Libcuck friend is constantly blathering about Trump's alleged Russian connection.
What are some info graphics, quotes, events, etc. that refute this.
Every fucking day the ((media)) is shilling this narrative and I haven't been as informed as I should be due to college finals
Thanks Sup Forums
Is this all bullshit?
There is nothing to refute it. Its proven 100% that Russia had leverage on Flynn which Trump tried to cover up. At this point we've reached Nixon level shit. If Trump isn't "connected" to Russia than he is grossly incompetent.
Show proof nao
There were plenty of indications way before the election that Russians were attempting sway US public opinion.
I don't even really give a fuck, but it would be nice if I could counter what these fags are saying.
Also, guess who is VP for my university Republican club?
THAS RITE
>New York Times
Literally the favorite mouthpiece of the kikes.
I'm not even clicking on the link - no need to give schlomo any extra ad revenue
You don't have to counter it. They need to present proof that it's true.
This - I have yet to see any proof of any direct link between Trump and the Russian government.
The longer the (media) can keep talking about this "collusion" the more they can sway your average soft headed American
The longer these fucks have the airwaves - whether on the tv or in lunch table discussion, the less likely our chances of successfully retaking the US. Just letting them drone on with their baseless allegations and shaky narrative isn't effective
You've got to be pretty fucking blind not to see it with the constant coverage. You know you can like a politician without dick sucking him this much.
You're on Sup Forums. The autists here do NOTHING but read up about this shit all day.
>pretty fucking blind
Show us the light. Faggot.
If he brings up Trump leaking "valuable intel" on ISIS to those evil ruskies, show him this.
bbc.com
If he thinks that Trump was having contact with the Ivans during the election, show him this
youtube.com
Fist to the face
What does your first link, explaining how the president can declassify information, even meant to say? Donald Trump eat his own shit if he wants, doesn't mean he should.
And lmao at your second link, you are literally referencing some George Bush shill?
There was a BBC article that was deleted, can't find the archive. All of this bullshit hinges on conspiracy theory; the amount of red tape and mental gymnastics it would take for Russia to plan a preemptive hack during election season so they're sleeper agent Donald rump would win is preposterous.
MEDIA COVERAGE ISN'T PROOF
show me the proof that the media is basing these headlines on you faggot. Show me one solid thing that isn't anderson cooper crying into rachel maddows big burly arms.
>democrats see news of seth rich resurfacing
>wtf i thought this was dead news
>"seth rich has contact with wikileaks before his death"
>ohshit.jpg
>push fake "dae drumpf=russian spy" story
>it's debunked within a few hours
>seth rich news getting more traction
>our shield within the fbi, comey, is gone
>ohshit.jpg
>panic kicks in
>use democratic shill to push "it's literally nothing goyim"
>use power of mass corruption to shut down the actual parents from speaking up
[we are here now]
>people start finding youtube.com
>it's all falling apart
>shill harder than you've ever shilled before
(posting in a Seth Rich slide thread)
>Didn't disclose entirety if single phone call during transition
>"Russian leverage"
Tell them that Russia isn't your enemy and of course countries have to work together to create a peaceful world.
>first link
Says that it doesn't matter what the president told anybody. It's not treason for the head of our executive branch of government to disclose information of this sort. And I like how you think it's bad that we gave Russia info on ISIS. You're really retarded if you can't see how this will benefit us in eradicating their threat.
>second link
Is CNN literally shitting in their own mouths. Mukasey facefucks the fat bitch with truth and she (and (you) apparently) can't seem to handle it.
>literally hillary tactics
Holy fuck, bring a source to the table and convince people to convert to your beliefs before trying to dismantle theirs. It gives an impression that you don't have a solid logical foundation to stand on and that you're just being contrarian.
>And lmao at your second link, you are literally referencing some George Bush shill?
only obama shills allowed to speak, gotcha
Yes.