Could United States win a war against the world?

Could United States win a war against the world?

Other urls found in this thread:

nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/2015-30-year-old-french-nuclear-submarine-sank-us-aircraft-18912
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Depends. If the goal is kill everyone. Probably.
Nation building after we crush every military. Nope.

No, one out of date French sub sank half your fucking fleet in training. nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/2015-30-year-old-french-nuclear-submarine-sank-us-aircraft-18912

if nukes, yes. if no nukea, no.

No.

could a slide thread be any more obvious

SETH RICH

saged

2% of your population is all it took to fuck your country up, so no.

North Korea could take down USA on its own, just look at how they crippled the world with the WANNACRY ransomware.

No. If nukes are involved, both lose.

>manpower
>artillery

Nah, their ranks would be thinned with an attack from all sides

That's what you think :)

But if the US creates a designer virus that only kills non-Whites including Slavs?

pffffffffffffffffff
of
course
we
could

You're all faggots who obey

Did you ever even win a war 1v1?

Honest question.

Excluding the civil war.
Killing yourselves doesnt count.

Stop the fantasy.
Countries USA can't stop
Afghanistan
Vietnam
Cuba
North Korea
Russia
China

Depends, is this offensive or defensive?
Offensively no, there's just too many nations to defeat.

Defensively though I think we could hold out. We would have to take Canada and as far south as Panama first though. Then it would be up to the opposing powers to mount an invasion across an ocean. That's extremely hard even with today's tech. We would certainly face an extended bombing campaign but since we'd be fighting it on our own turf we'd have the advantage.

No, they could, nor even win any sustained war against a minor poverty stricken country.

America's 100 million dollar weapons would be countered by a 25 cent AK 47 in the hands of a man who has 12 kids to replace him if he was to fail and who could live off of tree grubs for the next 20 years if needs be.

>Could United States win a war against the world?

...

you could nuke every single capital and win

but with disastrous consequences

False. It was all simulated engagement exercises.

>Second, it’s important to remember that “sunk” is in quotation marks for a reason. The French F17 torpedo has a 551 pound HBX-3 high explosive warhead. It can also only fire a salvo of four torpedoes at a time, due to having only four torpedo tubes. A 551 pound torpedo warhead would probably not sink a Ticonderoga or Burke-class escort, and though it would undoubtedly damage, it would definitely not sink a Nimitz-class supercarrier. Also, given a screen of four escort ships and Roosevelt’s onboard anti-submarine warfare helicopters, a single salvo of four torpedoes was all Saphir was going to get before it was forced to withdraw.

>Provided Saphir targeted Roosevelt and three of her escorts, it would have damaged four ships—not sunk them. Although the distinction is less important when it comes to the escorts, which might have been knocked out of action, with just one torpedo in her Roosevelt would have likely still been capable of air operations.

And Britfag...? Don't comment on our military. Yours could get stomped by nearly anybody. Also, reminder that Hitler kicked your ass, made you retreat, and we had to lend you money that you JUST finished paying back in 2006 (and finish the war for you).

the US can't even take on China at this point

>Did you ever even win a war 1v1?

Twice. Once against Mexico, then against Spain. Otherwise the USA has lost every 1v1 war it has ever ought.

Her ass looks like shit.

No, we lose to waves upon waves of enemies. Germany vs Russia, just keep throwing people at em and they will fault eventually.

Saved.

>Twice. Once against Mexico, then against Spain.

hahaha, oh shit, isnt this like literally the worst war record out of any non-nigger countries?