/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL

This thread is for Discussion of Libertarianism, Capitalism, AnarchoCapitalism, and the physical removal of communist fags from our board of peace.

>Post sneks
>Bump for Life, Liberty, and Private Death Squads

>Vanilla /lrg/ pastebin- CREATE IF YOU DONT SEE ONE IN THE CATALOG
pastebin.com/aEL5VWHY

Other urls found in this thread:

pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1b5b/8351b8e74885b976ae75ad605709b61b6ecb.pdf
liberalstudies.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/thelaw.pdf
il-rs.org.br/site/biblioteca/docs/Friedman__Milton___Rose_-_Free_To_Choose_--_A_Personal_Statement.pdf
socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/aristotle/Ethics.pdf
iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/Hayek's Constitution of Liberty.pdf
mises.org/system/tdf/Liberalism In the Classical Tradition_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/Economics and Ethics of Private Property Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/A Short History of Man — Progress and Decline.pdf?file=1&type=document
riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf
mises.org/system/tdf/Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, A_4.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/From Aristocracy to Monarchy to Democracy_Hoppe_Text 2014.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/Myth of National Defense, The Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/The Private Production of Defense_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/Economic Science and the Austrian Method_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/What Must Be Done_7.pdf?file=1&type=document
youtube.com/watch?v=jTYkdEU_B4o
youtube.com/watch?v=C4x5GPbZwTI
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augusto_Pinochet
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Go back to T_D faggots.

GENERAL READING LIST (feel free to make suggestions to expand this list)

>Basic Economics - Thomas Sowell
pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1b5b/8351b8e74885b976ae75ad605709b61b6ecb.pdf

>The Law - Frédéric Bastiat
liberalstudies.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/thelaw.pdf

>Free To Choose - Milton and Rose Friedman
il-rs.org.br/site/biblioteca/docs/Friedman__Milton___Rose_-_Free_To_Choose_--_A_Personal_Statement.pdf

>Nicomachean Ethics - Aristotle
socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/aristotle/Ethics.pdf

>Hayek’s The Constitution of Liberty - Eugene F. Miller
iea.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/files/Hayek's Constitution of Liberty.pdf

>Liberalism: In the Classical Tradition - Ludwig von Mises
mises.org/system/tdf/Liberalism In the Classical Tradition_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

FUCK OFF SHILL SLIDE THREAD

REMEMBER SETH RICH

UNITE BEHIND TRUMP

>back
Never been there. Trumpfags aren't libertarians and (((cultural libertarianism))) is a kike trick.

Pretty sure there's enough of those threads up. I bet half of you faggots didn't even know who Rich was.

HOPPE READING LIST

>The Economics and Ethics of Private Property (1993; 2006 2nd edition)
mises.org/system/tdf/Economics and Ethics of Private Property Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>A Short History of Man: Progress and Decline (2015)
mises.org/system/tdf/A Short History of Man — Progress and Decline.pdf?file=1&type=document

>Democracy—The God That Failed (2001)
riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf

>A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism (1988; 2010 edition)
mises.org/system/tdf/Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, A_4.pdf?file=1&type=document

>From Aristocracy, to Monarchy, to Democracy (2014)
mises.org/system/tdf/From Aristocracy to Monarchy to Democracy_Hoppe_Text 2014.pdf?file=1&type=document

>The Myth of National Defense: Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production (2003)
mises.org/system/tdf/Myth of National Defense, The Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>The Private Production of Defense (1998; 2006 edition)
mises.org/system/tdf/The Private Production of Defense_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>Economic Science and the Austrian Method (1995)
mises.org/system/tdf/Economic Science and the Austrian Method_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>What Must Be Done (2009)
mises.org/system/tdf/What Must Be Done_7.pdf?file=1&type=document

Mud lip

what did he mean by this

How do anclaps deal with the fact that nobody would adhere to the NAP and their "utopia" would just be free-for-all chaos?

They're retards. They don't think about their ideology in depth. They're also utopians.

Why is it that all the arguments Anti-ancaps can muster are straw man?

Do you honestly feel capable of holding a debate just because you read the NAP definition on Wikipedia? Because you certainly don't show to have any knowledge about Anarcho capitalism.

How is it that you expect Ancaps require everyone to adhere to the NAP and you can't even notice that you have millions of people who didn't adhere to your laws, yet you still have a somewhat functioning society?

The "NAP" argument is just a lazy way to straw man anarcho capitalists, like if we didn't actually have a plan outside of a moral code.

But we do: youtube.com/watch?v=jTYkdEU_B4o

A Short History of Man: Progress and Decline {Audiobook-Not read by Hoppe!}
youtube.com/watch?v=C4x5GPbZwTI

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

Just report all hist posts. Leftypol shills don't know they get physically removed

...

...

There, that should be enough. Thank you for your time and goodbye.

Nobody checks trips any more?
Fuck this board.
Death trips to Commies checked and witnessed.

...

...

Maltese is the strangest language I've ever heard. Italian on Arabic. Do you speak it?

...

Nope. I'm not Maltese, just happen to work and live here.

So under libertarianism, is there any enforced institution of marriage? Would it be more like the meme we have today minus the gay divorce laws or more like the traditional marriage of European glory?

Honest question for ancaps

What is your opinion on age of consent and general child protection laws?

How will the NAP protect children from child prostitution when our government can barely even do that?

Devil's advocate here, what is the difference between being a wagecuck to private organizations and being a labor cuck to an authoritarian government?

wouldn't the best way to preserve freedom be to abolish government as well as private organizations?

No. It would be either a religious or a legal institution between two people who voluntarily enter into it.

Religions would specify specific necessities (i.e. "we won't marry gay people") and would do their own thing

Gay people would find a secular celebrant and get married through them.

It would be legally binding agreements between the two, not a prespecified set of rules or mandates laid out by the government. Maybe the church would lay some restrictions, but it's always your choice to juat not get married through them.

>age of consent
Up to the different covenants / private cities. I assume those covenants that have some contractually enforced aoc will do better than others.

>child protection laws
Private entities should take care of prosecuting and denouncing. Check the video I posted to understand private law.

>How will the NAP protect children from child prostitution when our government can barely even do that?

Again, it's not the Nap that protects us, just like your laws don't protect you. It's all about law enforcement, and the video shows how it is possible and probably better.

The same as the difference between sex and rape. Consent

I think when you say libertarianism you actually mean anarcho-capitalism. And yes, under anarcho-capitalism marriage would be a meme

how much will you pay me when me and my fashy buddies remove some communists? we could be your contractors

>enforced institution of marriage?
Contracts.

Freedom of choice to sell your labor, as opposed to the authoritarian forced labor through coercion.

If you abolish private organizations you make it every man for himself. No insurance, no police, no courts, no firefighters. Private organizations are the way that individuals voluntarily come together to do things they could not do by themselves. So long as they're voluntary there is no issue with them

How can statists call anyone utopians you literally believe that a bunch of bureaucrats can manage and control an economy with millions of transactions, prices and actors. You assign omniscience to government.

A world without government for most statist is a scary one

>The same as the difference between sex and rape. Consent


Well I mean there is about as much consent in "work or starve" as there is in "work or prison"
even more so if you abolish the laws that keep companies from making work your ass off without break and only give you pennies as payment.
>Private entities should take care of prosecuting and denouncing.

Isn't that just feudalism with extra steps?
Also it is a fact of life that if someone can do it, they will do it. Without any government there will be more abuse of children as well as things like child slave trafficking, which many will consider an acceptable business.

Sup Forums has always been a libertarian board.

This

The nature of a board that allows any kind of speech at all is hella libertarian.

A fashy board would do things like censor communists and shit

>leftists take the world 'liberal' from advocates of liberty
>in the process of taking 'libertarian' to mean some degenerate shit
what's next?

I blame Gary "dude weed lmao" Johnson for that, him and his attempt to steal votes from confused centrists.

Optimal economic policy is not "utopia", and NAP is just a guideline for a better legal system, beyond enforcing contracts

>Well I mean there is about as much consent in "work or starve" as there is in "work or prison"

Starving is the natural status of men. Ever since we're born we are gradually starving until we put food in our stomach, and back to gradually starving.

Prison is not the natural status of men, in order to be imprisoned someone has to actively try to limit your rights and tell you that you're not the owner of your body.

There's massive philosophical differences between positive and negative rights.

>even more so if you abolish the laws that keep companies from making work your ass off without break and only give you pennies as payment.

There is no law allowing me to be paid more than 400€/month afaik, yet somehow I make way more than that. You accept the best society is willing to give you or you build a future for yourself.

If nobody in the world is willing to pay you more than pennies for your work, then chances are you have bigger problems than a lack of laws.

>Isn't that just feudalism with extra steps?

Not even close.

>if someone can do it, they will do it

Just showed you a video that addresses private law, seems you didn't even bother watching it. These are all pre-conceived notions and are all covered in the video.

Has socialist Europe hit your island? How is the economy in the Mediterranean?

It would be a sacred bond by your church, with no legal meaning. If you want more than that, you could always write up whatever contract you want and get it notarized. I'm sure there would be a basic template and I'm sure we'd just call it "the marriage contract", and there's a good chance that out of social habit we'd still do both.

Dude across all these Meds country the gov't employs half the population

Stop shilling libertarianism as violent.
Libertarianism is the opposite of violent.
It's nonviolent.

...

We wouldn't tolerate homosexuality in my commune

Pacifism is a mental illness

Sorry for so many posts, phonefagging makes this shit annoying.
Man has proven itself to work much better in groups. This is the phenomenon that has lead to athoritarian ideals, but as it turns out, we must also want to belong to that group. Even in an ethnostate, there will be quiet dissenters, thus inefficiency. Private marketplaces capitalize on peoples group preferences better than any system designed so far.

Wagecuckery does not exist. The concept stems from economic illiteracy. The market determines the price of your wage. It reflects your worth. Wagecuckery is the term used a coping device for losers who can't more than minimum wage at age 30.

> what is the difference between being a wagecuck to private organizations and being a labor cuck to an authoritarian government?

Consent. I don't want to be a servant to the government. Anarcho-capitalism allows for that. A lot of fascists, national socialists and communists/regular socialists are weak people, and they need someone to strip them of their income (lest they hurt themselves) and nanny them. In an anarcho-capitalist society we would make allowances for those people. Socialist communes could exist and you could live there following the personality cult of your leader (i.e. Hitler, Stalin, Mao) while you starve.

This country has grown amazingly in the last 20 years. It was a shithole with absolutely nothing and now construction and business are everywhere.

Thing is, meds always sabotage themselves, the moment they get out of absolute poverty they start becoming activists for the left, so this country is doomed. But for now, there's money to be made here, Socialism is not as rampant as in most of Europe.

The wealth of Nations - Adam Smith

Words/thoughts =/= actions.

...

People can say and think whatever they want until they actually fuck over other people.
A person who thinks only ever about murdering other people and causing them suffering but never actually puts their plots into actions is irrelevant to other people.

When we speak of communists, were not talking about any idiot who ever wore a che guevara t-shirt. I'm talking about actual communists that are actually trying to ram this trash down everones throats. Antifa and similar groups, corporate commies leading the agenda and so on.

>is irrelevant to other people

It's not. Being threatened conditions your way of life, incurs costs.

In fact there's plenty of evidence that that kind of cathartic thought is beneficial to the angry person. Thoughts of revenge and murder, if not carried out, prevent the feelings from repressing and manifesting later in negative, unproductive ways.

But as Spain taught us during the civil war years, nonagression will not work against agressive enemies. Sometimes it takes violent men committing violent deeds to defend their communities

If people do something that's one thing. If they say things and never do things that's entirely something else.

You can't draw a line with language or you open the path to absolute absurdity in moral reasoning. You have to have the line at physicality.

Consequentialism is cancer.

Also pic related.

One must be ready and able to do violence to protect peace. NAP only works if everyone agrees to it, not if there's outside actors with other ideologies

Here you go, Anarcho-Capitalism: refugees
a.) no government control = total privatization
b.) money on hand = capitalism
c.) might sink/rape = anarchism

So the libertarian should adhere to his moral principles of non agression in the face of a violent group who wishes to do him harm?

Or just roll over and submit, and go to his death along the moral high ground?

I'm willing to die for my principles.
If you're not you're a pathetic subhuman.
Better dead than a worthless monkey without a shred of righteousness who futilely clings to their own meager existence which will soon expire regardless of his desperate and pitiful struggle.

>You can't draw a line with language or you open the path to absolute absurdity in moral reasoning. You have to have the line at physicality

I draw the line at reasonable costs due to externalities (threat) and leave that in the hand of conflict resolution companies.

In the case of murder, preemptive security is the only method that works, if your intention is not to be murdered.

If I have to double my security because of a threat, you're de facto costing me money. All I would need if I wanted to make people poorer would be to threaten them, under your conditions, threatening would be a profitable business.

You guys aren't Anarchists or Anarcho Capitalists. So fuck off that subject. Idiot nationalist cunt. Social and Anarcho Capitalism is better than any other Uptight Nerd Cult of Cunts can allow.

When you threaten someone that is coercion. threat. If someone threatens me or my property It is perfectly in line with non aggression.
Libertarians unwilling to fight back for liberty are useful idiots.

Why do you morons keep posting that retard?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Augusto_Pinochet
>CIA helped fabricate a conspiracy against the Allende government, which Pinochet was then portrayed as preventing.
>Wages decreased by 8%.[64] Family allowances in 1989 were 28% of what they had been in 1970 and the budgets for education, health and housing had dropped by over 20% on average[64] The junta relied on the middle class, the oligarchy, foreign corporations, and foreign loans to maintain itself.
>Financial conglomerates became major beneficiaries of the liberalized economy and the flood of foreign bank loans. Large foreign banks reinstated the credit cycle, as the Junta saw that the basic state obligations, such as resuming payment of principal and interest installments, were honored. International lending organizations such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the Inter-American Development Bank lent vast sums anew.[64] Many foreign multinational corporations such as International Telephone and Telegraph (ITT), Dow Chemical, and Firestone, all expropriated by Allende, returned to Chile.[64] Pinochet's policies eventually led to substantial GDP growth, in contrast to the negative growth seen in the early years of his administration. Foreign debt also grew substantially under Pinochet, rising 300% between 1974 and 1988.

He literally not done anything else than sold everything to USA and got some bonus, totally ruined Chile forever.

>you do not live in alternate timeline where Ron Paul is 10 years younger and won the 2016 republican nomination
literally kill me famalams

>totally ruined Chile forever
>Highest GDP, median income and HDI of South America
>As opposed to Allende, who increased inflation by 606% in a couple of years

Anything and everything can be a threat.
You cannot draw a line without physicality, because ANYTHING can be logically construed ANY WAY.
Me walking by you with a bulge in my pocket can be taken by you as a threat, and you could self-justify shooting me by your absurd rationale of "perceived threat" being grounds for justified violent action. It's utterly crazy and absurd. You're worse than communists.

>Willing to die for your principles
>Not willing to fight for them

That's how tyranny takes hold. Weak men who think dying for righteousness is the same as fighting for your principled ideals

Since atheism can't account moral realism and since Christianity rules out pacifism I would infer that you're wrong.

I don't care what happens in the damn world.
The world can rot and burn. I'll die a righteous man and you'll die a rat.

Yes, when you sell Europe after you enter EU you also got high GDP, because literally you sell it, that's business according to capitalistic retards and you are worth more when Chinese raise your apartment prices. Congratulation retard. Here have your inflation too, so you can be a millionaire.