>the right to bear arms shall not be infrin-

...

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=ihSaGAVHmvw
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmudiyah_rape_and_killings
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>Technology means guaranteed win
>what is Vietnam war

SLIDE THREAD

SAGE

Only idiots would fall for this shit argument. /thread, sage

ged

Implying the united states would just start bombing their own cities

A bunch of goatfucking sandniggers with old soviet-era weapons can beat the american military.

Also

>what is the war on terrorism

Everyone knows that the US would be a safer and more civilized place if guns were further regulated. Most people here are just bad people though, and they would rather let thousands of their country's citizens die than give up their toys.

The shills are running out of sage threads, Sad!

/thread

>What is American Revolutionary War
Americans didnt have shit weapons against the brits at first
and what makes these idiots think the people wouldnt be able to obtain some of those weapons eventually, having a fighting chance with guns

The US government has only a handful of drones, tanks, and other armor that can be fielded. Of all of that, much of it is months away defending foreign countries.

Tanks are anti-armor and consequently help very little in a guerrilla war.

Drones require that you know where your target is, which consequently means that they're just short of useless in a guerrilla war. Pretty much all air support is restrained by this fact.

Nukes would get the US instantly sanctioned by all international organizations. The rebels would receive international support and win.

>that compression
>calling someone else retarded
lmao

if the government started mass killing civies then the military would turn on them and support a revolution.

liberals are literally incapable of thinking things through to their logical conclusion

the military will not kill their own citizens

Are they going to raid houses with tomahawks?

There is no statistical evidence supporting gun control

The US military going to war against it own citizens would be like me walking outside to my fields and setting my crops on fire.

Then ban Democrats from owning guns.

>78% of felons are Democrats or identify as Democrat

Crimes w/ guns would fall by 78% overnight if you really believed banning stuff works

...

/thread

fpbp

also sage

Kinda defeats the argument that noone needs 30 round magazines though. I mean which is it libshits? Don't need guns, or need better guns? Make up your retarded minds...

>carpet bomb, drone strike, and mobilize tanks against citizens on your own land
>not only turn every American Militia against the government, but also increase their size since you've given the people a reason to rebel
>Countries that have something against the U.S. Government start sending support to these militias
>get condemned by the U.N. for bombing your own nation

>the jar head pointing his rifle at the camera

lel stayed cucked

Guns are our line of defense against tyranny

You know how hard it is to make a cannon?
So hard that people without electricity, combustion engines, machine tools, any concept of metallurgy or pretty much any of our modern knowledge and conveniences could fabricate and operate them using little more than rocks from riverbeds, wood, fermented shit/piss and sand.

Insurgency will always create a stalemate because Americans will never accept a total war ever again. Unless there is a scorched earth policy against the enemy, an insurgency will continue to flourish.

Americans are way more concerned with civilian casualties than they are actually stomping the enemy into the ground.

So, if they won't accept total war against a foreign enemy, they will never accept one against their own people. And because of that, an American insurgency would probably never end.

Reminder that Americans can legally own destructive weapons

What a dumb argument based entirely on muh feels. You are willing to give up a fundamental right to save...a couple thousand lives a year? Honestly not a bad price to pay for that freedom desu desu, drop in the bucket really, especially when you look at other causes of death.

he's there to protect us goy

Do you know how easy it is to make an explosive device? How many years was the Unabomber active before they tracked him down? Rifles are the least of your worries if you're a tyrant.

yeah maybe when they can replace people soldiers with robots.

although in a civil war you don't really want to kill the opposng side's soldiers if you can help it, you want to try and stick to hit and run attacks on equipment and supplies.

/thread

>try to be witty
>too stupid to understand simple social dynamics or have any concept of politics

Must feel bad.

How's that assault weather ban coming along?

>Countries that have something against the U.S. Government start sending support to these militias
Sounds like a good way of starting a larger war. A nuclear armed nation, especially the most powerful one, isn't going to sit back as foreign nations interfere in its domestic troubles.
>get condemned by the U.N. for bombing your own nation
What are the UN going to do, invade? Who gives a fuck about them lol

>Vegas

Do you realize how ineffective gun bans actually are?

If AUSTRALIA, the most isolated "western" nation on Earth has a plague of biker gangs armed with domestically manufactured fully-automatic SMG's, what do you think the result of a gun ban will be anywhere in the Americas, Europe or Asia?

The neat part about a war against the government is that their is a strong disincentive to use high profile weapons against your citizenry, the goal at the end of supressing a revolution is to have people to rule over still. Also, any weapon that causes mass civilian casualties will only backfire by motivating fence post sitters to side against you.

>Sounds like a good way of starting a larger war.
That's why starting a civil war is a bad idea

The US can't fucking control A-stan and you expect the American public, who own more weight in firearms than the population of many countries, would get steamrollered in civil strife?

Civil wars divide armies too. OP confirmed militarily illiterate.

an opportunity for profit by those with the willingness to ignore the law.

if the us military is so great why did they lose to ragheads that live in mud huts?

youtube.com/watch?v=ihSaGAVHmvw

Kek, it is funny cause is true. Gun ban in Brazil only increased the crime rates. At least my parents have a rural property and we can buy a benelli, hope soon.

Well that's mostly due to the fact 95% of niggers and spics identify as democrats. America has a black problem.

Even if you could get rid of guns, which you can't, do you think they are the only weapons that can kill your statist ass?

>insurgents and guerilla warfare
>it's impossible for citizens to overthrow their gubment
You need to read.

Most deaths are caused by hand guns but everyone screams MUR ASSURT RAYFURRRS

>Dude bros
Shitty bait

i am sick of this crap. do you think for a second that the military is going to hold together if they are ordered to fire on americans on americans soil? The first thing that will happen is a true civil war with the military assest divesting to both sides.

>volunteers
>shooting their own people

Crazy admissible, user.

>Sounds like a good way of starting a larger war. A nuclear armed nation, especially the most powerful one, isn't going to sit back as foreign nations interfere in its domestic troubles.
Congratulations, now the USA is fighting several wars on many different fronts, thus making it even more impossible for them to win.

They had to shut down Boston looking for two idiots with pressure cookers
If even just a few thousand people bugged out and started hitting soft targets this country would collapse within a month

Don't they also have crazy dirt farmers in the outback sitting on gelignite stockpiles?

>because the soldiers will blindly follow and kill their neighbors

The best thing we could do is shut down the (((economy))) through sabotage

lmao all the butthurt yanktards

Politicians gave them shitty rules of engagement.... turn them loose and it would be nothing left but smoking ruins and crying widows.

Because there are neutral ragheads in the middle. Just like a civil war you cannot morally blow up civilians who are for neither size.

If all of the brown people were deemed as bad we would win the war in 3 hours.

Did he died?

Get rid of all nigger and spics and America 100% would be a safer place. I dont think safety is why you shill against guns though.

Check em'

The moment the US military fires on its own citizens is the day they lose any civil war or uprising

right, so how could the us military "win" against the US population? Even if the us military were totally mind-controlled and they got them to "turn loose" on us, if everybody is dead you don't even have a country to rule anymore.

Rules of engagement include raping kids? Idiot.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahmudiyah_rape_and_killings

You know that america would be better with no guns but at this points it's too late to ban them.

Either everyone has guns or no one has them.

In Poland no one has guns and I'm not afraid of being shot when I go out to buy a pack of smokes.

desparate people do desparate things.


in all likelihood in event of a civil war the navy would patrol the waters to protect our coasts and let us sort it out,

in all likelihood cowardly politicians would surrender instead of die

you also just have to adapt a scorched earth mentality

>blow up every bridge
>blow up every power station
>pull rails on tracks randomly
>focus attacks on machinery and supplies
>soldiers you're not killing get disgruntled over the shitting they're getting from washington and begin to see the effectiveness in what you're doing in comparison to the incompetence of their leaders
>more people are getting fucking pissed their power is out and there are ration lines
>further pissed off that their government is too incompetent to end it
this is why a loyalist police force and a doctrine to keep people isolated would be much more effective in preventing a civil war from ever happening.

personally I don't give a shit either way, I only enjoy watching it burn.

Did you read the sticky? You opened up with a logical fallacy.

Most people used to think the earth was flat.

The day guns are banned is the day that knife murders spike so hard the murder rate is actually increased because people are less able to defend themselves from thugs and drug addicts

why don't we just do that then?

>how are civilians going to combat the govern-

>no federal registry of gun owners
>government begins confiscating guns by indiscriminately blowing houses up with Abrams tanks and Apaches
Yeah, that will workout great. Tell tank and helicopter crews to go kill their neighbors because there's a 30% chance they might own a revolver.

Yeah but are you worried about getting stabbed or beaten up?
You might not have to fear guns, but that doesn't mean you don't fear equally as much about other shit.

>america would be better with no guns

>giving trigger happy dixies the chance to operate against a tyrannical government that drones their own people
>implying Russia wouldn't supply the shit out of them
>implying they wouldn't have multiple orgasms while shooting legit russians AKs
>implying your grid won't get btfo by operators operating operationally
>soldiers in a democracy (arguable) shooting their own friends
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Enjoy your logistic clusterfuck, yankee cuck.

Destroying supply houses, putting tanks in streets, kos mandatory curfews.

It would not be easy to win vs the people, but it is not even close to in our favor.

>Be drone operator
>Informant tips off authorities about the location of a suspected domestic terrorist
>order comes in to launch Drone strike
>Kill terrorist, his roommate, 23 innocent taxpayers
>Cause tens of thousands of dollars in property damage
>cryingeagle.jpg
>Man, I sure am proud to be doing my civic duty
>Go home
>Find wife raped and murdered in the living room
>call cops
>look outside
>my car is burning
>run outside in a panic
>get picked off from a van down the street

Man, I sure am glad we have all this technology that will definitely help quell internal resistance.

...

Tanks, planes, helicopters and rockets are highly dependent upon human crews to service, refuel and maintain them... humans are soft and squishy and not bullet proof.
Same for the people that transport the fuel and make the meals for the mechanics and support troops...

...

>mfw government wants go come arrest me and rolls a tank up to my house ready to fire a shell straight into my living room

In Iraq children were used to walk out in front of US convoys to make them stop and then ambushed. To counter this convoys were instructed to run over the children to avoid the ambush.

This got them in hot shit, how dare they risk 30 men for a brainwashed child.

If this didn't work how do you expect purposefully killing these children?

You're right, cause blackouts and take out some bridges and the infrastructure collapses. The government does not want to give people a reason to fight.

>multiple life sentences for all of them

That's the differnence between the US and those savages. Where they cheer for this shit we condemn it.

This is the kind of shit people make for shits and giggles. Do you really think people won't weaponize the crap out of everything they can get?

No black people so no stabbings.

So 30k annual gun deaths is nothing?

I highly doubt anyone here saying the military would support the government has served. The only ones who would are the KANGZ type and even then they'd probably start their own shit up. The people who actually pull triggers would be nowhere to be found in a government outfit

Imagine Vietnam.
Now instead of fighting say, 9 million people, you're fighting 32 million people.
And those people have years of shooting guns for fun under their belts and large modern gun collections.
And you can't just napalm everything anymore because it's not the 60's and other countries will get super pissed at you.

please give up your guns

forgot pic

We absolutely rekt the gooks in Vietnam.
Just look up the fucking k/d ratio.

We pulled out because of political pressure, not because we were being defeated. Had we stayed, we would have won with ease. If the government wanted to kill us, they very well could. The only problem though is that the tank, the attack helicopter, and the drone are all operated and controlled by volunteers, volunteers with civilian families and friends.

Homicide is not and has never been a gun problem.

fuck the normies just glass the middle east

>The US will bomb/send tanks to cities/towns just to take out one guy

>Napalm a random village
>30 dead kids, 20 dead grannies, 50 dead people of fighting age who may or may not actually be enemy combatants.
>Chalk it down as 100 enemy combatants dead.
>Look at how many people we killed! We won!

>disrupting/destroying food, fuel and other goods transports of opposition
>sabotaging electrical grids, power lines and other energy sources
>ambushes, sniping, terrorist attack, i.e.d.s and other guerilla tactics
>scorched earth, poisoning water sources, absolutely preventing backup /reinforcements/supplies from arriving
These are the things I read in a badass conflict fiction novel *hurrdurr*

Vietnam was in the jungle this is in wide open where satellites can see your every step.

We had Vietnam in the bag, but we let south Vietnam take over to flex and make it seem like we were some badass teachers who could train other countries to be as good as us.

And then they got rekt.

>point out difference between self and savage
>dancing in the street celebrating saddam, qadaffi, bin laden's death
>go to war with two countries that had nothing to do with 9/11 because (((they))) told you to

who are the simple savages again? both are rapists and paedophiles, as we've established.

The left
>lmao war sucks dude *hits weed* war sucks dude a bunch of vietnamese rice farmers wrecked america anyways
Also the left
>man your gun isn't going to do shit against the might and power of the american military you're just a corn farmer

Question asked if hypothetically all military men stayed on their side.

We could have killed every last jungle gook if we wanted, it just wouldn't have looked good on TV.