Why has this stopped? Why don't we want empires no more? Empires can make us proud and rich, we can send governors to colonies and show them how to do stuff better. We can tell other superpowers to watch out, because we are an empire.
Who cares if our colonies are darker than white? Who cares if they are Muslim? As long as there is no freedom of movement, everything is a-ok.
basically it's the jews pushing post-colonialism, social marxism, relativism, and post-modernism. Specifically the frankfurt school kikes
Easton Diaz
Because in the end you always end up with a lot of their subhumans in your country.
>As long as there is no freedom of movement, everything is a-ok. Can't keep that up it seems. Look at the most homogeneous countries in Europe. The obvious thing they have in common is to not have had colonies. Similar the other way round: France is full of niggers and sandniggers, England full of Indians, Pakis, Nigerians and Jamaicans. There's even a lively exchange of people between South America and the Iberian Peninsula. Even fucking Holland has a shitton of Indonesians. Now Germany gets flooded with (Southern) Europeans.
Aiden Brown
Empires are so 19th century We build economic empires now Why send your boots to their ground to colonize when you can manipulate them economically from afar?
Connor Rogers
Because the Imperial era ended with WW1 You lost then, and you will lose again.
David Davis
are you retarded? >EU >America controlled once most of the arabic world but fucked it up bigly >China is claiming Africa pice by pice >Russia is streangthening the bordering countrys
look outside your basement from time to time
Michael Wilson
>Because the Imperial era ended with WW1 A mistake. Empires were the best. The EU empire would be awesome.
Jonathan Howard
Cause no one wants to be the part of the EUs degenerate cultural marxism and blanda upp anymore.
You fucked up for the last time, germs. You are genociding yourselves now.
Grayson Hall
Buh buh how does Russia get included and Konigsberg left out
Tyler Rodriguez
Superpowers still have empires, they are just managed in different ways
Samuel Collins
this coupled with human rights if there is any calamity (especially civil wars) in your colony, you're pretty much obligated to absorb all the refugees, since the "cultural difference" argument can't even be applied anymore
Ian Martin
It's cheaper to do it the way it's done now. The vast majority of nearly every empire during the Age of Imperialism was a net loss.
Jace King
With Russian nuclear weapons EU would be unstoppable and the american scum would bow to us.
Luke Johnson
Because Germany's desire to form an empire lead to the two bloodiest wars in history.
Asher Brooks
WW1 wasn't Germany's fault
Owen Smith
Technical development with new trade and finance model allowed elites to reap benefits of being at top of the world without all hassle of building conventional empire.
Caleb Lee
Obligatory Union for the Mediterranean post
Pic related. It's literally now. It's hq is in Barcelona, it has its own universities and it's funded by the eu and the un. It's never in the news though it's member states often are Eurabia is now
You're creating it now with the current EU telling countries that have laws to fuck off, and trying to absorb all their militaries into one large EU one. On top of that, by 2025 all EU countries will use the euro.
It's a process that will be literally impossible to reverse which is what they want.
Cameron Jackson
We create free trade economic zones instead and then you just buy other countries out.
In theory I'm all for a pan-European empire based on racialist and nationalist principles. Enslaving and colonizing North Africa, the Levant and Turkey is definitely in the long term best interests of Europe as a whole as is securing Russia from turks, mongols, the Chinese and other such filth.