Everyone who watched the video knows you're a goddamn idiot if your takeaway from this was that Trump is innocent.
He basically admitted Trump and his people are traitors but couldn't come all the way forward without revealing evidence.
Noah Lopez
That man is a known liar. He is also so incompetent to have his AOL account hacked. He is also a converted mudslime in charge of subverting America's intelligence agencies.
Brayden Foster
I have no doubt that Russia (and other major countries) tried to meddle in our elections. Won't be the first time, won't be the last time (USA does the same shit).
But the issue is whether or not Trump WORKED with the Russian to achieve this. The ex-CIA director wouldn't say there was collusion.
Check mate liberals.
Josiah Reed
We see your ID you shill.
Zachary Campbell
He didn't say shit. Even the innuendos he speaks in run in circles and follow no logic.
Carson Nelson
Yeah no kidding you idiot, what's your point?
Gavin Thomas
Are you going to cry now? Please cry, I love the sense of panic in your voice.
Everything he said was damning to Trump and his cronies.
Angel Scott
He did not say he had any evidence supporting Trump collusion with Russia on the DNC hacks (in fact, there's no evidence that the russian government did the hacking regardless of why). He said he had information of contacts between the trump campaign and russia. No shit, we already knew this, it was already investigated and nothing came up.
Noah Rodriguez
>nothing to see here please stop looking
Thanks, Donald.
Asher Rivera
>projecting this hard
Andrew Lopez
You are giving us a headache screaming like a banshee while we are tying your noose
Carter Smith
They've been looking for 6 months, where is the evidence? There is NONE. Neither the senate intelligence committee nor CIA nor the FBI has reported a single finding corroborating the fabricated nonsense that the trump campaign worked with russia.
David Lewis
>swede can only think about violence
Sorry Muhammed, this doesn't concern you.
Brayden Richardson
>there is none provided to the public while they prepare their indictments
FTFY
Show me literally any case in history where they laid all the evidence out to the public before the trial, giving the defense time to destroy or alter evidence or witness testimony?
Idiot.
Dominic Torres
Bill Clinton couldn't destroy the semen encrusted dress
Isaiah Allen
They have not even stated that they have any at all, neither through their own channels nor through congressional hearings. The senate intelligence committee has straight up said multiple times that they have not found anything. They have not indicted anyone, nor recommended charges, nor reported even a potential ethics violation. NOTHING.
Gavin Richardson
Of course not, the Republican plant Monica Lewinsky kept it safe.
What they've said is that they can't talk about it in a public setting.
But I can see how your desperation to believe Trump is innocent would lead you to believe that there's nothing.
Carter Price
There is literally nothing barring them from saying that they've made some sort of progress. They refuse to admit their failure out of political spite
Wyatt Lopez
I think if this were simply a Nixon-like case they might, but considering it has so many overseas elements that they need to keep quiet, especially when a lot of information is coming from overseas sources, they don't want to burn any of those.
Hudson Parker
What have I missed?
Lucas Ramirez
Saying "yes we have evidence" would not harm any sources. Yet they refuse, and in some cases contradict.
There is nothing. You're chasing a boogyman. Worse than the actual red scare, at least then the russians actually did want us dead.
Josiah King
And ex-CIA guy testified that he thought the russia-trump story is real because he doesn't like or trust russians, and then gowdy crucified him
Colton Morales
He didn't say anything relevant period, Watched the whole thing and all he did was be extremely vague and told them to refer to what was already shown to you or i'll talk in a closed setting. He gave us nothing new period, gave no evidence, gave no sources, gave literally nothing.
Now he might give more information to them during the closed hearing that followed but the public doesn't know anything that was discussed.
So what the fuck are you talking about.
Wyatt Torres
The problem isn't a lack of evidence. There is more than enough circumstantial evidence to more than warrant even an impeachment hearing.
The problem is that the right is completely unwilling to acknowledge it. It's like climate change or anything else, they refuse to believe any aspect of it at first, and then when public opinion is overwhelmingly in acceptance of it, they change their tune and pretend they believed it all along. Currently, we're still at the "complete denial" among many of the right, despite all of our intelligence telling us that Russia interfered.
Oliver Miller
How come nothing has leaked? Everything else under the sun gets leaked but not even a scintilla of evidence?
James James
Actually there is NO circumstantial evidence, it is all hearsay at this point.
Jeremiah Walker
Where have you been? There's been leaks on an almost daily basis now. That's how we know that Europe is giving us intelligence on Trump associates and their communications with Russians. And that's not counting all our internal leaks.
Kayden Carter
>financial records >lying on government documents >obstructing investigations
Wake the fuck up.
Jaxson Nguyen
Collusion is still not illegal.
Kayden Barnes
>The problem isn't a lack of evidence. There is more than enough circumstantial evidence to more than warrant even an impeachment hearing.
No there isn't, or else it would have already been done. If there is evidence, that means he would be guilty. If he is guilty, it means he has done something illegal. If something illegal was conducted, he would be impeached. Period. It's the law.
Xavier Campbell
he said that he was not aware of anything illegal
he said that an international businessman had international contacts and those international businessmen around him also had international contacts.
repeat, he said that he was not aware of anything illegal or improper
he destroyed nothing
fuck off
Andrew Rodriguez
post the evidence then. post it right now for all of us to see. not from the MSM talking heads, and he said she said, but show us the doc's that prove Trump and his crew are in bed with Russia.
Carter Carter
You're really fucking dumb if you think the largest criminal and intelligence case can be wrapped up this quickly with all the I's dotted and T's crossed.
Also fuck that skank in the picture, she's obviously a nervous low IQ cunt who chews off her fingernails regularly. Enjoy your bimbos.
Gabriel Peterson
>be a liberal >get showered in nails
Cooper Morales
ΒΛΑΤ ΣΥΚΑ!
ΠΙΗΔΟΣΤΑΗΝ is know! Shut down!
American defectors: report to nearest ΡΟΣΣΚΝΝ embassy for rubles payments and passage to your ΗΟΒΟ-ΡΟΔΙΗΑ.
Loyal patriots in mother rossiya you can now turn off proxies is waste of rubles.
Elijah Stewart
Spying man will save america
Evan Ross
>expects me to post literally months of evidence
You don't want the evidence, son. If you did you would Google. Or have been paying attention for all of this time.
I'm not doing your legwork so that you can simply refute it all as fake news, stupid faggot. And don't even pretend that you've never accused something of being fake news just because you didn't like what it said.
Colton Martinez
>financial records >lying on government documents >obstructing investigations
Can I get your source please user where it states this as fact that there is evidence proving beyond doubt that it happened.
Brayden Perez
>seth richards Let's call it what it is, propaganda. This shit got stirred up """""coincidentally"""" when a special counsel to look into Trump's collusion with Russia was appointed.
On May 15, 2017, Fox 5 DC reported the uncorroborated and later largely retracted[39] claims by Rod Wheeler, a Fox News contributor and former homicide detective, that there was evidence Seth Rich had contacted WikiLeaks and that law enforcement were covering this up;[40][39] claims which were never independently verified by Fox.[41] The next day, Fox News published a lead story on its website and provided extensive coverage on its cable news channel about what it said were Wheeler's uncorroborated claims about the murder of Seth Rich.[41][42][39][43][44][15][45] In reporting these claims, the Fox News report re-ignited conspiracy theories about the killing.[38][41][39][7][46][47] According to NPR, within a day of the original Fox report, "Google searches for Rich had overtaken searches for James Comey, even amid continuous news about the former FBI director's conversations with Trump."[48] The Washington Post noted that Fox News chose to lead with this story at a time when most other media outlets were covering allegations that president Trump leaked intelligence to Russian officials.[49] Other news organizations revealed that Wheeler was a Donald Trump supporter, a paid Fox News contributor, and according to NBC News had >"developed a reputation for making outlandish claims, such as one appearance on Fox News in 2007 in which he warned that underground networks of pink pistol-toting lesbian gangs were raping young women".
alt-right believes this based black man
Austin Thompson
Uhhhh, are you fucking dumb?
How about you look at the sources OF THOSE SAME PEOPLE. Like fucking Flynn and Kushner and Manafort who all admitted their not providing all the information related to Russian connections and finances.
Fucking cuck, jesus christ.
Noah Sanchez
>alt-right New fag, go back to plebbit
Sebastian Campbell
>finally I can be executed for treason
Luis Parker
kek
Jackson Howard
What financial records or government documents do you speak of? The ones you made up?
Obstruction of justice requires destruction of physical evidence (like shillary did with her emails). Every respected legal commentator has said nothing that has been claimed or alleged in the news comes close to breaking that law.
Isaiah Young
Shit
Colton Gutierrez
Ask Flynn, Manafort, and Kushner, who have all admitted that they lied when providing contacts and deals with Russians. These three people alone could already be imprisoned. You realize that, right?
I mean you sound like fucking broken records. You all demand evidence, when your own fucking guys already admitted this shit themselves.
Aaron Edwards
>without revealing evidence Gee thanks godness you don't need that to convict anyone right?
Gavin Cox
Why can't you provide a source then mate?
>Here's more white bimbos for you.
Brandon Hill
Russia hacked DNC and exposed them as tipping the scale for Hillary and lying. Sooooooo.... As someone who voted for Obama twice and then Trump, fuck the DNC in their stupid face I'm glad they lost. Hope Trump gets 8 years.
Parker Torres
Like Podesta? Even so, that's not a crime as long as the intent was not there.
Also that has nothing to do with Trump doing anything wrong.
Andrew Robinson
A report on a supposed phonecall from an alleged, anonymous fbi agent describing from memory a piece of paper that nobody has seen or can confirm exists, supposedly written by comey describing a conversation neither trump nor comey has ever alluded to, is not evidence, you fucking idiot. It is less than a rumor. It is a fucking parody of evidence
Isaiah Adams
Russian shills and trump fags hilariously decimated by OP. Great post dude. Anyone left defending trump at this point is just willfully ignoring the undeniable facts
Hunter Torres
>gives source >"B-B-B-BUT NO SOURCE I G-G-GUESS"
There was no crime committed by Podesta or Hillary.
Next you'll try to convince me there's a pizza restaurant with little kids in the basement.
Ayden Morgan
WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE?
Hudson Torres
>that's all the evidence
You guys are the fucking stupidest sons of bitches I've ever seen.
>MUH EVIDENCE >PLZ GIVE IT AGAIN
Jayden Hernandez
>gives source >no source to be found
Dominic Brooks
show me the law shill.
Mason Jenkins
Just like in the interview, what are your sources, where are you evidence.
>Uh er...uh...classified, we've got classified sources they're all super legit but classified.
Thomas Richardson
Those people did not say they lied, that's your interpretation. Again, there is no proof of intent to mislead, and even if there was it really would not affect Trump in any legal way.
Brody Parker
>gives source No Source
>There was no crime committed by Podesta or Hillary.
So then if flynn doesn't get charged with criminal charges when/if he complies with the senate's newest set of subpoenas. Because you do realise he has not been charged yet. So by your logic, you will admit that he is no guilty of any crime.
Samuel James
Oh fuck off already, why don't you troll kikebook where the influencing is easy?
Better yet, just hang yourself in your closet tonight because you peaked several years ago and will never again be as happy as you once were.
Angel Richardson
>trusting a cia nigger republican or democrat, a cia nigger is a cia nigger
Charles Evans
I didn't say Podesta committed a crime, but he also did not report his business dealings with Russia. You can't say what Flynn did was illegal, but not Podesta because it was the exact same thing.
Jackson Cox
Nice copypasta shill. At least my "the goyim know shut it down" pidgin Russian in Hellenic letters like I'm too retarded to know the difference between Cyrillic and Hellenic letters is kinda funny. You just look like a retard.
Evan Taylor
Literally sticking with the "RUSSIA" is our enemy, omg traitor.
Just to try and bring God Emperor Trump down. If you would have asked any liberal about Russia before hand they would have shrugged and laughed.
Now? OMG MUH RUSSIA, GREAT ENEMY, MUCH TRAITOR.
When you realize that Hillary would have started WW3 already and we'd be fighting our Commie brothers of the north or hellfire would be raining down from the heavens.
Stupid faggots.
Jaxson Morales
It's official fact that hillary used a canadian shell "charity" to collect donations from the saudis while secretary of state, a felony. She also instructed her aids to mishandle classified documents for her convenience. She does not even deny it, and only got off because she's friends with Lynch and because Comey was a spineless fag.
Podesta, on the other hand, there's no proof he did anything illegal.
Charles Lewis
There is no other evidence. People doing business in russia is not business.
Daniel Wright
The seth rich story broke first you fucking moron
Jaxson Wood
John Brennan was a scourge on the CIA and a political hack. His testimony has no credibility or value at all.
Landon Campbell
>there's been leaks on an almost daily basis now
Leaks of what? Whispers and rumors? Allegedly spoke to an alleged source who intimated that Trump may have known about Russian dressing being passed around the cafeteria IN ADVANCE of suspected leaks concerning pro-Russian DNC operative Seth Rich's suicide.
Nicholas Bell
Of course just as in "sensible gun control", sensible here is intended to mean "agrees with me".
Levi Turner
You're brain-meltingly stupid, even for Sup Forums.
Israel, UK, France, China, Haus o' Saud all tried to influence the elections as well. This is all known. Your insistence to point and screan "It's all Russia" like a little girl afraid of a frog is both comical and concerning. You need help. i recommend getting outside, getting therapy or sucking on a loaded revolver.
Nathaniel Nelson
Alright, lay it all out for us in one simple concise post. It should be easy for you.
Dylan Moore
OP BTFO
Trey Gowdy makes me have to masturbate
Gabriel Sanders
White Muhabiyist...literal white privilege reincarnate, sure I believe him since white muzzies