Thread for bringing together all right wing political ideologies together to form an alliance against our common enemy; leftists.
Libertarians, Republicans, Conservatives, National Socialists, Fascists, & Anarcho-Capitalists are welcome here to share their fight against the left!
>> REPORT IN FOR YOUR IDEOLOGY!
>> TAKE BACK OUR BOARD!
>> DRIVE OUT THE LEFTISTS!
Remember: The enemy of your enemy is your friend!
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
aryanism.net
twitter.com
...
NatSoc reporting in with a Bump
Righteous my brother. Crush the left.
Don't we only need to eradicate the red square?
I'm just not very happy violating the NAP.
There's no green square.
>right wing
>classical liberals and anarchists welcome
The problem is that the enemy of my enemy is NOT my friend, we just have a common foe at the moment, so I doubt you will ever see any unity between those groups.
>NAP
Here we go again...
You can daydream all you want, but in the current predicament your anarcho-whatever would only make things worse.
Yes I agree, we don't have the same endgame. even so let's fight the common enemy
Go back to /cg/ you commie finn
My "anarcho-whatever" is the goal of a just society.
You just like to lick boots.
>all finnish posters are the same guy
I'm apparently in the red square, even though I want to give free helicopter rides to (((marxists)))
Yeah they are.
Ok, let's imagine that you have this anarchist utopia created on a certain continent, while the rest of the world is 3rd world shithole.
Now tell me what is stopping all the 3rd worlders from coming to your paradise en masse and fucking it up, if you dont have a central authority?
And don't give me the "The people themselves would organize!" bullshit argument. They wouldn't, and even if they did,
then it would not be fast enough, due to the lack of a centralized governing system.
tl;dr - Any sort of anarchism would work only if EVERYONE agreed with it. That is never going to happen. Anything anarcho-X is a pipedream.
To be an anarchist IS suffering.
You know who's supposed to protect us from invaders? Ourselves and those we hire.
I know...life would be hard in my "utopia," but it would be free.
Free.
Define "free"
Hahahahahaha if you actually believe this
Hmm, I mean "State free." The monopoly on "justifiable" or unquestioned violence would be no more, and the only thrust upon people is a lack of authority, which they are free to "give up" however they see fit.
There can be no monopoly or free market without a system enforcing it.
And do you think that violence would magically dissipate into thin air when the ruling classes are destroyed? It's the exact opposite.
Chaos would ensue, as everyone would go for all that is left, as there would be no more soon after, because the very system that proveded that would have been rendered obsolete.
Anarchism eventually leads to primitivism, and that is no freedom at all.
>THE MEANING OF FREEDOM - Augustus Invictus
youtube.com
If this is your definition of freedom, than our views on the meaning of it seem to differ by quite a margin.
Yes I agree with his perspective as the true meaning of freedom. Please know that liberteins (those who just wanna suck dicks) always think they are Libertarians and label themselves as such.
I'm sorry I misread you a bit.
What does freedom mean to you?
To me there is no freedom, but the freedom of mind. No matter what you do, you will be always be limited by something, be it a law, nature, or even physics.
Freedom is a concept created by humans, it is not some universal thing. Everyting is limited by something (probably space too) so there is no true freedom, but just what we make it to be.
This probably makes no sense, but I can't be bothered to go full "wall of text mode" right now.
Get on my level faggots.
I get what you're saying, in a way you understand the leftist meaning of the word. Communists (leftist "Libertarians") define liberty as non hierarchy. You and I both probably agree that hierarchy is part of nature and cannot be abolished.
Liberty doesn't mean lawlessness, no morality or any of that horseshit. It means to not be enslaved by the forces of evil. A moral society is a free society as the two concepts are inseparable.
Alright faggots. Here's the deal. Authoritarianism is a lost cause, at least for the west. It is incompatible with our history and legacy of free speech and human rights. After the day of the rope comes the day of Snek.
>leftist meaning of the word
Not quite, as they seem to belive in it very fervently, while I don't at all.
>hierarchy is part of nature and cannot be abolished
Exactly.
I don't even have to write much myself, thanks to this user >free speech and human rights
I do not believe in these two.
And wasn't libertarianism cenrtist by default? It is not really excluseively right wing, but that doesn't matter,
as the left-right spectrum is outdated anyway. It became obsolete when the last monarchy fell.
Cultural purity. My enemy is black culture. My weapons are claims of Cultural Appropriation. Cultural appropriation of black culture by whites must stop NOW.
I don't specifically identify with any group, I only believe in the improvement of society via teaching people how to function independently and in groups in a healthy and efficient way.
There are some things that I agree with, like pride in your nation, decency towards yourself and others, respect of yourself and those who deserve it, disapproval of degeneracy, and more.
However, i don't believe in the extremes, like getting rid of other races by force, triggering leftists with racist memes, and things like that. It will just give the leftists "proof" that they are the good guys who the "normies" should follow.
The thing is that you can't civilize a non-westerner by force if they don't want to change themselves. We are not meant to be saviors nor destroyers, there is no obligation for us to do either of these things purely for the sake of doing them.
In my honest opinion, the way that the anti-leftist narrative has been pushed hasn't been efficient. With all the racist memes, belittlement, insults, and such, people on the fence and supporters of the leftists aren't going to want to change their views.
People don't normally want to agree with the person who is attacking them. Attacks are going to naturally trigger a defensive response.
tl;dr If we want to fight the leftist narrative, we have to understand HOW to redpill the normies. It doesn't matter how right we are in this if we can't convince others to actively agree with us. From a normie's perspective, why would they want to side with someone who says that Hitler did nothing wrong, Islam has to be eradicated, and they're a pure cucked idiot of they don't agree? We have to educate others and provide sources and material. We don't have the esatablishment to help us force them to believe. We must spread information everywhere as much as possible.
>redpill the normies
Not going to happen, don't bother. The wast majority of the world doesn't give a crap about who rules over them, as long as they are provided with whatever they want and/or need.
I can't remember the quote exactly, but George Lincoln Rockwell said it best, "the great mass on nonfanatics" or something like that.
The only way to change anything is to take power, and in these days that would be through the media.
Whether you like Richard Spencer or not, you have to support him if you want to see our views represented on the world scene.
natsoc fascist reporting in
Paulbot reporting in. Bump for interest. Shitlibs, neocons and Jew media are our common enemy.
Those are two separate ideologies.
That's why I specified that I believe in both.
...
...
NatSoc here. Fuck off.
National Socialism's best chance is with the nonwhites and leftists, it's extremely easy to convert them to entry-level NatSoc. Hitler was a hero of social justice. He uplifted his people from the oppression of the banking families (the same ones behind WW1, the same 1% today) and banned usury and debt. He stood against the racist British empire which through colonialism brutally killed millions of people and exploited a sizeable portion of the world after conquering it. The British created racism as we know it, they invented the idea of "white" and today white nationalists and SJWs use the same colonial model of race. Hitler did not believe in whiteness nor do any Aryans.
Conservatives, AnCaps, and Traditionalists, and all racists are enemies of National Socialism moreso than leftists are.
Republicans and White Nationalists are literally Jew-tier. The only thing lower than a republican is a Jew, and the only group more hazardous to National Socialism than white nationalists are the Jews themselves (who created white nationalism).
But National Socialism is in the center of the red square if you answer according to Hitlerist beliefs.
The green square is where your strawman "leftists" are, although NatSocs are indeed far left.
Nontheless those are different outlooks on things, stop being indecisive and pick one you belive in most.
Also, your flag is painful to look at.
Giving up only helps the people that are trying to destroy our society. We can affect the people around us by providing them with proof. At least then if we're persecuted for our actions, we'll be persecuted for trying to genuinely fight against the destruction.
We have to prove ourselves and while triggering the leftists is fun, it's not going to help much when it comes to furthering our cause. Saying "Hitler did nothing wrong" and "the holocaust never happened" won't convince anyone that it's true.
You need to study both then.
Fascism is a political system, national socialism is an ideology.
Also, Hitler and Mussolini shared a lot of beliefs, and national socialism in some cases has been classified as a form of fascism. I do think they're different, but they're very closely related, enough so that one may consider themselves both a fascist and a national socialist.
Which is why one can be both a fascist and a national socialist.
natsocs are like that retarded kid that keeps hanging around that no one actually asked to be there who thinks he is everyones friend. not once, ever, in my entire life have i seen a libertarian say he thinks natsocs are anything except pieces of shit. we do not like you, we do not want you around. we consider you on the same level as communists. please, kill yourselves like your manlet leader did
t. libertarians
>Conservatives, AnCaps, and Traditionalists, and all racists are enemies of National Socialism
Meh, night of the long knives can wait.
Hitlerism has evolved silghty different now from National Socialism.
But yes, NatSoc is doesn't even fit on the spectrum, and if you try to force it there,
the center is the only place you could put it.
libertarians are leftists though.
They are just autistic leftists with low empathy.
>National Socialist German Workers Party written on an american flag
I really love the idea of anti equality.
Reporting. Those that do not comprehend and those that do not respect property rights shall face immediate removal.
Gtfo commutard, there's nothing more traditional than God's Law.
>triggering the leftists
Cultural appropriation should be one of our causes. Keeping our white culture pure and pissing off the Liberals is something that brings me joy.
I agree with this, nigger culture is trash. White culture for white people.
>tradition
Why would I want to support tradition? Tradition is the control, exploitation, and dehumanization of the masses for the profit of the arisocrats, so the aristocrats may as well be Jewish. Many of them were, Jewish banking families have been around a long time.
Hitler opposed tradition on multiple levels, even the traditional family - see: Hitlerjugend
>when you get too much socialism in your nationalism
Reminder that propertarianism is the successor to libertarianism
Tradition is not an exclusively Jewish thing, you know.
National Socialism doesn't really oppose it, as it even upholds some of it's elements.
My point was that triggering them with Nazi larping, belittlement, and insults won't make us look all that good because the mainstream holds them as the heroes.
Our best bet is to have power in numbers, and that's not a good way to achieve it. Yeah it can be fun and feel good, but that's all there is to it.
National Catholicism all the way
is there any real lefties on here though? i larp as one sometimes and I figured most of the CTR posters were doing the same. the real shills are the koch bros employees who use "da joos"
>promised to build a wall
>no wall will ever be built
>promised not to grovel to arabs
>curtsies and sucks saudi cocks for a week
>sells KSA hi tech weapons
>cuts medicaid, medicare and programs for agricultural training
>realizes they've been fucked over
Where do trumptards go from here?
OP is a faggot. These groups don't co-exist very well, especially considering libertarians are superior
What other option is there but to work together to bring the current leftist establishment down? We don't have to agree on what comes after, that can be fought over afterwards.
What's wrong with voluntarily working together to remove leftists and then all returning to fuck off in our leftist free states/property
bump