Good vs Evil

Good vs Evil

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=dcpVrtv2t-M
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>4' tie vs a a 2' cross

I would be smiling, too.

That shit eating grin. Trollin' the antipope.

GOD BLESS MERIKA

This is the last time they spoke as friends

Clown vs Patience

That's a good text and picture combination you have there.

Hopefully the sand religions will be gone in favor of American ingenuity soon enough.

>Jew vs Catholic

Why is Trump so Jewish?

White clown and Auguste

Capitalism vs Socialism

Goy vs Shabbos Goy.

reminder Trump is unironically an Atheist since he lies about attending church and can't even reference the bible properly despite being the fucking republican President so he has such little interest in religion he can't even be bothered to learn how to fake it like most politicians

Jew vs Christian

>the Pope is more evil than Donald Trump
>the Pope is evil

are you stupid?

This pope is evil. The only question is how Trump plays off of his desires.

t. catholic

More like
>The man of Money
>The man of Religion

Let's be very honest: If you don't believe the religions based on blind obedience have been evil for a long time, there might be something wrong.

Hi fellow kekkers I hate the Bible but maybe you'll care about this

Not even Roman Catholicism is based on blind obedience.

Whereas backward religions have brutal genital mutilation ceremonies, all that happens for us is you get bathed in water and then you are asked later if you want to be a part of it or not.

How do people not realize Catholicism is evil?

Trump is an extremely flawed individual, he's arrogant, he's pushy, he's whatever, but deep down at his core he's one of the good guys (hopefully).

>blind obedience
>What is the rich Catholic intellectualism throughout the ages

Fuck, I can smell the teenage reddit in your post from here

>the pope insists he intercedes before God on your behalf
>literally blasphemy
>pray directly to virgin mary
>literally idolatry

The pope is evil. Catholicism is corrupt.

> Posting the MSM photo

Nice job goyim, keep up the good work.

Oh no. All those times he brings up God out of respect to believers is a big dooty lie!

Fucking autist.

They really are so sure in their retardation.

DELET THIS

IM TALLER THAN DRUMPF

HE HAD A STOOD

ITS PHOTOSHOPPED

DELET

>Catholic intellectualism
Are you sure you haven't spent too much time there yourself?

>all that happens for us is you get bathed in water
And brainwashed into eternal slavery to the Lords of Israel.

Small price to pay for a bath, eh?

Kek

Correct.

Pope is the fucking antichrist

>And brainwashed into eternal slavery to the Lords of Israel.
Have you ever been to church user? It gets old pretty fast because they only read a tiny bit of the bible to you.

I don't think you know what you're talking about.

>Are you sure you haven't spent too much time there yourself?

Bravo, written just like reddit post. I bet your'e no older than 18 Whatever the case you're a waste of time

>I don't think you know what you're talking about.
I do, but somehow you believe that blindly adhering to a sect of Judaism is at all a good thing.

>I bet your'e no older than 18
On the other hand, you're playing a pedantic game of age-guessing on Sup Forums to defend your belief in Israeli fairytales.

I'm pretty sure Jesus and the entire Gospel is the story of how a guy threw shit in the faces of the Babylonian Talmudists and told them to shape up or ship out.

I could be wrong. But it's like Aristotle's written documentation of Plato. We don't really know if that's what Plato said or not, but you might as well spend your time arguing against these claims instead of telling me I'm a disgusting Jew.

R A R E
A
R
E

>Israeli
>Israel didn't exist till after WWlll

See there, stupid..

kys

>>Israel didn't exist till after WWlll
You should really look that up.

Oh look, the hat meme. That makes your marysue Zeus fanfic less edgy.

>Aristotle's written documentation of Plato
Neither of which were Christians. Justinian shut down their philosophical schools. Which are now superseded by physics.

>He thinks British Mandatory Palestine and Israel were the same thing

.

>Neither of which were Christians. Justinian shut down their philosophical schools. Which are now superseded by physics
It's not clear to me, as a peer-reviewed published scientist why that matters. Maybe you could explain it to me.

For extra credit, you could explain physics, and which version of physics you're using and why.

...

HAHAHHAHAHAHA I FUCKING LOVE THIS MAN

Is this real?

>It's not clear to me, as a peer-reviewed published scientist why that matters.
A pretentious appeal to authority. Have you tried applying science to the origin of the universe? You can't, because you assume a "divine creator". That is important for the "physics" thing.

I don't have to apply to authority. I already gave you the clues about whatever we think Plato or Jesus might have said.

All we have is the recorded data. Don't they teach science in schools anymore, or are you on of those people who needs to go back?

no it's a libtard sketch but an actually funny one this time, check their sleeves

>All we have is the recorded data.
That's right. And Platonism has been superseded by modern physics.

Unless you would like to argue the existence of an "ideal bowl" in the "divine mirror world".

Christianity is opposed to universal skepsis, and this science. QED.

I hate to say it, but none of that is an argument. What it would seem as though you have a goal of hating Christianity for an unsubstantiated reason.

Look at their sleeves, hilarious but of course not real

Good.

offcourse

>but none of that is an argument
It is, but in your blind obedience to Christian dogma, you are physically incapable of processing it. It would be no different if you were Muslim.

You just named-dropped Plato and Aristotle as if it meant anything, and said to "argue against it". THAT is not an argument. It is the one-liner of an unthinking cultist.

>how a german reacts to his girlfriend being raped by brownies

i could barely recognise the pope without a niggers foot in his yap

On what logical basis do I have blind obedience and to what dogma? If you review my posts, you'll see that have already stated that genital mutilation is wrong and that people should only engage in whatever religion or none after understanding it.

You have yet to address these points. Instead, you only associate me with what we have known for years is a piece of shit pope. I don't know what cult you are talking about, except perhaps a reflection of your own.

shabbos goy vs shabbos goy

>On what logical basis do I have blind obedience and to what dogma?
It was you who said:>Not even Roman Catholicism is based on blind obedience.
Which is false. It is. Do read the findings of the Council of Trent, Mister Historybuff.

Based upon the fact that you have passive-agressively sought to deride my posts on the matter, I concluded that you are an obfuscate shill for Christianity. It is a common occurrence. Such shills deny their allegiance, and merely agitate for the cult.

Which you are, implicitly, doing.

Why don't you preach better, then?

And also do you accept genital mutilation?

>Dumb and Dumber.

shabbos get down good goy
goyim got it poppin all over town
strictly kibbitz you dont play around
cover much ground, got shekels by the pound

>And also do you accept genital mutilation?
For a supposed "scientist", you don't produce any definition for "mutilation" beyond presumably that you don't like the unspecified thing done.

Are dental braces "mutilation of the sacred human form"?

>Why don't you preach better, then?
That seems to be your realm. For someone donning an air of aloofness, you surely do speak to defend Christianity often enough.

>you don't produce any definition for "mutilation" beyond presumably that you don't like the unspecified thing done
Kind of kikey, mate. I work with lots of kikes, so don't think I don't know how they play the game.

What's you're definition of genital mutilation? And is it a covenant with g-d?

let's be EXTREMELY honest: If you don't recognize that all of the peaceful, loving Christian neighbors surrounding you are better people than you, there might be something wrong.

>"B-but they don't know why Pascal's Wager is a fallacy!"

in that order.

Francis needs to leave.

Most self professed Christians are atheists

>And is it a covenant with
A fictional character written by ancient desert tribes? Well of course not.

>What's you're definition of genital mutilation?
Personally, I like to consider losses of function like lubrication and soft tissue protection.

Though do be aware that circumcision seems to have been invented by the Ancient Egyptians, then copied uncredited by other personages. The same with writing, I hear.

>>"B-but they don't know why Pascal's Wager is a fallacy!"
It is a fallacy that only an evil trickster would use, I might add.
"Why don't you buy some more insurance from your local usury stand, though."

>you are better people than you
Ahh yes, the Christian dripping with smug hubris. Very convincing.

It is almost as if the religion's entire intent was to lure persons into superbia.

>Though do be aware that circumcision seems to have been invented by the Ancient Egyptians, then copied uncredited by other personages
Why do you continue to defend it? Because of KANGZ or Babylon?

Do you know that makes you by our legal codes a sex offender?

That's not always true at all, many Christians are hypocrites who Christ would say "depart from me I never knew you", contrarily many non Christians unknowingly follow Christ

The kingdom of God is within man you faggot not a building or a book.

>Why do you continue to defend it?
I don't and never did. So it is you who have been misreading my posts.

It does after all result in some loss of lubrication and soft tissue protection.

On the other hand, there are more important details, like much of the populations blindhearted slavery to Yahweh. "Who of course, of everything, made sure to tell people to slice off their foreskin!"

m.youtube.com/watch?v=dcpVrtv2t-M

It's too late for you. Everything you type in to Sup Forums is saved forever. You are a wanton child molester who can't even explain his own faith.

You didn't even decry Muslims when I gave you the chance, who mutilate girls as well as boys.

>loving

implying the average american christian isn't an extremely judgmental sanctimonious bigoted idiot

Well you went off the crazy end pretty fast.

Is that stage two of the Christian shilling tactic? Blindly threaten and accuse? It worked for the witchhunters, most likely.

All of the Abrahamic religions have flaws of evil cracking through them. Perhaps you should spend your time preaching that.

I never said anything about the witch hunts, which were pretty stupid.

I only asked you about common sense things. And you have yet to disavow any of them.

>And you have yet to disavow any of them.
Like what? For technically, you have disavowed nothing yourself in this thread.

Isn't that right, plaintiff?

Why don't you say what you think about genital mutilation for starters?

Do we really have to come down to this level?

Man vs cuck.

Former Papist here. not gonna lie... but we can't leet this Pope get near whatever it is that Popes get near.

Pope is salt about a country having borders and representational government not ruled by an autocracy. EU cuckboi. I mean, he actually gives a nod to Islam, a false faith of no particular merit of any kind.

we cant let him get his hands on the little boys

I wonder what Trump thought of the little satanic cunt.

>Do we really have to come down to this level?
Yes. You have demanded disavowments, but made none yourself.

You will not even mention what specifically it is, as if trying to entrap people in missed meanings.

This baboon is happier in Saudi-Arabia than meeting his old allies over in Europe.
Makes you think.

So genital mutilation is OK?

I'm just trying to get a statement on record here.

>So genital mutilation is OK?
Tell us all what you mean by "genital mutilation"?

Because by definition, it is not considered "OK". That is what "mutilation" means.

I mean if you mutilate the genitals.

Why is this a hard question for you?

>I mean if you mutilate the genitals.
>Why is this a hard question for you?
By definition that is NOT a "good thing".

Should we be concerned by your fascination with the topic on a public forum? I don't really feel comfortable discussing it further.

Going back to the Greek, we could ask about the Hippocratic Oath.

But you don't want to describe nor describe where the delineation is. What would be an example of genital mutilation in your view of the world?

Did I hit too close to home?