Does White Privilege Exist?

Debate:
Explain how White Privilege does/does not exist.
Site your argument with legitimate sources.

This should be as constructive as possible. Help others with their arguments, and give ammunition for future debates.

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/hashtag/privilegedpeopleproblems?f=tweets&vertical=default&src=tren
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

First it must be defined.

Not a useless thread, heres a bump.

The proof that there is no white privilege is that there is NO proof FOR white privilege

How do you mean?

It's a gross generalisation which is just as ridiculous and racist as claiming that each and every every black person is a violent criminal.

Yes

white privilege exists in a place where one is accustomed to seeing other whites because in this scenario the place seems more natural and safe
but same goes with nonwhite privilege in nonwhite countries
so it does exist, but should it be stopped? sure, try to do it anywhere in africa or asia
its the same as if your daughter told you to suck the neighbour off because he doesnt have any family

I mean, we could bring statistics into the picture which, using liberal logic, would point into saying all black people are criminals

>it's the same as if your daughter told you to suck the neighbor off because he doesn't have any family

not sure I followed that one.

>first world problems

Yes... And no.

If you are not apart of Family X, you will not enjoy as many benefits of being in Family X.

I'm a Nickerson, for all intents and purposes.
My boss is a Smith, and the boss's sons who work with me are all smiths. They will generally receive greater treatment than I, because they are the boss's sons. If my cousins (Who are Nickersons) work for the smiths, then we will inevitably be seen as a collective; that anything a Nickerson does is what a Nickerson will do; likewise, anything that a Smith does is what a Smith will do; the only difference being that the Smiths are at the top of the hierarchy, leading to the stereotype that Smiths are bossy and the Nickersons are slaves. Meanwhile, a Ross jumps the fence and decides to work for cheaper wages; the Nickersons are left out of work, leading to the stereotype that Nickersons are lazy sobs, and that the Rosses are hard working but poor.

In that way, structural prejudice exists and will always exists. And yes, I used examples that are real.

The problem, though, is that structural racism does exist in America, but that's not a problem in itself; the problem is that people dismiss it or are against it.

Equality is the single most greatest detriment to humankind in all of history. Every time we do anything to give ourselves and others "Equality", we lead to things like "Feminism", "Black panthers", "BLM", "Social Justice warriors", "Antifa", etc, which are violent by nature. We need hierarchy.

White privilege does exist, but black people also have a form of privilege, and spics also have a form of privilege. Hierarchy is irrelevant in that case, because hierarchy is actually moral.

>your family=your race (your faimily is in bigger numbers and the neighbour is alone=majority and minority)
>affirmative action=sucking off
>deliberately letting blacks torture you because x was mentioned=sucking off
americunts are truly pathetic

also this

Do you think Hierarchy could only be truly successful if each race had its own land, or placement? Meaning blacks ruled each other, whites governed themselves, and Mexicans stayed in Mexico?

Sure, so does handicap privilege, black privilege etc..

No way to measure them and say whites have more or less

2/3 are successful when governing themselves.

>Equality is the single most greatest detriment to humankind in all of history. Every time we do anything to give ourselves and others "Equality", we lead to things like "Feminism", "Black panthers", "BLM", "Social Justice warriors", "Antifa", etc, which are violent by nature. We need hierarchy.

You missed communism, which has repeatedly caused the worst genocides in history.

Every race has their own "privilege."

Whatever the case is, it's just another means to pretend one's failures is the result of some esoteric force.

>MUH SICKLE

There are blacks who make more money than the entire income level of everyone in my neighborhood combined.

But they call us priviledged.

Define privilege though.

I mean we're white and we don't get any preferencial treatment. To be honest? I don't think that whites are better,i just think negroes are fucking retards and blame their retardation on the white man.

No dude it's it a tool by the Marxist left to create a segmented society...whites are the bourgeoisie and the minority's are the proletariat

>communism isn't going to lead to me getting killed or living a life not worth living.

You really do love avoiding history books don't you? Just keep on reading that propaganda book. Be a good goy.

sorta...it's more like African-American/American-Indian social/cultural handicap.

Very short version is after 200 years of shitting on these 2 groups being official government policy (either on a state or federal level) their cultures got pretty fucked.

There are examples of "white privilege" being used against other races (no Asian leading men in Hollywood for instance) but those are pretty minimal.

*It's important to remember that certain non-white groups in the US - East-Asians, South-Asians and African Immigrants - statestically do better then Whites*

This.

It's also inherently racist to even imply that racial privilege exists. To imply that people should not be held to the same standard is a paradox in its own, essentially saying that "no, the races are not equal and this race needs a helping hand because they're biologically worse than whites."

When you fully think it through to the end it is extremely racist, but we know liberals don't think their own ideas through to the end.

twitter.com/hashtag/privilegedpeopleproblems?f=tweets&vertical=default&src=tren

Shameless selfbump.

White privilege exists only on the technicality that society is mostly run by whites, if it was run by blacks, then people would be complaining about black privilege. While many whites definitely believe they're entitled to anything and everything just because they're white, many blacks believe they're entitled to free government payouts because of what their ancestors went through, humans by nature are selfish.

However, since the major part of the population is white, society as a whole benefits you much more if you are white and don't do anything to taint it. Say if you were a white female pornstar for example, you get much bigger payouts if you only have sex with other whites throughout your career, yet if you sleep with even one black guy, that guarantees you to have much less people interested in you and less money put into your paycheck.

If by white privilege you mean private people having biases against you based on your appareance then you might say so.

But this is how society works,sometimes you meet people that hate your guts for some reason or another regardless of what race you are. Try being an ugly ginger.

As for large scale bias against non whites, that simpley doesn't exist with how big of a deal racism is and how many laws will ruin your shit if you dare to offend some black dude. In fact it's quite the contary with many places lowering their standards for non-whites like Universities.

Somewhat.

The people that built many of the systems in the western world are...naturally...westerners. The systems are built to suit westerners as a result. So it gives us an advantage.

It's like sewing up a pair of trousers. Obviously my trousers are made to fit me. They might work for Jamal, but they'll probably be too short.

The answer?

Jamal can go and make his own fucking trousers to wear in his own home.

Liberals also can't have it both ways;

>LOL Y U TAKE PRIDE IN UR ANCESTORS!? U DIDN'T BUILD THAT! IT'S GOT NOTHING 2 DO WIT U

>HEY, YOU GOT PRIVILEGE BECAUSE YOUR ANCESTORS BUILT THIS SYSTEM FOR U!

Either you believe in continuity or you don't. Either we're born clean slates or we're part of a lineage.

This sort of discussion would be considered absurd in, say, Asia - You are part of a continuous family line. Your great grandfather worked to build wealth for offspring he would never meet. You know that you fucking around is wasting the effort your ancestors put in.

If someone came along and told them; "Hey! You're getting an advantage from the work of your ancestors! You need to give us what your ancestors left for you!" they'd stare and blink at you like you're having some sort of fit. Of course my people left me things to get an advantage over you with. That's the whole point.

Even the trailer park redneck understands this;

>So...I have no connection to the wonders that white civilization built...but I bear all the responsibility of their crimes against you? That doesn't sound like much of a deal

>reddit spacing

>There are examples of "white privilege" being used against other races (no Asian leading men in Hollywood for instance) but those are pretty minimal.

There are more Asian leading men in Hollywood than there are White leading men in Bollywood or Hong Kong.

>reddit spacing meme

If it was so bad here, why didn't they return to their countries of origin?
Obviously not the Natives, but we can backup their treatment with the history of Conquered people. At least they weren't all killed off. Look at all the peoples who have been whipped out completely throughout history. But we don't blame the Spanish for the genocide of the Mayans

The only people who say it does are crazy sjws who hate whites. No proof from them.

No you fucking nigger. I'm going to hang you.

#WhitePrivilege