Monarchism

monarchism.

last poll i made showed Sup Forums contained 11% monarchists.

well between the two, its closer to fascism

How old are you?

its actually closer to libertarianism.

Because monarchy is by divine right and by divine right you can sooner accept a libertarian than a forceful non divine right fascist state (its less legitimate)

Monarchism and Fascism are both about authoritarianism. Maybe I shouldve made a poll between authoritarianism and libertarianism.

This thread is a D&C
follow me if you're ready to drop some commies.

No im literally just trying to take stock of who my fellow board ppl are.

Monarchy is not authoritarian by nature. Some monarchs have been authoritarian but others have embraced and provided freedom for their citizens.

See Liechtenstein, Singapore* or Monaco for example.

How is one guy having all/most of the power not authoritarian?

you don't understand.

Authority comes from God.

A fascist has no authority to enforce anything upon others which is why its less legitimate than libertarianism between the two.

its cool im just fucking around, have a bump.

ty fellow burgerbro

Depends on the nature of the monarchy and the type of monarchy it is. Usually monarchs tend to be authoritarian, but that is government for you in general. Everything will get more authoritarian as things progress with a few instance of push back. Either way I am a facist monarchist but lolbertarian monarchists exist as well they just function in a much more autonomous fashion.

Libretarian but would rather live in a Right wing authoritarian state than a leftie 'libertarian' state.

don't feel like either desu. Traditionalist or Palecon who buys into racial realism. Modern Libertarianism and Neonazism (and modern fascism in general) both seem larpy and meme-teir.

what are some notable libertarian monarchs?

Not in the same way though.
Monarchy = small government authoritarian
Fascism = large government authoritarian (totalitarian)

Not necessarily. I used to be in your shoes but now I believe that the authority of a monarchy comes from the fact that it is difficult to topple in a modern sense. Coups were very rare in the pre-French Revolution era, at least in the sense that we understand them now.

what is small govt authoritarian? I dont understand this

The government demands obedience, but isn't involved in society as much as modern 20th century) governments would be.

You want system's that were more libertarian or monarchs who were more libertarian?

Assuming the latter a good example of one that granted a lot of autonomy was William III who granted England a lot of autonomy. He was given the thrown right after parliament (mostly nobles) overthrew him but still he was hands off for the most part.

Fascism isn't innately totalitarian both monarchies and fascists states have the potential to go totalitarian.