You bootlickers and your dreams about a government able to control who you can have sex with are pathetic. Why can't you get it through your thick heads that if you have a policy like that, you might as well get some lube and the biggest dildo you can find to stretch as much as possible, so you are prepared for the intense daily rape by the state that follows?
First of all, it's not as fucking common as you think it is. Second, the forbidden fruit is always the sweetest. Third, children of such families are not ostracized that much, especially in mongrelized countries most of you stormfags are from. Biological consequences of race mixing are not that relevant either, because guess what, we're not hunter-gatherers anymore. And even if race mixing caused the kid's dick to fall off, it's still the parents' choice. The bloody freedom you always bitch not to have enough, but want to take away from the people you don't like.
Spreading the truth about race mixing, and letting the coal burners decide for themselves if they are ready to pay the toll is the only true way. It's not like the toll is that big at this point anyway.
Race mixing
Go on a public streetcorner and tell normie russkis that its ok to coalburn and have faggot sex with young boyz...wonder what happens next....
Fresh strawmen right on schedule.
All I said was that your panic over race mixing is irrational and that the state shouldn't stick its nose in it.
About faggot sex. It's not ok. But what is going on on the fags' private property is the fags' business. On the other hand, if they decide to show their faggotry to the general public, they shouldn't be surprised about rotten tomatoes flying in their direction. Such is their "toll".
You shouldn't forget that what is and is not ok is a matter of opinion. There is no such thing as objective morality.
I agree, in fact in can help foreign families integrate.
It actually only makes it harder if the country is 90+ % white, but again, the foreigners knew what they were doing when they applied for an immigration visa.
...
Since when does Sup Forums want state restrictions on racemixing? Thought it was just a general consensus that women basically paint themselves red when they do it and it's just generally disgusting.
u r a nigger fagit
I'm talking specifically to /natsoc/. In a national-socialist country Rassenschändern are declared criminals and sent to the camps.
Like they even fucking exist anymore. Along with ancaps they were meme'd to death, soon to be resting with alt-right. You stuck in '13 or something?
Well, I'm a newfag (came in January 2016), but I've seen a lot of people who sounded like legit Nazis.
This
Based Canada Nat Soc to the rescue!
> the beer is warm
> fucking Jews!
Ancap showing his true colors.
>hurt durr you should have freedom to be degenerate. Also no borders n shiet
дa ты пpocтo чypкa хyли)))
muh degenaracy your fee fees dont mater mate:)
what matters if sombody gets hurt or not.
people should have the freedom to do what the want in their private house aslong as it doesnt hurt anybody.
> Also no borders n shiet
The boundaries of my property are my borders.
>no such thing as objective morality
Glad we're agreed friend :) . I feel no compunctions about gassing (((libertarian))) subversives like you ;^)
This. Basically all shitskin immigration would end cause the lefties would need to take them into their own property, not shove them into (((public property))). A few murders, rapes, etc. and this idiotism would quickly end
Oh, shoot, is that an argument I'm seeing? *looks closer*. Nah.
So you're saying there is an objective morality? Care to give an example?
Take a trip to /nsg/ if you see one active, you'll get better replies there.
Until then lurk more newfag.
Cause there isn't idiot. Is killing bad? If I kill a little baby cause I feel like it? When I kill a guy that tries to rape a kid? Is it bad or goood?
We have the notion something is bad or good cause it evolved as the most optimal strategy. Those who didn't think killing children is bad simply died out as their societies crumbled along with them.
In nature there is only what is optimal and possible by physical laws and what is not.
>Basically all shitskin immigration would end cause the lefties would need to take them into their own property
Not because of this. Why do shitskins come in the first place?
1) Welfare (most cases)
2) Diversity quotas, guaranteeing them jobs
If there is no state to implement all of this, what is the point of coming? And if the shitskin is a good worker, why is it bad he came?