Capitalism

...

Other urls found in this thread:

books.google.com/books?id=NPoAQRgkrOcC&pg=PA40&dq=pre-Columbian population million&cd=6#v=onepage&q=pre-Columbian population million&f=false
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

reminder that liberalism isn't communism

capitalism would be great, if it weren't for "supply and demand". the majority of people are stupid, and have no right to make any demand.

pic related is an example of how demand is engineered to exploit stupid decadent people.

bumping

Solution: buy another brand.

Communism has killed more people than any other ideology. In fact, the only way to make Socialism work is by killing anyone who dissents. Capatalism is a step in the right direction, it just needs work.

and how will you convince their millions of brainwashed consumers to do the exact same thing?
they own modern culture.

see pic related
I await your triggered reply: "it wasn't real capitalism"

...

Wait for them to stop being retarded. If they never do, nothing of value is lost.

>nothing of value is lost
except for money that could actually be going towards innovative corporations instead of technology that should have been considered obsolete a decade ago

>implying literally everything about smartphones isn't innovative

>it's a commu-autism thread
Sucks knowing the real world isn't compatible with your retarded world view, doesn't it you fucking stupid commie?

>missing the point

>Not clarifying

>Attributing anything before the year 1800 to "capitalism"

>Listing every single death under a colonialist/imperialist regime

Are you even trying anymore, commies?

The fact of the matter is that nobody dies directly because of private property and free trade, whereas people starve and get massacred DIRECTLY BECAUSE of common ownership of the MoP + centralized power.

>Inb4 "That's not my exact personal definition of socialism"

I used to think Capitalism was the problem but then I realized Capitalism works just fine with the proper checks and balances in place. Its when you remove those checks and balances that you have problems like an increasing wealth gap and eventual economic collapse

the flag checks out

Funny how they rely on a totally made up number (100 million squaws killed over 5 centuries by colonialism? Yeah ok) to exceed the socialist/communist deaths from just the last century

>increasing wealth gap
this is not a bad thing if both the rich and the poor are getting richer
i mean, the "poor" complain about the wealth gap while wasting their time on smartphones and watching tv

So how about we kill you and to make up for it, I'll have an extra baby.

>implying implementation of private property and profit-driven economy isn't capitalism
>implying indirect death is ok tho
the money could go towards something that's actually contributing to society. Apple has been making money off the same damn invention using planned obsolescence. I don't think that should be tolerated.
books.google.com/books?id=NPoAQRgkrOcC&pg=PA40&dq=pre-Columbian population million&cd=6#v=onepage&q=pre-Columbian population million&f=false

Both of these are equally valid. (Fairly regulated) Capitalism works because it funnels evil into greater good, while communism doesn't because it allows good intent to fester into darker evil.

>China's great leap forward killed between 15 to 30 million people during the Great Chinese Famine, which caused the termination of the great leap forward.

>There was a huge jump in birth rates to account for the horrific number of people who died during the forced implementation of socialist ideas, you dickhead.

>A 3% increase in the GDP of central Africa thanks to capiralist policies pulled 100 million people OUT of poverty... unlike the socialist systems which put them IN poverty.

You could ban smartphones altogether and it wouldn't change the fact that a fool and his money are soon parted. If it weren't for Apple, they'd just find some other frivolity to blow the money on. For a market environment that rewards constant innovation and a race to the bottom of prices, it's a small price to pay- pun very much intended.

>how to tell communists are brainwashed: the post

Most of that literally had nothing to do with capitalism. The deaths under communism was a direct result of either starvation or murdering of dissenters who live in the communist regime.

also

>jap imperialism 1931 - 1945
they were commies you retarded cuck

>But they were impoverished before they put in a socialist system

>But their rate of natural increase exploded right after the GLF

I'm waiting

Tovarisch, revolution when?

Hello Capitalist Pig

cabidalism gills 50000000000000000000000000 beoble a day

That's not an argument

only people who dont like capitalism r broke faggots

Neither is communism

Disgusting fucking commies. The day of the rope awaits you.

...

lol that's still not an argument

Hello.

LMAO
>Be china
>Kill millions of your own people
>Turn half capitalist in 1980s
>Get an economic boom
Le american milenials start use you as an argument for comunism

>But they were impoverished before they put in a socialist system

The image shows that the Great Leap forward barely changed their GDP, compared to the market based reforms that began to drastically increase it, similar to what the USSR saw in the 60s when it made some market based reforms as well.

>But they were impoverished before they put in a socialist system

...

Look at

>nothing of value is lost.

It is, though.

I live in a world of superempored locusts.

>muh 100 gorillion
They didn't die due to capitalism they died due to disease.

Even Sup Forumstards don't blame asiatics for the black death.

>implying you have to be a communist to be against capitalism

>Implying the third position isn't still tsundere for capitalism

>Implying there's only 3 positions

Capitalism is one of the jew's main methods for control. You get rid of capitalism and you severely weaken the jew.

>wwii japan
>communist
this post screams desperate

>Implying syndicalists aren't tsundere for Hitler

Very few natives here died because the Spaniards genocided them. It was disease.

Also the fact that people are well off enough to afford smart phones is a great thing. The excess that causes it is also what allows other people to improve all of our lives. You don't need to allocate everything to great technological pursuits anyway, there's room for entertainment too. Preventing someone from buying an Apple phone won't prevent the cure for cancer from happening.

Besides, Apple does use a lot of that money for research too, mostly in AI.

>China's great leap forward killed between 15 to 30 million people during the Great Chinese Famine, which caused the termination of the great leap forward.

>There was a huge jump in birth rates to account for the horrific number of people who died during the forced implementation of socialist ideas, you dickhead.

>A 3% increase in the GDP of central Africa thanks to capiralist policies pulled 100 million people OUT of poverty... unlike the socialist systems which put them IN poverty.

>Preventing someone

I mean someone buying an Apple phone won't prevent

>But they were impoverished before they put in a socialist system

>But their rate of natural increase exploded right after the GLF

Again >But they were impoverished before they put in a socialist system

>But their rate of natural increase exploded right after the GLF

They have that commie cat on lefty-pol anyone got lewds of her?

Wasn't the USSR's population growth sustained over a few decades? Like, a normal population growth over 50 years (whereas nations experience that amount of growth in a time span far shorter).