Thread for bringing together all right wing political ideologies together to form an alliance against our common enemy; leftists.
Libertarians, Republicans, Conservatives, National Socialists, Fascists, & Anarcho-Capitalists are welcome here to share their fight against the left!
> REPORT IN FOR YOUR IDEOLOGY!
> TAKE BACK OUR BOARD!
> DRIVE OUT THE LEFTISTS!
Remember: The enemy of your enemy is your friend!
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
myredditnudes.com
twitter.com
...
...
...
...
"God" is imaginary
fuck off TJ no one cares about your youtube channel. eat a dick faggot.
ready to save mankind
This would be the best timeline.
1488/1776 Globalist Kikes ain't gonna tread on my whites!
National (((socialists))) are literally leftists and are no better than Marx.
Tell me the quote in the pic related isn't something Hitler would say.
how is libertarianism almost equal to fascism?
libertarianism is all about minimal statism with personal responcibility and fascism is all about you crying about how the big bad jew is out there to get ya with his tricks and you crying for the state not being big enough
being 100% legit here
National Socialists are more worried about fighting the threats to our people, not so much economics. We should work together while we have the same intrest of subjugating the left.
a real libertarian would bang bailey jay in a heartbeat with a lit number while the cuck fascist would look down on him and mumble "degenerate" under his breath
Neither believe in or support equality.
I am all for using the power of the state to achieve our goals, however I am equally as willing to give up the power as I am to use it. The difference is that you people are not. You wouldn't pull a Pinochet and step down, you'd aim for even greater power, just as Hitler did. You cannot be trusted to form an alliance with.
those are liberteins and (((left-libertarians))), We libertarians hate those degenerate cucks.
think of those degenerates as our version of strasserfags. they claim to be you and totally gay it up.
who mentioned equality?
the two ideologies are polar opposites
just because a dog has the same face configuration like you (eyes, nose, mouth, backend butthole and vagina) doesnt give you the moral authority to rape that poor sucker
daily reminder for the NatSocs
rejection of ALL mysticism is the only way forward for the white race
This to be honest.
It really comes down to how one thinks people best improve themselves. We want the same thing. Strong men. Non-degenerate society. After the liberals are purged.,we can have a discussion about other things.
modern left-(((libertarians))) are basically communists who are trying to infiltrate the political establishment with their positive buzzwords
sjw's and so called left-libertarians are basically communists, dont fool your self
You're a retarded faggot who's bone will be crushed under the power boot of transparent national technosocialism
fascists are basically leftists larping as romans
they crave the big state, colectivism and other "degenerate" shit
libertarians in contrast dont
you are a libertarian with a swastica aka a mis informed fool
Your people are not the most open to discussion, just look at the history of national socialism and fascism. And you simply cannot be trusted with power, history has also proven that. You'd attempt remove us right after victory was achieved, if not before.
The Right's association with religion is it's #1 flaw. They need to make the decision immediately to amputate Christianity or it will not succeed in the future. Christians need to wake the fuck up.
Which is why libertarians are rightfully known as completely retarded anarchy niggers. We have the technology to govern ourselves to such a degree as to remove many base problems faced by man in an effective and transparent manner.
t.Vít Jedlička
nice to see you here
I for one just want a transparent government that we are capable of that insures the future of humanity is stable, healthy and happy. Degeneracy will inevitably have to be eliminated and I don't know how long till it will make sense to go the extra mile for things like homosexuality.
>they crave the big state, colectivism and other "degenerate" shit
I can't say I disagree.
>you are a libertarian with a swastica aka a mis informed fool
You may have a point. I think many national-socialists would be happy with the nationalism, they just don't know it.
>I think many national-socialists would be happy with the nationalism, they just don't know it.
NatSocs very rarely understand economics. They think an economy based on constant theft from within and without is a smart idea and allows for infinite growth
>They need to make the decision immediately to amputate Christianity or it will not succeed in the future. Christians need to wake the fuck up.
I was originally ambiguous towards Christianity but seeing how utterly intolerant it is of other faiths combined with its slave worship, I have come to seriously oppose it.
it's hard for people to admit that the last 2000 years were a mistake - but they were. And we need to just move on.
What? Thats exactly what I'm saying. Real libertarians don't want to blow some tranny. those communists pretending to be us do.
basically this dude broke down the basic gestalt on why your opinion is dumb
ok i may've come out as an abrasive asshole but yes, he is correct. Almost in all aspects in life someone who has great power, or has a massive almost monopolistic influence he will abuse it
history is my witness
>some tranny
checking in
There will always be corruption yes, but is it maybe possible to you that libertarians can gain more influence by working with the nazis to destroy the left, its not like we're in danger of becoming an ethnostate anytime soon, even if it would be nice.
I'm not a nazi. I hate socialism.>Your people are not the most open to discussion, just look at the history of national socialism and fascism.
Not a nazi. Pinochet is where I stand. But even he had to go dictatormode to purge.
...
A big state dictatorship runs the risk of being corrupted. It only works so long as the dictator is benevolent. A true natsoc would be just as skeptical of the state as a libertarian would.
ok so lets say we combine forces
..and lets say somehow we win..
what should be done after the fat lady sings? what form of """(((((government)))))""" should be implemented?
see, honest libertarians know that you fuckers are going to violate the NAP and throw us in the gulag
do you ever visit those political compass threads with the 4 bar ratings? most people here on pol are statists, and real libertarians/ancaps know a jew-gulag is waiting for us because we are all in for personal property and your counter argument would be "dont be a jew user :^)"
And he was willing to give up power after everything he wanted to do was done, in a democratic referendum. Democratic referendums, by the way, are very opposed by the EU despite their claim of being a democratic union. They're basically Communists. Pinochet was a far right dictator, and yet he was still more democratic than the EU. That's just a little side note there, not really relevant to the discussion.
How do you initially draw the lines on who owns what properties?
>and real libertarians/ancaps know a jew-gulag is waiting for us because we are all in for personal property and your counter argument would be "dont be a jew user :^)"
That was not true for Hitlers Germany. Only if you were an actual jew.
Almost none of the natsocs were skeptical of Hitler when he went ape shit.
I'm not a National Socialist I'm Paleolibertarian AnCap, I simply have much respect for the traditional family values, race realism, and holding yourself to a high standard that national socialists espouse. fuck libertarians that want "liberty" to fuck themselves in the ass. and smoke meth. they are part of the leftist enemy.
maybe you don't like it but many libertarians have the same endgoal as nazis, just a different means to do so.
you have to mix you labor with resources to consider it property, this is the same with land. its your land when you build a house on it.
"this is mine, k buddy?"
so young and misinformed :/
well im not really bothered with people like you, and i dont really get why you mind people smoking meth, its their choice and they are responcible for what they've picked up as a habbit, you as an autonomous being have the "right" to not interact because he doesnt fit your taste
You are not a libertarian if you really want to enforce your "views"
Read some hoppe, my dude
cannot
be
trusted
Bussiness-Conservative reporting in.
I want all sand-skippers to die.
I fully support this. Alliance is needed now more than ever.
ok, snark aside
if you actually tried to do something that was in your economical benefit like use gas in the wrong day you would be imprisoned
if you actually tried to do something that was against the rules you would be imprisoned
Listen to some people who lived in that time, these guys had a huge stick up their ass, sitting confortably infront of your computer while ignoring the facts of history really makes you paint the whole situation pink and rosy
How many Sup Forumstards who post in or lurk in threads like these end up being put on CIA hitlists?
>le (((meme)))
hahaha so le (((epic))) (((meme))) le ((((funny))) XDDDD!!!!!(((!!!))))
my god it's beautiful
>Libertarians, Republicans, Conservatives, National Socialists, Fascists, & Anarcho-Capitalists
All of them are controlled and financed by Jews.
Make the Jews your enemy and you stop all the others.
Kek
delete your innane comment, now
>ok, snark aside
>Continues to make massive strawmans
You argue like a jew.
You're an ankle deep libertarian. You you think the methhead is gonna own property when theres no state to support him? No. probably not, so he must live on someone elses property on the PROPERTY OWNERS TERMS, If he says no meth then no fucking meth. its fiscally irresponsible to have metheads on your property.
from this point we must understand that the state should act as a responsible market actor, that meanse cant have methheads harrassing familes on public property
from rothbard
>Further: We must reject once and for all the left-libertarian view that all government-operated resources must be cesspools. We must try, short of ultimate privatization, to operate government facilities in a manner most conducive to a business, or to neighborhood control. But that means: that the public schools must allow prayer, and we must abandon the absurd left-atheist interpretation of the First Amendment that "establishment of religion" means not allowing prayer in public schools, or a creche in a schoolyard or a public square at Christmas. We must return to common sense, and original intent, in constitutional interpretation.
I've re-examined the second world war and while hitler probably should have listened to his generals more, I don't think he ever actually went ape shit. It is easy to call the nazis a bunch of statists, but war was inevitable to moment germany tried to remove itself from the international finance system. In a different world you could be natsoc while reducing the size of the government. You could even be natsoc in ancapistan.
Socialism + small government is not compatible. Hitler broke many agreements and treaties, as well as being an expansionist idiot. No wonder the entire world teamed up to take him down. If he remained peaceful he could've purchased Danzig from the Polish, and Nazi Germany would still be around to this day, but no, instead he decided to attack everyone neighboring him.
listen
liberty was't something you could actually practice in NatSoc germany
the only thing that would keep you out of prison was a dumb slogan "lead, follow, or get out of the way"
>You you think the methhead is gonna own property when theres no state to support him? No. probably not, so he must live on someone elses property on the PROPERTY OWNERS TERMS
Just shoot him if he bothers you
>If he says no meth then no fucking meth. its fiscally irresponsible to have metheads on your property.
Its like you don't even live where ever you live, there is a huge opioid epidemic in the US and you probably know some childhood friends who shoot H-darts regularly, and we both know you've broke all contacts with them, why would you do the same with methheads
Addiction isnt that common you know, protecting your self or even donating to private addiction clinics seems like a reasonable solution to me
you're a fucking libertein, read some real fucking libertarianism works. Rothbard and Hoppe would be embarrased if they heard your garbage.
>Just shoot him if he bothers you
a few minutes ago you were all "who cares maan let him shoot meth into is balls, why does it concern you?"
what are you some kind tranny loving cuck larping as hoppean?
...
Constitutionalist right winger with heavy libertarian leanings and interventionist foreign policy(realpolitik rather then NeoCon autistic we can make the third world not shti) wise.
What if I am an actual jew do you get to violate my rights?
Hierarchy is an emergent property of our species.
i may've come off as a bit rough there, but in reality why DOES he bother you?
If he is doing property damage just "shoo" him with your gun, why do you need to force other people to pay taxes just because young jimmy is scaring the kids with his nodding episodes in your front lawn
Be responcible and solve your own problems is what i was aiming for
I'm off for the night gentlemen, in summary: National socialism and Communism are two sides of the same leftist coin.
Can I build my house right next to yours? I'm a poop smith.
>What if I am an actual jew do you get to violate my rights?
It's not your right to live in my country. Jews have been in Denmark for 300 years, and they are still jews, not danes. That is not the norm for all other ethnicities. Germans, poles, swedes, russians and I could go on, they all assimilate, just not jews. After 300 years of non-assimilation, back to Israel. The jews who wish to becomes actual danes and not retain their ethnicity can do so. It's not like Israel is any better.
I don't really want to use taxes to do it, the issue is that we don't live in Ancapistan. The state exists and in the mean time the state should mimic a responsible market actor, policing itself in a productive way.rather than being a cesspool of undisireable behaivor, because "freedom"
>anarcho capitalists/libertarians
>right
worshiping money does not make you right wing you know they will sell out your nation to open borders in exchange for cheaper products?
>the state should mimic a responcible market actor
>should
but does it :^)
Start living like a moral man, this is why the Left dominates the West. Don't be an edgelord and look for flaws in yourself
we don't worship money. I'd choose to pay for borders instead of selling em away.
what happened to /lrg/? I haven't see it for a few days?
No it doesn't. democracy allows leftist trash to gain power being inheritly egalitarian and favoring the unwashed masses.
fascism would be closer to Ancap than democracy.
threads been slow mate. I haven't hosted in a while I usually keep em alive.
Pinochet reliquished power into the jaws of ((global finance)) and ((cultural revolution)).
Am I a national socialist?
Long live King Ferdinand, long live the Conquest of the Americas, long live Francisco Franco, long live General Carlos Ibañez del Campo, long live Augusto Pinochet!
You Libertarians whine about economics more than the national "socialists" do. I am not worried about economics, use what works.
I believe that the State should exist for the People- not for any people, for my People. Chile is for Chileans, fuck off central bank cartel.
Fuck communists, fuck atheists, fuck faggots, transexuals. The State should be strongly religious and explicitly anti-degeneracy. Useless, vagrant shitskins, of which we have many in Santiago and in the north, should be deported. The criminal ones should be killed.
Citizenship is for our People, not for whoever the fuck moves here. Fuck Democracy. Freedom doesn't exist, people aren't Equal. Democracy is just the State relinquishing power so that the Despotism of Capital can take it up into their empire of Gold.
No-fault divorce is bullshit. Family courts destroy families. Women should marry young and raise minimum three children, they don't need college degrees. Whores who run away from their husbands should be ostracized and left in the streets, cold and penniless, like before.
Sodomites should be publically flogged, like in Indonesia. People with HIV should be sent to an island. We have many islands.
Jews should be forbidden from great property ownership, and from finance, law, politics, journalism and humanist academia.
Drug dealers should be killed by motorcycle death squads, like in the Phillippines.
What are my politics?
Long live the Family!
Long live the State!
Glory to God!
Hail Victory!
>private borders
I love how open borders ancaps always justify their globalism with muh private borders. We already have that, dont mean I want Muslims all over my country
HELICOPTER PILOTS UNITED
Fuck commies burn in hell all Lettie scum
>Pinochet reliquished power into the jaws of ((global finance)) and ((cultural revolution)).
This is true. Now you have this dumb cunt as President.
en.wikipedia.org
" After leaving the presidency and while not immediately re-electable, she was appointed the first executive director of the newly created United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UN Women). In December 2013, Bachelet was re-elected president with over 62% of the vote, bettering the 53.5% she obtained in 2006. She is the first person since 1932 to win the presidency of Chile twice in competitive elections."
"Facing growing food shortages, the government of Salvador Allende placed Bachelet's father in charge of the Food Distribution Office. When General Augusto Pinochet suddenly came to power via the 11 September 1973 coup d'état, Bachelet's father was detained at the Air War Academy under charges of treason" (Communist pig)
"After four years in exile, Bachelet finally returned to Chile in 1979."
Eat a dick retard, we don't want to abolish roads and borders, we just want them to be run privately. Shit bait.
You're getting NatSoc too mixed up with Strasserism.
Very nice. 5/5
Stop arguing about economics. Stop wasting production on yachts, golf courses, and infinity food stamps, and the economy will fix itself.
ancaps dont want to abolish borders? You feel that the government telling people where they can move or not move to is tyranny and that borders are totalitarianism
Nat/soc here. Big fan of Mosley
I'm fine with someone making sure muzzies and wetbacks don't shit up our nation, I'd even pay for it. I just think it should be funded without compulsion. In the meantime government controlling and funding the borders with taxation is preferable to having no borders.