Fuck everything to do with his death, what's the story about him being the DNC leaker?
>Did he get in contact with Kim Dotcom and branch into Wikileaks through him? >Did he work alone or in a group? >Did he hand the emails to a UK ambassador? >To Kim Dotcom? >To Guccifer 2.0? >How did he get the emails? >When did he turn? >Why did he turn?
The only trustworthy voice out of all of them is Assange, and if Guccifer2.0 was actually the hacker(he wasn't) then that would explain his whole "My sources are concerned" shit. Do we have ANYTHING to go one, other than him being dead?
The fact Guccifer2.0 mentioned him at all is just confusing as fuck too. Why would a DNC scarecrow meant to play the DNC "hacker" bring him up at all if they wanted to keep it under wraps?
The family knows that Kim Dotcom is real, his information is real, and justice for their son is forthcoming. All it took was the word, Panda.
Jacob Gonzalez
He was killed by the RNC. It's a false flag to make Democrats look bad.
Carson Wood
sort of.
both.
reportedly, or through a cut out.
no, kim is on other side of planet.
that's interesting but doubt it. guccifer 2.0 is likely not a person. to the list of actors between DNC and wikileaks don't forget MI6 as well as Russia and others' state sec orgs.
from a computer.
he never turned, never was /theirguy/.
he never turned.
his name was Seth Rich.
Asher Ward
Nobody actually believes it. It's just that we would rather forgo common human deceny and respect for the dead than miss out of memeing a scandal for the Democrats
Cameron Rogers
>we
Benjamin Cooper
Yes we but not you kys please
Oliver Foster
Because an insider source was always more likely than muh hacker russia. It always seemed fishy to me how those "hackings" kept going on, and they didn't upgrade their non-existent firewall.
Colton Edwards
Fuck off nigger
The thing that convinced me was the interview with Assange where Seth Rich was mentioned and Assange wouldn't answer if he was the leaker or not, he just kept saying they protect their sources, alive or dead
Kevin Price
Because he had to motive and means and his online persona fits the profile of a leaker.
Are you retarded?
Lincoln Ramirez
Give up, Shills. We know kimdotcom has the goods and Seth is the leaker.
Elijah Robinson
The real shills are people like you that are paid by the Mercer family to spread disinfo.
Colton Ward
>We know kimdotcom has the goods
those were baked goods. he ate them all.
Jose Young
This, also Seth was in a really good position to be the source, was also a BernieBro and the leaks revealed that the DNC were fucking Bernie over for Shillary
Leo Foster
Because of Assange's Dutch TV interview And all the subsequent dots connected
Mason Baker
Meta data from the DNC leaks indicated they were accessed by some one authorised indicating and insider. There were threads all day celebrating that we had someone on the inside.
I believe there were a few time stamps from someone claiming to be on the inside.
We had rich pegged simply based on his personality. When he died we were almost sure of it. We tried to track down his murderer before.
Election was heating up and then Trump one so we forgot about it for a bit. Didn't gain traction with normies anyway.
Recent reveals by independents that he was the source and the Russian collusion allegations bring this to the front again. If we can prove it, it will not only destroy that narrative but also implicate the DNC in politically motivated assassination.
Hence why it is being buried as "fake news"
Adam Gray
assange all but said so in an interview. you would have to be an idiot not to be able to see that he was obviously pointing to seth without officially disclosing a source.
he wasnt even very subtle about it. he just stopped short of saying it was him.
Aiden Reyes
If Hannity is willing to put he's career in the line I guess something must be in it
Jace James
kek were any of you kids even on the Seth Rich thread last night? It was fucking insanity. Probably the most sophisticated raid I've ever seen
Adrian Phillips
True, but it isn't either/or. Is Seth Rich being murdered the only evidence he was the whistle blower?
Owen Gomez
>Because he had to motive and means and his online persona fits the profile of a leaker. In what fucking way, Gucci?
Benjamin Kelly
Assange was strongly hinting at it, fatto.com say he has proof, but won't deliver. Nothing to be done, really but wait.
Brandon Phillips
I don't see why it's crazy that a leak of the DNC was internal. Every time we have a whistleblower it's someone on the inside that has seen the corruption. Seth Rich fits that almost to a t, but yet it's easier to push the Russian story because of whatever the fuck reason. I keep telling people on social media and real life that this media push makes no sense. He should be paraded for being a hero if he really did leak this information. Why is it so bad that he is the leaker? We already know everything that happened with the DNC, it really doesn't change the outcome. So why is there such a push from the media for this to be fake news? And these normies seem to be noticing the tread.
Levi Richardson
>This, also Seth was in a really good position to be the source, was also a BernieBro and the leaks revealed that the DNC were fucking Bernie over for Shillary If he was a Berniebro, then that assumes he only began his relationship with Wikileaks after seeing his treatment. That discredits Kim.
Craig Murray's claim would make sense in that case but there would be no need for the whistle blower to be Seth Rich in that case. The only lead would be that he was shot.
There's also no evidence he was a Berniebro.
Robert Scott
The interview only suggests that Assange's sources were spooked. It doesn't mean he was in contact with Seth Rich, or even that he would know who the sources were.
What dots connected? There are like four different scenarios, and they all currently seem to think they agree with each other.
Thomas Mitchell
What about him makes it seem like he'd be the whistle blower? Everyone that knows him denies this would be in his character.
Nicholas Rogers
Kim.com is a useless, self aggrandising distraction. As fucking always
Julian's comments count. That fat fucktard's don't.
His name was Seth Rich
Joshua Fisher
Kim's recent statement
Samuel Richardson
Because we don't have any real concrete evidence of where the initial leak came from. However leaks within the US always come from within. Might it have been with Snowden or Manning. It's easier to see someone being upset over internal corruption.
Not only that you can never truly know one's character or how they'll react to such knowledge. Ultimately we have to figure out where the leak came from, might it have come from a internal or external source both routes require investigation. The issue is only one of them is actually being investigated.
Robert Ramirez
He said he doesn't name sources but his sources were concerned to see his murder.
He also tweeted out a conversation between Guccifer2.0 and Robbin Young that said Seth Rich was his whistle blower.
He then tweeted "WikiLeaks has never disclosed a source. Sources sometimes talk to other parties but identities never emerge from WikiLeaks. #SethRich". This could outright mean Seth Rich was a source. It could also mean that he wouldn't have named Seth Rich if he was.
Nicholas Reyes
Kim predicting the DNC and Podesta leaks from WikiLeaks in 2014 and again in 2015: youtu.be/p6F8oq7apqY
He's legit. Anyone got screenshots of the user explaining how Megaupload was used by WL for large document transfers like the DNC and Podesta emails?
Justin Adams
Muh Seth Rich Keep crying drumpftard redditors
Nathaniel Garcia
This is the truth.
The day of the noose is approaching
Logan Hernandez
and confirms Kim isn't just LARPing
Camden Bailey
So was he a Berniebro gone rogue? How did he get the emails? How did he access them? Steal them?
Or was he working with Assange before then?
Or was he working with Kim Dotcom? Despite never mentioning an Internet Party to his family. Or through any of his social media accounts.
Aiden Gonzalez
>So was he a Berniebro gone rogue? Yes >How did he get the emails? Dude was a programmer surounded by tech illiterates, Podesta's password was "password" for example >Or was he working with Assange before then? Don't know as Assange won't confirm or deny sources >Or was he working with Kim Dotcom? Yes. According to Kim, >Despite never mentioning an Internet Party to his family. Or through any of his social media accounts. He was working for the DNC, why would he publically talk about other parties that are potentially future competition of his employer?
Jacob Anderson
...
Justin Johnson
In virtually every way, leaf.
Jose Butler
Keep on bumping, keep on investigating, keep on demanding justice for Seth Rich.
Juan Williams
DNC via David Brooks via a big-money "Crisis manager" has clamped down the Seth Rich family to keep them quiet.
"Family spokesman" Brad Bauman, is a professional Democratic Crisis Public-Relations Consultant who has frequently criticized President Donald Trump. He is a consultant with Pastorum Group in Washington, D.C., a firm with progressive ties (“strategic communications advice to Democratic candidates and labor unions”) and “founded Progressive Action PAC.” Bauman has called for civil disobedience to push for an “independent investigation of Russia.”
Something explosive is being covered up. Can you sense it?
James Watson
HAPPENING
>Open letter to the #SethRich family
>Dotcom has penned an open letter to Rich's family clarifying points about the ongoing dispute and has shared the letter exclusively with IBTimes UK.
no assange blinks his eyes and swallows when asks then sticks to his lines, we don't reveal our sources, etc. being in touch with kim and favoring bernie are not mutually exclusive, and there Is evidence suggesting he was for bernie.
this leaf is bullshitting and trying to poke holes, one leaf cannot gaslight entire internet
Austin Mitchell
Name one? I can't find a single shred of evidence he liked Bernie Sanders or Kim Dotcom.
The story that he leaked to Murray asa disgruntled insider upset about Bernie goes against Kim Dotcom's statement that he's known about the emails since 2014.
Jayden Peterson
He states he he only knew Seth through the Internet Party from back in 2014. Through there communications he made the statement about being her worst nightmare in 2016 was made in 2015. Did that mean he had the emails then or knew Seth was gonna leak during the election? We really don't know, but he never claimed to have known or seen the emails back on 2014.
Charles Jenkins
why not both? hack+leak, how else could wikileaks verify that what they publish is accurate
Connor Barnes
based archive guy strikes again
Alexander Gomez
can we false flag that it was a nigger death squad who did Seth in?
