Scientific Racism

I am a psychology student. I have to write a ten-pages long text on how structural and deemed scientific racism has made blacks' fare worse than whites on studies and education.

I have no sources on scientific racism, so I decided to come ask my favorite neo-nazi pub in town: Sup Forums.

I am not asking you to do my work, I would just like some sources on deemed (or actual) scientific racism, or even pseudo-cientific. Anything that would make use of the voice of Science in order to justify white supremacy.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=F0_NsS1Zdlk
humanbiologicaldiversity.com/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoamine_oxidase_A#Aggression_and_the_.22Warrior_gene.22
fanghornforest.wordpress.com/hate-facts/
youtube.com/watch?v=wQRg6KMp02U
anyforums.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Yes it's humanities and yes it's a constant blabber about white privilege.

I'm not in favor of that either, but I have to go thorugh it if I want to go deeper into neuroscience.

talk about how people's inability to accept genetic basis for differences has allowed degenerate loops to worsen their effects. That in fact reverse racism, the over valuing of blacks, has brought them back further then white people ever could have we tried. The jews, now, that is a different story.

could you develop further on the jews? I have little knowledge on their effort to undermine western society besides their game in porn industry.

start off with how 90% of all media is owned by people of jewish heritage and how the media actively tries to fuck over anyone with even a remote amount of common sense.

Don't quote me on this but The Bell Curve is what you need

go all-out and make a paper with a theis that scientific racism is justified and based on evidence

Jesus H Christ user that is just what I needed

turn in 10 pages of
"the holocaust never happened but it would have been nice if it did"

and leave that cancerous school

>brazil
>education

Be careful with what you say. Do not forget that racism can get you jailed here.

most of my education comes from Udemy, Khan Academy, Coursera, EDx and several books. I am just working on getting a degree on psychology in order to wave it and say, "hear me out, ungodly creatures: a psychologist has something that say that in the end might even be useful to you!"

Go full shitlord and talk about how scientific """racism""" is actually valid and how """science""" that denies biological race is actual pseudoscience.

Why are you not doing Jujitsu? Psychology is a racket for the Jews

Get rolling faggot!

you can describe scientific racism and pseudoscience, but you'll just be engaging in more of it if you write the paper you describe. there is no evidence that racism, scientific or not makes students of any color perform differently. also, slap your professor in the fucking mouth for giving you an assignment that requires you to find evidence to support a conclusion, the definition of pseudoscience.

Minnesota Trans-racial adoption study:

youtube.com/watch?v=F0_NsS1Zdlk

Here you go you unerudite faggot: humanbiologicaldiversity.com/ Remember me when your ultra-progressive professor gives you a C just because they don't like you.

Well, I wouldn't say that there isn't a correlation. There is, but no directly connected to racism. People fare worse on their studies due to lower quality of enviroments: it is usually blacks that live in awful neighborhoods ridden with violence. Stress might make you fare worse in your studies. Besides that, namecalling and talking down on people may have a negative impact on their self-esteem, and such an attitude can make blacks score less than others -- not because of racism, but because of demeaning talk and structural suffering.

In the end, the cause would not be actual racism, but the suffering the comes from it, for blacks to have worse fare than whites on their scores.

Google eugenics.

op, you are a fucking fraud. you came here asking for sources and claimed you know nothing about scientific racism, yet here you are, trying to refute it. the fucks your problem?

I'm not trying to refute it. I believe blacks and whites are different in their biological structure, I just have very little background on this.

I'm not pro-racism. I believe there is a cause for blacks to have a worse score medium on testes than whites, but I don't think that is because of race.

But yes, I believe that blacks and whites have a fundamental biological difference that MAY impact this fact. I just don't know enough.

Why am I even explaining myself to you

>Well, I wouldn't say that there isn't a correlation.
well, what did you mean by this^
In any case, there is abundant info on your topic, all of which can be found with a query "scientific racism". Keep in mind that in writing this paper, which presupposes a conclusion and requires you to find evidence to support that conclusion, you are furthering the cause of pseudoscience and scientific racism.

Because you asked /po/ for help.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoamine_oxidase_A#Aggression_and_the_.22Warrior_gene.22

If you read what I actually said you will in the end see that I am actually agreeing with you, you bastard. I'm just getting there through other means.

And yes, I know. There's a thin line that allows me to put there what I believe is right and scoring an F. The middle way is the way to go.

>Well, I wouldn't say that there isn't a correlation. There is, but no directly connected to racism. People fare worse on their studies due to lower quality of enviroments: it is usually blacks that live in awful neighborhoods ridden with violence. Stress might make you fare worse in your studies. Besides that, namecalling and talking down on people may have a negative impact on their self-esteem, and such an attitude can make blacks score less than others -- not because of racism, but because of demeaning talk and structural suffering.

They do those twin studies in order to separate nature from nurture. Blacks still have lower IQ when raised by upper middle class whites. Chinamen are still smarter when raised with middle class white parents. Conclusion: it's genetics.

Are you per chance a black hue monkey?

I had no prior knowledge of these studies and would still have to see them myself to make my conclusion.

also, I'm brown.

Listen and read to Thomas Sowell. Might not be exactly what you need but he really knows what he's talking about.

There you go. But all kidding aside, I know more about your field's methodologies and I'm in the humanities... How shit are your universities?

Pretty bad, actually. It's all heavily inclined towards leftism, although it's all very subliminar. The content has some reason, but they refuse to see the other side of things.

I disagree with most of what I see there, but by means of my own personal studies I believe I can make some good contribution in this field which I love but is just so corrupted with marxist ideals.

Besides that the State is broke and the University is in pretty bad (physical) shape. And it's still one of the best Universities in the country in my field -- the second, to be more precise.

One of my teachers studied in Europe, don't remember where. He said how very different everything is there. Our focus here is mostly Freudian psychoanalysis -- which I don't like very much -- but other areas are growing, mainly in the fields of neuroscience (the only thing that keeps me in the college).

Well, you've got a pretty good case to make on how IQ is a predictor of academic achievement. Then elaborate on how IQ relates to ancestry, i.e. race. (Make sure to stress that this is on average, in order to not look racist.) Then you can examine the effectiveness of affirmative action programs - they're not - by using, for example, the work of Thomas Sowell. In the conclusion suggest other socialist measures to ensure equal opportunity for everyone, regardless of race. Also stress that having low IQ is not morally wrong and that a society won't function when everyone's clever since other necessary niches need to be filled. Ethics is not about facts, but what you do with those facts, when you start treating people different on the basis of their IQ is when you act immoral.

"Scientific racism" is a leftist buzzword being pushed big time by (((cultural Marxists))) to hide scientific facts behind the veil of racism. Truth is racist. Genetics, behavior, and thus culture born from it continues to have repeating patterns throughout history. Races are incredibly different in arrays of intelligence, curiosity, emotion, disposition to violence, lack of impulse, aggressive hormones and other chemicals, and thousands of other traits that geneticists are just barely beginning to scratch the surface of. Throughout human chains of evolution and breeding, "small" differences in DNA make huge differences in IQ and behavior.

I hope your report isn't bullshit telling them what they want to hear but I'm guessing that's what you're hear for. Fuck it. Here you go. You can look into the gene MAOA. The most aggressive allele known of it so far is MAOA-2R, occurring 5-10x more in black men vs. white men by US measures. 5% of the US black male population vs. under 1% of the US white male population), which is linked to lack of impulse and psychopathic aggression. Again, "little numbers" make up large differences and it's directly displayed in disproportionate crime statistics (black men are greatly more likely to commit violent crimes irrespective of socioeconomic background).

Truth is hate speech. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength.

Freud is mostly seriously considered in the humanities as a means of cultural analysis and as a link to describe the effects of romanticism on our current ways of thinking, how from the 20th century culture is very much a struggle between our Enlightenment views and our romantic views. Psychology is trying to be as much of a medical field as it can be. Freud is used in intro courses to describe the development of the field and the origins of certain terms. My town specializes in Neurosciences, partly because they tend to attract more subsidies for being a hard, data driven niche. Of course they do need a lot of capital for their equipment. Don't go in to social psychology, they are pretty big quacks.

>*here for

Check out some hate facts here: fanghornforest.wordpress.com/hate-facts/

Lovely stuff.

Cherry picked FBI statistics are still technically evidences gathered through the scientific method

>I believe there is a cause for blacks to have a worse score medium on testes than whites, but I don't think that is because of race.
Christ. You're in full denial and this is your position going into the paper? You don't even comprehend how bluepilled you are. I don't have time for it. You should lurk on the 100 threads a day in the Catalog that cover all of this if you're even remotely genuinely curious beyond cultural Marxist phony bullshit beliefs. Are you also so brainwashed you think there aren't gender differences on average in behaviors and intelligence?

Thanks for the link.

Silly goyim

>claims to be psychology student
>doesn't know about the bell curve
LARP confirmed

>you must demonstrate your fluidity in newspeak before you can study neuroscience
Lol fuck this gay earth

Here's the problem with modern US crime stats. You can bet they do this in other countries now too to poison the public's understanding of who's causing the most crime.

...

/thread

Friend of mine went to Harvard for a year where he shared a house with a Jewish-Chinese couple that liked to brag that they were starting the master race together. So yeah, it's well known. I'm pretty surprised that OP didn't, but then again he's from a shit hole so I gave him the benefit of the doubt.

> You don't even comprehend how bluepilled you are.
Less than you'd actually believe.

>Are you also so brainwashed you think there aren't gender differences on average in behaviors and intelligence?
This is one of the ideas they try to propagate on our unis.

>Silly goyim
שלמה טיפש

You might try Steven J. Gould's "The Mismeasure of Man", which covers the subject at the pop-science level, and is fairly well sourced.

Forgot to post link to some nice Brazillian tunes

youtube.com/watch?v=wQRg6KMp02U

I like how they believe mixing a superior race with an inferior one somehow creates a master race.

Europeans are dumb af. When I lived in Europe I felt like I was interacting with mentally retarded people. Maybe because I was in a school full of minorities, though. I started school not speaking a word of English and a year later I had the highest grades in school.
White people I met were a bit more intelligent, but nothing compared to the Jews I know here. Even the uneducated people here seem very intelligent when you talk to them.

Of course, you have the hebrew-speaking priviledge!

kek

Jared Taylor. That's who you're looking for. He's spent his entire life studying this. If he's too far right, look up Stefan Molyneux "An Honest Conversation about Race and Iq" on YouTube. These videos are unique because a few of the interviews are with people who are not the least bit racist but not willing to accept the big lie. They're deemed racist for their research essentially. This will consume hours of time to listen to but it's the best explanation around, especially the woman he speaks to that specific interview is excellent.

If correcting the grammar of an african-american student is racist, the only ones graduating with good enough language skills for good careers are jews, whites and asians.

Whites (non-hispanic, non-jew) have higher average IQs than Jews (of a similar pure lineage) when it's the equivalent socioeconomic sampling. The only exception is Ashkenazi which have higher average IQs than whites. The problem is that no country is really like that now, so your anecdotal experiences are probably fairly representative. Cultural Marxists are making sure of it through multiculturalism in western states that aren't Israel.

>ce with an inferior one somehow creates a master race.
One's good with maths, the other with finances. Put them together and you have someone good in finance and keeping count of how much he made fucking you over.

Redpanel's IQ bell curve for males and females is wrong, though. Females tend to be more center-oriented, while males have IQs scattered across the spectrum.

I think there is a very high correlation between IQ and ingenuity, but I don't think it's 100% representative of intelligence. Take a look at China, Japan and Korea. They all have very high IQs, but they are not very inventive and barely win any noble prizes in comparison to their population. They are very good at raw memorization and copying though.
As for Ashkenazi Jews, yes they are more intelligent than other Jews, but even Sepharadic Jews are more intelligent than Europeans. In France for example, there are mostly Sepharadic Jews and they are extremely educated, all enginners, doctors and lawyers and have won more noble prizes per capita than any European nation. Even 10 times more than Ashkenazis in Israel. In Israel they are less educated, though.
I think it's all to do with breeding. Orthodox Jews have been breeding their daughters for generations with the smartest scholars, while the dumb ones usually didn't get to marry and have kids.

we as a society must come together to overthrow Jewish Privilege.

...

Thomas Sowell is probably your best option

He often talks how minimum wage laws and poor education made life worse for blacks. Minimum wage laws increased their unemployment rate, because unskilled blacks weren't able to work for a lower wage anymore, which was compatible to their skills.

He also shows how welfare and other measures that are supposed to help blacks and poor people, actually have the opposite effect.

...Continuing

Due to affirmative action, blacks end up qualifying for universities that they aren't prepared. If they actually went to universities that they were prepared for, instead of getting a free pass, they would graduate at a much higher rate than they do now.

Yeah, the whole China/Japan/Korea IQ averages are surely slightly oversampling a certain segment of the population. IQ alone is clearly not the only genetic and cultural achievement that matters in the array of intelligence that produces pioneers of the world in curiosity, art, and innovation. Asians have a high compulsion to subservience while whites have a high compulsion to individualism and thus exploration and liberty in government. It should be noted that whites (loosely) have more radical geniuses on the long-tail of the IQ spectrum than do Asians, which explains a good part of scientific breakthroughs in the past few hundred years. I'm not comfortable, however, with how so many Jews have compulsions to communism (a Jewish born and pushed philosophy) and dismantling western nations from within through religious and ethnic tribalism while playing victims so masterfully, ushering in globalism under their control.

I'm fine with Israel fucking sticking to Israel instead of infesting US deep state policy entirely. Only then will peace be real.

>won more noble prizes per capita than any European nation
Word of advice. Don't use stats like that to back up anything. It's the opposite of objectivity. Jews largely control who receives those awards. It's a bullshit pageantry of brotherly networks like the Oscars.

>jewish chinks
fucking nightmare fuel

You're misreading the data. That's a bit of a myth. The lower end for both men and women is effectively the same while the upper half is dominated my men.

The accurate thing you say is that women are more clustered at the average mean creating a similar average. That doesn't matter at all. Society is largely dictated by jobs that require the most intelligence. Thus, society, assuming no artificial constraints, inherently becomes male dominated irrespective of "patriarchy."

...

You're getting worked faggot. Don't and stop, write something in relation, but not to every note of the requirement. Prove your point, have respectable sources, and ask your teacher why his premise is what it is. If you're a true Sup Forumslock, you'd have both written.

Agree with Sowell and on the other end to complete the circle is Jared Taylor. Sowell tells it while Taylor is unafraid to give direct examples.
In one of his books he let's the workers give their experience working with black people.
A union boss talks about how the union used to be an effective way to keep the unskilled blacks (therefore all blacks) out of trade labor. He said that as soon as they were allowed quality and teamwork declined greatly due to distrust and inability to follow directions. Trust was important when they were building skyscrapers and relied on each other to stay safe.
There's also a debate Taylor did at a black college. This is the greatest display of the gap between blacks and whites. Taylor gave an epic argument against multiculturalism citing facts and evidence to support his side. The black guy he debated used humor to try and argue his point but ultimately his argument for the benefit of blacks in society consisted of:
Entertainment and sports.
For the rest of the races:
The selection of ethnic foods.
Every time Taylor offended them with his argument the crowd sounded like angry chimpanzees.
At the end Taylor graciously took questions from a very hostile audience that never heard a bit of his argument. If you want to see the difference between blacks and white civility watch this debate.

Back later, anonbros. Good luck on the bullshit paper in a bullshit curriculum like all the other bullshit brainwashing degrees around the world. Reality is more important, especially when trails almost always lead to rabbit holes of inconvenient, buried, censored, sordid sides of humanity, which they will never teach you in pathetic "education" mills. Keep asking Sup Forums if you remain curious.