SWEDEN YES!

SWEDEN YES!

Swedish scientist have now confirmed what the first swedish people looked like!

svt.se/nyheter/vetenskap/de-var-de-forsta-svenskarna

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.com/news/science-environment-29213892
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_(novel)
biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/05/09/135616.full.pdf html
youtu.be/X3-_KZExlJ0
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komsa_culture
biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/03/03/113241
cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(16)31542-1
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

WE

...

WUz

VIKINGS

*VIKANGS

I mean, I can believe it. You need to travel to colder regions and die in droves before you can evolve to cope with the physical and mental rigors.

What fresh hell is this?

Oh God damn it. That's impossible. Even if they found African DNA it had to be a slave or a migrant. African genes are really strong in their expression. They don't just turn into whites with blond hair after a few thousand years because it's cold.

Sheeeit

Some browns lived in Europe and Asia, whites evolved from them and then outcompeted them to death.

apparently blue eyed negros mixed with chinks and later on syrians, and thus the swedes were created.

I'm just going to note that the two main pools of non-white immigration in Sweden are Arab men and East Asian women.

So, even granting that selection process (which was at least in part a hybridization process, please cf. Varg Vikernes), this is a case of modern-day Swedes projecting the present onto the past.

What if it was possible to meme blackface as a legitimate form of social protest for the left? Like if a dindu chimps out and gets shot by a cop, people just take to the streets in blackface in solidarity

>SVT(state owned media)
>suddenly Swedes happen to be Syrian
>this information surges when skepticism towards Syrians is at its highest
>this being published and pushed by the media is just a coincidence

fucking kek

>blue eyes
Legit

>svt

Not to troll, but it's true that indigenous europeans had dark skin and possibly light eyes.

However, they got wiped out by two migration waves of white people who make up the core of the ancestry of present day europeans, a migration of farmers from the near east through anatolia, and of course the indo-european migration from the steppes of Russia.

>getting skin colour from skull-based facial reconstruction
topkek

why is the women wearing like a head band? is that like a proto hijab?

also I like how the guy looks somalian

It's not science fiction WHG or Western-Hunter gatherers the types that roamed Western Europe were all dark skinned and blue eyed, thought picture in OP is probably nowhere near as close as they looked like. Eastern Hunter-gatherers were on average more depigmented those that roamed around Pontic Steppe and contributed much of their ancestry to the incoming Indo-Europeans who can be modeled EHG + CHG( Caucasus Hunter- Gatherers) it's little more complex than that tho.

Those are Australoids or cousins of Abos, they were the original inhabitants of Eurasia before one of them mutated into the thing that would mutate into Caucasoids and Mongoloids.

classic

>what is dna

with a simple genetic code from a bone they can tell what your skin color was

swedish public service

they made sure to squeeze in a line about pre-historic syrian farmers coming to swedens as well

>import niggers
>wonder if they remove your history
Science should be supervised by government, you can't just claim something theoretically and publish it as science, first you have to disprove previous science. Now suddenly in capitalism every medical college is close to finding cancer cure, Steve Jobs still dies, Rockefeller still dies. Oh right, this science is similar bullshit.

It isn't entirely wrong. Don't think there is a consensus regarding Swedish population history before historical times, but there were a population with dark skin. They were later displaced/breed out.

so back to the roots

>Science should be supervised by government

in Swedens case this might not be a good thing

Still would be better, since government should collect scientists on this field to confirm this, so they can stand with their names for it. Now it still might be government and scientists but they don't stand with their name for it, which is bad, since scientists should always put their names on the line, as well as politicians, so they can fail. Now they can publish articles like this and not take responsibility.

**VIKANGZ

in text it says that the researcher "believes" they were dark skinned

Would make sense, since light skin only appeared with agriculture.

breddy good comrade

That's true though. European stock were swarthy forest people. Light skin came from the agriculture practicing Middle Eastern peoples who migrated into Europe

bbc.com/news/science-environment-29213892

Again it's a known that the same people from Anatolia who spread agriculture to Europe came to Sweden. But to call them Syrian is a bit retarded, when such ethnicity didn't exist at the time.
Not really.

WHGs were dark but they skulls were nothing like tha fag on the left, they'd look more like a dark Oliver Kahn

So a nigger and a Thai monkey.

Cool

you're missing the point that researchers don't say "We believe something" they give a statistical result based on their analysis. media always fucks up everything on science reporting

scientist in sweden are cucks, the government are cucks as well. theres no helping them, more socialism and government contorl aint gonna help them

Yes really.
Which is why eskimos aren't white.

DNA is unstable, it decays. There is no way they have DNA samples of primordial humans, unless they were trapped in a glacier.

BLANDA UP

>Which is why eskimos aren't white.

They are asian.

Are you saying asian peoples who discovered agriculture count as whites too?

AY YO
HOL UP
U BE SAYING
WE WUZ
SUM SORT OF
VI-KAAAAAAAAAANGS?

>Bilden är vår egen tolkning av forskarnas resultat.
The image is our (the kike medias) own interpretation of the researchers result.
>Deras hud var mörk, tror Mattias Jakobsson som är professor i genetik i Uppsala
Their skin was dark,believes Mattias Jakobsson who's a professor in genetics in Uppsala
>de hade blå ögon med rätt mörk hud.
They had blue eyes and fairly dark skin

This fucking article made me wanna throw up. They force things like immigrants, refugees, race mixing etc. into the text just to try to support their narrative that Sweden has always been an immigrant nation.

>light skin only appeared with agriculture
No, it appeared with cold-area migration, blacks have higher rates of depression in cold climates. By the time humans settled Sweden, they would have been quite fair-skinned.

They certainly wouldn't have been a race which births Asian girls and Black men.

I wonder what Varg has to say about this.

Problem is that they don't take responsibility when their claims are wrong and just pretend it never happened. At least Stephen Hawking took the chances, he was wrong many times and we can assess him. Even better would be if government controlled Stephen Hawking, since then existing scientists on this field could battle and disprove theories before publishing it in newspapers. In Sweden and USA on other hand is complete free market, people just publishing total bullshit, no shame, no proof needed, no names needed, no quality check needed, everything is allowed that benefits the elites, but they never take their names into the mud, because they are uncles in background pulling the strings, not directly. You read a lot from Anglo newspapers, scientists blabla from Mexico or blalbla say blabla. What freaking scientists, who fact checked it? Nobody.

he's probably having a heart attack right about now

nigga this isnt dinosaurs we talking about , dna can still be found in 6,000 year old samples.

they even found king tuts dna which is over 3,000 years old

How would they even know that they had blue eyes? Does anyone have a direct link to the paper?

They say in the end of the article that they wouldn't know how the genes passed on by the different groups would affect people today which leads me to believe that it's not the same blue eyed gene that we commonly have in Sweden.

niggerniggernigger

you dont need government to do anything, there already exist peer reviews , thats how one scientist gets his results verified, government controlling that shit would run the risk in making or publishing studies for propaganda purposes

Nope.

EHG's were on average more depigmented compared to farmers, less than 10% of farmers carried allele for light skin, early farmers cluster near modern day Sardinians, they're not exactly epitome of light skinned people aren't they? Fact is EHG were lighter and they had no ancestry from Anatolian farmers.

>The genetic variations for lactase persistence and greater height came with the Yamna people.[47] The derived allele of the KITLG gene (SNP rs12821256) that is associated with – and likely causal for – blond hair in Europeans is found in populations with Eastern but not Western Hunter Gatherer ancestry, suggesting that its origin is in the Ancient North Eurasian (ANE) population and may have been spread in Europe by individuals with Steppe ancestry.

As I said steppe people aka Indo-Europeans can be modeled as EHG+CHG, L3 sample in Latvia is Indo-European not HG.

>The Neolithic Transition in the Baltic Was Not Driven by Admixture with Early European Farmers

>We also found tentative evidence for progressive skin depigmentation in Latvia based on mutations in the SLC24A5 and SLC45A2 genes (rs1426654 and rs16891982, respectively; Figure S3B and Table S2).

How come these niggas had light skin mutations, but had no ancestry from farmers then uh?

Asian people who discovered agriculture and who lived in cold areas have light skin, user.

All right there seems to be some confusion. Of course cold temperature (or rather, lack of sunlight in higher latitudes) was the reason that the white skin was selected in the populations living in such areas. But not the only reason. The other main reason was the diet change that occured when humans switched to agriculture, from a high protein diet to a low protein diet. Only when humans living in cold areas stopped having a high protein diet did the benefits associated with having lighter skin make themselves felt.

Eskimos didn't undergo this evolution because they have a high protein fish based diet.

This is one of the most disgusting, revolting pieces of disinformation I've ever seen.

Violent National Socialist revolution when?

Ok, then show me who verified that article. If you can't show me, then you are reading bullshit that isn't confirmed by anybody but the people who made it up. Every product in food needs control, same should be even more true for science.

We wuz negros and chongs

Oh yeah,since i don't understand shit from Swedish,does this basically mean that the I1 proto-yuropors got bleached by R1a indo-yuropoors?

Motala hunter-gatherers were notoriously light-pigmented. Some of them were probably even blond.

in article they don't really say that their test showed dark skin dna or whatver tho

they just say they believe the skin was dark due to african ancestry

Nobody actually believes this

It's propaganda to de-legitimize our claim on our nation

Why are there only hunter gatherer genes on your map?

Whites come from Cro-magnon hybrids that lived in the cold, cloud covered north for 50-60,000 years.

Eskimos have "only" been living up there for 5-6000 years.
That's why.

when are "journalists" going to start getting rounded up

Cro magnon ancestry in present day whites is negligible, as they were abo tier niggers who got wiped out.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_(novel)

The wall is to stop Americans from escaping.

The very first ones to come into Sweden territory were WHG, then EHG arrived who had mutations for lighter features. You can even see in this pic they're 50/50 WHG/EHG and PCA plots Scandinavian HG's fall between WHG/EHGs.
It's not only about HG's in that study.

biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/05/09/135616.full.pdf html

Fuck forgot pic.

>WHITEZ ARE SHIT SEE????

>WHITE = OVERRATED

>WHITE = EVIL

>DARK = SUPREME

>WELCOME THE NU-SWEDES

youtu.be/X3-_KZExlJ0

>Ok, then show me who verified that article. If you can't show me, then you are reading bullshit that isn't confirme

sheet yeah negro, thats all you had to say, of course the article is bullshit I never said otherwise, my argument is only againts government control of scientific studies

so if the local somalian community mixies with the incoming syrians the child of those could recreate the modern swede by having a child with a sami?

Where in the article does it mention skin color?

...

Not really. Cro-Magnon DNA basically formed modern Europeans. You're thinking of Neanderthals.

Or I guess I should say "old europeans" now otherwise I'll be called racist. Because we are all european now, #openboarders

>Cro-Magnon DNA basically formed modern Europeans.
False

I have to go, I'll that Lithuanian guy talk to you, he seems to know his shit.

Motala-like people lived there for thousands of years. Pure WHGs may have lived for a couple of hundred at most because EHG was already there right away.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komsa_culture

I'll let*

>to be swedish must be more than skin and place of birth

well ok, so what then?

>it must be you, me and everyone together
ahhh ok, so we are replacing definite things with meaningless platitudes.

no no, you specifically need a blue-eyed somali to mix with a chink/finn. Then that child must mix with a syrian. lrn2racemix

Sweden, don't you get it? If nobody shitchecks your articles/science then anybody can write anything, claim anything without proof. Doesn't matters if government if good or bad, they should check it, so they can have their fucking names in the article, to be responsible. If they are not responsible and take no risks, then you going to get buttfucked. Why do you think there are so many shitty medications and alternative medicine in USA? People die from it, doesn't works, you wasted money, nobody gives a shit. You want experimental medicine and articles? Well don't be surprised if you turn into niggerland then. Don't be surprised if they write articles where they find no crime, since why should they? They never looked crime statistics anyway. They just wrote a fucking article they pulled out of their own ass, some reporter did, might be a fictional reporter, who knows, nobody knows, because you got no government organizations checking it and standing with their names for it.

Cro magnons,is an umbrella term like caucasian, that includes, Northafricans, arabs , central asians, and euros.

Yeah they were the first europeans, but then they got schreked by other cromagnons that spoke indo european language, they got shreked so hard that no early paleo cro magnon language exist

>I don't know what I'm talking about but ur wrong lol I have to go
Haplogroup N's derived clades include the macro-haplogroup R (and its descendants) and haplogroups A, I, S, W, X, and Y.
So yeah, nah. Cro-magnons formed modern europeans.

Yeap.

don't know if they were the first, but they'll prbly be the last...

According to the scientists this was roughly 9000 years ago.
Plenty of time to evolve, since that's around the time of the ice age. As you can see we have whiter skin now and it's because we live further north, we need more sunlight.
Retards who will use this to argue for us not being "native" are retards because the people who immigrated here ages ago were at a natural disadvantage until they could acquire most vitamin D.

Use this argument if you're dealing with leftists in this issue btw.
It has nothing to do with the cold, or well, it only has some to do with the cold.
A lot if it is due to Sweden and the rest of Scandinavia being in the northern hemisphere and thus receives less sunlight.

Why is Sweden so hell-bent on destroying their culture and identity

All light pigmentation genes europeans today posses were already in Europe with huntergatherers more than 10k years ago.

nigger, how do you expect a cucked government that wants more refugees going to help swedens sceintific community?

guess what they are not and as a matter of fact they probably funded that bullshit article in the OP

>The other main reason was the diet change that occured when humans switched to agriculture, from a high protein diet to a low protein diet. Only when humans living in cold areas stopped having a high protein diet did the benefits associated with having lighter skin make themselves felt.
Please explain

prove it

cro magnon, like the name says, refers to a particularly European type of modern sapiens and it's first and foremost a taxonomical classification, based on the skull of the man of cro magnon

the late European foragers from the mesolithic(known as WHGs) are not only genetically related to old samples from Upper paleolithic Europe, but also contributed significantly to modern Europeans, and still showed to some degree cromagnon features

it's the aurignacians who basically disappeared

Sincerely a mystery to me, seems to be general cultural Marxism but I can't actually fully comprehend it and the people propagating it obviously don't understand what they're doing either.

well, at least European aurignacians

We only came here towards the end of the ice age because it got warmer.

>Swedish scientist have now confirmed what the last swedish people looked like!
FTFY

Different study.

biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/03/03/113241

Baltic HG's are most known depigmented ancient population on average so far, mostly because unlike like elsewhere in Europe agriculture appeared without farmer ancestry, still modern day populations here have farmer ancestry probably introduced via female exogamy. Very first people were here WHG's from Kunda and Narva culture then EHG's ancestry appeared with Pit-Comb ware culture.

>Similar to the other Mesolithic hunter-gatherers, all our Baltic foragers carry the
derived HERC2 allele which codes for light iris color, and like SHG and EHG they
already possess an increased frequency of the derived alleles for SLC45A2 and
SLC24A5, coding for lighter skin color (Extended Data Table 2). The two male Narva
individuals carry Y-chromosomal haplogroups of the I2a1 clade

While types of that article in OP is talking about WHG's without EHG ancestry were all uniformly dark skinned.

Also from a different study, there could be older sample, but so far the oldest sample that had mutation for light skin is HG from Ukraine from around 11-10K years ago.

>"Note that the Ukrainian HG is dated to 11143-10591 ybp so about 9193 BC-8641 BC and yet is derived for both SLC45A2 and SLC24A5 making it the oldest sample derived for both light skin mutations."


cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(16)31542-1

>they probably did, but we don't know it, since they don't stand with their names for it
So yes, shit private organization claiming some shit and now it's your goy's problem to read 2000 pages of some shit research and maybe discover it's all a lie, good luck wasting 2 years of your life doing it and then good luck wasting 10 years of your life discovering if those cancer cures really work, when it should be THE FUCKING JOB OF GOVERNMENT to shitcheck this with other scientists, this is why we pay tax. It's not my job to check every food product if it is contaminated or every article if it is true or false, that's government job and when they check it, there should say in article organization 1 to 20 checked this and confirms to be truth.

>Swedes refuse their Balkan-nigger roots and colour them selves black.

Cro mangnons, remains have been found in the middle east and north africa before they migrated to europe, cromagnons are 50,000 years old

Is that Wojack's mom?