If you cannot reproduce with a partner if the same sex, why is the LGBT movement growing instead of diminishing...

If you cannot reproduce with a partner if the same sex, why is the LGBT movement growing instead of diminishing? If they aren't reproducing, their genes aren't being passed on, so I guess that means that LGBT people are not genetically designed that way, right?

Other urls found in this thread:

discord.gg/pRMgy
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051088
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xq28
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Because it takes millenias for a gene to be breed out of a species, if not longer. You'll be long dead before homosexuality disappears.

>tfw gay
>tfw too weak to survive in the real world and can only live in an ultra high tech safe space in the middle of a city that's entirely detached from nature
>mfw the system inevitably collapses and I'll be beaten and raped and hanged from a lamp post

They're not scared anymore, that's all. See historical example Oscar Wilde for more details.

basically this but not really, because homosexuality and gender is a spectrum is real op. and it is real because think about it; how did people get gay in the first place? the mutation over time part of evolution of course, and so just like this guy mentioned, not only would it take forever to get rid of it, you probably would eventually be back to square one anyway (this combined with undesirable traits is also why eugenics don't work)

as for LGBT being designed that way, thats ridiculous. Lots of people are born with fatal chronic illnesses op. so what happens is that they die before they can reproduce, but this trait still hangs on, why? because of recessive genes, recessive homosexual related genes can combine in random people who are mostly straight, and that means they can reproduce, and that homosexuals can even compete in evolution since if they get people to breed with their recessive trait in them, they are furthering their genes, as well as the genes of their family (other non homo traits).

Basically no, it doesn't prove shit. homosexuals are all natural.

because homosexuality has multiple causes, the most recent is mothers being treated with progesterone during pregnancy (to stabilize the pregnany)

Because there's no gay gene, gays are obviously produced by straight couples which increase as the population increases.
Stupid fucking moron OP.

...

It's the Rainbow of Racism!

What a shit thread OP

a lot of them are just trendies

Because it works as an ideology.

The idea behind the lgbt movement is pure hedonism, and thats really attractive to the youth. The pursuit of pleasure with anyone is a seductive idea to people that have never and will never experience any real challenge/threat in their lives.

Ok, so are you saying that homosexuality is genetic? That a child is destined from birth to be gay or not?

It is a mutation on the X chromosome that gives women more kids and men less. That is why it persists.

>gender is a spectrum goy

Gas yourself

I was asking to provoke discussion, not because I don't know anything about the topic, stupid faggot ass Aussie.

Have you tried to hook up with a straight guy?

It's an actual challenge/threat.

Join the OFFICIAL /polgb/ Discord:

discord.gg/pRMgy

Water is turning the fro- i mean humans gay

>That gives women more kids and men less

Nigga what? Every child has a biological father and mother.

Because it's fucking trendy to be a fag and a tranny. You niggers are making kids who just want to be cool decide that the only way to do that is to suck dick or cut their dicks off.

This, they are stupid cunts following the trend.

His name alone reeks of faggot

not necissarily, sometimes genes can arise with interesting disadvantages or advantages that don't work in the way you think they do. our lack of ability to find a gay gene makes it likely it has more to do with the stability or way a woman's womb builds the child in her body, and a variation on that would be what caused the gay, but it all goes back to genetics in the end. after all where did that variability come from if not the mothers genes? even if we assume that outside factors could affect it through epigenetics and chemical contamination, gays where born far earlier than most chemical hazards we consumed, and it would still mean that its destiny at birth in effect

welcome to basic evolution, mutations have to occur and sexual dimorphic traits are no exception nor are they a single on and off switch.

Most "gay" men are the victims of child molestation trying to engage in "trauma reenactment"
Most gay women are the same, but got hairbrush raped by a female relative instead of a stepdaddy or uncle or whatever
At least half of gay men were molested as children. You have to wonder how much that affected them being fags as adults.
Pedophilia and homosexuality are passed along like lycanthropy or vampirism in fiction. The monster gets you, then you turn into the monster.

Are you fucking retarded? Women have more kids on average if they have the gay gene and men have less because it makes you more attracted to men.

Look homosexuality is the just the economic incentive for people to be gay. The entire animal kingdom does it so why is it surprising in humans? But here is the difference and why it is bad. It legit leads to unhappiness in society.,, and eventual collapse... its great for apes who don't have a civilization but is terrible for humanity. I'm not saying purge the gays but they will be our downfall and thus is why society has hated them for millennia.

>he took the carmilla pill
go away /lit/

When can we kill off the benders, lads?

Ok sure, but think of this. 1 woman has 3 kids with 1 man and 1 kid with a different man. While one male has more kids than another, the average of the 2 males is 4 kids. So women do not "have more kids than men." It all averages out, though it may be correct to say that if you randomly selected one woman and one man from a population, the woman would be more likely to have more kids than the man.

There is no such thing as "sexual orientation".

The idea that someone is born with a fixed sexuality that is completely unchanging, and oriented to a specific gender, is rediculous and doesn't reflect what we know about human sexuality.

A human beings sexual preferences changes of their lifetime. This is because humans, like some other species, are predesposed to finding one partner to mate with for life. As their partners physically change over their lifetime, their changing preferences can more easily adapt. In other words, human sexuality is fluid to accomodate human beings' monogamous nature.

And of course, growing up in modern society can cause oddities because of that fluid sexuality.
That's where fetishes come from. And same sex attraction is really just a fetish. The differences between men and women are small enough that our wild and unpredictable sexuality can easily cross into same sex attraction.

Sexuality can change. It does change, all the time, constantly. And with reinforcement, you can slowly and subtly direct that attraction. Truth is, there is no such thing as "homosexuality" as a condition.

What matters is women having a reproductive advantage over other women, not women vs. men. Women have children, men do not.

journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051088

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xq28

Have you tried to fuck using grindr?

Homosexuality = easy sex

They're not reproducing (yet, just wait for artificial wombs), but they are recruiting at a very high rate due to the popularity of the movement, because everyone wants to feels "sexually liberated."
There may be epigenetic factors, that people who considered themselves or acted gay/bi but ultimately had children may have either passed on or instilled in their adopted kids. This is along with the estrogen/mimickers that help feminize the population and contribute to the emotional and over-sexualization of the population. People are more "sensitive,"more likely to buy into propaganda that tells them to get sex whenever they can and that homosexuality is cool and progressive.
They still only make up a small part of the population but it's kind of ridiculous how easy it is to incrementally push this shit on the population.

1. Many homosexuals try being hetero first.
2. Many homos are bisexual for a large part.
3. Some may choose to have a family anyway.
4. The relatives of the gays can pass on the gays genes.
5. A childless but rich homosexual uncle can bankroll his siblings education for example. Thus increasing their evolutionary fitness by him being gay.
6. Recessive genes
7. The environment that activates the fag genes may be more prevalent in modernity.
8. A certain number of gays may be beneficial to society (the tribe). Gays are often artistically minded and can -childless- but in lots of time in a craft.
9. Certain functions beneficial to man, like organized religion (christian identity, unity...) can be kept ideally by gay men if celibacy is expected.
10. Gay men reduce sexual competition within the men of the tribe.
11. The negative effects of gayness, drug abuse, orgies, STDs, degeneracy are a recent phenomenon. It's unlikely that a tribe could afford such a big gay scene necessary for that behaviour.

Their genes aren't being passed on but their memes are.

By normalizing homosexuality the social stigma against it is removed and more people engage in it.

>rediculous

Stopped reading right there.

Its a learned behavior not genetic. It develops the same way a fetish or kink does, exposing yourself to certain things under certain circumstances flips a switch in you brain.