So, Comey is full of shit by the way:

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHH shit son.

So was Comey lying then or is he lying now?

Guess we can get back to exposing the murderers of Seth Rich.

Other urls found in this thread:

breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/17/comey-under-oath-have-not-experienced-any-requests-to-stop-fbi-investigations/
lawfareblog.com/no-jim-comey-not-legal-jeopardy
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

His quote. Under oath.

A Breitbart article, sad! They are fake news and they are lying. We need to impeach orange hitler bloompf NOW.

It will just be some more cooked up shit next week OP.

>Said CNN
Go back to setting up non-existent problems, buddy. I think there's a field somewhere that needs yellow tape around it, if you can think up a grizzly story.

>White man rapes every nigger on the planet! Says Trump ordered him to!
>REAL NEWS EVERYONE ELSE IS LYING

That's you, CNN.

Comey never lied. Trump never asked him to stop the investigation and liberals are misconstruing the memo.

everyone blatantly ignores the fact that the question was about the Department of Justice asking to stop an investigation. Not, let's say, someone whose associates (and possibly himself) are under investigation.

You mean liberals never read the memo. Which is 100% correct.

Learn how you read you spastics.

It says he didn't get requests from the department of justice. Nothing about Trump.

>Have you ever been asked to stop an investigation for political purposes?
>No.
>DRUMPF ASKED HIM TO STOP INVESTIGATING FOR POLITICAL PURPOSES!!!!
>IMBEACH DRUMPF!!!!
Why is it so hard for liberal to read? Why must everything be sensationalized and taken out of context? Seriously. Ask any liberals if context matters and most, if not all, will tell you no because their rule and opinion on things are absolute. Whatever will make them look better in the public eye and won't make them look like a bigot, they don't care what it takes, they will agree with it.

This is something you never see talked about. Like you're talking with someone about some business and you're like

"Man, I hope you all let that go because I think he's a good guy, but you gotta do what you gotta do, ya know?"

Instead it's somehow being reported Trump had a loaded glock to his temple talking in tongues while finger blasting Mrs. Comey in a dark room.

I don't know. Just thinking out loud.

I guess "I'm not gonna answer that question" would be too suspicious so he decided to give a partial answer.

>No not the Department of Justice, but the President did, I just did not report it (though it is my sworn duty to do so) because I am corrupt and/or incredibly inept.

See Now follow your own advice. Learn to read.
>B-but it doesn't say anything about Drumpf specifically! They tricked him!
He answered a general question and gave a general answer. If Trump asked him to stop investigating, the answer would have been a "yes", which as you can see, is not. There are no mental gymnastics to be had here. This is plain and simple. He says he has not been asked to stop investigating even though it would be fine if someone of that level asked him to. The President doesn't have jurisdiction but the DOJ and "senior officials" do? You're being fucking retarded.

it's a religion bro, they have selective logical capabilities.

>stopping for political purposes
>never occurred
>not Trump
is Denmark flooded by niggers? I thought they were more intelligent than this.

cool slashfic thx

I want to lean towards the center and say the right can be that way too, to be fair, but that wouldn't be true. They're passionate about values and stuff but not the zealots the left make them out to be. The one thing they're passionate about, above all else, is free speech, and that includes the liberal's ability to speak their mind. How liberals think they're oppressed, I have no idea. Especially today, after having a total system turn-around in favor of PC culture, 8 years of a liberal/socialist president, and even conservatives trying to be more accommodating. It's too much and now there's a red resurgence because of it.

I think you're the one doing the mental gymnastics here. The question as worded, does not involve Trump but rather "senior officials AT THE DOJ." Is Trump a senior official part of the DOJ? He answers the question first, staying sometimes they have opinions that maybe they ought to stop the case. But the DOJ never acted politically. That's one way a non-desperate-for-some-political-cover reader would take it

Hahaha feeling nervous drumfkins?

What's wrong with his ear?

>President doesn't have jurisdiction over the government
>A single senior official does
Nice backflip, faggot.

>Has anyone at the DOJ tried to interfere
>No

OMG TRUMP IS INNOCENT EVEN THOUGH HE'S NOT THE DOJ OMG SHAREBLUE SLIDE SLIDE SLIDE!

>I think you're the one doing the mental gymnastics here
Well that's because you're completely retarded user.

being the retards they are, they never realized the democrat majority rules process behind it all. At this point they think because they aren't gettin their way 100% of the time, then it must mean they're being oppressed.

It's ironically also deeply harming them ever having a majority support again - like being less probable (to the point of "never again") to bump shoulders with a psycho ex.

>hearing was on the 3rd
>comey fired on the 9th
>THERE IS ZERO CHANCE THE MEETING TOOK PLACE WITHIN THIS WEEK THOUGH
You all are fucking faggots.

both of their entire extended families belong in a state-sanctioned labor camp

>Have you ever been asked to stop an investigation for political purposes
>Why is it so hard for liberal to read?

Why is it so hard for you not make up bullshit?

>I don't know how this shit works.

President is not the DOJ retard.

maybe you should read the article for yourself and not trust some random retarded user

Jurisdiction has nothing to do with it faggot.

Gonna believe an oath or some giggly 9 year old writings on a sticky post it memo?

The one on the right ate it last night in the midst of passionate throes

Fucking weasel

>So was Comey lying then or is he lying now?
When did he ever say anything other than this? The memo shit was from (((sources)))

Source?

Well I guess comey just neglected his duty at the time and withheld this until politically expedient.

Perhaps comey needs to be investigated for any other withheld information saved for political blackmail

>I don't know how this shit works.
Neither do you. If someone is trying to obstruct justice it's his job to report it.

>He still won't read the single paragraph because he's already made up his mind

>Some oldfag in the DoJ can demand head of the FBI stop all investigation, if he wanted
>Trump, who can turn down a congress of over 500 people with a simple "No" veto, can't.
That's your logic. You are officially full retard.

It's Breitbart.com
I though the font would give it away.

Read between the lines. If Trump asked him to do anything unethical, he was obligated to immediately report it. This would have happened months ago.
Has there been any mention of it in the past few months? In the past few days? No. There, your question has been answered. Either there was no unethical behavior or Comey dun goofed and will drag Trump down with him. There isn't going to be a smoking gun just laying out in the open for you to find, that is not how people like this operate.

It's also ironic that the liberals with their useless interpretation of relationships and sexual health would be the ones to act like a psycho ex.

These liberal dems are dumb cucks no matter how you look at it. Their ideology is significantly flawed to the point of not even being a working lifestyle. It's like a person who went to college for agriculture so they could cultivate marijuana being frustrated that they can't create robotic and electrical components cause they aren't mechanical engineers - in a world where marijuana is illegal and engineers are in demand.

Liberal Democracy is literally the wrong degree and education for the job of running a country.

Never underestimate how stupid Sup Forums is. They think pizzagate is real and voted for Trump, remember?

Sorry OP is a massive faggot

breitbart.com/big-government/2017/05/17/comey-under-oath-have-not-experienced-any-requests-to-stop-fbi-investigations/

Have you stopped to think why the democrats, liberals and the media are pushing for impeachment so hard?
It's because they're desperate, they're running out of time.
They know they have at least 60% of the country against them, more and more people are pissed at them by the hour, they know their last chance to retain power is now.

You see, to get someone impeached you need to have the majority of the legislature approval, while republicans are indeed the majority in the congress, the democrats can still convince a few of them to "switch" and help them, with the 2018 elections looming and the public support of democratic candidates on the lowest levels an impeachment or any kind of resistance against republicans would be impossible, outright unthinkable.

A republican supermajority looks like the most possible outcome of 2018, and it would give reps the capacity to basically edit the constitution to their liking, not only that but reps also controlling the congress more also means they will have it easier to acquire even more control of the other two branches (judicial and executive)
It would be the literal end of democratic control save for a few cities, but even those areas wouldn't escape the new republican rule.

Trump working closely with those newly appointed reps would mean he going nuclear against liberals and their policies without any kind of resistance.

So that's why democrats are so desperate of getting him impeached as soon as possible, that's why you have the media creating all these sourceless fake controversies one after the other, by the time one gets dismissed and proven false they already release another and the public outrage continues, they're trying desperately to make a controversy "big" enough so they can finally convince those needed republicans to accept and start the impeachment process.

Type on comey under oath.
Representative Hazy Mazie Hirono (Hawaii-D) asked him during the May 3rd hearing.

Anyways, if impeachment happens, the Republicans will be to blame because they are the only ones with the ability to make it happen

Better Luck next time Democrats.

>"being told to stop an investigation would be a very big deal"
>does absolutely nothing about it when blumpft tells him to stop an investigation

>little black blurb thing blocks the preceeding question
Didnt read

His own goddamned testimony. Is there a better source for Comey's words than Comey's actual words? Dafuq?

this, so much.

Comey never lied. Times simply made up memo

Every deportation and illegal immigrant scared off is the erosion of the Democratic party base. No shit they are scared, they are losing voters. People with jobs are less inclined to be dependent on big government for a handout and less likely to want higher taxes. More erosion of their base. They are panicking. Not to mention their leaders are all geriatrics. Another year or so and there will probably be supreme court nominees on the way. More Federal judge slots to fill. Every month they are out of power is an erosion of their base of power from which they are used to operating from. Less voters, less welfare, less judges means they are fucked.

>Neocons don't exist
>Muh oppressed underdoge liberals :(((
Snowflake please. I'm sure there's a more successful thread you could be trolling and would make more (You)bucks on. This is the last one you're getting from me. I don't care how retarded you look if you slam your stupid face into a logic wall another 20 times.

Yes I agree. it's also meant to demoralize his base and wear him and his supporters down with constant attacks.
Also they may have more support than you think. Too many Rep are RINOs and would stab America in the back at a moments notice.
At this point if they did succeed in a Coup, would there be a civil war? And is that what they are going for?

> never underestimate how stupid Sup Forums is.
Where do you think you are at rn, exactly?

WHat are they really distracting us from and sliding into the backpage of the news?

Have you never watched one of these things? They only answer the exact question and nothing more. Plus he didn't want to start shit. (yet)

wtf are you even talking about.

First of all, the president's veto can get overridden by less than 500 people fucktard.

Second, the woman only asked if anyone at the Department of Justice had interfered. She didn't say shit about the president. It wasn't a general question it was a specific question. But keep turning yourself into knots to feel better.

>Read between the lines. If Trump asked him to do anything unethical, he was obligated to immediately report it.

Says who?

He had a tumor and had surgery that left it fucked up for life. He wanted to be a marine biologist but couldn't scuba dive because of it : (

>when you embarrass yourself while trying to nflience opinions
God I sort of hurt for how awkwardly shameful your posts are. I'm not even memo when I say kys, it literally won't get any better.

You're retarded. Learn to read.

>DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

for fuck sake learn to read Sup Forums

Stay in school kiddo.

Under the law, Comey is required to immediately inform the Department of Justice of any attempt to obstruct justice by any person, even the President of the United States. Failure to do so would result in criminal charges against Comey. (18 USC 4 and 28 USC 1361) He would also, upon sufficient proof, lose his license to practice law.

You can't expect much out of the dumbest board besides Sup Forums.

well said

I don't understand why people are shutting on Comey for this supposed memo. There is no proof it exists, that Comey wrote it, or the statements reported are accurate. Blaming him for some horseshit the NYT made up is stupid. Blame him for his actual actuons.

I never embarrass myself when i nflience my memos.

Simmer down cletus.
I'm not excusing or defending the dems; not sure how you think that was in anyway a shilling for dems.
And neocons fall under the umbrella of aforementioned 'Republicans'- the party with two house majority power (considerably so).

So if it happens, the Republican party will have squandered their power for fear of media headlines and reelection.
Neocons are also in the party of power.

But anyways, yeah, fuck the coward Republicans for even suggesting impeachment today. Dems in lock step like fools but today no Republican came to defense while more than your typical McCain-Grahm buttfuck came out suggesting impeachment.

Over what? A trump allegedly making comment recorded on a post it note that is precisely characterized by Comey's quote-
"oftentimes they give us opinions that we don’t see a case there, and so you ought to stop investing resources in it,”
Fuck you cletus for voting for Lindsey Graham.

lawfareblog.com/no-jim-comey-not-legal-jeopardy

Literally the first google result. Try not to get all your info from fox new personalities boyo.

I once heard him describe it as "scooping it out of there like a melon baller." I found the idea so disturbing and distasteful I've never watched any of his material since. (But I adore him on Strangers with Candy and love the old debate bit he used to do with Carell on TDS)

>Sup Forums is dumb
Dumb is true for all masses of people.
Sup Forums is 'dumb' because it's populated.
Now, Canada isn't that populated, so it's gotta be dumb for other reasons. I mean, they are lead by a ladyboy cuck with niggerdick breath. And they chose a leaf

Comey's response was in general you fuckwits.

>I'm talking about a situation where we were told to stop something for a political reason
>It's not happened in my experience.

You learn to read.

>posts an answer without a question
>thinks other people can't read

says the job description

Exactly, they're trying to cling to whatever they can.
But their voter base is dwindling in numbers day by day.
>if they did succeed in a Coup, would there be a civil war? And is that what they are going for?
Highly doubt they would try an actual coup, it would backfire completely on them on the spot, while if they did try an actual coup it would easily devolve into Civil War 2.0 they wouldn't even think to do one.
They're trying to take the power away, but in a different way (by conviction) rather like a "soft coup" you see you probably already know very well how closely the media and democratic party work.
The smear campaign is here to do the dirty job, by creating all these controversies they hope to erode his base and further divide the American people, they're trying to radicalize both ends of the spectrum and to incite violence, they're trying to create fake scandals so the trust and perceptions of the president gets deteriorated and people start acting violently, and then blame it on him.
They're basically taking their chances and hoping the public simply gets tired of the current state, blames it on the president and the support for a destitution gets overwhelming approval.

I have no idea what the fuck you mean.

Are you talking about the question that was posted for all to see in the very first response in this thread?

If so: you fucking retard.

/lit/ is the dumbest board, but they don't leave often.

Which investigations is he talking about?

The Hillary ones?

In Robert M Chesneys opinion...on his blog.

The question that was asked of Comey that he gave the answer you posted.

What ya stupid kid?

Fuck Donald trump

Stop posting fake news from Trump News Corp ©, trumpanzee shill

Right.

The one that's in the very first reply to this thread.

If you're going to reply to an ongoing discussion, it's your job to take the time and go back a post or two to see what the discussion is even about.

In other words: lurk moar.

What you posted was one guy's opinion in an op-ed. What ur point?

>expecting rationality from rabid Drumpfkins
Drumpf said that Comey was the enemy, and that makes him the enemy. Fucking shills get off my rebbit. Mods can we get this unbeliever shadowbanned?

>distort someone's (Comey) answer by ignoring the subject of the question

If you're going to reply to an ongoing discussion, it's your job to take the time and breathe in and out so the oxygen can flow to your brain while you type.

In other words: stop being autistic.

What you're talking about was exactly the point of this post: Comey's answer was a general one.

Or do you think Comey meant that it wouldn't be a big deal if anyone other than the AG or senior DoJ officials did the asking?

Again: it's your job to read up on the discussion you're about to reply into.

>Drumpf said that Comey was the enemy, and that makes him the enemy.

Please provide the quote of Trump calling Comey an enemy.

Bump

She asked him specifically about the DOJ, and he responded specifically about the DOJ. Never said anything about the President. This has been talked about several times in this thread. You should take your own advice brah.

I'll just chalk it up to being Belgium.

mfw this will all blow over just like every single other god damn thing in the past 2 years they've tried to throw at us

>he responded specifically about the DOJ
So you think Comey meant that it wouldn't be a big deal if anyone other than the AG or senior DoJ officials did the asking?

Nice strawman. You're adding all sort of inferences that aren't there. Maybe if you read the one sentence of Comey's answer you so "carelessly" left out, it would become clear to you.

From the DOJ though. Let's not sink to the liberal fake news level.

It's a very simple question bucko; do you think Comey meant that it wouldn't be a big deal if anyone other than the AG or senior DoJ officials did the asking?

Because if you don't think that's what he meant (obviously), then his answer was indeed a general one.

This made me laugh.
Here's your (you).

They had someone read parts of it to them even though it is not a classified document.

bumpbump

>ignores Comey's full answer
>create made up inference

whew lad

Answer the very simple question.

Would it be a big deal if anyone other than the AG or DoJ officials asked Comey to stop an investigation?

My favorite part of his quote is where he says, "But I'm talking about a situation where we were told to stop something for a political reason, that would be a very big deal. It's not happened in my experience."

>very big deal
>Trump did it?
>lucky for Trump Hirono was so specific and didn't and if anyone ever had done it

This is important.

Like Seth rich's family said (through a legal representative appointed and assigned to them by the dnc) that they want yall to stop looking into their son's assassina- I mean botched robbery

Obviously. Now put the part of Comey's answer you didn't post.

He doesn't have any answers, just more Sharia Blue jewspeak. Best to ignore.