the murder didn't really have the traits of a professional hit job. he was shot twice in the back. you'd expect him to just be shot in the head a couple of times.
also, why would the murderers feel the need to approach him? why give him a chance to struggle?
for these reasons it seems like a robbery gone wrong.
Other urls found in this thread:
>1 post by this ID
>robbery gone wrong
>nothing was stolen
Really makes you think
maybe the dindus got spooked and ran away.
there's plenty of youtube videos of dindu's flaking out of a robbery whenever something bad goes wrong.
>why shoot in the back?
back of the head is classic execution kill. sloppy kill ties in with the "botched robbery" narrative
>approach him
we have no idea what happened except there was a struggle. he could've been kidnapped and shot there, maybe he fought and ran, who knows.
>why give him a chance to struggle?
once again, who knows.
>robbery gone wrong
it goes really wrong if you have time to beat up your victim, shoot him twice, and don't take at least his wallet and phone (left behind watch and jewelry)
we won't know for sure until Kim Dotcom (hopefully) releases his info. until then, it looks really suspicious
There are plenty of niggers in DC. I got lost there one time on a drive back from vacation and ended up in a ghetto surrounded by niggers at 4am in the morning.
It's just as likely that his murder was a gang initiation.
then why did they pick up their shells. they are so spooked they think clearly enough to pick up shells but not clearly enough to finish the robbery? And dindu's kept it a perfect secret and never got ratted on by a girlfriend or compatriot for that 6 figure reward money?
it's unfortunate for them they didn't start with this theory because it actually fits. bizarre they insist on the robbery story without supporting evidence of that motive.
wait they picked up their shells? wtf
or used a revolver
>dindus got spooked
See what you did there.
dindu's using a revolver is more bizarre than dindu's picking up shells. hipoints don't come in revolver. revolvers are expensive and use expensive ammo. dindus are gonna 9mm
>knowing what professional hit jobs are on an Ugandan basket weaving BBS
Flanked Ultimate initiation at close range is a considered stealth move. (Aka, a high MMR move)
A high MMR player can use that ultimate within 30-15 ft.
But of course it's Brazil level shit right? :3c
Good thing they don't ever steal things otherwise they might have access to revolvers
only in movies do people shoot the head
proffessionals aim for center mass because they're more likely to hit the person and there's plenty of vital organs there
this
youtube.com
here's a video from around where seth rich was killed, it clearly shows a dindu using a revolver.
>oy vey goyim it was just a random robbery. nothing to see here just move along and forget about it.
why shoot in the back of the head when you can frame it as a robbery dingus. do they teach you anything in shill school?
well he was still alive when the cops showed up. you shoot in the back of the head and he's sure to not live.
or you shoot him in the chest and he may live.
the thing youre forgetting is it was made to look like a robbery gone wrong.
go back to fbi anons post.
when she said seiu killed seth, she didnt mean they hired seiu to shoot him, they killed him at the hopsital.
this corroborates with the med resident post.
it was all made to look like a robbery,
scenario one
2 guys start beating seth, he starts screaming, and they shoot him twice and run. hoping they had finished the job.
not knowing they shot him in the liver.
then the whole hospital story plays out.
and they finish the job there since the hitmen fucked up.
that brings us to the 2 guys shot in the front seat of the van the next morning in another state.
scenario 2
2 guys walk up to seth and start beating him in his drunken possibly drugged stooper, shoot him twice in the liver because it wouldnt kill him, and wait for the police and ambulance to arrive. this is why its important to note that the responding officers have dnc ties.
the cheif has ties to podestas, and alefantis.
john podestas wife sits on the board, as does tony podestas wife.
it was all preplanned to get him to the hospital. so they could then kill him however they wanted.
which also goes with the hospital anons story of people rushing and covering the doorway to the room.
I wonder how conscious he was, and was he unconscious at first? Did whoever killed Seth think he was dead?
it could be figured out if the cops released their body cameras, which they had on according to the police report
give me one good reason why a thief would assassinate someone for whatever is in their wallets? also, since you believe this was a robbery more than anything, why didn't he take any of rich's belongings? why wasn't footage of cameras in the area released? why was the investigation called off? why hasn't the DNC pushed to find his murderer?
you have to remember the dc police involvement in this.
the ties that the clintons and dnc have in the department.
for all we know the police couldve even snatched the casings and never mentioned anything about them. which is why there werent any ballistics reports, or reports on what type of gun used.
although i hadnt really thought of that theory before.
i was leaning alot more towards the revolver explanation.
>why a thief would assassinate someone for whatever is in their wallets?
people have died for much less
>why didn't he take any of rich's belongings?
maybe he wanted to get away as fast as possible or something, maybe he didn't want to stay around and loot the dude.
> why wasn't footage of cameras in the area released? why was the investigation called off? why hasn't the DNC pushed to find his murderer?
you bring up good points which i can not refute. but
Everything is mentioned on his person but his keys. Who would steal the keys to his apartment. What would be in his apartment that you'd want to get your hands on? Laptop/hard drives perhaps?
>hmmmmmm
Steal his keys to get his laptop from his apt
nothing is confirmed, but that's why you gotta question something like this. one thing that convinced me was the massive amounts of shilling that went on when seth rich was brought up again. it's insane how much people on the left would care about this care to want the investigation not to be solved.
revolvers were the only guns allowed after the assault ban in DC. not surprising it would be popular among those citizens who use stolen guns. any weapon that had bottom fed clip was considered assault weapon. illegal guns lead to banishment, so to speak.
How did he die exactly? How long did it take him to die after being shot?
im pretty sure a professional would make it seem like it wasnt done by a professional
NO footage has been released by the police department of the body cameras? Hm...
Side point: does Sup Forums support police being required to wear body cameras and not being allowed to turn them off on-duty?
It is if it was meant to be a warning.
Right now it's pretty much Occam's razor.
>Hacks are much easier to accomplish from the inside.
>Seth Rich was a Berniecrat, he had motive and opportunity.
>Seth Rich was murdered, and the murder is unsolved and suspicious.
If you add nothing else to this, and there is more, it's something that has to be looked in to. Sounds like it was possibly a revolver. It's plausible that it was a botched murder. Anything is possible, but 'possible' isn't proof. People come in here claiming that investigating Seth Rich's murder is a 'conspiracy theory', when their own 'theory' on what happened has even less evidence to support it than the 'conspiracy theory'. Some cops made a guess at what happened. Closed the books... I think that under the circumstances we need a bit more than a guess on this one.