Former supporter here. It's obvious that the tangerine nightmare that is the leader of the free world is in over his head.
Articles of impeachment when?
Former supporter here...
Joseph Garcia
Other urls found in this thread:
historylearningsite.co.uk
foxnews.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Cooper Parker
...
Tyler Hall
>So far everything thrown at him has resulted in nothing
>no real evidence of wrongdoing, just "the sources say"
>Liberal media are so desperate that they just make stuff up by now, eliminating their last shred of crediblity.
And no, I'm not a fan of Donald. Its just that all these accusations of "Trump=Putins puppet" etc. seem so far-fetched. Putin has SO many economic and domestic problems, he has no time to care about TrumpyWumpy.
Jaxon Torres
>h-he's done this time it's real
Kill yourself you faggot shill, I hope your suicide is truly painful when you end it all November 9th 2020.
Elijah Green
....now just the minor detail of the Proofs.
Ian Lee
>Trumpfags will defend this
Ian Myers
Either impeach him or kill him. I hate that fat bastard so damn much.
Connor Williams
So to clarify the declassification of that intelligence may or may not be illegal. So whether you could use it to impeach him. Well it kinda depends on how you interpret things.
currently governing order, E.O. 13292 (amending E.O. 12958, as amended), pretty much leaves without restrictions the ability for a president to declassify anything at anytime. However, there are a few caveats. Section 3.1(b),notes, "In some exceptional cases, however, the need to protect [classified] information may be outweighed by the public interest in disclosure of the information, and in these cases the information should be declassified." This section goes on to refer to the decision of the "agency head or the senior agency official". This is kinda where we need to draw the line. If Trumps decision fell within this interp then he's totally in the clear. However there are other subsections that could land him into trouble. Those are listed bellow.
1) a declassification decision designed to inform the public (fine);
2) a declassification decision designed to correct a widespread misunderstanding of why the President did something (a subset of 1), and also fine, and claimed by some of the president's defenders here);
3) a declassification decision that jeopardizes national security (to say the least, not fine);
4) a declassification decision that discloses the name of a CIA agent (almost always a subset of 3), and to say the least, not fine -- again, not alleged thus far with respect to the President or Vice President);
5) a declassification decision that represents, in context, an effort not only to defend the President but also to mislead the public (not fine)
The debate, right now, seems to be whether the declassification decision at issue falls in category 1) or category 3).
William Sullivan
Well, Uh...we are in the earliest stage of the investigation...um and we uh are following where the leads take us... and er...
Asher White
>where is the evidence?
>what exactly was this "classified info" about?
>who is the source of the rumors
Need some more verifiable information, guys, not just whimpering. If I'm supposed to be against Trump, I'll need some more.
Nicholas Williams
AHAHHAHAHA WHY DONT YOU JUST KILL YOURSELF YOU PATHETIC WORM, NO MORE BIG ORANGE MEANIE IF YOU KILL YOURSELF
Carter Reed
THE INVESTIGATION IS ONGOING BUT IMPEACH HIM FIRST AND WE PROMISE TO HAVE IT BY THEN!
Benjamin Wright
Choose one of the following:
A) No proofs
B) Resignations, recusals, subpoenas for information, documents on Trump sent over from the Treasury Financial Crimes Unit, numerous cases of individuals attempting to conceal their contacts with Russian officials from the investigation, etc
Carson Price
>Former supporter
>tangerine nightmare
trump is a cuck but you're pathetic if you try come to Sup Forums and subvert the un-subvertable
Mason Wilson
user I want you to do nothing more than to read this explanation of Nazi propaganda and how it operated and then to trace back the origin of this story that everyone is reporting on.
historylearningsite.co.uk
Ethan Martinez
foxnews.com
>It's unlikely that Trump has broken any law. As president, Trump has broad authority to declassify government secrets.
>"If Trump weren’t president, his dangerous disclosure to Russia could end with him in handcuffs," the DNC statement continued.
Carter Perez
>call everyone reddit
>divide and conquer
>muh-nu-pol
>muh two scoops of vanilla bean codes
>drumpf is done this time
Cameron Rogers
I agree, please live stream it.
I want to hear your neck pop when your im with her panties squeeze around your neck and the ceiling fan was just strong enought to hold up your pathetic weak 90 pounds
Jaxon Nguyen
>t. Asshurt lib nigger
Gavin Moore
Sage and fraudulent
Asher Morgan
lol, i hate the fucker for hitting Assad, but this just looks like he warned the Russians about a plot... like they warned the US about the Boston bombers. shut the fuck up with your stupid russophobic bullshit, mehmet
Jonathan Hill
HE NEVER RELEASED HIS TAX RETURNS!!!!!! >:(((((
Blake Morris
>"If Trump weren't in a position to do exactly what he dis, his dangerous disclosure to Russia could end with him in handcuffs," the DNC statement continued.
Captain obvious over here
Kevin Edwards
Faux news only tells the half of it. It's very possible that Trump willfully declassified something that could be a genuine threat to national security. In that case it would be a crime
Jaxon Sanders
The fucking DNC just admitted he didn't break any laws. Get fucked, Shariablue.
Luke Parker
I HURT MY SELF TODAY...
Thomas Anderson
Posting in a sageblue thread.
The truth about immigration, by the numbers:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxist Jews Admit Organizing White Genocide
The plan to eliminate the white race:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxism in action… Political Correctness, the tip of the blade:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxism & Social Justice Explained:
>youtube.com
Why are we in Decline - Cultural Marxism:
>youtube.com
also see
The facts about slavery in North America:
>youtube.com
Cultural Marxist Jews fund media propaganda against whites on an enormous scale:
>youtube.com
Does this sound familiar at all? (starting at 6:52)
>youtu.be
The Holocaust:
>youtube.com
Ethan Perez
Did you read the article? A short way into the article he admits NO LAWS WERE BROKEN. Anonymous sources who don't want to be identified complain he's breaking the normal way they go about their business. GOOD! Knowing pretty much every agency is working against Trump, it makes sense they would come up with this load of crap to lure dumbasses who don't read the article and only the headline into thinking Trump is treasonous.... Oy Vey!
Camden Perez
>Former supporter here. It's obvious that the tangerine nightmare that is the leader of the free world is in over his head.
>Articles of impeachment when?
That's what happens when you have a president that "says what's on his mind" trusted with classified information.
Adrian Wright
"According to the Washington Post."
KYS
Luke Bailey
The President is in charge of National Security. He can release/discuss/disclose anything at anytime he wishes. This is not an impeachable offense.
Fun fact: Johnson disclosed the the top secret A-12/YF-12/SR-71 to the public to help win his Presidential re-election
Hudson Moore
Proofs?
Thomas Perry
>WaPo writes an article
>every other news site references WaPo and NO OTHER SOURCE, it's solely WaPo
What did they meme by this?
Ryan Carter
Why do people think we're crazy for thinking that the steak salesman and beauty pageant organizer is probably not a Russian puppet
Henry Rodriguez
>President shared classified info
Who are they classified for?
Tfw trying to undermine the office of the Presidency. Presidency is outdated senpai. UN is where it's at nowadays.
Anti-trust these "news" organizations asap.
Austin Perry
Has an eerie similarity to
> Not gonna lie, former Trump supporter here. This is fucking hilarious watching Trump crash and burn.. But in all seriousness we can't let this man get the nuclear codes!
Is it going to be the next shareblue copypasta?
Chase Hill
Finally! This is the end of Trump.
Sebastian Ross
Ok so you're either a troll or you're one of those reddit r/the_donald shit for brains. The diffrence here is that Trump didn't tell anyone what he was giving, how much, when, why or how. One was the US state department as well as a few intelligence agencies putting together a carefully planned packet to give the Russians. While trump just opened the vaults and told them take what they wanted
Elijah Cruz
Luckily he's the president and can declassify a wide range of information at will
Ryan Miller
Not entirely true, there's a pretty large post here explaining that.
Elijah Adams
Not true, I wrote a pretty big explanation of that already, you may want to read it
Angel King
SHUT IT DOWN'S!
>SHUT IT DOWN'S!
SHUT IT DOWN'S!
>SHUT IT DOWN'S!
SHUT IT DOWN'S!
>SHUT IT DOWN'S!
SHUT IT DOWN'S!
>SHUT IT DOWN'S!
SHUT IT DOWN'S!
>SHUT IT DOWN'S!
SHUT IT DOWN'S!
>SHUT IT DOWN'S!
Kayden Bell
It's nice that the kikes are dropping the idea that this is about something other than their desire to steal Syrian land and oil.
the left is so assblasted that they're literally working to undermine the U.S. on behalf of an apartheid state.
But by all means, keep it up. you're redpilling the fuck out of normies by admitting openly that you're bugging the Oval Office.