>Metadata suggests it took only 30 minutes to go from a DNC tech/data strategy consultant creating documents to Guccifer2.0 tainting them - all occurring on a date that Guccifer2.0 claimed to be after he was locked out of the DNC Network - occurring on the same day that Guccifer2.0 emerged.
Data found deeper in files now also demonstrates there was a misdirection effort, that, in its larger scope - seems to have been intended to discredit leaks by having leaks blamed on Russian hackers
Come on, /pol. Let's get ahead of (((the curve))).
(5) Rushing To Be Russian - The Donkey In A Bear Costume Made A Mistake
5a. "Russia-Tainted Metadata" Reportage Mostly Ignored A Key Piece of Metadata
There is a key fact about some non-Russian metadata that nobody seems to have reported and it certainly seems to be of critical importance - and that is the document creation timestamps...
There were multiple documents shared with TheSmokingGun, Gawker, ArsTechnica and others.
The first document, "1.doc" (mirror), was given considerable coverage, while the name "Warren Flood" was reported, the date in the report (rather than in the metadata) was reported and so it was attributed to Warren Flood on 12/19/15.
Gawker incorrectly claimed the metadata showed the document was created in 2015 when it actually indicated the document was created by Warren Flood at a much later date.
The truth is that the metadata shows the document being created 30 minutes before Guccifer2.0 appears to have gotten his hands on it:
Created by Warren Flood on 15th of June at 13:38 Modified by Фeликc Эдмyндoвич on 15th of June at 14:08
Carson Evans
Who is Warren Flood?
IMPORTANT: Before getting into the details of Warren Flood - please be clear on one critical fact: There is a good chance he's innocent. - Even if he is involved, it's an issue for government officials, FBI, etc. to resolve, please do NOT harass Warren Flood because of this report stating that Warren Flood appears to have done something... all we know for certain is that someone used an account with that name.
The corpus/language analyses carried out also show Guccifer 2.0's communications lack a subtle punctuation flaw that appears to be present in Flood's writing elsewhere. - So, even if Flood does have any involvement, it's likely to have been a minor role in the overall Guccifer 2.0 operation (eg. sourcing files) - it does seem that somebody else was taking care of communicating and likely managing the overall operation.
The above statement supercedes and overrides any assertions expressed on this page or anywhere else on this site on the subject of any attribution to Warren Flood.
So... who is Warren Flood? - How did the documents get from Flood apparently creating them to the "hacker" within 30 minutes AND how did that happen when Guccifer2.0 claimed that he had been kicked out of the DNC's systems as of June 12th according to the conversation he had on the 21st of June with Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai for Motherboard/Vice? (An article in which Guccifer2.0 shows he can easily change the identity of the person who last modified the file)
We can answer the first question by looking at Warren's linkedin and facebook profiles (these profiles have almost no private or personal character information - we're only revealing things about his work, experience, professional skill set and his history with DNC, etc.).
Brayden Hughes
While Warren's name may have been relatively unknown to many reading this article, he has worked for Obama for America, the DNC, served as Joe Biden's technical director and is no stranger to the White House, as his photograph with Joe and Jill Biden (embedded) suggests.
As for the main file (Trump Opposition Research) - it's basically copied from this file (which is also attached to this leaked email).
It was actually a document originally authored by Lauren Dillon (DNC research director) and modified (and sent to John Podesta) by Tony Carrk (Research Director at Hillary for America).
As it's clear the original source document was not authored by Flood it seems odd that Flood's name would be there! - Was he or his company hired to provide technical assistance (possibly to help manage the op)? - While re-opening and saving the documents did record the desired Russian metadata, it only did so in relation to the last modification - maybe in the rush to get the documents out to media he forgot his name was on these as the original creator?
Note: While the paragraph above mentions opening and saving documents, it has now come to light that it was likely to have been a Russian template document used - and that content from original documents was copied and pasted into the template and the results were saved as a new file (a process that appears to be repeated for the first 3 documents due to correlating RSIDs on stylesheets).
Liam Gomez
In my research to investigate the real identity of Guccifer 2.0, I discovered that the name Warren Flood applied to more documents than had originally been reported and highlighted the unusual nature of those documents both in terms of the metadata and the RSIDs (and Russian Stylesheet that existed in multiple documents even before the content in each document did) and explained that this demonstrates an effort to try to discredit Wikileaks by blaming leaks on Russian hackers.
Considering where copies of Microsoft Word installed by Flood (highlighted in the photo above with Biden) might exist besides on computers he owns, I considered his past role as Sen. Joe Biden's Technology Director (as noted on his Linked-In profile) and thought one place to look for interesting activity would be computers residing in Biden's office or generally at the White House.
So, I wondered who may have visited Biden that day around that time. I thought I'd check out visits to the White House hosted by Biden, wondering whether there'd be any interesting activity anywhere near 1:38pm on June 15th 2016.
It turns out that Biden was hosting visits from a number of Ukrainians around that time, on that date. To see how frequent this sort of activity occurred I checked the whole of June. - It seems such visits were not a regular occurance.
(Times below are appointment times, some individuals turned up before their 2pm appointment)
Notice the leaders of Hillary's Ukraine coup Victoria Nuland and Geofrrey Pyatt are also on this list.
Eli Murphy
See that mongrel niggerJew, pol?
That's Guccifer2, who is a primary actor in claiming that the Seth Rich leaks were Russian. But he fucked up and the goyim know.
Aiden Adams
DELETE THIS SHIT RIGHT FUCKING NOW GOY
YOUVE BEEN WARNED
Jaxon Phillips
...
Lucas Evans
This is great work thank you
John Carter
This is really important. And it's really hard to get people to notice or care about anything they aren't already programmed with.
This guy has been pushing his website for MONTHS and even Julian Assange retweeted him, but nobody has picked it up.
Jayden Flores
BUMP
READ THIS SHIT YOU NIGGERS
Chase Murphy
Well duh. They've been pushing the Russia narrative for months. Here is my prediction >Kim Dotcom provides evidence on tuesday >Collective freakout all of tuesday night >Wednesday morning the Rich/Russia narrative is pushed >Clinton hailed as hero for killing a secret Russian agent >Bernie win election
Henry Wood
All this forensic cryptography is over my head, sorry.
Jaxon Campbell
bump
Gabriel Roberts
post this info here.
Lincoln Hall
TWWWOOOOO SCOOOOOOPPPPS?????
Ethan Turner
need back up Sup Forumsros and /p/olacks, come red pill this dumb liberal.
→
Brayden Hill
bump niggers, keep this post alive
Oliver Moore
>tfw your the DNC and a micronesian stamp collecting image board came all up in your burrito
Joseph Brown
Bumping for the boys
Jack Jackson
As the Vault 7 releases showed, even CIA keeps other nations' exploits and fakes various markers to misdirect attribution efforts. Good work famalam. Also bump
Adrian Williams
...
Christopher Walker
Don't forget about his leaked chat
Carson Russell
dont forget this twitter account discovered by user two days ago, either
