Stop being cucks and save net neutrality

Net Neutrality refers to all websites being, essentially, the same and the property of their administrators. Losing Net Neutrality means that companies can decide which websites you're allowed to visit on their service. It means that they can throttle certain websites and make them unusable. Say you want to look at their competitor's website - if such a competitor exists, considering that there are only two remaining in the country and they both already have an agreement of non-competition - they would legally be able to prevent you from doing so.

Net Neutrality takes sovereignty away from web developers and hosting services, forcing changes on customers and businesses alike focused solely on giving providers more money. It will not improve service because in the current climate there is no need to improve service. There is no need to remove Net Neutrality, opponents often cite overuse of bandwidth by allowing a general use internet but the fact is that if a connection isn't visiting a site, it isn't using bandwidth to connect to that site. Cutting people off from sites they already don't use aids nobody, and simply removes choice and agency from the consumer.

Internet started being used in the consumer space in 1989, the US had no net neutrality regulation till 2015. During this time stuff like your picture images never happened. To imply that removing the regulation will cause that when that wasn't a thing before the regulation existed is asnine and fear mongering for idiots that know little about the internet's history.

>America also didn't enforce immigration laws and your country is still doing fine. It's asinine and fear mongering to suggest you need to start doing it now.

Spoken like a true cuck.

Cheaper internet and options for consumers? Less Facebook and Google in people's homes and pockets? Sign me up for that, shill.

Spotted the comcast shill.

lies net neutrality was in play till '05 when Republicans reclassified then under title 3 instead of title 2.
nice try evil guy.

this is a free ,market capitalist board
commies get helicopter rides

Nope. Educate yourself.

There is no free market when it comes to isps. They're monopolies. These monopolies need to be regulated.

"Everyone I disagree with is a shill, and I won't argue the point"

>competitors ban porn
>other company sees this and allows it
>customers flock to new network
>other companies getting dicked
>they eventually allow porn again

Everything will just zero out

>the two main cable companies both in agreement for non competition
>everything will zero itself out

I would gladly pay 5x the amount I pay now for internet service if it keeps poor shitskins from access.

You're saying letting a monopoly control what information you're allowed to access is ok? this can't be ruse can it? t

>competitors
Where the fuck do you live that there are competitors?

Stop being poor. Fuck you, pay your provider or discontinue use.

you sure about that you brain dead alex jones watching Republican gimp? Or maybe I wasn't and advisor for key portions of title 2 regulation in Verizon v. fcc in 05?

this proves Sup Forums is no room for actual discussion, just people trying to keep up narratives whether it's Shariablue or The_Donald

Fucking cucks are willing to actually take an ass fucking if it means not insulting Trump ONCE.

>government intervention is good

>>>/reddit/

>Stop being cucks and pls do exactly what the DNC says

gfy

Alright, so let's get some competition going. Municipal broadband companies. Private schools and couriers are doing fine vs their public competitors...
>"No," the fat commissioner laughed

This is a National Socialist board. (((Capitalism))) and (((Communism))) are different sides of the same coin you dumb fuck.

In the case of monopolies, it's absolutely necessary.

That poster argued a point before the word shill, dipshit

You weren't

Hey Burgers

Did you know there are other countries in the world that don't have net neutrality laws? Want to hear all of the horror stories about evil ISPs changing the internet?

NN is a bill that favors google and Facebook. The only thing it does is protect them from the ISP racketeering.
But that begs the question: why didn't they just address the issue of the ISP racketeering in the first place?

The answer is that NN is a piece of selfish legislation meant to allow the ISPs to continue their bullshit with Facebook and Google legally allowed to sit out of the rape.
Unfortunately for the end consumer, there is nothing in NN that protects them.