Is this a true statement?
Is this a true statement?
Lucas Morales
Other urls found in this thread:
photius.com
iq-research.info
statisticbrain.com
sciencedirect.com
sciencedirect.com
academic.oup.com
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Jack Lopez
>implying racism isnt completely healthy and part of nature
Jacob Turner
That's what I get for posting during Aussie hours.
Adam Richardson
Technically placing your race first does make you racist according to the textbook definition.
"a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another."
>or who believes that a particular race is superior to another.
Carson Torres
not if you hate every other race equally, then you are just being biased.
but there isn't anything wrong with hating on minorities anyway, if they provided an important role in a nations social structure then they would flourish naturally anyway. subverting natural selection within a social setting a.k.a. forcing a race to exist in a social environment it has no sociological niche to fill is cruel to said races you are afraid to upset
>nationalism and racism are different. you can be a patriot without being a bigot, just ignore the toxic sjw culture
Nathaniel Phillips
It's that Merriam Webster or (((Google)))?
Kayden Murphy
thats the i have an opinion and i wish you to accept it as fact without citations, but you should believe me because i am an sjw so i shouldn't need to prove my lunacy for you to accept it
Sebastian Gomez
Putting your race first doesn't mean you think your race is superior though. You're conflating the two.
Sebastian Wright
I will say it doesn't make you xenophobic. Don't know if it does make you racist as this term doesn't have a universal definition anymore.
Noah Gomez
This. I put white people first but Asians are smarter, jews are cleverer and negroes are criminaler.
It's like character creating in an RPG just different classes for different play styles.
Connor Nguyen
Yes unless you are white
Gavin Campbell
yeah it's true, but who gives a shit about racism anymore? it's just an insult used to shut down Whites
John Cruz
Irrelevant. Racism means "disagreement with a communist faggot" and is therefore healthy and morally sound.
Ayden Foster
racism is fine against every race except the aryan masterrace. there was a reason the white male has been the pinnacle of performance in most socio-economic areas for so long. because "marginalised minorities" just don't justify the tolerances and allowances they are given by sjws these days. it is unhealthy to believe we should value diversity above success
Aaron Sanders
I found these definitions of racism in a french dictionnary from 2002
1. Ideology based on the belief that an hierarchy exists between the different human groups, "the races" ; behavior inspired by this ideology. 2. Systematical hostility shown toward a determined category of people.
In my opinion, placing your race first doesn't equal thinking that an hierarchy exists between the different groups or showing a systematical hostility toward them. At the end, it will be your own opinions which will determine if you are or not a racist.
Jayden Baker
>In my opinion, placing your race first doesn't equal thinking that an hierarchy exists between the different groups or showing a systematical hostility toward them
except science itself puts races into a hierarchy
therefore to not be racist is to avoid reality
Charles Richardson
what studies are you thinking about ? IQ biased studies ?
Also there's a ton of thing science found which are not socially accepted. So I won't say that objective ethno facts found by scientists will necessarly red pill the society into racism.
Jaxon Ward
>what studies are you thinking about ? IQ biased studies ?
first day huh?
Daniel Reed
Ok. Just making sure.
Jayden Foster
not att all, my friend.
I just want objective genetical studies.
The Egyptian, the ottomans, the Huns where all respectable and accomplished ethnic groups.
Giving me "significant figures" studies, a term which they don't even defined, won't convince me.
I want to find the truth and if the truth is racism, I will take it. But I won't take your three graphics as a prooth.
Jonathan Lee
Thomas Walker
here is some more stuff you can read, if you like
you'll have to type the links out though
Brody Peterson
...
Kayden Lee
...
James Adams
...
Ian Ramirez
...
Jaxon Russell
...
Nathaniel Rivera
...
Colton Gray
...
Camden Collins
...
Blake Reed
...
Anthony Walker
...
Oliver Roberts
...
Ryan Evans
...
Justin Johnson
...
John Foster
...
Leo Lewis
...
Jonathan Nelson
...
Hudson Edwards
...
Evan Morales
...
Elijah Phillips
...
Asher Jenkins
...
Daniel Howard
...
Carson Allen
...
Kevin Hughes
...
Hudson Martin
...
Asher Cooper
It makes the statement racist by default as race is a factor in it, after concluding this we have to figure out to what degree the racism is.
Juan Johnson
...
Brody Davis
...
Nathaniel James
It always depends on definition. The real question is if you think it's moral.
Thomas Murphy
MCPH1 and ASPM having nothing to do with IQ, mental illness, or any such traits. Those papers are from 2005, but better testing was continued and in 2007 they found no link. Mekel-Bobrov even published the corrections from 2007-2009
Asher Wright
>Those papers are from 2005, but better testing was continued and in 2007
can you back that up?
what about the dozen or so other genes found to correlate?
are you denying racial brain size differences also?
Isaiah Russell
It makes your scientific argument convincing if you misspell the human species name in your infographic
Tyler Carter
Well said
Blake Thomas
sciencedirect.com
sciencedirect.com
academic.oup.com
As for your "dozen or so other genes." There are no known genes to influence IQ, but if we did find them there would be hundreds since IQ is highly polymorphic. There is a difference between finding an SNP that might be a gene candidate and actually identifying a gene.
Brain size has no affect on IQ. The correlation is less than 0.3
Michael Howard
Ofcourse the author doesn't even claim that. He says they are associated with brain development.
Camden Parker
what?
you seriously think it's wrong?
Luke Carter
The modern definition of species has nothing to do with offspring. It's based on genetics: chromosome count, genome size, allele frequencies, Fst, and so on.
Jack Turner
Which it was found out they weren't. They are only known to play a role in a genetic disorder called microcephaly. A condition which seems to afflict most Sup Forumstards and science denying racists.
Sebastian Hernandez
>Based black lives matter
This is absolutely correct no matter what race it comes from (obviously unless they make it into a double standard) but knowing them they probably will sit and spout how white pride is racism. Because;
>They're dumb niggers
>Who can't think critically
Brandon Garcia
>"a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another."
Interestingly ~six months ago it was only the superior part. I was surprised it did not have the discrimination aspect.
Now it does, at the start while also including the adjective which is heavily towards the discrimination side of things.
Merriam Webster is more in line with that google had previously.
> a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race
Wyatt James
It's Homo Sapiens, not "Sapien". And I'm a race realist but I've never seen actual evidence that blacks are a different species.
Luke Fisher
>Brain size has no affect on IQ. The correlation is less than 0.3
I take this to mean that you do not claim there are no differences in brain size between racial groups?
do you also accept that there are racial IQ differences?
Caleb Morales
so?
Zachary Gonzalez
>I've never seen actual evidence that blacks are a different species
but you agree that african and asian elephants are different species? and polar and grizzly bears?
are you aware that non-Blacks have 1-4% neanderthal admixture, whilst Blacks have none?
Justin Ramirez
Putting your race first is not the same as believing it is superior.
Ayden Carter
All you trolls talking about IQ. Mother fuckers, even if my brother was retarded that doesnt give me the right to enslave him. If your not just trolling them you're looking for excuses to rule over people. There's a human race, and that's about it, because we can all fuck and make kids. For now we're all stuck on this rock together so stop acting like a cunt.
Kevin Baker
...
Owen Peterson
Nope
its a racist statment
like saying that africans have on average IQ
true but still racist
Hudson Cook
Yes, we are all racists. And evolution made all races of man equally intelligent, because evolution cares about equality.
Jeremiah Wright
...
Carson Nelson
terrible bait, try harder
James Mitchell
No one puts their race first because they think they are objectively inferior.
Hudson Reyes
>like saying that africans have on average IQ
wat?
Owen Brooks
No way are fukken turks that light.
Hudson Roberts
RPGs have different races with different attributes. It's more like that.
Noah Williams
yes
Racist = believing you should invade other races and kill/replace them
Most of Sup Forums isn't actually racist by the correct definition.
Julian Murphy
did you stop playing already?
Jose Kelly
Come and get me faggot
James Long
It has nothing to do with inferiority or superiority. It has to do with making decisions that benefit your race over others.
Mason Wilson
Yes, this was pretty much why I posted.
Chase White
>jews are cleverer
This meme really does have to stop. Having no empathy and being cowardly doesn't make you clever. Forcing everyone to play a game by one set of rules and you playing with your own rules doesn't make you smart. Having accomplished literally nothing of any worth at any time ever and being universally loathed doesn't make you clever.
I agree with your overall sentiment, but you're clearly a Jew and not white.
David Sullivan
thanks I will read all of that
Thomas Richardson
Including abos disgusting.
Jackson Young
"Species" is not an entirely objective method of classification, is it? When are two animals definitively a different species? I'm not a biologist and forgot a lot of high school biology by now.
Hudson Wright
>eskimos
>human
Logan Morris
Evolution deosn't care about IQ.
Evolution is not a guided processes that makes organisms "better." It's an emergent property of natural selection. It's a "just enough to get by" mechanism, not one that cares about traits humans like.
Matthew Myers
These are just numbers with no labels. What does this represent?
Me 100
You 0
Anthony Robinson
Then how come:
Dogs and wolves can fuck and make kids?
Are they the same race? Nope, not even same species
Owen Wood
en.wikipedia.org
the traditional definition was being unable to interbreed, but there are plenty of species able to interbreed with other species
Hunter Hughes
as much as I know, there are two species when they can't procreate together. Wikipedia second sentence : "A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which two individuals can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual reproduction."
Sebastian Turner
Otherwise every race in every nation ever in history would be considered racist. It's been a matter of survival. Even to this day.
Christopher Wright
examples ?
Adam Mitchell
answer my questions first
Landon Brooks
Jose Jones
If you are not a racist what are you?
Carson Reyes
Dogs & wolves. There offspring are not infertile either
Colton Bennett
oy vey goyim, surely you trust the scientists?
Andrew Gomez
What are white people more _____-er than the other classes?
Jordan Reed
...and idiot
It's tribalism. We're supposed to be at least skeptical of people that are different. That keeps you alive