that conclusion after a wide-ranging investigation
>law-enforcement officials who said any cyberattacks carried out were “aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Trump.”
>no conclusive evidence of deliberate communications between Trump and a Russian bank
nytimes.com/2016/11/01/us/politics/fbi-russia-election-donald-trump.html?_r=0
businessinsider.com/fbi-donald-trump-russia-connection-2016-10

Paul Ryan, Feb 2017
>“No one has ever showed us any evidence that any collusion had occurred between an American involved with the political system and the Russians.”
thehill.com/homenews/house/321578-ryan-wont-say-if-he-has-seen-evidence-of-contact-between-trump-campaign-russia

James Clapper, March 2017
>“[Regarding] NSA, FBI…CIA…Director of National Intelligence (DNI), that had anything, that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians, there was no evidence of that included in our [January] report,” Clapper testified. He was asked, “…but does it exist?” He answered, “Not to my knowledge.”
nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/video/full-clapper-no-evidence-of-collusion-between-trump-and-russia-890509379597
cnn.com/2017/05/08/politics/white-house-donald-trump-russia-james-clapper/

Devin Nunes, March 2017
>NUNES: Well, I think — I understand that…but I can tell you that we don’t have any evidence and we’re conducting our own investigation here.
washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/03/20/full-transcript-fbi-director-james-comey-testifies-on-russian-interference-in-2016-election

[Blake Kelly]

James Comey, March 2017
>Comey was asked if he agreed with former Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Clapper who said there was “no evidence” of “collusion between the members of the Trump campaign and the Russians.” Comey replied, “I think he’s right about characterizing the [January] report which you all have read.”
washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/03/20/full-transcript-fbi-director-james-comey-testifies-on-russian-interference-in-2016-election/?utm_term=.472511ee25a7

Chris Stewart, March 2017
>“At this point, everyone on this dais should agree with Mr. Clapper because we in the committee have seen no evidence, zero, that would indicate that there was collusion or criminal wrongdoing between any members of the previous [sic] administration or campaign and Russian officials.”
washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/03/20/full-transcript-fbi-director-james-comey-testifies-on-russian-interference-in-2016-election/?utm_term=.472511ee25a7

Adam Schiff, April 2017
>When asked, “Can you say definitively that there was collusion, there were people affiliated with the Trump campaign who were working with Russians to time the release of damaging information about Hillary Clinton that had been hacked either from [Hillary campaign chair] John Podesta or the DNC?” Schiff replied, “I don’t think we can say anything definitively at this point.”
realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/04/02/adam_schiff_there_is_no_definitive_proof_of_any_trump-russia_connection.html

Diane Feinstein, May 2017
>When asked if she had evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign, Feinstein replied, “Not at this time.”
freebeacon.com/national-security/feinstein-no-evidence-collusion-between-trump-associates-russia/

[Ian Roberts]

Joe Manchin, May 2017
>“People that might have said they were involved, to what extent they were involved, to what extent the president might have known about these people or whatever, there is nothing there from that standpoint that we have seen directly linking our president to any of that.”
freebeacon.com/national-security/manchin-no-evidence-collusion-between-trump-russia/

James Clapper, May 2017
>At a hearing, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) asked Clapper if it’s still accurate that he has no knowledge of the existence of evidence of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. Clapper replied, “It is.”
washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/05/08/full-transcript-sally-yates-and-james-clapper-testify-on-russian-election-interference/?utm_term=.74edb763a166

Maxine Waters, May 2017
>Rep. Waters has repeatedly stated that President Trump “has colluded with the Russians,” but when asked if she has seen evidence to back up her claims, Waters replied: “No, we have not.”
breitbart.com/video/2017/05/09/waters-i-believe-trump-colluded-with-the-russians-i-havent-seen-any-evidence-to-back-that-up/

[Nolan Flores]

Bu-da-bump to trigger liberals

[Leo Reyes]

Of course there is no evidence.

Go to Youtube. Get one of the congressional hearings. Now listen to the choices of words: they are extremely vague and leading.

Why? Because nobody has proofs. It's a Democrat ran hoax.

[Anthony Brown]

>The Russian government maintains connections to the GOP through Paul Manafort and Carter Page, who have worked for these shell companies in the past. Manafort has experience laundering illegal money into campaigns from his days working with Ferdinand Marcos in the 80s.
>Flynn, being the closest to Trump, is the one finding these firms like Colt Ventures and building relationships with people like Jon Iadonisi, all the while acting as an agent of Moscow.
>These SuperPacs, or potentially even the Trump Campaign itself, contracts out an insane digital marketing and fundraising push bigger than any other in history. The Russian money is now spread out over several GOP consultancy firms across the country.
>The consulting firms pocket the payments as usual, but their fundraising push raises even more money online for the Trump Campaign. By paying these small-time firms with illicit Russian money, the Trump Campaign manages to trade it for legally raised donations.
>That legal money is then pooled with more incoming Russian money, and re-invested in digital marketing to continue to produce a stream of legal cash.

[Matthew Johnson]

Bump for triggering

[Kevin Wilson]

Um sorry sweetie, but my feelings are more important than your "facts." Impeachment is happening

[William Lopez]

b-blumpt will be imp-peached

[Caleb Jenkins]

This. Facts are racist.
bumpo